CVE-2026-63073
Untrusted Sender DN Used as Format String in CMP Response Validation
Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to ERR_raise_data().
Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender.
CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)
Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as "CN=%s%n" reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses.
Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
9.8
Untrusted Sender DN Used as Format String in CMP Response Validation
Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to ERR_raise_data().
Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender.
CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)
Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as "CN=%s%n" reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses.
Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
CVE-2026-63073- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-134
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-65483
9.8
Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to ERR_raise_data().
Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender.
CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)
Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as "CN=%s%n" reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses.
Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
EUVD-2026-65483- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-826x-qg76-xqjx
9.8
Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response sender distinguished...
Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to ERR_raise_data().
Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender.
CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)
Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as "CN=%s%n" reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses.
Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
GHSA-826x-qg76-xqjx- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-134
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
9.8
Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to ERR_raise_data().
Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender.
CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)
Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as "CN=%s%n" reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses.
Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
CVE-2026-63073- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-134
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2026-63073
9.8
Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to ERR_raise_data().
Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender.
CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)
Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as "CN=%s%n" reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses.
Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
ALPINE-CVE-2026-63073- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBELL-CVE-2026-63073
9.8
- Record
BELL-CVE-2026-63073- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 20 moreShow less
OSV
9.8
Untrusted Sender DN Used as Format String in CMP Response Validation
Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to ERR_raise_data().
Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender.
CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)
Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as "CN=%s%n" reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses.
Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
CVE-2026-63073- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-134
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-63073
9.8
Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response sender distinguished name directly as the format string to ERR_raise_data(). Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender. CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String) Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as "CN=%s%n" reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses. Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution. FIPS impact: no No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-63073- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-3830
7.5
openssl security update
OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.
Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.
CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference
Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).
When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.
Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-14457)
Issue summary: QUIC server may double free QRX (QUIC record layer RX) object when channel creation fails for initial packet.
Impact summary: Double free leads to heap corruption, which typically results in termination of QUIC server process, leading to Denial of Service. There is so far no evidence that this double free is exploitable for remote code execution, thus it is considered highly improbable.
CWE: CWE-415: Double Free
Description: In order to validate initial packet, OpenSSL QUIC stack default packet handler (port_default_packet_handler()) creates a so-called QRX object. If the initial packet validates successfully with QRX object, the default packet handler proceeds to channel (connection object) creation. The QRX object used for packet validation is passed to port_bind_channel(), so it becomes part of the newly created connection. If port_bind_channel() fails, then it also frees the QRX object. Once port_bind_channel() returns, the port_default_packet_handler() detects the failure and proceeds to the error branch, where the same QRX object is freed for the second time.
The failure in port_bind_channel() function can be induced with a relatively low effort by a malformed (non RFC 9000 compliant) INITIAL packet. If the packet carries DCID (destination connection ID) which is shorter than 8 bytes, then port_bind_channel() jumps to the error path after ossl_quic_lcidm_enrol_odcid() detects that the DCID has invalid length.
FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected, as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-18798)
Issue summary: Receiving a DTLS record for a future epoch while a handshake is in progress causes OpenSSL to buffer far more memory than the record itself requires.
Impact summary: A peer can use a small amount of network traffic to make an OpenSSL DTLS endpoint retain a disproportionately large amount of memory, which may lead to a Denial of Service.
CWE: CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)
Description: While a DTLS handshake is in progress, a peer may legitimately have already moved on to the next epoch (for example, having sent its ChangeCipherSpec and Finished messages) before the local endpoint has processed the same transition, typically because of reordering on the underlying UDP transport. OpenSSL buffers such early…
- Record
OESA-2026-3830- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:59635
9.1
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:59635- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:59641
9.1
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:59641- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:67154
7.5
Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:67154- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:67165
7.5
Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:67165- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRLSA-2026:67154
7.5
Important: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update
OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.
Security Fix(es):
-
openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)
-
openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)
-
openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)
-
openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)
-
openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)
-
openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)
-
openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)
-
openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)
-
openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)
Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):
- openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [Rocky Linux 10.2.z] (JIRA:Rocky Linux-212362)
For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.
- Record
RLSA-2026:67154- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRLSA-2026:67165
7.5
Important: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update
OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.
Security Fix(es):
-
openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)
-
openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)
-
openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)
-
openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)
-
openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)
-
openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)
-
openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)
-
openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)
-
openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)
Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):
- openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [Rocky Linux 9.8.z] (JIRA:Rocky Linux-232828)
For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.
