Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-71311

rclone: FTP Command Arguments Permit CRLF Injection When Custom Encoding Preserves Newlines

6.4 MediumFix available

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.0, a valid but nondefault FTP filename encoding in backend/ftp/ftp.go can restore raw CR/LF immediately before an attacker-controlled path is interpolated into the line-oriented FTP control channel, and github.com/jlaffaye/ftp formats the argument through textproto.Conn.Cmd without rejecting CR or LF, allowing a filename such as victim CRLF DELE other-secret CRLF NOOP to inject an independent authenticated FTP command when the victim copies or syncs to a more-privileged FTP destination. This issue is fixed in 1.75.0.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
Required

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

0.39%Up 0.2 points since Aug 6, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 6.4

rclone: FTP Command Arguments Permit CRLF Injection When Custom Encoding Preserves Newlines

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.0, a valid but nondefault FTP filename encoding in backend/ftp/ftp.go can restore raw CR/LF immediately before an attacker-controlled path is interpolated into the line-oriented FTP control channel, and github.com/jlaffaye/ftp formats the argument through textproto.Conn.Cmd without rejecting CR or LF, allowing a filename such as victim CRLF DELE other-secret CRLF NOOP to inject an independent authenticated FTP command when the victim copies or syncs to a more-privileged FTP destination. This issue is fixed in 1.75.0.

Record
CVE-2026-71311
CVSS 3.1
6.4 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-93
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-53618 6.4

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.0, a valid but nondefault FTP filename encoding in backend/ftp/ftp.go can restore raw CR/LF immediately before an attacker-controlled path is interpolated into the line-oriented FTP control channel, and github.com/jlaffaye/ftp formats the argument through textproto.Conn.Cmd without rejecting CR or LF, allowing a filename such as victim CRLF DELE other-secret CRLF NOOP to inject an independent authenticated FTP command when the victim copies or syncs to a more-privileged FTP destination. This issue is fixed in 1.75.0.

Record
EUVD-2026-53618
CVSS 3.1
6.4 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-8c48-q9wj-3w37 6.4

rclone: FTP Command Arguments Permit CRLF Injection When Custom Encoding Preserves Newlines

1. Summary

A valid but nondefault FTP filename encoding can restore raw CR/LF immediately before an attacker-controlled path is interpolated into the line-oriented FTP control channel. The dependency does not reject CR or LF in command arguments, so a filename can inject an independent authenticated command. A real test server observed the injected DELE command.

The default FTP encoding and the configuration-wizard examples include Ctl and are not vulnerable to the demonstrated filename. A manual custom encoding that omits Ctl/CrLf is mandatory and is reflected as High attack complexity. The credible trust boundary is a lower-trust source namespace feeding a more-privileged FTP destination: if the attacker already has equivalent rights on that destination, the report establishes a bug but no privilege gain. Protocol framing must still be enforced at the command sink because a filename-compatibility encoder is not a safe substitute for command-argument validation.

2. Affected Assets & Attack Surface

  • Verified rclone revision: a0c09f1381ae93e2a9a33c529d170186c61ad058 (v1.74.0-240-ga0c09f138)
  • Current-master check: the relevant paths remained present at commit 961266888fe797390c535386f3b3aa46f4853602 on 2026-07-18
  • rclone FTP encoding: backend/ftp/ftp.go:232-248, 768-785
  • Encoder masks/conversion: lib/encoder/encoder.go:36-68, 121-152, 1144-1165
  • FTP command sinks: backend/ftp/ftp.go:1071-1173, 1309-1428
  • Dependency: github.com/jlaffaye/[email protected]
  • Dependency command formatting: ftp.go:604-610, with path-bearing callers at ftp.go:893-947, 1010-1026, and 1069-1080
  • Preconditions: an attacker can create a filename in a source namespace, the victim copies/syncs it to an FTP destination with greater authority, and that destination uses a manually configured encoding that leaves CR/LF raw
  • Platform note: Unix and some remote backends can supply newline-bearing names; a local Windows source cannot create the demonstrated filename

3. Technical Root Cause Analysis

Rclone represents control characters safely in its internal Standard encoding. Immediately before an FTP operation, FromStandardPath decodes that representation and applies the configured backend mask. If the mask omits Ctl/CrLf, raw newlines are restored. The dependency then formats the resulting argument onto a CRLF-delimited control stream through textproto.Conn.Cmd without validating it. Reversible filename representation is therefore being used as the only protection for a protocol-command boundary.

