Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-58442

Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass

6.5 MediumFix available

CVE-2026-58442 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 6.5) in Gitea Open Source Git Server, published July 21, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.43%, the 36th percentile. Fixed in code.gitea.io/gitea 1.27.0.

Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.43%Up 0.3 points since Aug 14, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 6.5

Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass

Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass

Record
CVE-2026-58442
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-200, CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-58169 6.5

Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass

Record
EUVD-2026-58169
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-h2x6-g7q6-344v 6.5

Gitea: Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass

Summary

Gitea's repository migration URL validation can be bypassed when a migration hostname resolves to multiple IP addresses. The validation logic accepts the destination if any resolved IP is allowed, even if another resolved IP is loopback, private, or otherwise blocked. The later git clone operation resolves the hostname again outside of that validation decision, so it can connect to the internal address.

An authenticated low-privilege user who can create repository migrations can use an attacker-controlled DNS name to make Gitea connect to internal-only Git services and import their contents into a repository controlled by the attacker.

Details

The issue is in services/migrations/migrate.go, in the migration allow/block-list check.

Current logic computes whether any resolved IP is allowed:

var ipAllowed bool
var ipBlocked bool
for _, addr := range addrList {
    ipAllowed = ipAllowed || allowList.MatchIPAddr(addr)
    ipBlocked = ipBlocked || blockList.MatchIPAddr(addr)
}

Then, when an allow-list is active, the host is accepted if the hostname matches or ipAllowed is true:

if !allowList.IsEmpty() {
    if !allowList.MatchHostName(hostName) && !ipAllowed {
        return &git.ErrInvalidCloneAddr{Host: hostName, IsPermissionDenied: true}
    }
}

This means a hostname resolving to both:

  • an allowed public IP, e.g. 1.2.3.4
  • a blocked internal IP, e.g. 127.0.0.1

passes validation because the public IP sets ipAllowed = true.

The actual repository import is later performed by git clone --mirror via MigrateRepositoryGitData / gitrepo.CloneExternalRepo. That git subprocess performs its own DNS resolution and is not tied to the specific IP set that was validated earlier. If the hostname resolves, rotates, or is re-bound to the internal address at clone time, Gitea can connect to a destination the migration filter would reject if supplied directly.

The direct internal URL is correctly blocked, but the multi-answer hostname is accepted.

PoC

I verified the vulnerable predicate locally against Gitea checkout:

e8654c7e062431a521636703f47339cde64644fd

using Dockerized Go tests with golang:1.26.4.

The local test proves:

  • checkByAllowBlockList("loopback.example.test", [127.0.0.1]) is rejected.
  • checkByAllowBlockList("mixed.example.test", [1.2.3.4, 127.0.0.1]) is accepted.

Minimal reproducer at the validation layer:

func TestMigrationMultiAnswerAnyAllowed(t *testing.T) {
    old := setting.Migrations
    t.Cleanup(func() { setting.Migrations = old })

    setting.Migrations.AllowedDomains = ""
    setting.Migrations.BlockedDomains = ""
    setting.Migrations.AllowLocalNetworks = false
    require.NoError(t, Init())

    err := checkByAllowBlockList("mixed.example.test", []net.IP{
        net.ParseIP("1.2.3.4"),
        net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"),
    })
    require.NoError(t, err, "mixed public+loopback answers should currently pass")

    err = checkByAllowBlockList("loopback.example.test", []net.IP{
        net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"),
    })
    require.Error(t, err, "loopback-only answer should be rejected")
}

To reproduce end-to-end:

  1. Run Gitea with repository migration enabled and ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false.
  2. Create a normal non-admin user that can create repositories.
  3. Run an internal Git HTTP service reachable only from the Gitea server, for example on 127.0.0.1:18082.
  4. Configure an attacker-controlled hostname so that DNS can return both a public address and 127.0.0.1, or can return a public address during Gitea's pre-flight validation and 127.0.0.1 during the later git clone.
  5. Confirm the direct internal migration is rejected:
curl -X POST http://GITEA/api/v1/repos/migrate \
  -H "Authorization: token USER_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "clone_addr": "http://127.0.0.1:18082/repo.git",
    "repo_name": "direct-internal",
    "service": "git",
    "private": true
  }'…
Record
GHSA-h2x6-g7q6-344v
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-200, CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 6.5

Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass

Record
CVE-2026-58442
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-200, CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 6.5

Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass

Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass

Record
CVE-2026-58442
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-200, CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-h2x6-g7q6-344v 6.5

Gitea: Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass

Summary

Gitea's repository migration URL validation can be bypassed when a migration hostname resolves to multiple IP addresses. The validation logic accepts the destination if any resolved IP is allowed, even if another resolved IP is loopback, private, or otherwise blocked. The later git clone operation resolves the hostname again outside of that validation decision, so it can connect to the internal address.

An authenticated low-privilege user who can create repository migrations can use an attacker-controlled DNS name to make Gitea connect to internal-only Git services and import their contents into a repository controlled by the attacker.

Details

The issue is in services/migrations/migrate.go, in the migration allow/block-list check.

Current logic computes whether any resolved IP is allowed:

var ipAllowed bool
var ipBlocked bool
for _, addr := range addrList {
    ipAllowed = ipAllowed || allowList.MatchIPAddr(addr)
    ipBlocked = ipBlocked || blockList.MatchIPAddr(addr)
}

Then, when an allow-list is active, the host is accepted if the hostname matches or ipAllowed is true:

if !allowList.IsEmpty() {
    if !allowList.MatchHostName(hostName) && !ipAllowed {
        return &git.ErrInvalidCloneAddr{Host: hostName, IsPermissionDenied: true}
    }
}

This means a hostname resolving to both:

  • an allowed public IP, e.g. 1.2.3.4
  • a blocked internal IP, e.g. 127.0.0.1

passes validation because the public IP sets ipAllowed = true.

The actual repository import is later performed by git clone --mirror via MigrateRepositoryGitData / gitrepo.CloneExternalRepo. That git subprocess performs its own DNS resolution and is not tied to the specific IP set that was validated earlier. If the hostname resolves, rotates, or is re-bound to the internal address at clone time, Gitea can connect to a destination the migration filter would reject if supplied directly.

The direct internal URL is correctly blocked, but the multi-answer hostname is accepted.

PoC

I verified the vulnerable predicate locally against Gitea checkout:

e8654c7e062431a521636703f47339cde64644fd

using Dockerized Go tests with golang:1.26.4.

The local test proves:

  • checkByAllowBlockList("loopback.example.test", [127.0.0.1]) is rejected.
  • checkByAllowBlockList("mixed.example.test", [1.2.3.4, 127.0.0.1]) is accepted.

Minimal reproducer at the validation layer:

func TestMigrationMultiAnswerAnyAllowed(t *testing.T) {
    old := setting.Migrations
    t.Cleanup(func() { setting.Migrations = old })

    setting.Migrations.AllowedDomains = ""
    setting.Migrations.BlockedDomains = ""
    setting.Migrations.AllowLocalNetworks = false
    require.NoError(t, Init())

    err := checkByAllowBlockList("mixed.example.test", []net.IP{
        net.ParseIP("1.2.3.4"),
        net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"),
    })
    require.NoError(t, err, "mixed public+loopback answers should currently pass")

    err = checkByAllowBlockList("loopback.example.test", []net.IP{
        net.ParseIP("127.0.0.1"),
    })
    require.Error(t, err, "loopback-only answer should be rejected")
}

To reproduce end-to-end:

