Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-57994

phpMyFAQ - Information Disclosure of Inactive FAQ Content via Public API Endpoints

6.9 MediumFix available

phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 applies inconsistent active=yes and publication-date filtering across its public FAQ API endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve inactive (draft or review-only) FAQ content. Specifically, GET /api/v3.1/faq/{categoryId}/{faqId} returns the inactive FAQ title and full answer, while GET /api/v3.1/faqs/tags/{tagId} and GET /api/v4.0/faqs/tags/{tagId} return the inactive FAQ title and answer preview, disclosing non-public content.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.36%Up 0.1 points since Jul 11, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 6.9

phpMyFAQ - Information Disclosure of Inactive FAQ Content via Public API Endpoints

phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 applies inconsistent active=yes and publication-date filtering across its public FAQ API endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve inactive (draft or review-only) FAQ content. Specifically, GET /api/v3.1/faq/{categoryId}/{faqId} returns the inactive FAQ title and full answer, while GET /api/v3.1/faqs/tags/{tagId} and GET /api/v4.0/faqs/tags/{tagId} return the inactive FAQ title and answer preview, disclosing non-public content.

Record
CVE-2026-57994
CVSS 4.0
6.9 MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-200
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-42892 6.9

phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 applies inconsistent active=yes and publication-date filtering across its public FAQ API endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve inactive (draft or review-only) FAQ content. Specifically, GET /api/v3.1/faq/{categoryId}/{faqId} returns the inactive FAQ title and full answer, while GET /api/v3.1/faqs/tags/{tagId} and GET /api/v4.0/faqs/tags/{tagId} return the inactive FAQ title and answer preview, disclosing non-public content.

Record
EUVD-2026-42892
CVSS 4.0
6.9 MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-7582-hcc6-fvcg 6.9

phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 applies inconsistent active=yes and publication-date filtering across its...

phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 applies inconsistent active=yes and publication-date filtering across its public FAQ API endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve inactive (draft or review-only) FAQ content. Specifically, GET /api/v3.1/faq/{categoryId}/{faqId} returns the inactive FAQ title and full answer, while GET /api/v3.1/faqs/tags/{tagId} and GET /api/v4.0/faqs/tags/{tagId} return the inactive FAQ title and answer preview, disclosing non-public content.

Record
GHSA-7582-hcc6-fvcg
CVSS 4.0
6.9 MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-200
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-mf8r-wm2w-f8c5 5.3

phpMyFAQ public FAQ APIs expose inactive FAQ content

Affected Product

phpMyFAQ

Affected Versions

  • Confirmed affected: 4.1.4, API v3.1.
  • Confirmed affected: current main / 4.2-style source, API v4.0, for GET /api/v4.0/faqs/tags/{tagId} when api.onlyActiveFaqs=true.

Patched Versions

4.1.5.

Description

The public FAQ API applies inconsistent active = 'yes' filtering across endpoints. A FAQ entry marked active = 'no' is hidden from GET /api/v3.1/faqs/{categoryId} in phpMyFAQ 4.1.4, but the same inactive FAQ can still be retrieved through public API routes:

  • GET /api/v3.1/faq/{categoryId}/{faqId} returns the inactive FAQ title and full answer.
  • GET /api/v3.1/faqs/tags/{tagId} returns the inactive FAQ title and answer preview.

On the current 4.2-style branch, api.onlyActiveFaqs=true hides inactive FAQs from list and direct-by-id endpoints, but GET /api/v4.0/faqs/tags/{tagId} still returns inactive FAQ title and preview because it calls Faq::getFaqsByIds() without active/date filtering.

Inactive FAQs are commonly used as drafts or review-only content, so these unauthenticated public API paths may disclose non-public content.

Root Cause

FaqController::getByCategoryId() calls Faq::getAllAvailableFaqsByCategoryId(), which filters:

fd.date_start <= now
AND fd.date_end >= now
AND fd.active = 'yes'

FaqController::getByTagId() instead resolves record IDs through Tags::getFaqsByTagId() and then calls Faq::getFaqsByIds($recordIds).

Faq::getFaqsByIds() filters by record ID, language, and permission, but does not filter fd.active = 'yes' or publication date windows before returning record_title and record_preview.

In phpMyFAQ 4.1.4, FaqController::getById() calls Faq::getFaqByIdAndCategoryId(), which also lacks an inactive/publication-window filter and returns the full answer.