- Record
RLSA-2026:67165- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-63073
9.8
Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response sender distinguished name directly as the format string to ERR_raise_data(). Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender. CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String) Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as "CN=%s%n" reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses. Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution. FIPS impact: no No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-63073- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALSA-2026:67154 No score
Important: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update
OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.
Security Fix(es):
- openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)
- openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)
- openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)
- openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)
- openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)
- openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)
- openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)
- openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)
- openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)
Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):
- openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [AlmaLinux 10.2.z] (JIRA:AlmaLinux-212362)
For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.
- Record
ALSA-2026:67154- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALSA-2026:67165 No score
Important: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update
OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.
Security Fix(es):
- openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)
- openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)
- openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)
- openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)
- openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)
- openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)
- openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)
- openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)
- openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)
Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):
- openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [AlmaLinux 9.8.z] (JIRA:AlmaLinux-232828)
For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.
- Record
ALSA-2026:67165- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-97950 No score
CVE-2026-63073 affecting package openssl for versions less than 3.3.7-6
Issue summary: OpenSSL CMP response validation passed an unexpected response
sender distinguished name directly as the format string to ERR_raise_data().
Impact summary: A malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint can crash a CMP client that enforces an expected sender or uses a pinned server certificate whose subject becomes the default expected sender.
CWE: CWE-134 (Use of Externally-Controlled Format String)
Description: When validating a received CMP message, ossl_cmp_msg_check_update() converts the peer-supplied sender distinguished name with X509_NAME_oneline() and passes it directly as the format argument to ERR_raise_data(). Percent characters survive the conversion, so a sender DN such as "CN=%s%n" reaches BIO_vsnprintf() as an attacker-controlled format string with no matching variadic arguments. This path is only reached when the caller configures an expected sender or pins a server certificate, which is the normal configuration for a CMP client validating server responses.
Since the attacker controls the format string but none of the variadic arguments, such specifiers as %s and %n dereference or write through unrelated stack contents and crash the client. The reliable consequence is a denial of service, when the response comes from a malicious or intercepted CMP endpoint. There is no controlled memory write, arbitrary-address read, or reliable path to remote code execution.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the CMP protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
AZL-97950- Updated
- 2026-11-05
OSVMGASA-2026-0353 No score
Updated openssl packages fix security vulnerabilities
Unbounded Memory Growth in QUIC Server Incoming Channel Queue. (CVE-2026-14456) QUIC Server May Trigger Double Free When Processing INITIAL Packet. (CVE-2026-18798) Heap Buffer Overflow in CMS Key Unwrapping. (CVE-2026-63072) Invalid Pointer Dereference in CMP Server via Crafted protectionAlg. (CVE-2026-63076) RPK Server Signature Algorithm Selection Can Dereference a Missing Certificate. (CVE-2026-14457) Excessive Memory Use Buffering DTLS Records for a Future Epoch. (CVE-2026-54874) Untrusted Sender DN Used as Format String in CMP Response Validation. (CVE-2026-63073) CMP Indefinite Cache Growth of ExtraCerts. (CVE-2026-63074) QUIC ACK-only Packet Retention Can Cause Memory Exhaustion. (CVE-2026-63075)
- Record
MGASA-2026-0353- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:11623-1 No score
libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-8.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-8.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:11623-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21744-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
August 2026 release.
- CVE-2026-14456: unbounded memory growth in QUIC server incoming channel queue (bsc#1274791).
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-18798: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (bsc#1274777).
- CVE-2026-34181: PKCS#12 files with PBMAC1 are accepted with short HMAC keys (bsc#1266343).
- CVE-2026-54874: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (bsc#1274795).
- CVE-2026-63072: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63073: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (bsc#1274796).
- CVE-2026-63074: CMP indefinite cache growth of
ExtraCerts(bsc#1274797). - CVE-2026-63075: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (bsc#1274798).
- CVE-2026-63076: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted
protectionAlg(bsc#1274790). - CVE-2026-75803: AEAD forgeries with empty ciphertext when using
EVP_Cipher()(bsc#1275837).
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21744-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23463-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
August 2026 release.
- CVE-2026-14456: unbounded memory growth in QUIC server incoming channel queue (bsc#1274791).
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-18798: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (bsc#1274777).
- CVE-2026-34181: PKCS#12 files with PBMAC1 are accepted with short HMAC keys (bsc#1266343).
- CVE-2026-54874: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (bsc#1274795).
- CVE-2026-63072: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63073: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (bsc#1274796).
- CVE-2026-63074: CMP indefinite cache growth of
ExtraCerts(bsc#1274797). - CVE-2026-63075: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (bsc#1274798).