  1. Run Gitea with repository migration enabled and ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false.
  2. Create a normal non-admin user that can create repositories.
  3. Run an internal Git HTTP service reachable only from the Gitea server, for example on 127.0.0.1:18082.
  4. Configure an attacker-controlled hostname so that DNS can return both a public address and 127.0.0.1, or can return a public address during Gitea's pre-flight validation and 127.0.0.1 during the later git clone.
  5. Confirm the direct internal migration is rejected:
curl -X POST http://GITEA/api/v1/repos/migrate \
  -H "Authorization: token USER_TOKEN" \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "clone_addr": "http://127.0.0.1:18082/repo.git",
    "repo_name": "direct-internal",
    "service": "git",
    "private": true
  }'…
Record
GHSA-h2x6-g7q6-344v
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-200, CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 4 moreShow less
OSVGO-2026-6058 No score

Gitea: Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass in gitea.dev

Gitea: Repository migration SSRF via multi-answer DNS allow-list bypass in gitea.dev

Record
GO-2026-6058
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21551-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260727T201416 2026-07-27T20:14:16Z (jsc#PED-11136):

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-5046 CVE-2026-46385 GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w
  • GO-2026-5047 CVE-2026-46384 GHSA-mc57-h6j3-3hmv
  • GO-2026-5048 GHSA-mx64-mj3q-7prj
  • GO-2026-5051
  • GO-2026-5069 CVE-2026-30246 GHSA-35hp-hqmv-8qg8
  • GO-2026-5074 CVE-2026-45022 GHSA-389r-gv7p-r3rp
  • GO-2026-5105 CVE-2026-41506 GHSA-3xc5-wrhm-f963
  • GO-2026-5116 CVE-2026-44517 GHSA-49p4-px3h-rq49
  • GO-2026-5158 CVE-2026-41178 GHSA-5wrp-cwcj-q835
  • GO-2026-5198 CVE-2026-41642 GHSA-7235-89m6-f4px
  • GO-2026-5208 CVE-2026-40890 GHSA-77fj-vx54-gvh7
  • GO-2026-5266 CVE-2026-41643 GHSA-8rxh-r2p6-7f2q
  • GO-2026-5309 GHSA-c3wq-j5vh-68rc
  • GO-2026-5327 CVE-2026-2303 GHSA-cp6g-7hqx-qxhp
  • GO-2026-5336 CVE-2026-45571 GHSA-crhj-59gh-8x96
  • GO-2026-5346 CVE-2026-52845 GHSA-f59h-q822-g45g
  • GO-2026-5408 GHSA-gx7w-56w6-g48x
  • GO-2026-5426 CVE-2026-39883 GHSA-hfvc-g4fc-pqhx
  • GO-2026-5435 CVE-2026-35206 GHSA-hr2v-4r36-88hr
  • GO-2026-5452 CVE-2026-34783 GHSA-j6v5-g24h-vg4j
  • GO-2026-5463 CVE-2026-8276 GHSA-jcqv-2g3v-gm88
  • GO-2026-5471 CVE-2026-6993 GHSA-jj45-xvq5-rhh9
  • GO-2026-5490 CVE-2026-44740 GHSA-m3xc-h892-ggx6
  • GO-2026-5492 CVE-2026-45135 GHSA-m675-2p33-xv9g
  • GO-2026-5506 CVE-2026-29181 GHSA-mh2q-q3fh-2475
  • GO-2026-5525 CVE-2026-42285 GHSA-p3w2-64xm-833j
  • GO-2026-5543 CVE-2026-32952 GHSA-pjcq-xvwq-hhpj