Proof of Concept

The attached PoC uses phpMyFAQ's real Composer autoloader, real public FaqController, and a temporary copy of tests/test.db.

Run from a local phpMyFAQ 4.1.4 source checkout after dependencies are installed and tests/test.db exists:

php poc_phpmyfaq_414_inactive_faq_api_exposure.php /path/to/phpMyFAQ-4.1.4

Expected output:

phpMyFAQ version: 4.1.4
Inserted FAQ: id=991414, active=no, anonymous-readable, category=991414, tag=991414

GET /api/v3.1/faqs/991414 status: 200
Category response contains inactive title: no

GET /api/v3.1/faq/991414/991414 status: 200
Direct-by-id response contains inactive full title+answer: yes

GET /api/v3.1/faqs/tags/991414 status: 200
Tag response contains inactive title+preview: yes

VERDICT: reproduced inactive FAQ exposure through public API controller paths.

Suggested Fix

Apply one consistent public visibility check across all public FAQ API routes:

  • fd.active = 'yes'
  • fd.date_start <= now
  • fd.date_end >= now

Suggested implementation options:

  • Add Faq::getActiveFaqsByIds(array $faqIds) and use it in public tag API routes.
  • Or add an $onlyActive / $publicOnly argument to Faq::getFaqsByIds() and default public controllers to enabled filtering.
  • Update Faq::getFaqByIdAndCategoryId() or the public controller wrapper so inactive records return 404 for unauthenticated public API requests.
  • Add regression tests with an inactive, anonymous-readable FAQ that has both category and tag relations.

Reporter Credit

Please credit:

Yaohui Wang

CVE Request

Because this is unauthenticated exposure of inactive / non-public FAQ content through public API endpoints in a supported release line, please consider assigning a GHSA and requesting a CVE if it meets the project's advisory criteria.

Full PoC Source

<?php

declare(strict_types=1);

/*
 * PoC for phpMyFAQ 4.1.4 inactive FAQ exposure through public FAQ APIs.
 *
 * Usage from a phpMyFAQ 4.1.4 source checkout:
 *   php path/to/poc_phpmyfaq_414_inactive_faq_api_exposure.php /path/to/phpMyFAQ-4.1.4
 *
 * If no path is provided, the current working directory is used.
…
Record
GHSA-mf8r-wm2w-f8c5
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-200, CWE-863
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 6.9

phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 applies inconsistent active=yes and publication-date filtering across its public FAQ API endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve inactive (draft or review-only) FAQ content. Specifically, GET /api/v3.1/faq/{categoryId}/{faqId} returns the inactive FAQ title and full answer, while GET /api/v3.1/faqs/tags/{tagId} and GET /api/v4.0/faqs/tags/{tagId} return the inactive FAQ title and answer preview, disclosing non-public content.

Record
CVE-2026-57994
CVSS 4.0
6.9 MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-200
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 6.9

phpMyFAQ - Information Disclosure of Inactive FAQ Content via Public API Endpoints

phpMyFAQ before 4.1.5 applies inconsistent active=yes and publication-date filtering across its public FAQ API endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to retrieve inactive (draft or review-only) FAQ content. Specifically, GET /api/v3.1/faq/{categoryId}/{faqId} returns the inactive FAQ title and full answer, while GET /api/v3.1/faqs/tags/{tagId} and GET /api/v4.0/faqs/tags/{tagId} return the inactive FAQ title and answer preview, disclosing non-public content.

Record
CVE-2026-57994
CVSS 4.0
6.9 MediumCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-200
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-mf8r-wm2w-f8c5 5.3

phpMyFAQ public FAQ APIs expose inactive FAQ content

Affected Product

phpMyFAQ

Affected Versions

  • Confirmed affected: 4.1.4, API v3.1.
  • Confirmed affected: current main / 4.2-style source, API v4.0, for GET /api/v4.0/faqs/tags/{tagId} when api.onlyActiveFaqs=true.

Patched Versions

4.1.5.

Description

The public FAQ API applies inconsistent active = 'yes' filtering across endpoints. A FAQ entry marked active = 'no' is hidden from GET /api/v3.1/faqs/{categoryId} in phpMyFAQ 4.1.4, but the same inactive FAQ can still be retrieved through public API routes:

  • GET /api/v3.1/faq/{categoryId}/{faqId} returns the inactive FAQ title and full answer.
  • GET /api/v3.1/faqs/tags/{tagId} returns the inactive FAQ title and answer preview.

