Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-88017

rclone: FTP cross-session auth-proxy backend confusion

7.3 HighFix available

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.64.0 until 1.75.1, the FTP auth-proxy driver in cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go stores one obscured password per username in the server-wide userPass map[string]string instead of binding the credential or VFS to the authenticated session. If two accepted credentials use the same username but resolve to different proxy backends, a later CheckPasswd login overwrites userPass[user], and subsequent getVFS operations on the first session are reauthorized with the later password. The first session can then read, create, overwrite, rename, or delete objects using the second credential’s backend authority. Exploitation requires the later same-username login to occur while the first session remains open. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
Required

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.23%Unchanged since Sep 11, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 7.3

rclone: FTP cross-session auth-proxy backend confusion

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.64.0 until 1.75.1, the FTP auth-proxy driver in cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go stores one obscured password per username in the server-wide userPass map[string]string instead of binding the credential or VFS to the authenticated session. If two accepted credentials use the same username but resolve to different proxy backends, a later CheckPasswd login overwrites userPass[user], and subsequent getVFS operations on the first session are reauthorized with the later password. The first session can then read, create, overwrite, rename, or delete objects using the second credential’s backend authority. Exploitation requires the later same-username login to occur while the first session remains open. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.

Record
CVE-2026-88017
CVSS 3.1
7.3 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness
CWE-488
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-75577 7.3

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.64.0 until 1.75.1, the FTP auth-proxy driver in cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go stores one obscured password per username in the server-wide userPass map[string]string instead of binding the credential or VFS to the authenticated session. If two accepted credentials use the same username but resolve to different proxy backends, a later CheckPasswd login overwrites userPass[user], and subsequent getVFS operations on the first session are reauthorized with the later password. The first session can then read, create, overwrite, rename, or delete objects using the second credential’s backend authority. Exploitation requires the later same-username login to occur while the first session remains open. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.

Record
EUVD-2026-75577
CVSS 3.1
7.3 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-c476-6w5q-jw77 7.3

rclone: FTP cross-session auth-proxy backend confusion

Summary

The FTP auth-proxy driver stores one obscured password per username in a server-wide map. It does not bind the credential or returned VFS to the authenticated FTP session. If two accepted credentials use the same username but resolve to different proxy backends, the later login overwrites the map entry. Subsequent operations on the first, still-authenticated session are re-authorized with the later session's password and execute against the later session's backend.

This is not exploitable in every auth-proxy deployment. It requires a proxy that accepts distinct credentials for the same username and returns different roots or backend configurations, plus a later login while the attacker's session remains open. The behavior is nevertheless within the supported model: cmd/serve/proxy keys VFS entries by username, authentication material, and client IP specifically so a new credential can produce a fresh backend.

Confirmed affected versions are v1.75.0 and development commit 5629f2668c69149bf3d9d8e2a25bb32a2648606e. The username-global map was introduced in v1.64.0, but versions before credential-aware proxy caching may require cache expiration or different timing and are not claimed as confirmed here.

Affected Assets & Attack Surface

  • cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go:170-178 defines userPass map[string]string as driver-global state keyed only by username.
  • cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go:318-335 validates (user, pass) through the proxy and then overwrites d.userPass[user].
  • cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go:352-373 retrieves the current map entry by Sess.LoginUser() for every filesystem operation and calls the proxy again with that password.
  • cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go:376 onward routes FTP filesystem operations through getVFS, including stat, listing, retrieval, upload, rename, and deletion.
  • cmd/serve/proxy/proxy.go:114-119 documents credential- and client-IP-aware backend caching.
  • cmd/serve/proxy/proxy.go:235-243 derives a cache key from username, credential, and client IP.
  • cmd/serve/proxy/proxy.go:328-365 resolves and verifies the VFS using that composite identity.
  • Attack surface: any rclone serve ftp --auth-proxy ... deployment in which the proxy accepts more than one credential for a shared username and those credentials do not have equivalent backend authority.

Technical Root Cause Analysis

Authentication initially uses the correct session data:

d.proxy.Call(user, pass, false, sctx.Sess.RemoteAddr().String())

After success, the driver discards the returned VFS and VFS cache key. It obscures the password and stores it in:

d.userPass[user] = oPass

For each later FTP operation, getVFS knows only the session's username. It looks up whichever password was most recently stored for that username and calls the proxy again. The mutex prevents a Go data race but does not provide session isolation.