  • GO-2026-5548 CVE-2026-44166 GHSA-pq7p-mc74-g65w
  • GO-2026-5566 CVE-2026-35205 GHSA-q5jf-9vfq-h4h7
  • GO-2026-5569 GHSA-q76j-gcg9-vxc6
  • GO-2026-5585 CVE-2026-42554 GHSA-qjv7-627w-8qjv
  • GO-2026-5593 CVE-2026-40611 GHSA-qqx8-2xmm-jrv8
  • GO-2026-5595 CVE-2026-52844 GHSA-qrp7-cvwr-j2c6
  • GO-2026-5597 CVE-2026-44973 GHSA-qw64-3x98-g7q2
  • GO-2026-5606 GHSA-r46f-3rpw-hxrv
  • GO-2026-5617 CVE-2026-42306 GHSA-rg2x-37c3-w2rh
  • GO-2026-5660 CVE-2026-52846 GHSA-vcc4-2c75-vc9v
  • GO-2026-5666 CVE-2026-35204 GHSA-vmx8-mqv2-9gmg
  • GO-2026-5684 CVE-2026-42328 GHSA-w239-58x2-q8p5
  • GO-2026-5693 GHSA-w5pp-99ch-qj29
  • GO-2026-5730 GHSA-wwhq-w58m-w29c
  • GO-2026-5736 CVE-2026-44283 GHSA-x35m-3gp4-4fh5
  • GO-2026-5740 CVE-2026-44301 GHSA-x597-9fr4-5857
  • GO-2026-5748 CVE-2026-7482 GHSA-x8qc-fggm-mpqg
  • GO-2026-5750 CVE-2026-7020 GHSA-x99g-8v8j-25j2
  • GO-2026-5774 GHSA-3fxj-6jh8-hvhx
  • GO-2026-5775 GHSA-9g5q-2w5x-hmxf
  • GO-2026-5777 GHSA-rjr7-jggh-pgcp
  • GO-2026-5781
  • GO-2026-5841 GHSA-259r-337f-4rfw
  • GO-2026-5879 CVE-2026-50162 GHSA-8xwf-rjm4-xvhv
  • GO-2026-5880 CVE-2026-50163 GHSA-fxhp-mv3v-67qp
  • GO-2026-5882 CVE-2026-50151 GHSA-jxpm-75mh-9fp7
  • GO-2026-5884 GHSA-vh4v-2xq2-g5cg
  • GO-2026-5885 CVE-2026-48978 GHSA-xf85-363p-868w
  • GO-2026-5886 CVE-2026-44332 GHSA-g5vh-55hw-rxm8
  • GO-2026-5887 CVE-2026-45045 GHSA-gcfq-8gqf-4876
  • GO-2026-5912 CVE-2026-53624 GHSA-gv83-gqw6-9j2c
  • GO-2026-5954 CVE-2026-49838 GHSA-frrj-87jh-2772
  • GO-2026-5955 CVE-2026-49837 GHSA-gjrg-jjr3-56cm
  • GO-2026-5960 CVE-2026-54063 GHSA-h69g-9hx6-f3v4
  • GO-2026-5971 CVE-2026-37462 GHSA-pw7p-7fqv-hpj8
  • GO-2026-5983 CVE-2026-54448 GHSA-q3fv-x8vg-qqm4
  • GO-2026-6000 CVE-2026-50274 GHSA-74j5-xf3v-crq8
  • GO-2026-6058 CVE-2026-58442 GHSA-h2x6-g7q6-344v
  • GO-2026-6059 CVE-2026-58431 GHSA-h56g-4qw7-2mxg
  • GO-2026-6060 CVE-2026-58426 GHSA-hg5r-vq93-9fv6
  • GO-2026-6061 GHSA-hrxh-6v49-42gf
  • GO-2026-6062 CVE-2026-58434 GHSA-j2w3-9c3r-g83q
  • GO-2026-6063 CVE-2026-58417 GHSA-jr5x-6h83-wrxf
  • GO-2026-6064 CVE-2026-55984 GHSA-m932-crvm-gcp5
  • GO-2026-6065 CVE-2026-55982 GHSA-mg4f-x9v4-6h2p
  • GO-2026-6066 CVE-2026-58507 GHSA-p4mj-98mv-xq26
  • GO-2026-6067 CVE-2026-58445 GHSA-pgqf-926r-548m
  • GO-2026-6068 CVE-2026-58427 GHSA-prr9-9mp4-5gp2
  • GO-2026-6069 CVE-2026-58510 GHSA-q423-49rw-g9mh
  • GO-2026-6070 CVE-2026-58432 GHSA-q9pg-jj6x-j9p6
  • GO-2026-6071 CVE-2026-59766 GHSA-qf2f-qh6p-7v89
  • GO-2026-6072 CVE-2026-56750 GHSA-rgv6-xp99-6mgj
  • GO-2026-6073 CVE-2026-58435…
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21551-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23216-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260727T201416 2026-07-27T20:14:16Z (jsc#PED-11136):