4. Proof-of-Concept & Evidence

The source filename was equivalent to:

victim\r\nDELE other-secret\r\nNOOP

With the default encoding, no raw newline reached the command. With the valid nondefault configuration encoding = Slash, FromStandardPath restored raw CRLF. During a real FTP path operation, the server parsed DELE other-secret as an independent authenticated command. This establishes injection, not merely unsafe serialization. The test did not establish confidentiality impact or operating-system command execution.

5. Impact Assessment

Injected commands run with the configured FTP account's permissions. Demonstrated direct impact is deletion of a different path, with corresponding integrity and availability loss inside that account. Other FTP filesystem commands may be reachable, but confidentiality and arbitrary operating-system command execution are not claimed. The privilege-boundary case requires the victim's FTP account to have more authority than the attacker has in the source namespace.

6. Remediation Guidance

  • Reject CR and LF in every FTP command argument at the lowest command-construction boundary.
  • Apply the check to paths, usernames, passwords, rename arguments, and all other formatted fields.
  • Return an error rather than silently normalizing an unsafe argument.
  • Keep the default encoder protection as defense in depth and…
Record
GHSA-8c48-q9wj-3w37
CVSS 3.1
6.4 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-93
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 6.4

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.0, a valid but nondefault FTP filename encoding in backend/ftp/ftp.go can restore raw CR/LF immediately before an attacker-controlled path is interpolated into the line-oriented FTP control channel, and github.com/jlaffaye/ftp formats the argument through textproto.Conn.Cmd without rejecting CR or LF, allowing a filename such as victim CRLF DELE other-secret CRLF NOOP to inject an independent authenticated FTP command when the victim copies or syncs to a more-privileged FTP destination. This issue is fixed in 1.75.0.

Record
CVE-2026-71311
CVSS 3.1
6.4 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-93
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 6.4

rclone: FTP Command Arguments Permit CRLF Injection When Custom Encoding Preserves Newlines

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.0, a valid but nondefault FTP filename encoding in backend/ftp/ftp.go can restore raw CR/LF immediately before an attacker-controlled path is interpolated into the line-oriented FTP control channel, and github.com/jlaffaye/ftp formats the argument through textproto.Conn.Cmd without rejecting CR or LF, allowing a filename such as victim CRLF DELE other-secret CRLF NOOP to inject an independent authenticated FTP command when the victim copies or syncs to a more-privileged FTP destination. This issue is fixed in 1.75.0.

Record
CVE-2026-71311
CVSS 3.1
6.4 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-93
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-71311 6.4

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.0, a valid but nondefault FTP filename encoding in backend/ftp/ftp.go can restore raw CR/LF immediately before an attacker-controlled path is interpolated into the line-oriented FTP control channel, and github.com/jlaffaye/ftp formats the argument through textproto.Conn.Cmd without rejecting CR or LF, allowing a filename such as victim CRLF DELE other-secret CRLF NOOP to inject an independent authenticated FTP command when the victim copies or syncs to a more-privileged FTP destination. This issue is fixed in 1.75.0.

Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-71311
CVSS 3.1
6.4 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 6 moreShow less
OSVGHSA-8c48-q9wj-3w37 6.4

rclone: FTP Command Arguments Permit CRLF Injection When Custom Encoding Preserves Newlines

1. Summary

A valid but nondefault FTP filename encoding can restore raw CR/LF immediately before an attacker-controlled path is interpolated into the line-oriented FTP control channel. The dependency does not reject CR or LF in command arguments, so a filename can inject an independent authenticated command. A real test server observed the injected DELE command.

