CVE-2026-84783
Use-After-Free in X.509 Extension Cache Under Concurrent Use
Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while another thread is still using it.
Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a Denial of Service.
CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free
Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate's X.509v3 extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory.
Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its extensions are decoded. In TLS the certificates at risk are the trusted CA certificates supplied for chain verification, by whatever means, since these are shared by every connection and their extensions are decoded and cached the first time a chain is built to them. Certificates sent by the peer are decoded separately for each connection and are not shared, so they are not affected. In a TLS client verifying server certificates, or a TLS server that requests and verifies client certificates, the use-after-free could only occur if the first chains built to the same trusted CA are built by several connections at the same time.
FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as X.509 certificate handling is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
OpenSSL 4.0 is vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.
OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.3.
This issue was reported on 27 August 2026 by Tim Becker (Xint.io) and independently in a public report on 31 August 2026 by aydinmercan.
The fix has been developed by Bob Beck.
-- cut (non-publishing metadata for internal use) -- Reported by: Tim Becker (Xint.io), aydinmercan Fixed by: Bob Beck
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
7.5
Use-After-Free in X.509 Extension Cache Under Concurrent Use
Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while another thread is still using it.
Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a Denial of Service.
CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free
Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate's X.509v3 extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory.
Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its extensions are decoded. In TLS the certificates at risk are the trusted CA certificates supplied for chain verification, by whatever means, since these are shared by every connection and their extensions are decoded and cached the first time a chain is built to them. Certificates sent by the peer are decoded separately for each connection and are not shared, so they are not affected. In a TLS client verifying server certificates, or a TLS server that requests and verifies client certificates, the use-after-free could only occur if the first chains built to the same trusted CA are built by several connections at the same time.
FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as X.509 certificate handling is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
OpenSSL 4.0 is vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.
OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.3.
This issue was reported on 27 August 2026 by Tim Becker (Xint.io) and independently in a public report on 31 August 2026 by aydinmercan.
The fix has been developed by Bob Beck.
-- cut (non-publishing metadata for internal use) -- Reported by: Tim Becker (Xint.io), aydinmercan Fixed by: Bob Beck
- Record
CVE-2026-84783- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-416
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-89014
7.5
Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while another thread is still using it.
Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a Denial of Service.
CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free
Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate's X.509v3 extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory.
Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its extensions are decoded. In TLS the certificates at risk are the trusted CA certificates supplied for chain verification, by whatever means, since these are shared by every connection and their extensions are decoded and cached the first time a chain is built to them. Certificates sent by the peer are decoded separately for each connection and are not shared, so they are not affected. In a TLS client verifying server certificates, or a TLS server that requests and verifies client certificates, the use-after-free could only occur if the first chains built to the same trusted CA are built by several connections at the same time.
FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as X.509 certificate handling is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
OpenSSL 4.0 is vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.
OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.3.
This issue was reported on 27 August 2026 by Tim Becker (Xint.io) and independently in a public report on 31 August 2026 by aydinmercan.
The fix has been developed by Bob Beck.
-- cut (non-publishing metadata for internal use) -- Reported by: Tim Becker (Xint.io), aydinmercan Fixed by: Bob Beck
- Record
EUVD-2026-89014- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8
7.5
Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by several threads may...
Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while another thread is still using it.
Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a Denial of Service.
CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free
Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate's X.509v3 extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory.
Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its extensions are decoded. In TLS the certificates at risk are the trusted CA certificates supplied for chain verification, by whatever means, since these are shared by every connection and their extensions are decoded and cached the first time a chain is built to them. Certificates sent by the peer are decoded separately for each connection and are not shared, so they are not affected. In a TLS client verifying server certificates, or a TLS server that requests and verifies client certificates, the use-after-free could only occur if the first chains built to the same trusted CA are built by several connections at the same time.
FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as X.509 certificate handling is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
OpenSSL 4.0 is vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.
OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.3.
This issue was reported on 27 August 2026 by Tim Becker (Xint.io) and independently in a public report on 31 August 2026 by aydinmercan.
The fix has been developed by Bob Beck.
-- cut (non-publishing metadata for internal use) -- Reported by: Tim Becker (Xint.io), aydinmercan Fixed by: Bob Beck
- Record
GHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-416
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
7.5
Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while another thread is still using it.
Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a Denial of Service.
CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free
Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate's X.509v3 extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory.
Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its extensions are decoded. In TLS the certificates at risk are the trusted CA certificates supplied for chain verification, by whatever means, since these are shared by every connection and their extensions are decoded and cached the first time a chain is built to them. Certificates sent by the peer are decoded separately for each connection and are not shared, so they are not affected. In a TLS client verifying server certificates, or a TLS server that requests and verifies client certificates, the use-after-free could only occur if the first chains built to the same trusted CA are built by several connections at the same time.
FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as X.509 certificate handling is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
OpenSSL 4.0 is vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.
OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.3.
This issue was reported on 27 August 2026 by Tim Becker (Xint.io) and independently in a public report on 31 August 2026 by aydinmercan.
The fix has been developed by Bob Beck.
-- cut (non-publishing metadata for internal use) -- Reported by: Tim Becker (Xint.io), aydinmercan Fixed by: Bob Beck
- Record
CVE-2026-84783- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-416
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBELL-CVE-2026-84783
7.5
CVE-2026-84783 does not affect BellSoft software
- Record
BELL-CVE-2026-84783- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
7.5
Use-After-Free in X.509 Extension Cache Under Concurrent Use
Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while another thread is still using it.
Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a Denial of Service.
CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free
Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate's X.509v3 extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory.
Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its extensions are decoded. In TLS the certificates at risk are the trusted CA certificates supplied for chain verification, by whatever means, since these are shared by every connection and their extensions are decoded and cached the first time a chain is built to them. Certificates sent by the peer are decoded separately for each connection and are not shared, so they are not affected. In a TLS client verifying server certificates, or a TLS server that requests and verifies client certificates, the use-after-free could only occur if the first chains built to the same trusted CA are built by several connections at the same time.
FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as X.509 certificate handling is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
OpenSSL 4.0 is vulnerable to this issue.
OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue.
OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.3.
This issue was reported on 27 August 2026 by Tim Becker (Xint.io) and independently in a public report on 31 August 2026 by aydinmercan.
The fix has been developed by Bob Beck.
-- cut (non-publishing metadata for internal use) -- Reported by: Tim Becker (Xint.io), aydinmercan Fixed by: Bob Beck
- Record
CVE-2026-84783- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-416
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:59641
9.1
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:59641- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:70734
5.9
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:70734- CVSS 3.1
- 5.9 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-84783
7.5
Issue summary: The first concurrent use of the same X.509 certificate by several threads may cause its cached extension data to be freed while another thread is still using it. Impact summary: A remote, unauthenticated peer could crash a multi-threaded TLS client, or a multi-threaded TLS server that requests client certificates, if the first certificate chains built to the same trusted CA certificate are built by several connections at the same time. This is a use-after-free read, which is likely to crash the process, resulting in a Denial of Service. CWE: CWE-416: Use After Free Description: OpenSSL caches the decoded values of a certificate's X.509v3 extensions inside the X509 object the first time they are needed. In OpenSSL 4.0 this cache is built in two phases: the extension values are computed while holding a read lock on the certificate, and the results are then installed into the certificate under a write lock. Because a read lock does not exclude other readers, several threads can compute the cache for the same certificate at the same time. Each thread that subsequently acquires the write lock installs its own results and frees the values installed by the thread before it, even though that earlier thread has already marked the cache as complete and may have returned pointers into it to its caller. A caller still using those pointers then reads freed memory. Any certificate shared between threads is exposed the first time its extensions are decoded. In TLS the certificates at risk are the trusted CA certificates supplied for chain verification, by whatever means, since these are shared by every connection and their extensions are decoded and cached the first time a chain is built to them. Certificates sent by the peer are decoded separately for each connection and are not shared, so they are not affected. In a TLS client verifying server certificates, or a TLS server that requests and verifies client certificates, the use-after-free could only occur if the first chains built to the same trusted CA are built by several connections at the same time. FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected as X.509 certificate handling is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. OpenSSL 4.0 is vulnerable to this issue. OpenSSL 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, 3.0, 1.1.1 and 1.0.2 are not affected by this issue. OpenSSL 4.0 users should upgrade to OpenSSL 4.0.3. This issue was reported on 27 August 2026 by Tim Becker (Xint.io) and independently in a public report on 31 August 2026 by aydinmercan. The fix has been developed by Bob Beck. -- cut (non-publishing metadata for internal use) -- Reported by: Tim Becker (Xint.io), aydinmercan Fixed by: Bob Beck
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-84783- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
opensslRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-config-fipsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-develRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-devel-engineRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-fips-provider-upstreamRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-libsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-perlRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 28 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl3Red Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-1.hum1 |
openssl3-develRed Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-1.hum1 |
openssl3-devel-engineRed Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-1.hum1 |
openssl3-libsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-1.hum1 |
nodejsUbuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 12.22.5~dfsg-5ubuntu112.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu112.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu312.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu212.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3 Show 7 moreShow less12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.112.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.212.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.312.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.412.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.512.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.612.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6+esm2 |
None known |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-84783 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.5) in Openssl, published August 27, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.29%, the 21st percentile. Fixed in openssl3 0:3.5.8-1.hum1.
References
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/de97a1a54f43edefd43b5084ecac54ecadb33081
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84783
github.com/advisories/GHSA-2pj2-4hfp-vxp8
docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2026-84783
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/84xxx/CVE-2026-84783.json
Show 124 moreShow less
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:59641
images.redhat.com
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63074
access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63073
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14457
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63076
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63075
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63072
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54874
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18798
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-75803
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42769
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42768
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34180
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42767
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7383
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45447
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45446
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34182
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34183
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45445
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-9076
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42765
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42771
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34181
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35188
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42766
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42770
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42764
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-84783
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_59641.json
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481879
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-7383
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7383
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481880
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9076
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-9076
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517562
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14457
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-14457
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517559
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18798
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-18798
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481881
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34180
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34180
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481882
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34181
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34181
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481884
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34182
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34182
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481885
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34183
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34183
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481886
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35188
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35188
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481887
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42764
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42764
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481889
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42765
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42765
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481890
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42766
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42766
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481891
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42767
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42767
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481892
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42768
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42768
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481893
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42769
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42769
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481894
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42770
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42770
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481895
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42771
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42771
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481896
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45445
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45445
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481897
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45446
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45446
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481898
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45447
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45447
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517564
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54874
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54874
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517560
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63072
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63072
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517565
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63073
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63073
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517566
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63074
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63074
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517570
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63075
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63075
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517561
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63076
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63076
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2523425
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75803
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-75803
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/119ab9555dc62275bbd71f6f49529b1a44feba42
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3621257986e27e540bf96a11570929a6e5a9e05b
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/6c7aa6f8f6449b7fe0137ee8be65fcd239bd7d6a
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bdeb0cd994d915342787f117ee75044f0dc36f34
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bf95f5f772e9362f87b25cfa2f8cb15d984865b9
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2543243
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-84783
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:70734
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_70734.json
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-84783