- CVE-2026-63076: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted
protectionAlg(bsc#1274790). - CVE-2026-75803: AEAD forgeries with empty ciphertext when using
EVP_Cipher()(bsc#1275837).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23463-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23609-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
August 2026 release.
- CVE-2026-14456: unbounded memory growth in QUIC server incoming channel queue (bsc#1274791).
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-18798: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (bsc#1274777).
- CVE-2026-34181: PKCS#12 files with PBMAC1 are accepted with short HMAC keys (bsc#1266343).
- CVE-2026-54874: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (bsc#1274795).
- CVE-2026-63072: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63073: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (bsc#1274796).
- CVE-2026-63074: CMP indefinite cache growth of
ExtraCerts(bsc#1274797). - CVE-2026-63075: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (bsc#1274798).
- CVE-2026-63076: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted
protectionAlg(bsc#1274790). - CVE-2026-75803: AEAD forgeries with empty ciphertext when using
EVP_Cipher()(bsc#1275837).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23609-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:4039-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
August 2026 release.
- CVE-2026-14456: unbounded memory growth in QUIC server incoming channel queue (bsc#1274791).
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-18798: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (bsc#1274777).
- CVE-2026-34181: PKCS#12 files with PBMAC1 are accepted with short HMAC keys (bsc#1266343).
- CVE-2026-54874: excessive Memory Use Buffering DTLS Records for a Future Epoch (bsc#1274795).
- CVE-2026-63072: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63073: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (bsc#1274796).
- CVE-2026-63074: CMP indefinite cache growth of
ExtraCerts(bsc#1274797). - CVE-2026-63075: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (bsc#1274798).
- CVE-2026-63076: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted
protectionAlg(bsc#1274790). - CVE-2026-75803: AEAD forgeries with empty ciphertext when using
EVP_Cipher()(bsc#1275837).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:4039-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUSN-8678-1 No score
openssl vulnerabilities
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the QUIC server incoming channel queue. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-14456)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled signature algorithm selection when using Raw Public Keys. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-14457)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled QUIC INITIAL packet processing. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-18798)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled buffering of DTLS records for a future epoch. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2026-54874)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled CMS key unwrapping. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a heap buffer overflow, leading to a denial of service or arbitrary code execution. (CVE-2026-63072)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly validated the sender distinguished name in CMP response messages. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-63073)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly limited the growth of an internal certificate cache used during CMP operations. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2026-63074)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled QUIC ACK-only packet retention. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-63075)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled CMP protection algorithm validation. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2026-63076)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly verified authentication tags when using certain AEAD ciphers via the EVP_Cipher() interface. An attacker could possibly use this issue to perform AEAD forgery attacks. (CVE-2026-75803)
- Record
USN-8678-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
opensslAlpine:v3.21 |
3.4.0 up to 3.3.7-r1 | 3.3.7-r1 |
opensslAlpine:v3.22 |
3.4.0 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.23 |
3.4.0 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.24 |
3.4.0 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslAlmaLinux:10 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 |
openssl-develAlmaLinux:10 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 |
openssl-libsAlmaLinux:10 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 |
openssl-perlAlmaLinux:10 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 |
opensslAlmaLinux:9 From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-develAlmaLinux:9 From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
Show 58 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
openssl-libsAlmaLinux:9 From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-perlAlmaLinux:9 From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
opensslAzure Linux:3 |
before 3.3.7-6 | 3.3.7-6 |
opensslAlpaquita:25 |
3.5.0-r0 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslAlpaquita:stream |
3.1.1-r1 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslBellSoft Hardened Containers:25 |
3.5.0-r0 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslBellSoft Hardened Containers:stream |
3.1.1-r1 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslDebian:13 |
before 3.5.7-1~deb13u2, plus listed versions 3.5.1-13.5.1-1+deb13u13.5.2-13.5.3-13.5.4-1 Show 8 moreShow less3.5.4-1~deb13u13.5.4-1~deb13u23.5.5-13.5.5-1~deb13u13.5.5-1~deb13u23.5.6-1~deb13u13.5.6-1~deb13u23.5.7-1~deb13u1 |
3.5.7-1~deb13u2 |
opensslDebian:14 |
before 3.6.4-1, plus listed versions 3.5.1-13.5.2-13.5.3-13.5.4-13.5.4-1~deb13u1 Show 18 moreShow less3.5.4-1~deb13u23.5.5-13.5.5-1~deb13u13.5.5-1~deb13u23.5.6-1~deb13u13.5.6-1~deb13u23.5.7-1~deb13u13.5.7-1~deb13u23.5.7-1~deb13u33.6.0-13.6.0-23.6.0~~alpha1-13.6.0~~beta1-13.6.1-13.6.1-23.6.1-33.6.2-13.6.3-1 |
3.6.4-1 |
opensslMageia:10 From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 3.5.8-1.mga10 | 3.5.8-1.mga10 |
opensslMageia:9 From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 3.0.22-1.mga9 | 3.0.22-1.mga9 |
opensslopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP4 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 3.5.6-7.oe2403sp4 | 3.5.6-7.oe2403sp4 |
openssl3Red Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 27 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl3-develRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 27 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl3-devel-engineRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 27 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl3-libsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 27 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
opensslRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-config-fipsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-develRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-devel-engineRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-fips-provider-upstreamRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-libsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-perlRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
openssl-debugsourceRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
openssl-develRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
openssl-libs-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
openssl-perlRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
opensslRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
openssl-libsRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
openssl-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-debugsourceRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-develRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-libs-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-perlRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
opensslRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-debugsourceRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-libsRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-libs-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
opensslRocky Linux:10 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
opensslRocky Linux:9 From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.10.1 | 3.5.0-160000.10.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.10.1 | 3.5.0-160000.10.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.10.1 | 3.5.0-160000.10.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-150700.5.50.1 | 3.5.0-150700.5.50.1 |
nodejsUbuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.10.25~dfsg2-2ubuntu14.2.2~dfsg-14.2.3~dfsg-14.2.4~dfsg-1ubuntu14.2.4~dfsg-2 Show 7 moreShow less4.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu14.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu44.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.14.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.24.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2+esm14.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2+esm24.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2+esm3 |
None known |
nodejsUbuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 6.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu16.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu26.12.0~dfsg-1ubuntu16.12.0~dfsg-2ubuntu16.12.0~dfsg-2ubuntu2 Show 10 moreShow less8.10.0~dfsg-28.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.28.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.38.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.48.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm18.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm28.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm38.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm48.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm58.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm6 |
None known |
edk2Ubuntu:26.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.11-3ubuntu72025.11-3ubuntu82026.05-2ubuntu12026.05-2ubuntu22026.05-2ubuntu3 |
None known |
edk2-hweUbuntu:26.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.11-3ubuntu82025.11-3ubuntu92026.05-2ubuntu12026.05-2ubuntu22026.05-2ubuntu3 |
None known |
edk2Ubuntu:26.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.02-8ubuntu32025.11-3ubuntu62025.11-3ubuntu72025.11-3ubuntu7.22025.11-3ubuntu7.3 |
None known |
edk2-hweUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.11-3ubuntu62025.11-3ubuntu82025.11-3ubuntu8.2 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
before 3.5.5-1ubuntu3.4, plus listed versions 3.5.3-1ubuntu23.5.5-1ubuntu13.5.5-1ubuntu33.5.5-1ubuntu3.23.5.5-1ubuntu3.3 |
3.5.5-1ubuntu3.4 |
opensslUbuntu:22.04:LTS From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.29, plus listed versions 1.1.1l-1ubuntu13.0.0-1ubuntu13.0.1-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu1.1 Show 21 moreShow less3.0.2-0ubuntu1.23.0.2-0ubuntu1.43.0.2-0ubuntu1.53.0.2-0ubuntu1.63.0.2-0ubuntu1.73.0.2-0ubuntu1.83.0.2-0ubuntu1.93.0.2-0ubuntu1.103.0.2-0ubuntu1.123.0.2-0ubuntu1.133.0.2-0ubuntu1.143.0.2-0ubuntu1.153.0.2-0ubuntu1.163.0.2-0ubuntu1.173.0.2-0ubuntu1.183.0.2-0ubuntu1.193.0.2-0ubuntu1.203.0.2-0ubuntu1.213.0.2-0ubuntu1.233.0.2-0ubuntu1.253.0.2-0ubuntu1.26 |
3.0.2-0ubuntu1.29 |
opensslUbuntu:24.04:LTS From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 3.0.13-0ubuntu3.15, plus listed versions 3.0.10-1ubuntu23.0.10-1ubuntu2.13.0.10-1ubuntu33.0.10-1ubuntu43.0.13-0ubuntu2 Show 11 moreShow less3.0.13-0ubuntu33.0.13-0ubuntu3.13.0.13-0ubuntu3.23.0.13-0ubuntu3.33.0.13-0ubuntu3.43.0.13-0ubuntu3.53.0.13-0ubuntu3.63.0.13-0ubuntu3.73.0.13-0ubuntu3.93.0.13-0ubuntu3.113.0.13-0ubuntu3.12 |
3.0.13-0ubuntu3.15 |
opensslUbuntu:26.04:LTS From an advisory covering 10 CVEs |
before 3.5.5-1ubuntu3.4, plus listed versions 3.5.3-1ubuntu23.5.5-1ubuntu13.5.5-1ubuntu33.5.5-1ubuntu3.23.5.5-1ubuntu3.3 |
3.5.5-1ubuntu3.4 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Tumbleweed From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.5.3-8.1 | 3.5.3-8.1 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Leap 16.0 From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.10.1 | 3.5.0-160000.10.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected | ||
| facts | OSV | |
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-63073 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.8) in Openssl, published August 25, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 1.16%, the 67th percentile. Fixed in openssl 3.3.7-r1.