The default FTP encoding and the configuration-wizard examples include Ctl and are not vulnerable to the demonstrated filename. A manual custom encoding that omits Ctl/CrLf is mandatory and is reflected as High attack complexity. The credible trust boundary is a lower-trust source namespace feeding a more-privileged FTP destination: if the attacker already has equivalent rights on that destination, the report establishes a bug but no privilege gain. Protocol framing must still be enforced at the command sink because a filename-compatibility encoder is not a safe substitute for command-argument validation.

2. Affected Assets & Attack Surface

  • Verified rclone revision: a0c09f1381ae93e2a9a33c529d170186c61ad058 (v1.74.0-240-ga0c09f138)
  • Current-master check: the relevant paths remained present at commit 961266888fe797390c535386f3b3aa46f4853602 on 2026-07-18
  • rclone FTP encoding: backend/ftp/ftp.go:232-248, 768-785
  • Encoder masks/conversion: lib/encoder/encoder.go:36-68, 121-152, 1144-1165
  • FTP command sinks: backend/ftp/ftp.go:1071-1173, 1309-1428
  • Dependency: github.com/jlaffaye/[email protected]
  • Dependency command formatting: ftp.go:604-610, with path-bearing callers at ftp.go:893-947, 1010-1026, and 1069-1080
  • Preconditions: an attacker can create a filename in a source namespace, the victim copies/syncs it to an FTP destination with greater authority, and that destination uses a manually configured encoding that leaves CR/LF raw
  • Platform note: Unix and some remote backends can supply newline-bearing names; a local Windows source cannot create the demonstrated filename

3. Technical Root Cause Analysis

Rclone represents control characters safely in its internal Standard encoding. Immediately before an FTP operation, FromStandardPath decodes that representation and applies the configured backend mask. If the mask omits Ctl/CrLf, raw newlines are restored. The dependency then formats the resulting argument onto a CRLF-delimited control stream through textproto.Conn.Cmd without validating it. Reversible filename representation is therefore being used as the only protection for a protocol-command boundary.

4. Proof-of-Concept & Evidence

The source filename was equivalent to:

victim\r\nDELE other-secret\r\nNOOP

With the default encoding, no raw newline reached the command. With the valid nondefault configuration encoding = Slash, FromStandardPath restored raw CRLF. During a real FTP path operation, the server parsed DELE other-secret as an independent authenticated command. This establishes injection, not merely unsafe serialization. The test did not establish confidentiality impact or operating-system command execution.

5. Impact Assessment

Injected commands run with the configured FTP account's permissions. Demonstrated direct impact is deletion of a different path, with corresponding integrity and availability loss inside that account. Other FTP filesystem commands may be reachable, but confidentiality and arbitrary operating-system command execution are not claimed. The privilege-boundary case requires the victim's FTP account to have more authority than the attacker has in the source namespace.

6. Remediation Guidance

  • Reject CR and LF in every FTP command argument at the lowest command-construction boundary.
  • Apply the check to paths, usernames, passwords, rename arguments, and all other formatted fields.
  • Return an error rather than silently normalizing an unsafe argument.
  • Keep the default encoder protection as defense in depth and…
Record
GHSA-8c48-q9wj-3w37
CVSS 3.1
6.4 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-93
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-71311 6.4

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.0, a valid but nondefault FTP filename encoding in backend/ftp/ftp.go can restore raw CR/LF immediately before an attacker-controlled path is interpolated into the line-oriented FTP control channel, and github.com/jlaffaye/ftp formats the argument through textproto.Conn.Cmd without rejecting CR or LF, allowing a filename such as victim CRLF DELE other-secret CRLF NOOP to inject an independent authenticated FTP command when the victim copies or syncs to a more-privileged FTP destination. This issue is fixed in 1.75.0.

Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-71311
CVSS 3.1
6.4 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVBIT-rclone-2026-71311 No score

rclone: FTP Command Arguments Permit CRLF Injection When Custom Encoding Preserves Newlines

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. Prior to 1.75.0, a valid but nondefault FTP filename encoding in backend/ftp/ftp.go can restore raw CR/LF immediately before an attacker-controlled path is interpolated into the line-oriented FTP control channel, and github.com/jlaffaye/ftp formats the argument through textproto.Conn.Cmd without rejecting CR or LF, allowing a filename such as victim CRLF DELE other-secret CRLF NOOP to inject an independent authenticated FTP command when the victim copies or syncs to a more-privileged FTP destination. This issue is fixed in 1.75.0.