The authorization sequence is therefore:

  1. Session A authenticates as shared with credential A and receives backend A.
  2. Session B authenticates as shared with credential B and overwrites userPass["shared"].
  3. Session A performs another FTP command.
  4. getVFS uses credential B, not the credential that authenticated Session A.
  5. The proxy returns backend B, and Session A's command runs there.

This creates a cross-session identity mismatch; no race condition is required. Credential-dependent routing is not an artificial assumption added by the PoC: the proxy cache deliberately distinguishes the same username with different authentication material. A proxy that maps username alone, rejects all concurrent alternate credentials, or binds credentials to client IP in a way that rejects the replay is not exploitable by this sequence.

Proof of Concept & Evidence

Create two roots and a proxy that uses the password as a tenant token while requiring the same FTP username:

mkdir -p /tmp/rclone-ftp-attacker /tmp/rclone-ftp-victim
printf 'attacker-only\n' >…
Record
GHSA-c476-6w5q-jw77
CVSS 3.1
7.3 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness
CWE-488
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 7.3

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.64.0 until 1.75.1, the FTP auth-proxy driver in cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go stores one obscured password per username in the server-wide userPass map[string]string instead of binding the credential or VFS to the authenticated session. If two accepted credentials use the same username but resolve to different proxy backends, a later CheckPasswd login overwrites userPass[user], and subsequent getVFS operations on the first session are reauthorized with the later password. The first session can then read, create, overwrite, rename, or delete objects using the second credential’s backend authority. Exploitation requires the later same-username login to occur while the first session remains open. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.

Record
CVE-2026-88017
CVSS 3.1
7.3 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness
CWE-488
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 7.3

rclone: FTP cross-session auth-proxy backend confusion

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.64.0 until 1.75.1, the FTP auth-proxy driver in cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go stores one obscured password per username in the server-wide userPass map[string]string instead of binding the credential or VFS to the authenticated session. If two accepted credentials use the same username but resolve to different proxy backends, a later CheckPasswd login overwrites userPass[user], and subsequent getVFS operations on the first session are reauthorized with the later password. The first session can then read, create, overwrite, rename, or delete objects using the second credential’s backend authority. Exploitation requires the later same-username login to occur while the first session remains open. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.

Record
CVE-2026-88017
CVSS 3.1
7.3 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness
CWE-488
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-88017 7.3

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.64.0 until 1.75.1, the FTP auth-proxy driver in cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go stores one obscured password per username in the server-wide userPass map[string]string instead of binding the credential or VFS to the authenticated session. If two accepted credentials use the same username but resolve to different proxy backends, a later CheckPasswd login overwrites userPass[user], and subsequent getVFS operations on the first session are reauthorized with the later password. The first session can then read, create, overwrite, rename, or delete objects using the second credential’s backend authority. Exploitation requires the later same-username login to occur while the first session remains open. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.

Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-88017
CVSS 3.1
7.3 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 8 moreShow less
OSVGHSA-c476-6w5q-jw77 7.3

rclone: FTP cross-session auth-proxy backend confusion

Summary

The FTP auth-proxy driver stores one obscured password per username in a server-wide map. It does not bind the credential or returned VFS to the authenticated FTP session. If two accepted credentials use the same username but resolve to different proxy backends, the later login overwrites the map entry. Subsequent operations on the first, still-authenticated session are re-authorized with the later session's password and execute against the later session's backend.

This is not exploitable in every auth-proxy deployment. It requires a proxy that accepts distinct credentials for the same username and returns different roots or backend configurations, plus a later login while the attacker's session remains open. The behavior is nevertheless within the supported model: cmd/serve/proxy keys VFS entries by username, authentication material, and client IP specifically so a new credential can produce a fresh backend.

Confirmed affected versions are v1.75.0 and development commit 5629f2668c69149bf3d9d8e2a25bb32a2648606e. The username-global map was introduced in v1.64.0, but versions before credential-aware proxy caching may require cache expiration or different timing and are not claimed as confirmed here.