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-5046 CVE-2026-46385 GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w
  • GO-2026-5047 CVE-2026-46384 GHSA-mc57-h6j3-3hmv
  • GO-2026-5048 GHSA-mx64-mj3q-7prj
  • GO-2026-5051
  • GO-2026-5069 CVE-2026-30246 GHSA-35hp-hqmv-8qg8
  • GO-2026-5074 CVE-2026-45022 GHSA-389r-gv7p-r3rp
  • GO-2026-5105 CVE-2026-41506 GHSA-3xc5-wrhm-f963
  • GO-2026-5116 CVE-2026-44517 GHSA-49p4-px3h-rq49
  • GO-2026-5158 CVE-2026-41178 GHSA-5wrp-cwcj-q835
  • GO-2026-5198 CVE-2026-41642 GHSA-7235-89m6-f4px
  • GO-2026-5208 CVE-2026-40890 GHSA-77fj-vx54-gvh7
  • GO-2026-5266 CVE-2026-41643 GHSA-8rxh-r2p6-7f2q
  • GO-2026-5309 GHSA-c3wq-j5vh-68rc
  • GO-2026-5327 CVE-2026-2303 GHSA-cp6g-7hqx-qxhp
  • GO-2026-5336 CVE-2026-45571 GHSA-crhj-59gh-8x96
  • GO-2026-5346 CVE-2026-52845 GHSA-f59h-q822-g45g
  • GO-2026-5408 GHSA-gx7w-56w6-g48x
  • GO-2026-5426 CVE-2026-39883 GHSA-hfvc-g4fc-pqhx
  • GO-2026-5435 CVE-2026-35206 GHSA-hr2v-4r36-88hr
  • GO-2026-5452 CVE-2026-34783 GHSA-j6v5-g24h-vg4j
  • GO-2026-5463 CVE-2026-8276 GHSA-jcqv-2g3v-gm88
  • GO-2026-5471 CVE-2026-6993 GHSA-jj45-xvq5-rhh9
  • GO-2026-5490 CVE-2026-44740 GHSA-m3xc-h892-ggx6
  • GO-2026-5492 CVE-2026-45135 GHSA-m675-2p33-xv9g
  • GO-2026-5506 CVE-2026-29181 GHSA-mh2q-q3fh-2475
  • GO-2026-5525 CVE-2026-42285 GHSA-p3w2-64xm-833j
  • GO-2026-5543 CVE-2026-32952 GHSA-pjcq-xvwq-hhpj
  • GO-2026-5548 CVE-2026-44166 GHSA-pq7p-mc74-g65w
  • GO-2026-5566 CVE-2026-35205 GHSA-q5jf-9vfq-h4h7
  • GO-2026-5569 GHSA-q76j-gcg9-vxc6
  • GO-2026-5585 CVE-2026-42554 GHSA-qjv7-627w-8qjv
  • GO-2026-5593 CVE-2026-40611 GHSA-qqx8-2xmm-jrv8
  • GO-2026-5595 CVE-2026-52844 GHSA-qrp7-cvwr-j2c6
  • GO-2026-5597 CVE-2026-44973 GHSA-qw64-3x98-g7q2
  • GO-2026-5606 GHSA-r46f-3rpw-hxrv
  • GO-2026-5617 CVE-2026-42306 GHSA-rg2x-37c3-w2rh
  • GO-2026-5660 CVE-2026-52846 GHSA-vcc4-2c75-vc9v
  • GO-2026-5666 CVE-2026-35204 GHSA-vmx8-mqv2-9gmg
  • GO-2026-5684 CVE-2026-42328 GHSA-w239-58x2-q8p5
  • GO-2026-5693 GHSA-w5pp-99ch-qj29
  • GO-2026-5730 GHSA-wwhq-w58m-w29c