Record
BIT-rclone-2026-71311
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-6187 No score

FTP command injection via custom encoding in github.com/rclone/rclone

FTP command injection via custom encoding in github.com/rclone/rclone

Record
GO-2026-6187
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21761-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260827T195228 2026-08-27T19:52:28Z (jsc#PED-11136).

    Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-5026 CVE-2026-39821
    • GO-2026-6225
    • GO-2026-6250 CVE-2026-63328 GHSA-8rc5-4fr6-64pw
    • GO-2026-6253 CVE-2026-17106 GHSA-hfg8-hc9c-6c3h
    • GO-2026-6254 CVE-2026-53941 GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6q
    • GO-2026-6255 CVE-2026-61711 GHSA-7236-3392-c5c6
    • GO-2026-6256 CVE-2026-61712 GHSA-72x6-4j93-7w86
    • GO-2026-6258 CVE-2026-45404 GHSA-42cj-99w8-cp2p
    • GO-2026-6259 CVE-2026-32637 GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6
    • GO-2026-6260 CVE-2026-55149 GHSA-qqff-5854-px68
    • GO-2026-6261 CVE-2026-54061 GHSA-rrwh-6jrq-wp5v
    • GO-2026-6262 GHSA-22w5-2fxg-vrwx
    • GO-2026-6263 CVE-2026-54168 GHSA-6f2p-296r-cc28
    • GO-2026-6264 CVE-2026-54245 GHSA-7q96-f8xw-jv5j
    • GO-2026-6265 GHSA-8fxq-53rx-ph5f
    • GO-2026-6266 CVE-2026-54167 GHSA-f5f4-3hh4-f54m
    • GO-2026-6267 GHSA-h58c-xccx-75m3
    • GO-2026-6268 GHSA-q9c5-pp7m-fm2g
    • GO-2026-6269 GHSA-rxhg-vcww-2mpw
    • GO-2026-6270 CVE-2026-54162 GHSA-x3g7-qrwc-f6c5
    • GO-2026-6271 CVE-2026-67448 GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m
    • GO-2026-6272 CVE-2026-67447 GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97
    • GO-2026-6273 CVE-2026-64679 GHSA-26w5-6g95-gj28
    • GO-2026-6274 CVE-2026-76905 GHSA-mmfr-pmjx-hw9w
    • GO-2026-6275 CVE-2026-77354 GHSA-xhj3-7xw9-vr34
    • GO-2026-6277 GHSA-4ph6-mjv7-3fq6
    • GO-2026-6278 GHSA-w67g-5rqw-f597
    • GO-2026-6279 CVE-2026-6046 GHSA-3vmp-whvv-5v9v
    • GO-2026-6280 CVE-2026-7387 GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw
    • GO-2026-6281 CVE-2026-6961 GHSA-8qq9-cqj8-82w4
    • GO-2026-6282 CVE-2026-7184 GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9
    • GO-2026-6283 CVE-2026-6689 GHSA-c28q-m4gf-vg4q
    • GO-2026-6284 CVE-2026-55477 GHSA-jm48-m3rr-9hgg
    • GO-2026-6285 CVE-2026-6739 GHSA-m2w9-h2mm-79qr
    • GO-2026-6286 CVE-2026-3433 GHSA-rp4v-qc77-phm4
    • GO-2026-6287 GHSA-vx2m-jpxr-xv7w
    • GO-2026-6288 CVE-2026-11624 GHSA-76g7-m3xw-x9gr
    • GO-2026-6289 GHSA-w8j7-39hp-8x59
    • GO-2026-6290 CVE-2026-55581 GHSA-3x77-wg38-92r3
    • GO-2026-6291 CVE-2026-55582 GHSA-74hp-mggr-hv58
    • GO-2026-6292 CVE-2026-55580 GHSA-f5pj-2738-996m
    • GO-2026-6293 CVE-2026-55677 GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq
    • GO-2026-6294 CVE-2026-55092 GHSA-mcj4-mphf-j9ff
    • GO-2026-6295 CVE-2026-55637 GHSA-cmwv-wf9p-p8wx
    • GO-2026-6296 CVE-2026-54523 GHSA-79gf-7frw-68m9
    • GO-2026-6297 CVE-2026-50879 GHSA-g743-m6x3-v6wm
    • GO-2026-6298 CVE-2026-54563 GHSA-w5fv-7x5q-g8qp
    • GO-2026-6299 CVE-2026-50884 GHSA-5442-mh7f-72px
    • GO-2026-6300 CVE-2026-50891 GHSA-rcqf-cpv9-g5jf
    • GO-2026-6301 CVE-2026-42350 GHSA-g7gw-m874-7rmf