Affected Assets & Attack Surface

  • cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go:170-178 defines userPass map[string]string as driver-global state keyed only by username.
  • cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go:318-335 validates (user, pass) through the proxy and then overwrites d.userPass[user].
  • cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go:352-373 retrieves the current map entry by Sess.LoginUser() for every filesystem operation and calls the proxy again with that password.
  • cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go:376 onward routes FTP filesystem operations through getVFS, including stat, listing, retrieval, upload, rename, and deletion.
  • cmd/serve/proxy/proxy.go:114-119 documents credential- and client-IP-aware backend caching.
  • cmd/serve/proxy/proxy.go:235-243 derives a cache key from username, credential, and client IP.
  • cmd/serve/proxy/proxy.go:328-365 resolves and verifies the VFS using that composite identity.
  • Attack surface: any rclone serve ftp --auth-proxy ... deployment in which the proxy accepts more than one credential for a shared username and those credentials do not have equivalent backend authority.

Technical Root Cause Analysis

Authentication initially uses the correct session data:

d.proxy.Call(user, pass, false, sctx.Sess.RemoteAddr().String())

After success, the driver discards the returned VFS and VFS cache key. It obscures the password and stores it in:

d.userPass[user] = oPass

For each later FTP operation, getVFS knows only the session's username. It looks up whichever password was most recently stored for that username and calls the proxy again. The mutex prevents a Go data race but does not provide session isolation.

The authorization sequence is therefore:

  1. Session A authenticates as shared with credential A and receives backend A.
  2. Session B authenticates as shared with credential B and overwrites userPass["shared"].
  3. Session A performs another FTP command.
  4. getVFS uses credential B, not the credential that authenticated Session A.
  5. The proxy returns backend B, and Session A's command runs there.

This creates a cross-session identity mismatch; no race condition is required. Credential-dependent routing is not an artificial assumption added by the PoC: the proxy cache deliberately distinguishes the same username with different authentication material. A proxy that maps username alone, rejects all concurrent alternate credentials, or binds credentials to client IP in a way that rejects the replay is not exploitable by this sequence.

Proof of Concept & Evidence

Create two roots and a proxy that uses the password as a tenant token while requiring the same FTP username:

mkdir -p /tmp/rclone-ftp-attacker /tmp/rclone-ftp-victim
printf 'attacker-only\n' >…
Record
GHSA-c476-6w5q-jw77
CVSS 3.1
7.3 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness
CWE-488
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-88017 7.3

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.64.0 until 1.75.1, the FTP auth-proxy driver in cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go stores one obscured password per username in the server-wide userPass map[string]string instead of binding the credential or VFS to the authenticated session. If two accepted credentials use the same username but resolve to different proxy backends, a later CheckPasswd login overwrites userPass[user], and subsequent getVFS operations on the first session are reauthorized with the later password. The first session can then read, create, overwrite, rename, or delete objects using the second credential’s backend authority. Exploitation requires the later same-username login to occur while the first session remains open. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.

Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-88017
CVSS 3.1
7.3 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVBIT-rclone-2026-88017 No score

rclone: FTP cross-session auth-proxy backend confusion

rclone is a command-line program to sync files and directories to and from different cloud storage providers. From 1.64.0 until 1.75.1, the FTP auth-proxy driver in cmd/serve/ftp/ftp.go stores one obscured password per username in the server-wide userPass map[string]string instead of binding the credential or VFS to the authenticated session. If two accepted credentials use the same username but resolve to different proxy backends, a later CheckPasswd login overwrites userPass[user], and subsequent getVFS operations on the first session are reauthorized with the later password. The first session can then read, create, overwrite, rename, or delete objects using the second credential’s backend authority. Exploitation requires the later same-username login to occur while the first session remains open. This issue is fixed in version 1.75.1.

Record
BIT-rclone-2026-88017
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-6458 No score

rclone: FTP cross-session auth-proxy backend confusion in github.com/rclone/rclone

rclone: FTP cross-session auth-proxy backend confusion in github.com/rclone/rclone

Record
GO-2026-6458
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21897-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

