Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-56738

phpMyFAQ has SQL Injection in `StopWords::add()` — Unescaped Stop Word Insertion

8.5 HighFix available

phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. The StopWords::add() method inversions prior to 4.1.6 builds a SQL INSERT statement using sprintf() and inserts the user-supplied stop word value directly into the query string without calling the application's database escaping function on it. A sibling method, StopWords::update(), which modifies an existing stop word, correctly escapes the same kind of input. The omission is isolated to the add() (insert) code path. An authenticated administrator who can reach the stop-word management feature can submit a crafted value as the "word" parameter that breaks out of the SQL string literal and injects arbitrary SQL, including statements to drop tables, exfiltrate data, or modify other rows in the database. Version 4.1.6 fixes the issue.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
High
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.26%Unchanged since Sep 25, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 8.5

phpMyFAQ has SQL Injection in `StopWords::add()` — Unescaped Stop Word Insertion

phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. The StopWords::add() method inversions prior to 4.1.6 builds a SQL INSERT statement using sprintf() and inserts the user-supplied stop word value directly into the query string without calling the application's database escaping function on it. A sibling method, StopWords::update(), which modifies an existing stop word, correctly escapes the same kind of input. The omission is isolated to the add() (insert) code path. An authenticated administrator who can reach the stop-word management feature can submit a crafted value as the "word" parameter that breaks out of the SQL string literal and injects arbitrary SQL, including statements to drop tables, exfiltrate data, or modify other rows in the database. Version 4.1.6 fixes the issue.

Record
CVE-2026-56738
CVSS 4.0
8.5 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-89
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-86289 8.5

phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. The StopWords::add() method inversions prior to 4.1.6 builds a SQL INSERT statement using sprintf() and inserts the user-supplied stop word value directly into the query string without calling the application's database escaping function on it. A sibling method, StopWords::update(), which modifies an existing stop word, correctly escapes the same kind of input. The omission is isolated to the add() (insert) code path. An authenticated administrator who can reach the stop-word management feature can submit a crafted value as the "word" parameter that breaks out of the SQL string literal and injects arbitrary SQL, including statements to drop tables, exfiltrate data, or modify other rows in the database. Version 4.1.6 fixes the issue.

Record
EUVD-2026-86289
CVSS 4.0
8.5 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-rw77-vq4g-x3hp 8.5

phpMyFAQ has SQL Injection in `StopWords::add()` — Unescaped Stop Word Insertion

Summary

The StopWords::add() method in phpMyFAQ builds a SQL INSERT statement using sprintf() and inserts the user-supplied stop word value directly into the query string without calling the application's database escaping function on it. A sibling method, StopWords::update(), which modifies an existing stop word, correctly escapes the same kind of input. The omission is isolated to the add() (insert) code path.

An authenticated administrator who can reach the stop-word management feature can submit a crafted value as the "word" parameter that breaks out of the SQL string literal and injects arbitrary SQL, including statements to drop tables, exfiltrate data, or modify other rows in the database.


Affected Code

File: phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/StopWords.php Method: add() (approx. lines 60–75 in the audited revision)

$sql = sprintf(
    "INSERT INTO %s VALUES(%d, '%s', '%s')",
    $this->getTableName(),
    $id,
    $this->configuration->getDb()->escape($this->language), // language IS escaped
    $word                                                     // <-- $word is NOT escaped
);

$word is taken directly from the administrative form input (the new stop word to add) and concatenated into the SQL string via sprintf("'%s'", ...) with no call to the database driver's escape() method.

Contrast with the safe sibling method

Method: update() (line 82 in the audited revision)

$this->configuration->getDb()->escape($word)

update() — which modifies an existing stop word — correctly escapes $word before use. add() does not perform the same escaping on the equivalent value. This inconsistency between two methods handling the same data type is the root cause: the escaping convention used throughout the rest of the file was not applied uniformly to this one insertion path.


Proof of Concept

Precondition: Attacker has valid administrator credentials (or has otherwise obtained an authenticated administrator session, e.g. via a separate session-hijacking or CSRF vector).