References
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/7eb2e3ec9d1d4f35c8022fccd4b03398b3f33e21
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/6a0acc072b4d37a7cac1252a29c1ce1f00c5ec29
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/0cc20b322639919aa423e90799d9a57c3b4b76ca
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/a7e5a6eea8fd3ccca6b6fbba031a5fbf8a3d93b4
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63073
Show 194 moreShow less
github.com/advisories/GHSA-826x-qg76-xqjx
security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2026-63073
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:67154
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14456
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14457
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18798
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54874
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63072
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63073
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63074
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63075
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63076
bugzilla.redhat.com/2515348
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517559
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517560
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517561
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517562
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517564
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517565
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517566
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517570
errata.almalinux.org/10/ALSA-2026-67154.html
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:67165
errata.almalinux.org/9/ALSA-2026-67165.html
redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2026-75803.html
docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2026-63073
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/63xxx/CVE-2026-63073.json
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-63073
advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2026-0353.html
bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36139
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/13/4
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260813.txt
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/25/3
lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2026/msg00376.html
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-3830
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-14457
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-18798
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54874
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63072
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63074
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63075
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63076
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-75803
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:59635
images.redhat.com
access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-75803
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42769
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42768
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34180
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7383
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45447
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42766
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42767
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34183
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45445
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-9076
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42765
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42771
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35188
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34181
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42770
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42764
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45446
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34182
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_59635.json
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481879
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-7383
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7383
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481880
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9076
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-9076
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517562
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14457
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517559
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18798
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481881
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34180
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34180
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481882
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34181
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34181
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481884
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34182
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34182
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481885
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34183
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34183
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481886
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35188
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35188
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481887
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42764
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42764
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481889
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42765
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42765
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481890
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42766
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42766
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481891
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42767
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42767
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481892
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42768
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42768
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481893
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42769
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42769
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481894
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42770
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42770
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481895
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42771
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42771
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481896
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45445
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45445
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481897
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45446
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45446
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481898
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45447
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45447
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517564
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54874
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517560
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63072
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517565
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63073
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517566
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63074
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63075
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63076
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75803
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/119ab9555dc62275bbd71f6f49529b1a44feba42
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3621257986e27e540bf96a11570929a6e5a9e05b
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/6c7aa6f8f6449b7fe0137ee8be65fcd239bd7d6a
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bdeb0cd994d915342787f117ee75044f0dc36f34
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bf95f5f772e9362f87b25cfa2f8cb15d984865b9
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:59641
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_59641.json
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-84783
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84783
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/de97a1a54f43edefd43b5084ecac54ecadb33081
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt
issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-212362
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_67154.json
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14456
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-14456
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/08e7756c3900bcfd77a720e7b74e27d6e4ed01a9
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4084152e040329ca0194c4c1750b9b46d00a5b6b
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f2f1465f2d2e5c61dfeac4d20fd093797d821139
issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-232828
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_67165.json
errata.rockylinux.org/RLSA-2026:67154
errata.rockylinux.org/RLSA-2026:67165
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623463-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1266343
bugzilla.suse.com/1274774
bugzilla.suse.com/1274777
bugzilla.suse.com/1274788
bugzilla.suse.com/1274790
bugzilla.suse.com/1274791
bugzilla.suse.com/1274792
bugzilla.suse.com/1274795
bugzilla.suse.com/1274796
bugzilla.suse.com/1274797
bugzilla.suse.com/1274798
bugzilla.suse.com/1275837
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14456
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14457
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18798
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34181
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54874
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63072
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63073
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63074
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63075
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63076
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-75803
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623609-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20264039-1
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-63073
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8678-1
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-14456
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-14457
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-18798
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-54874
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-63072
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-63074
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-63075
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-63076
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-75803
Left out here: 6 references and the rest of 1 source description. The JSON record has them.