Changes for govulncheck-vulndb:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260916T180043 2026-09-16T18:00:43Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-6348 CVE-2026-84304 GHSA-vp52-pcj8-j9qc
  • GO-2026-6356 CVE-2026-65959 GHSA-mhc4-g3wh-cw7m
  • GO-2026-6366 CVE-2026-61625 GHSA-8q3c-rjr9-xxrp
  • GO-2026-6372 CVE-2026-79921 GHSA-6c5v-hqjr-5xxp
  • GO-2026-6441 CVE-2026-84303 GHSA-qc2q-p7wx-3px3
  • GO-2026-6443 CVE-2026-84445 GHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wj
  • GO-2026-6444 CVE-2026-53495 GHSA-7jxh-36q5-gcqv
  • GO-2026-6445 CVE-2025-58363 GHSA-c23q-fw86-9h5x
  • GO-2026-6446 CVE-2025-24978 GHSA-g8rh-fjm6-h2h9
  • GO-2026-6447 CVE-2025-24979 GHSA-pqqc-8v73-9gg2
  • GO-2026-6448 CVE-2026-59185 GHSA-cp3j-m783-3ph5
  • GO-2026-6449 GHSA-hxjg-93wc-h8p8
  • GO-2026-6450 CVE-2026-59172 GHSA-m835-3cm9-rggg
  • GO-2026-6451 CVE-2026-59157 GHSA-v25g-mvwr-f5fp
  • GO-2026-6452 CVE-2026-59162 GHSA-fx5j-qcqg-grpf
  • GO-2026-6453 CVE-2026-59161 GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc
  • GO-2026-6454 CVE-2026-88012 GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c
  • GO-2026-6455 CVE-2026-88011 GHSA-rf44-j88r-hh8c
  • GO-2026-6456 CVE-2026-88045 GHSA-2p48-j3qc-rx9f
  • GO-2026-6457 CVE-2026-88046 GHSA-38xv-hf3p-h7mq
  • GO-2026-6458 CVE-2026-88017 GHSA-c476-6w5q-jw77
  • GO-2026-6459 CVE-2026-88016 GHSA-f8g7-2xjc-7mfh
  • GO-2026-6460 CVE-2026-88044 GHSA-p569-5gjg-9cmj
  • GO-2026-6461 CVE-2026-88015 GHSA-p6m2-r3w9-mpxw
  • GO-2026-6462 CVE-2026-88018 GHSA-xwwr-4h3p-r22c
  • GO-2026-6463 CVE-2026-88013 GHSA-486v-q2wf-fp2r
  • GO-2026-6464 CVE-2026-88014 GHSA-66hp-wgxq-6f5q
  • GO-2026-6465 CVE-2026-88009 GHSA-f52w-8j3h-j724
  • GO-2026-6466 CVE-2026-88007 GHSA-qqjf-53cj-pwvv
  • GO-2026-6467 CVE-2026-88004 GHSA-v67p-phpq-fc8x
  • GO-2026-6468 CVE-2026-88008 GHSA-w4v4-9rw7-5326
  • GO-2026-6469 CVE-2026-56665 GHSA-v77h-2w3m-94hx
  • GO-2026-6470 CVE-2026-56666 GHSA-992q-9gwp-7r79
  • GO-2026-6473 CVE-2026-76081 GHSA-v859-c572-qh5p
  • GO-2026-6474 CVE-2026-56668 GHSA-vrh8-c9cm-wh8v
  • Update to version 0.0.20260910T144842 2026-09-10T14:48:42Z.
  • GO-2026-6302 GHSA-mf7q-r4rv-jv94
  • GO-2026-6343 CVE-2026-25782 GHSA-qm72-8prh-g92x
  • GO-2026-6344 CVE-2026-26292 GHSA-rc56-rj3f-xggf
  • GO-2026-6345 CVE-2026-27779 GHSA-v8f2-2ghq-9whv
  • GO-2026-6346 CVE-2026-27780 GHSA-vhq7-fwwh-7hjf
  • GO-2026-6347 CVE-2026-27660 GHSA-x92v-f5gc-r34v
  • GO-2026-6350 CVE-2026-59832 GHSA-275h-v5h9-vr82
  • GO-2026-6351 CVE-2026-72920 GHSA-2v6v-25fm-p4fg
  • GO-2026-6353 CVE-2026-59834 GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88
  • GO-2026-6357 CVE-2026-73667 GHSA-2mw5-23gm-pccq
  • GO-2026-6358 CVE-2026-73841 GHSA-52gf-6rpq-fgmx
  • GO-2026-6359 CVE-2026-67446 GHSA-75mr-qw9x-3r39
  • GO-2026-6360 CVE-2026-73840 GHSA-c5f6-2rm9-2w8g
  • GO-2026-6361 CVE-2026-72921 GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq
  • GO-2026-6362 CVE-2026-73843 GHSA-qh9r-j7rp-4x2m
  • GO-2026-6363 CVE-2026-67445 GHSA-w878-pj84-3j5v
  • GO-2026-6364 GHSA-99rq-75j6-5j9f
  • GO-2026-6365 GHSA-gw25-m53r-qh88
  • GO-2026-6367 CVE-2026-56743 GHSA-fm8w-2m5w-9j7r
  • GO-2026-6368 CVE-2026-75602 GHSA-h6cj-26g5-67fv
  • GO-2026-6369 CVE-2026-73232 GHSA-jcvh-xf52-2cwm
  • GO-2026-6370 CVE-2026-73292 GHSA-8cj9-r88m-8945
  • GO-2026-6371 CVE-2026-73293 GHSA-cxvf-gvfq-36w2
  • GO-2026-6373 CVE-2026-69086 GHSA-7hm9-v7vf-7g4w
  • GO-2026-6374 CVE-2026-69083 GHSA-fph3-ghq9-vw66
  • GO-2026-6377 CVE-2026-69084 GHSA-vh22-h7hf-www7
  • GO-2026-6379 CVE-2026-68586 GHSA-36v8-mpjm-8j5r
  • GO-2026-6381 CVE-2026-68587 GHSA-69mh-gvh4-8gp7
  • GO-2026-6382 CVE-2026-68584 GHSA-7j72-f6wg-cxw6
  • GO-2026-6384 CVE-2026-68585 GHSA-pm3w-vxp9-ccwc
  • GO-2026-6386 CVE-2026-72809 GHSA-3mp7-4rh5-jrv9
  • GO-2026-6387 CVE-2026-72805 GHSA-67x2-mq63-v9vm
  • GO-2026-6388 CVE-2026-72806 GHSA-6mcf-g667-w3qv
  • GO-2026-6392 CVE-2026-72801 GHSA-8x84-r2ff-h8pq
  • GO-2026-6395 CVE-2026-72800 GHSA-5fhr-f75j-8wr9
  • GO-2026-6398 CVE-2026-72802 GHSA-jv8v-xq2h-657v
  • GO-2026-6400 CVE-2026-72810 GHSA-mw8r-mw84-88v2
  • GO-2026-6402 CVE-2026-72811 GHSA-q2vg-7qgx-x5fc
  • GO-2026-6404 CVE-2026-72803…
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21897-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVROOT-APP-GOBINARY-CVE-2026-88017 No score