Attack steps:

  1. Authenticate to the phpMyFAQ administration panel.

  2. Navigate to the Stop Words management feature.

  3. Submit a new stop word with the following value instead of a normal word:

    test', 'en'); DROP TABLE faqstopwords; --
    
  4. The resulting SQL statement sent to the database becomes (table/column names approximate, based on the traced sprintf template):

    INSERT INTO faqstopwords VALUES(1, 'en', 'test', 'en'); DROP TABLE faqstopwords; --')
    
  5. The injected DROP TABLE faqstopwords; statement executes as a second SQL statement (subject to the database driver/PDO configuration permitting multi-statement execution; even where multi-statement execution is disabled, the same injection point allows classic single-statement SQLi techniques such as UNION-based data extraction or boolean/time-based blind injection against other tables the database user can access).


Impact

  • Confidentiality: An attacker with this access can use UNION-based or blind SQL injection techniques to read data from other tables in the database (e.g. user credentials, FAQ content marked as private/internal, session data) that the database user account has permission to access.
  • Integrity: Arbitrary INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statements can be appended, allowing modification of unrelated application data.
  • Availability: As demonstrated in the PoC, structural statements like DROP TABLE can be injected, directly impacting application availability.

Mitigating factor: Exploitation requires an authenticated administrator session. This is not exploitable by an anonymous or low-privilege user. This lowers the severity from Critical/High to Medium, consistent with phpMyFAQ's own threat model where administrators are a trusted role — but it remains a genuine defense-in-depth failure: a compromised or malicious admin…

Record
GHSA-rw77-vq4g-x3hp
CVSS 4.0
8.5 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-89
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 8.5

phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. The StopWords::add() method inversions prior to 4.1.6 builds a SQL INSERT statement using sprintf() and inserts the user-supplied stop word value directly into the query string without calling the application's database escaping function on it. A sibling method, StopWords::update(), which modifies an existing stop word, correctly escapes the same kind of input. The omission is isolated to the add() (insert) code path. An authenticated administrator who can reach the stop-word management feature can submit a crafted value as the "word" parameter that breaks out of the SQL string literal and injects arbitrary SQL, including statements to drop tables, exfiltrate data, or modify other rows in the database. Version 4.1.6 fixes the issue.

Record
CVE-2026-56738
CVSS 4.0
8.5 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Weakness
CWE-89
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 8.5

phpMyFAQ has SQL Injection in `StopWords::add()` — Unescaped Stop Word Insertion

phpMyFAQ is an open source FAQ web application. The StopWords::add() method inversions prior to 4.1.6 builds a SQL INSERT statement using sprintf() and inserts the user-supplied stop word value directly into the query string without calling the application's database escaping function on it. A sibling method, StopWords::update(), which modifies an existing stop word, correctly escapes the same kind of input. The omission is isolated to the add() (insert) code path. An authenticated administrator who can reach the stop-word management feature can submit a crafted value as the "word" parameter that breaks out of the SQL string literal and injects arbitrary SQL, including statements to drop tables, exfiltrate data, or modify other rows in the database. Version 4.1.6 fixes the issue.

Record
CVE-2026-56738
CVSS 4.0
8.5 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-89
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-rw77-vq4g-x3hp 8.5

phpMyFAQ has SQL Injection in `StopWords::add()` — Unescaped Stop Word Insertion

Summary

The StopWords::add() method in phpMyFAQ builds a SQL INSERT statement using sprintf() and inserts the user-supplied stop word value directly into the query string without calling the application's database escaping function on it. A sibling method, StopWords::update(), which modifies an existing stop word, correctly escapes the same kind of input. The omission is isolated to the add() (insert) code path.

An authenticated administrator who can reach the stop-word management feature can submit a crafted value as the "word" parameter that breaks out of the SQL string literal and injects arbitrary SQL, including statements to drop tables, exfiltrate data, or modify other rows in the database.


Affected Code

File: phpmyfaq/src/phpMyFAQ/StopWords.php Method: add() (approx. lines 60–75 in the audited revision)

$sql = sprintf(
    "INSERT INTO %s VALUES(%d, '%s', '%s')",
    $this->getTableName(),
    $id,
    $this->configuration->getDb()->escape($this->language), // language IS escaped
    $word                                                     // <-- $word is NOT escaped
);

$word is taken directly from the administrative form input (the new stop word to add) and concatenated into the SQL string via sprintf("'%s'", ...) with no call to the database driver's escape() method.