  • Update to version 0.0.20260819T170606 2026-08-19T17:06:06Z.

    Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-4720 GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
    • GO-2026-4942 CVE-2026-35172 GHSA-f2g3-hh2r-cwgc
    • GO-2026-4950
    • GO-2026-6093 GHSA-464c-974j-9xm6
    • GO-2026-6094 GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g
    • GO-2026-6095 GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw
    • GO-2026-6097 CVE-2026-55495 GHSA-49h3-cwhj-4737
    • GO-2026-6098 CVE-2026-55496 GHSA-8r7f-r8hj-r3rv
    • GO-2026-6099 CVE-2026-57497 GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q
    • GO-2026-6100 CVE-2026-55497 GHSA-g9j2-8w95-3vwv
    • GO-2026-6101 CVE-2026-55502 GHSA-hq88-5x99-x3gf
    • GO-2026-6102 CVE-2026-55499 GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8
    • GO-2026-6103 CVE-2026-73564 GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp
    • GO-2026-6104 CVE-2026-62323 GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp
    • GO-2026-6105 GHSA-c534-2w9c-x7fm
    • GO-2026-6106 GHSA-v6w6-358x-2433
    • GO-2026-6107 CVE-2026-73500 GHSA-6vch-q96h-7gc3
    • GO-2026-6108 CVE-2026-73505 GHSA-6xj8-qv9j-xcjq
    • GO-2026-6109 GHSA-86cx-wwf4-phq4
    • GO-2026-6110 CVE-2026-73509 GHSA-95cv-r8x4-vh75
    • GO-2026-6111 CVE-2026-73506 GHSA-fwjx-9p69-h25h
    • GO-2026-6112 CVE-2026-73502 GHSA-jpcw-4wr7-c3vq
    • GO-2026-6113 GHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337
    • GO-2026-6114 CVE-2026-73499 GHSA-xg4h-6gfc-h4m8
    • GO-2026-6115 CVE-2026-56867
    • GO-2026-6117 GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5
    • GO-2026-6118 CVE-2026-47427 GHSA-w4q6-qw23-4rg7
    • GO-2026-6119 CVE-2026-43983…
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21761-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23625-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260827T195228 2026-08-27T19:52:28Z (jsc#PED-11136).

    Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-5026 CVE-2026-39821
    • GO-2026-6225
    • GO-2026-6250 CVE-2026-63328 GHSA-8rc5-4fr6-64pw
    • GO-2026-6253 CVE-2026-17106 GHSA-hfg8-hc9c-6c3h
    • GO-2026-6254 CVE-2026-53941 GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6q
    • GO-2026-6255 CVE-2026-61711 GHSA-7236-3392-c5c6
    • GO-2026-6256 CVE-2026-61712 GHSA-72x6-4j93-7w86
    • GO-2026-6258 CVE-2026-45404 GHSA-42cj-99w8-cp2p
    • GO-2026-6259 CVE-2026-32637 GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6
    • GO-2026-6260 CVE-2026-55149 GHSA-qqff-5854-px68
    • GO-2026-6261 CVE-2026-54061 GHSA-rrwh-6jrq-wp5v
    • GO-2026-6262 GHSA-22w5-2fxg-vrwx
    • GO-2026-6263 CVE-2026-54168 GHSA-6f2p-296r-cc28
    • GO-2026-6264 CVE-2026-54245 GHSA-7q96-f8xw-jv5j
    • GO-2026-6265 GHSA-8fxq-53rx-ph5f
    • GO-2026-6266 CVE-2026-54167 GHSA-f5f4-3hh4-f54m
    • GO-2026-6267 GHSA-h58c-xccx-75m3
    • GO-2026-6268 GHSA-q9c5-pp7m-fm2g
    • GO-2026-6269 GHSA-rxhg-vcww-2mpw
    • GO-2026-6270 CVE-2026-54162 GHSA-x3g7-qrwc-f6c5
    • GO-2026-6271 CVE-2026-67448 GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m
    • GO-2026-6272 CVE-2026-67447 GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97
    • GO-2026-6273 CVE-2026-64679 GHSA-26w5-6g95-gj28
    • GO-2026-6274 CVE-2026-76905 GHSA-mmfr-pmjx-hw9w
    • GO-2026-6275 CVE-2026-77354 GHSA-xhj3-7xw9-vr34
    • GO-2026-6277 GHSA-4ph6-mjv7-3fq6
    • GO-2026-6278 GHSA-w67g-5rqw-f597
    • GO-2026-6279 CVE-2026-6046 GHSA-3vmp-whvv-5v9v
    • GO-2026-6280 CVE-2026-7387 GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw
    • GO-2026-6281 CVE-2026-6961 GHSA-8qq9-cqj8-82w4
    • GO-2026-6282 CVE-2026-7184 GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9
    • GO-2026-6283 CVE-2026-6689 GHSA-c28q-m4gf-vg4q
    • GO-2026-6284 CVE-2026-55477 GHSA-jm48-m3rr-9hgg
    • GO-2026-6285 CVE-2026-6739 GHSA-m2w9-h2mm-79qr
    • GO-2026-6286 CVE-2026-3433 GHSA-rp4v-qc77-phm4
    • GO-2026-6287 GHSA-vx2m-jpxr-xv7w
    • GO-2026-6288 CVE-2026-11624 GHSA-76g7-m3xw-x9gr
    • GO-2026-6289 GHSA-w8j7-39hp-8x59
    • GO-2026-6290 CVE-2026-55581 GHSA-3x77-wg38-92r3
    • GO-2026-6291 CVE-2026-55582 GHSA-74hp-mggr-hv58
    • GO-2026-6292 CVE-2026-55580 GHSA-f5pj-2738-996m
    • GO-2026-6293 CVE-2026-55677 GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq
    • GO-2026-6294 CVE-2026-55092 GHSA-mcj4-mphf-j9ff
    • GO-2026-6295 CVE-2026-55637 GHSA-cmwv-wf9p-p8wx
    • GO-2026-6296 CVE-2026-54523 GHSA-79gf-7frw-68m9
    • GO-2026-6297 CVE-2026-50879 GHSA-g743-m6x3-v6wm
    • GO-2026-6298 CVE-2026-54563 GHSA-w5fv-7x5q-g8qp
    • GO-2026-6299 CVE-2026-50884 GHSA-5442-mh7f-72px
    • GO-2026-6300 CVE-2026-50891 GHSA-rcqf-cpv9-g5jf
    • GO-2026-6301 CVE-2026-42350 GHSA-g7gw-m874-7rmf

  • Update to version 0.0.20260819T170606 2026-08-19T17:06:06Z.

    Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-4720 GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
    • GO-2026-4942 CVE-2026-35172 GHSA-f2g3-hh2r-cwgc
    • GO-2026-4950
    • GO-2026-6093 GHSA-464c-974j-9xm6
    • GO-2026-6094 GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g
    • GO-2026-6095 GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw
    • GO-2026-6097 CVE-2026-55495 GHSA-49h3-cwhj-4737
    • GO-2026-6098 CVE-2026-55496 GHSA-8r7f-r8hj-r3rv
    • GO-2026-6099 CVE-2026-57497 GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q
    • GO-2026-6100 CVE-2026-55497 GHSA-g9j2-8w95-3vwv
    • GO-2026-6101 CVE-2026-55502 GHSA-hq88-5x99-x3gf
    • GO-2026-6102 CVE-2026-55499 GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8
    • GO-2026-6103 CVE-2026-73564 GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp
    • GO-2026-6104 CVE-2026-62323 GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp
    • GO-2026-6105 GHSA-c534-2w9c-x7fm
    • GO-2026-6106 GHSA-v6w6-358x-2433
    • GO-2026-6107 CVE-2026-73500 GHSA-6vch-q96h-7gc3
    • GO-2026-6108 CVE-2026-73505 GHSA-6xj8-qv9j-xcjq
    • GO-2026-6109 GHSA-86cx-wwf4-phq4
    • GO-2026-6110 CVE-2026-73509 GHSA-95cv-r8x4-vh75
    • GO-2026-6111 CVE-2026-73506 GHSA-fwjx-9p69-h25h
    • GO-2026-6112 CVE-2026-73502 GHSA-jpcw-4wr7-c3vq
    • GO-2026-6113 GHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337
    • GO-2026-6114 CVE-2026-73499 GHSA-xg4h-6gfc-h4m8
    • GO-2026-6115 CVE-2026-56867
    • GO-2026-6117 GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5
    • GO-2026-6118 CVE-2026-47427 GHSA-w4q6-qw23-4rg7
    • GO-2026-6119 CVE-2026-43983…
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23625-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/rclone/rclone
Go
 before 1.75.0
1.75.0
rclone
Bitnami
 before 1.75.0
1.75.0
rclone
Debian:12
 All versions, plus listed versions
1.60.1+dfsg-21.60.1+dfsg-31.60.1+dfsg-41.65.0+dfsg-11.65.0+dfsg-21.69.3+dfsg-11.69.3+dfsg-21.69.3+dfsg-3
 None known
rclone
Debian:13
 All versions, plus listed versions
1.60.1+dfsg-41.65.0+dfsg-11.65.0+dfsg-21.69.3+dfsg-11.69.3+dfsg-21.69.3+dfsg-3
 None known
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0
From an advisory covering 181 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0
From an advisory covering 181 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
rclone
Ubuntu:18.04:LTS
 All versions, plus listed versions
1.36-31.36-3ubuntu0.11.36-3ubuntu0.2
 None known
rclone
Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS
 All versions, plus listed versions
1.47.0+ex1-61.47.0+ex1-71.49.5-21.49.5-31.50.2-21.50.2-2ubuntu0.11.50.2-2ubuntu0.21.50.2-2ubuntu0.2+esm1
 None known
rclone
Ubuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS
 All versions, plus listed versions
1.53.3-11.53.3-21.53.3-41.53.3-4ubuntu11.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.1
Show 7 moreShow less
1.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.21.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.31.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.3+esm11.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.41.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.4+esm11.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.51.53.3-4ubuntu1.22.04.5+esm1
 None known
rclone
Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS
 All versions, plus listed versions
1.60.1+dfsg-2build11.60.1+dfsg-31.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.11.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.21.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.3
Show 6 moreShow less
1.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.41.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.4+esm11.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.51.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.5+esm11.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.61.60.1+dfsg-3ubuntu0.24.04.6+esm1
 None known
rclone
Ubuntu:26.10
 All versions, plus listed versions
1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu31.69.3+dfsg-31.69.3+dfsg-3ubuntu1
 None known
rclone
Ubuntu:Pro:26.04:LTS
 All versions, plus listed versions
1.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu21.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu31.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.11.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.1+esm11.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.21.60.1+dfsg-4ubuntu3.2+esm1
 None known
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 181 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-71311 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 6.4) in Rclone, published August 5, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.39%, the 33rd percentile. Fixed in github.com/rclone/rclone 1.75.0.

References

Show 186 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 4 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

Pages All vulnerabilities Browse Docs Sources Guide Get API key
MoveEnter Open