CVE-2026-88017 in github.com/rclone/rclone - Patched by Root

Root has patched CVE-2026-88017 in the github.com/rclone/rclone package for Root:Go. Multiple fixed versions available.

Record
ROOT-APP-GOBINARY-CVE-2026-88017
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23855-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

Changes for govulncheck-vulndb:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260916T180043 2026-09-16T18:00:43Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-6348 CVE-2026-84304 GHSA-vp52-pcj8-j9qc
  • GO-2026-6356 CVE-2026-65959 GHSA-mhc4-g3wh-cw7m
  • GO-2026-6366 CVE-2026-61625 GHSA-8q3c-rjr9-xxrp
  • GO-2026-6372 CVE-2026-79921 GHSA-6c5v-hqjr-5xxp
  • GO-2026-6441 CVE-2026-84303 GHSA-qc2q-p7wx-3px3
  • GO-2026-6443 CVE-2026-84445 GHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wj
  • GO-2026-6444 CVE-2026-53495 GHSA-7jxh-36q5-gcqv
  • GO-2026-6445 CVE-2025-58363 GHSA-c23q-fw86-9h5x
  • GO-2026-6446 CVE-2025-24978 GHSA-g8rh-fjm6-h2h9
  • GO-2026-6447 CVE-2025-24979 GHSA-pqqc-8v73-9gg2
  • GO-2026-6448 CVE-2026-59185 GHSA-cp3j-m783-3ph5
  • GO-2026-6449 GHSA-hxjg-93wc-h8p8
  • GO-2026-6450 CVE-2026-59172 GHSA-m835-3cm9-rggg
  • GO-2026-6451 CVE-2026-59157 GHSA-v25g-mvwr-f5fp
  • GO-2026-6452 CVE-2026-59162 GHSA-fx5j-qcqg-grpf
  • GO-2026-6453 CVE-2026-59161 GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc
  • GO-2026-6454 CVE-2026-88012 GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c
  • GO-2026-6455 CVE-2026-88011 GHSA-rf44-j88r-hh8c
  • GO-2026-6456 CVE-2026-88045 GHSA-2p48-j3qc-rx9f
  • GO-2026-6457 CVE-2026-88046 GHSA-38xv-hf3p-h7mq
  • GO-2026-6458 CVE-2026-88017 GHSA-c476-6w5q-jw77
  • GO-2026-6459 CVE-2026-88016 GHSA-f8g7-2xjc-7mfh
  • GO-2026-6460 CVE-2026-88044 GHSA-p569-5gjg-9cmj
  • GO-2026-6461 CVE-2026-88015 GHSA-p6m2-r3w9-mpxw
  • GO-2026-6462 CVE-2026-88018 GHSA-xwwr-4h3p-r22c
  • GO-2026-6463 CVE-2026-88013 GHSA-486v-q2wf-fp2r
  • GO-2026-6464 CVE-2026-88014 GHSA-66hp-wgxq-6f5q
  • GO-2026-6465 CVE-2026-88009 GHSA-f52w-8j3h-j724
  • GO-2026-6466 CVE-2026-88007 GHSA-qqjf-53cj-pwvv
  • GO-2026-6467 CVE-2026-88004 GHSA-v67p-phpq-fc8x
  • GO-2026-6468 CVE-2026-88008 GHSA-w4v4-9rw7-5326
  • GO-2026-6469 CVE-2026-56665 GHSA-v77h-2w3m-94hx
  • GO-2026-6470 CVE-2026-56666 GHSA-992q-9gwp-7r79
  • GO-2026-6473 CVE-2026-76081 GHSA-v859-c572-qh5p