  • GO-2026-5736 CVE-2026-44283 GHSA-x35m-3gp4-4fh5
  • GO-2026-5740 CVE-2026-44301 GHSA-x597-9fr4-5857
  • GO-2026-5748 CVE-2026-7482 GHSA-x8qc-fggm-mpqg
  • GO-2026-5750 CVE-2026-7020 GHSA-x99g-8v8j-25j2
  • GO-2026-5774 GHSA-3fxj-6jh8-hvhx
  • GO-2026-5775 GHSA-9g5q-2w5x-hmxf
  • GO-2026-5777 GHSA-rjr7-jggh-pgcp
  • GO-2026-5781
  • GO-2026-5841 GHSA-259r-337f-4rfw
  • GO-2026-5879 CVE-2026-50162 GHSA-8xwf-rjm4-xvhv
  • GO-2026-5880 CVE-2026-50163 GHSA-fxhp-mv3v-67qp
  • GO-2026-5882 CVE-2026-50151 GHSA-jxpm-75mh-9fp7
  • GO-2026-5884 GHSA-vh4v-2xq2-g5cg
  • GO-2026-5885 CVE-2026-48978 GHSA-xf85-363p-868w
  • GO-2026-5886 CVE-2026-44332 GHSA-g5vh-55hw-rxm8
  • GO-2026-5887 CVE-2026-45045 GHSA-gcfq-8gqf-4876
  • GO-2026-5912 CVE-2026-53624 GHSA-gv83-gqw6-9j2c
  • GO-2026-5954 CVE-2026-49838 GHSA-frrj-87jh-2772
  • GO-2026-5955 CVE-2026-49837 GHSA-gjrg-jjr3-56cm
  • GO-2026-5960 CVE-2026-54063 GHSA-h69g-9hx6-f3v4
  • GO-2026-5971 CVE-2026-37462 GHSA-pw7p-7fqv-hpj8
  • GO-2026-5983 CVE-2026-54448 GHSA-q3fv-x8vg-qqm4
  • GO-2026-6000 CVE-2026-50274 GHSA-74j5-xf3v-crq8
  • GO-2026-6058 CVE-2026-58442 GHSA-h2x6-g7q6-344v
  • GO-2026-6059 CVE-2026-58431 GHSA-h56g-4qw7-2mxg
  • GO-2026-6060 CVE-2026-58426 GHSA-hg5r-vq93-9fv6
  • GO-2026-6061 GHSA-hrxh-6v49-42gf
  • GO-2026-6062 CVE-2026-58434 GHSA-j2w3-9c3r-g83q
  • GO-2026-6063 CVE-2026-58417 GHSA-jr5x-6h83-wrxf
  • GO-2026-6064 CVE-2026-55984 GHSA-m932-crvm-gcp5
  • GO-2026-6065 CVE-2026-55982 GHSA-mg4f-x9v4-6h2p
  • GO-2026-6066 CVE-2026-58507 GHSA-p4mj-98mv-xq26
  • GO-2026-6067 CVE-2026-58445 GHSA-pgqf-926r-548m
  • GO-2026-6068 CVE-2026-58427 GHSA-prr9-9mp4-5gp2
  • GO-2026-6069 CVE-2026-58510 GHSA-q423-49rw-g9mh
  • GO-2026-6070 CVE-2026-58432 GHSA-q9pg-jj6x-j9p6
  • GO-2026-6071 CVE-2026-59766 GHSA-qf2f-qh6p-7v89
  • GO-2026-6072 CVE-2026-56750 GHSA-rgv6-xp99-6mgj
  • GO-2026-6073 CVE-2026-58435…
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23216-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23227-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260727T201416 2026-07-27T20:14:16Z (jsc#PED-11136):