On the current 4.2-style branch, api.onlyActiveFaqs=true hides inactive FAQs from list and direct-by-id endpoints, but GET /api/v4.0/faqs/tags/{tagId} still returns inactive FAQ title and preview because it calls Faq::getFaqsByIds() without active/date filtering.

Inactive FAQs are commonly used as drafts or review-only content, so these unauthenticated public API paths may disclose non-public content.

Root Cause

FaqController::getByCategoryId() calls Faq::getAllAvailableFaqsByCategoryId(), which filters:

fd.date_start <= now
AND fd.date_end >= now
AND fd.active = 'yes'

FaqController::getByTagId() instead resolves record IDs through Tags::getFaqsByTagId() and then calls Faq::getFaqsByIds($recordIds).

Faq::getFaqsByIds() filters by record ID, language, and permission, but does not filter fd.active = 'yes' or publication date windows before returning record_title and record_preview.

In phpMyFAQ 4.1.4, FaqController::getById() calls Faq::getFaqByIdAndCategoryId(), which also lacks an inactive/publication-window filter and returns the full answer.

Proof of Concept

The attached PoC uses phpMyFAQ's real Composer autoloader, real public FaqController, and a temporary copy of tests/test.db.

Run from a local phpMyFAQ 4.1.4 source checkout after dependencies are installed and tests/test.db exists:

php poc_phpmyfaq_414_inactive_faq_api_exposure.php /path/to/phpMyFAQ-4.1.4

Expected output:

phpMyFAQ version: 4.1.4
Inserted FAQ: id=991414, active=no, anonymous-readable, category=991414, tag=991414

GET /api/v3.1/faqs/991414 status: 200
Category response contains inactive title: no

GET /api/v3.1/faq/991414/991414 status: 200
Direct-by-id response contains inactive full title+answer: yes

GET /api/v3.1/faqs/tags/991414 status: 200
Tag response contains inactive title+preview: yes

VERDICT: reproduced inactive FAQ exposure through public API controller paths.

Suggested Fix

Apply one consistent public visibility check across all public FAQ API routes:

  • fd.active = 'yes'
  • fd.date_start <= now
  • fd.date_end >= now

Suggested implementation options:

  • Add Faq::getActiveFaqsByIds(array $faqIds) and use it in public tag API routes.
  • Or add an $onlyActive / $publicOnly argument to Faq::getFaqsByIds() and default public controllers to enabled filtering.
  • Update Faq::getFaqByIdAndCategoryId() or the public controller wrapper so inactive records return 404 for unauthenticated public API requests.
  • Add regression tests with an inactive, anonymous-readable FAQ that has both category and tag relations.

Reporter Credit

Please credit:

Yaohui Wang

CVE Request

Because this is unauthenticated exposure of inactive / non-public FAQ content through public API endpoints in a supported release line, please consider assigning a GHSA and requesting a CVE if it meets the project's advisory criteria.

Full PoC Source

<?php

declare(strict_types=1);

/*
 * PoC for phpMyFAQ 4.1.4 inactive FAQ exposure through public FAQ APIs.
 *
 * Usage from a phpMyFAQ 4.1.4 source checkout:
 *   php path/to/poc_phpmyfaq_414_inactive_faq_api_exposure.php /path/to/phpMyFAQ-4.1.4
 *
 * If no path is provided, the current working directory is used.
…
Record
GHSA-mf8r-wm2w-f8c5
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-200, CWE-863
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
thorsten/phpmyfaq
Packagist
4.1.0 to 4.1.4
4.1.5
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
Packagist
4.1.0 to 4.1.4
4.1.5
thorsten/phpmyfaq
Packagist
4.1.0 up to 4.1.5, plus listed versions
4.1.14.1.24.1.34.1.4
4.1.5
phpmyfaq/phpmyfaq
Packagist
4.1.0 up to 4.1.5, plus listed versions
4.1.14.1.24.1.34.1.4
4.1.5

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-57994 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 6.9) in Phpmyfaq, published July 10, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.36%, the 29th percentile. Fixed in thorsten/phpmyfaq 4.1.5.

References

This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open