  • GO-2026-6474 CVE-2026-56668 GHSA-vrh8-c9cm-wh8v
  • Update to version 0.0.20260910T144842 2026-09-10T14:48:42Z.
  • GO-2026-6302 GHSA-mf7q-r4rv-jv94
  • GO-2026-6343 CVE-2026-25782 GHSA-qm72-8prh-g92x
  • GO-2026-6344 CVE-2026-26292 GHSA-rc56-rj3f-xggf
  • GO-2026-6345 CVE-2026-27779 GHSA-v8f2-2ghq-9whv
  • GO-2026-6346 CVE-2026-27780 GHSA-vhq7-fwwh-7hjf
  • GO-2026-6347 CVE-2026-27660 GHSA-x92v-f5gc-r34v
  • GO-2026-6350 CVE-2026-59832 GHSA-275h-v5h9-vr82
  • GO-2026-6351 CVE-2026-72920 GHSA-2v6v-25fm-p4fg
  • GO-2026-6353 CVE-2026-59834 GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88
  • GO-2026-6357 CVE-2026-73667 GHSA-2mw5-23gm-pccq
  • GO-2026-6358 CVE-2026-73841 GHSA-52gf-6rpq-fgmx
  • GO-2026-6359 CVE-2026-67446 GHSA-75mr-qw9x-3r39
  • GO-2026-6360 CVE-2026-73840 GHSA-c5f6-2rm9-2w8g
  • GO-2026-6361 CVE-2026-72921 GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq
  • GO-2026-6362 CVE-2026-73843 GHSA-qh9r-j7rp-4x2m
  • GO-2026-6363 CVE-2026-67445 GHSA-w878-pj84-3j5v
  • GO-2026-6364 GHSA-99rq-75j6-5j9f
  • GO-2026-6365 GHSA-gw25-m53r-qh88
  • GO-2026-6367 CVE-2026-56743 GHSA-fm8w-2m5w-9j7r
  • GO-2026-6368 CVE-2026-75602 GHSA-h6cj-26g5-67fv
  • GO-2026-6369 CVE-2026-73232 GHSA-jcvh-xf52-2cwm
  • GO-2026-6370 CVE-2026-73292 GHSA-8cj9-r88m-8945
  • GO-2026-6371 CVE-2026-73293 GHSA-cxvf-gvfq-36w2
  • GO-2026-6373 CVE-2026-69086 GHSA-7hm9-v7vf-7g4w
  • GO-2026-6374 CVE-2026-69083 GHSA-fph3-ghq9-vw66
  • GO-2026-6377 CVE-2026-69084 GHSA-vh22-h7hf-www7
  • GO-2026-6379 CVE-2026-68586 GHSA-36v8-mpjm-8j5r
  • GO-2026-6381 CVE-2026-68587 GHSA-69mh-gvh4-8gp7
  • GO-2026-6382 CVE-2026-68584 GHSA-7j72-f6wg-cxw6
  • GO-2026-6384 CVE-2026-68585 GHSA-pm3w-vxp9-ccwc
  • GO-2026-6386 CVE-2026-72809 GHSA-3mp7-4rh5-jrv9
  • GO-2026-6387 CVE-2026-72805 GHSA-67x2-mq63-v9vm
  • GO-2026-6388 CVE-2026-72806 GHSA-6mcf-g667-w3qv
  • GO-2026-6392 CVE-2026-72801 GHSA-8x84-r2ff-h8pq
  • GO-2026-6395 CVE-2026-72800 GHSA-5fhr-f75j-8wr9
  • GO-2026-6398 CVE-2026-72802 GHSA-jv8v-xq2h-657v
  • GO-2026-6400 CVE-2026-72810 GHSA-mw8r-mw84-88v2
  • GO-2026-6402 CVE-2026-72811 GHSA-q2vg-7qgx-x5fc
  • GO-2026-6404 CVE-2026-72803…
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23855-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23863-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