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-5046 CVE-2026-46385 GHSA-w8j3-pq8g-8m7w
  • GO-2026-5047 CVE-2026-46384 GHSA-mc57-h6j3-3hmv
  • GO-2026-5048 GHSA-mx64-mj3q-7prj
  • GO-2026-5051
  • GO-2026-5069 CVE-2026-30246 GHSA-35hp-hqmv-8qg8
  • GO-2026-5074 CVE-2026-45022 GHSA-389r-gv7p-r3rp
  • GO-2026-5105 CVE-2026-41506 GHSA-3xc5-wrhm-f963
  • GO-2026-5116 CVE-2026-44517 GHSA-49p4-px3h-rq49
  • GO-2026-5158 CVE-2026-41178 GHSA-5wrp-cwcj-q835
  • GO-2026-5198 CVE-2026-41642 GHSA-7235-89m6-f4px
  • GO-2026-5208 CVE-2026-40890 GHSA-77fj-vx54-gvh7
  • GO-2026-5266 CVE-2026-41643 GHSA-8rxh-r2p6-7f2q
  • GO-2026-5309 GHSA-c3wq-j5vh-68rc
  • GO-2026-5327 CVE-2026-2303 GHSA-cp6g-7hqx-qxhp
  • GO-2026-5336 CVE-2026-45571 GHSA-crhj-59gh-8x96
  • GO-2026-5346 CVE-2026-52845 GHSA-f59h-q822-g45g
  • GO-2026-5408 GHSA-gx7w-56w6-g48x
  • GO-2026-5426 CVE-2026-39883 GHSA-hfvc-g4fc-pqhx
  • GO-2026-5435 CVE-2026-35206 GHSA-hr2v-4r36-88hr
  • GO-2026-5452 CVE-2026-34783 GHSA-j6v5-g24h-vg4j
  • GO-2026-5463 CVE-2026-8276 GHSA-jcqv-2g3v-gm88
  • GO-2026-5471 CVE-2026-6993 GHSA-jj45-xvq5-rhh9
  • GO-2026-5490 CVE-2026-44740 GHSA-m3xc-h892-ggx6
  • GO-2026-5492 CVE-2026-45135 GHSA-m675-2p33-xv9g
  • GO-2026-5506 CVE-2026-29181 GHSA-mh2q-q3fh-2475
  • GO-2026-5525 CVE-2026-42285 GHSA-p3w2-64xm-833j
  • GO-2026-5543 CVE-2026-32952 GHSA-pjcq-xvwq-hhpj
  • GO-2026-5548 CVE-2026-44166 GHSA-pq7p-mc74-g65w
  • GO-2026-5566 CVE-2026-35205 GHSA-q5jf-9vfq-h4h7
  • GO-2026-5569 GHSA-q76j-gcg9-vxc6
  • GO-2026-5585 CVE-2026-42554 GHSA-qjv7-627w-8qjv
  • GO-2026-5593 CVE-2026-40611 GHSA-qqx8-2xmm-jrv8
  • GO-2026-5595 CVE-2026-52844 GHSA-qrp7-cvwr-j2c6
  • GO-2026-5597 CVE-2026-44973 GHSA-qw64-3x98-g7q2
  • GO-2026-5606 GHSA-r46f-3rpw-hxrv
  • GO-2026-5617 CVE-2026-42306 GHSA-rg2x-37c3-w2rh
  • GO-2026-5660 CVE-2026-52846 GHSA-vcc4-2c75-vc9v
  • GO-2026-5666 CVE-2026-35204 GHSA-vmx8-mqv2-9gmg
  • GO-2026-5684 CVE-2026-42328 GHSA-w239-58x2-q8p5
  • GO-2026-5693 GHSA-w5pp-99ch-qj29
  • GO-2026-5730 GHSA-wwhq-w58m-w29c
  • GO-2026-5736 CVE-2026-44283 GHSA-x35m-3gp4-4fh5
  • GO-2026-5740 CVE-2026-44301 GHSA-x597-9fr4-5857
  • GO-2026-5748 CVE-2026-7482 GHSA-x8qc-fggm-mpqg
  • GO-2026-5750 CVE-2026-7020 GHSA-x99g-8v8j-25j2
  • GO-2026-5774 GHSA-3fxj-6jh8-hvhx
  • GO-2026-5775 GHSA-9g5q-2w5x-hmxf
  • GO-2026-5777 GHSA-rjr7-jggh-pgcp
  • GO-2026-5781