Contrast with the safe sibling method

Method: update() (line 82 in the audited revision)

$this->configuration->getDb()->escape($word)

update() — which modifies an existing stop word — correctly escapes $word before use. add() does not perform the same escaping on the equivalent value. This inconsistency between two methods handling the same data type is the root cause: the escaping convention used throughout the rest of the file was not applied uniformly to this one insertion path.


Proof of Concept

Precondition: Attacker has valid administrator credentials (or has otherwise obtained an authenticated administrator session, e.g. via a separate session-hijacking or CSRF vector).

Attack steps:

  1. Authenticate to the phpMyFAQ administration panel.

  2. Navigate to the Stop Words management feature.

  3. Submit a new stop word with the following value instead of a normal word:

    test', 'en'); DROP TABLE faqstopwords; --
    
  4. The resulting SQL statement sent to the database becomes (table/column names approximate, based on the traced sprintf template):

    INSERT INTO faqstopwords VALUES(1, 'en', 'test', 'en'); DROP TABLE faqstopwords; --')
    
  5. The injected DROP TABLE faqstopwords; statement executes as a second SQL statement (subject to the database driver/PDO configuration permitting multi-statement execution; even where multi-statement execution is disabled, the same injection point allows classic single-statement SQLi techniques such as UNION-based data extraction or boolean/time-based blind injection against other tables the database user can access).


Impact

  • Confidentiality: An attacker with this access can use UNION-based or blind SQL injection techniques to read data from other tables in the database (e.g. user credentials, FAQ content marked as private/internal, session data) that the database user account has permission to access.
  • Integrity: Arbitrary INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE statements can be appended, allowing modification of unrelated application data.
  • Availability: As demonstrated in the PoC, structural statements like DROP TABLE can be injected, directly impacting application availability.

Mitigating factor: Exploitation requires an authenticated administrator session. This is not exploitable by an anonymous or low-privilege user. This lowers the severity from Critical/High to Medium, consistent with phpMyFAQ's own threat model where administrators are a trusted role — but it remains a genuine defense-in-depth failure: a compromised or malicious admin…

Record
GHSA-rw77-vq4g-x3hp
CVSS 4.0
8.5 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-89
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
Packagist
through 4.1.5
4.1.6
thorsten/phpmyfaq
Packagist
through 4.1.5
4.1.6
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
Packagist
before 4.1.6, plus listed versions
2.10.0-alpha2.8.02.8.0-RC2.8.0-RC22.8.0-RC3
Show 45 moreShow less
2.8.0-RC42.8.0-alpha22.8.0-alpha32.8.0-beta2.8.0-beta22.8.0-beta32.8.12.8.102.8.112.8.122.8.132.8.142.8.152.8.162.8.172.8.182.8.192.8.22.8.202.8.212.8.222.8.232.8.242.8.252.8.262.8.272.8.282.8.292.8.32.8.42.8.52.8.62.8.72.8.82.8.92.9.02.9.0-alpha2.9.0-alpha22.9.0-alpha32.9.0-alpha42.9.0-beta2.9.0-beta22.9.0-rc2.9.0-rc22.9.0-rc3
4.1.6
thorsten/phpmyfaq
Packagist
before 4.1.6, plus listed versions
2.10.0-alpha2.8.02.8.0-RC2.8.0-RC22.8.0-RC3
Show 45 moreShow less
2.8.0-RC42.8.0-alpha22.8.0-alpha32.8.0-beta2.8.0-beta22.8.0-beta32.8.12.8.102.8.112.8.122.8.132.8.142.8.152.8.162.8.172.8.182.8.192.8.22.8.202.8.212.8.222.8.232.8.242.8.252.8.262.8.272.8.282.8.292.8.32.8.42.8.52.8.62.8.72.8.82.8.92.9.02.9.0-alpha2.9.0-alpha22.9.0-alpha32.9.0-alpha42.9.0-beta2.9.0-beta22.9.0-rc2.9.0-rc22.9.0-rc3
4.1.6

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-56738 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.5) in Thorsten Phpmyfaq, published September 24, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.26%, the 17th percentile. Fixed in phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq 4.1.6.

References

This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 248 versions and the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open