Changes for govulncheck-vulndb:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260916T180043 2026-09-16T18:00:43Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-6348 CVE-2026-84304 GHSA-vp52-pcj8-j9qc
  • GO-2026-6356 CVE-2026-65959 GHSA-mhc4-g3wh-cw7m
  • GO-2026-6366 CVE-2026-61625 GHSA-8q3c-rjr9-xxrp
  • GO-2026-6372 CVE-2026-79921 GHSA-6c5v-hqjr-5xxp
  • GO-2026-6441 CVE-2026-84303 GHSA-qc2q-p7wx-3px3
  • GO-2026-6443 CVE-2026-84445 GHSA-2v4p-qf9q-27wj
  • GO-2026-6444 CVE-2026-53495 GHSA-7jxh-36q5-gcqv
  • GO-2026-6445 CVE-2025-58363 GHSA-c23q-fw86-9h5x
  • GO-2026-6446 CVE-2025-24978 GHSA-g8rh-fjm6-h2h9
  • GO-2026-6447 CVE-2025-24979 GHSA-pqqc-8v73-9gg2
  • GO-2026-6448 CVE-2026-59185 GHSA-cp3j-m783-3ph5
  • GO-2026-6449 GHSA-hxjg-93wc-h8p8
  • GO-2026-6450 CVE-2026-59172 GHSA-m835-3cm9-rggg
  • GO-2026-6451 CVE-2026-59157 GHSA-v25g-mvwr-f5fp
  • GO-2026-6452 CVE-2026-59162 GHSA-fx5j-qcqg-grpf
  • GO-2026-6453 CVE-2026-59161 GHSA-q5j5-6p94-4gwc
  • GO-2026-6454 CVE-2026-88012 GHSA-7ghq-v6jf-g56c
  • GO-2026-6455 CVE-2026-88011 GHSA-rf44-j88r-hh8c
  • GO-2026-6456 CVE-2026-88045 GHSA-2p48-j3qc-rx9f
  • GO-2026-6457 CVE-2026-88046 GHSA-38xv-hf3p-h7mq
  • GO-2026-6458 CVE-2026-88017 GHSA-c476-6w5q-jw77
  • GO-2026-6459 CVE-2026-88016 GHSA-f8g7-2xjc-7mfh
  • GO-2026-6460 CVE-2026-88044 GHSA-p569-5gjg-9cmj
  • GO-2026-6461 CVE-2026-88015 GHSA-p6m2-r3w9-mpxw
  • GO-2026-6462 CVE-2026-88018 GHSA-xwwr-4h3p-r22c
  • GO-2026-6463 CVE-2026-88013 GHSA-486v-q2wf-fp2r
  • GO-2026-6464 CVE-2026-88014 GHSA-66hp-wgxq-6f5q
  • GO-2026-6465 CVE-2026-88009 GHSA-f52w-8j3h-j724
  • GO-2026-6466 CVE-2026-88007 GHSA-qqjf-53cj-pwvv
  • GO-2026-6467 CVE-2026-88004 GHSA-v67p-phpq-fc8x
  • GO-2026-6468 CVE-2026-88008 GHSA-w4v4-9rw7-5326
  • GO-2026-6469 CVE-2026-56665 GHSA-v77h-2w3m-94hx
  • GO-2026-6470 CVE-2026-56666 GHSA-992q-9gwp-7r79
  • GO-2026-6473 CVE-2026-76081 GHSA-v859-c572-qh5p
  • GO-2026-6474 CVE-2026-56668 GHSA-vrh8-c9cm-wh8v
  • Update to version 0.0.20260910T144842 2026-09-10T14:48:42Z.
  • GO-2026-6302 GHSA-mf7q-r4rv-jv94
  • GO-2026-6343 CVE-2026-25782 GHSA-qm72-8prh-g92x