  • GO-2026-5841 GHSA-259r-337f-4rfw
  • GO-2026-5879 CVE-2026-50162 GHSA-8xwf-rjm4-xvhv
  • GO-2026-5880 CVE-2026-50163 GHSA-fxhp-mv3v-67qp
  • GO-2026-5882 CVE-2026-50151 GHSA-jxpm-75mh-9fp7
  • GO-2026-5884 GHSA-vh4v-2xq2-g5cg
  • GO-2026-5885 CVE-2026-48978 GHSA-xf85-363p-868w
  • GO-2026-5886 CVE-2026-44332 GHSA-g5vh-55hw-rxm8
  • GO-2026-5887 CVE-2026-45045 GHSA-gcfq-8gqf-4876
  • GO-2026-5912 CVE-2026-53624 GHSA-gv83-gqw6-9j2c
  • GO-2026-5954 CVE-2026-49838 GHSA-frrj-87jh-2772
  • GO-2026-5955 CVE-2026-49837 GHSA-gjrg-jjr3-56cm
  • GO-2026-5960 CVE-2026-54063 GHSA-h69g-9hx6-f3v4
  • GO-2026-5971 CVE-2026-37462 GHSA-pw7p-7fqv-hpj8
  • GO-2026-5983 CVE-2026-54448 GHSA-q3fv-x8vg-qqm4
  • GO-2026-6000 CVE-2026-50274 GHSA-74j5-xf3v-crq8
  • GO-2026-6058 CVE-2026-58442 GHSA-h2x6-g7q6-344v
  • GO-2026-6059 CVE-2026-58431 GHSA-h56g-4qw7-2mxg
  • GO-2026-6060 CVE-2026-58426 GHSA-hg5r-vq93-9fv6
  • GO-2026-6061 GHSA-hrxh-6v49-42gf
  • GO-2026-6062 CVE-2026-58434 GHSA-j2w3-9c3r-g83q
  • GO-2026-6063 CVE-2026-58417 GHSA-jr5x-6h83-wrxf
  • GO-2026-6064 CVE-2026-55984 GHSA-m932-crvm-gcp5
  • GO-2026-6065 CVE-2026-55982 GHSA-mg4f-x9v4-6h2p
  • GO-2026-6066 CVE-2026-58507 GHSA-p4mj-98mv-xq26
  • GO-2026-6067 CVE-2026-58445 GHSA-pgqf-926r-548m
  • GO-2026-6068 CVE-2026-58427 GHSA-prr9-9mp4-5gp2
  • GO-2026-6069 CVE-2026-58510 GHSA-q423-49rw-g9mh
  • GO-2026-6070 CVE-2026-58432 GHSA-q9pg-jj6x-j9p6
  • GO-2026-6071 CVE-2026-59766 GHSA-qf2f-qh6p-7v89
  • GO-2026-6072 CVE-2026-56750 GHSA-rgv6-xp99-6mgj
  • GO-2026-6073 CVE-2026-58435…
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23227-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
code.gitea.io/gitea
Go
before 1.27.0
1.27.0
gitea.dev
Go
before 1.27.0
1.27.0
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0
before 0.0.20260727T201416-160000.1.1
0.0.20260727T201416-160000.1.1
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0
before 0.0.20260727T201416-160000.1.1
0.0.20260727T201416-160000.1.1
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
before 0.0.20260727T201416-160000.1.1
0.0.20260727T201416-160000.1.1

History

History
WhenChangedSources
2026-11-02createdCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

References

Show 80 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 5 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open