  • GO-2026-6344 CVE-2026-26292 GHSA-rc56-rj3f-xggf
  • GO-2026-6345 CVE-2026-27779 GHSA-v8f2-2ghq-9whv
  • GO-2026-6346 CVE-2026-27780 GHSA-vhq7-fwwh-7hjf
  • GO-2026-6347 CVE-2026-27660 GHSA-x92v-f5gc-r34v
  • GO-2026-6350 CVE-2026-59832 GHSA-275h-v5h9-vr82
  • GO-2026-6351 CVE-2026-72920 GHSA-2v6v-25fm-p4fg
  • GO-2026-6353 CVE-2026-59834 GHSA-h89q-4j2h-7h88
  • GO-2026-6357 CVE-2026-73667 GHSA-2mw5-23gm-pccq
  • GO-2026-6358 CVE-2026-73841 GHSA-52gf-6rpq-fgmx
  • GO-2026-6359 CVE-2026-67446 GHSA-75mr-qw9x-3r39
  • GO-2026-6360 CVE-2026-73840 GHSA-c5f6-2rm9-2w8g
  • GO-2026-6361 CVE-2026-72921 GHSA-gv5w-hfx8-8cwq
  • GO-2026-6362 CVE-2026-73843 GHSA-qh9r-j7rp-4x2m
  • GO-2026-6363 CVE-2026-67445 GHSA-w878-pj84-3j5v
  • GO-2026-6364 GHSA-99rq-75j6-5j9f
  • GO-2026-6365 GHSA-gw25-m53r-qh88
  • GO-2026-6367 CVE-2026-56743 GHSA-fm8w-2m5w-9j7r
  • GO-2026-6368 CVE-2026-75602 GHSA-h6cj-26g5-67fv
  • GO-2026-6369 CVE-2026-73232 GHSA-jcvh-xf52-2cwm
  • GO-2026-6370 CVE-2026-73292 GHSA-8cj9-r88m-8945
  • GO-2026-6371 CVE-2026-73293 GHSA-cxvf-gvfq-36w2
  • GO-2026-6373 CVE-2026-69086 GHSA-7hm9-v7vf-7g4w
  • GO-2026-6374 CVE-2026-69083 GHSA-fph3-ghq9-vw66
  • GO-2026-6377 CVE-2026-69084 GHSA-vh22-h7hf-www7
  • GO-2026-6379 CVE-2026-68586 GHSA-36v8-mpjm-8j5r
  • GO-2026-6381 CVE-2026-68587 GHSA-69mh-gvh4-8gp7
  • GO-2026-6382 CVE-2026-68584 GHSA-7j72-f6wg-cxw6
  • GO-2026-6384 CVE-2026-68585 GHSA-pm3w-vxp9-ccwc
  • GO-2026-6386 CVE-2026-72809 GHSA-3mp7-4rh5-jrv9
  • GO-2026-6387 CVE-2026-72805 GHSA-67x2-mq63-v9vm
  • GO-2026-6388 CVE-2026-72806 GHSA-6mcf-g667-w3qv
  • GO-2026-6392 CVE-2026-72801 GHSA-8x84-r2ff-h8pq
  • GO-2026-6395 CVE-2026-72800 GHSA-5fhr-f75j-8wr9
  • GO-2026-6398 CVE-2026-72802 GHSA-jv8v-xq2h-657v
  • GO-2026-6400 CVE-2026-72810 GHSA-mw8r-mw84-88v2
  • GO-2026-6402 CVE-2026-72811 GHSA-q2vg-7qgx-x5fc
  • GO-2026-6404 CVE-2026-72803…
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23863-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/rclone/rclone
Go
 1.64.0 to 1.75.0
1.75.1
rclone
Bitnami
 1.64.0 up to 1.75.1
1.75.1
rclone
Debian:12
 All versions, plus listed versions
1.60.1+dfsg-21.60.1+dfsg-31.60.1+dfsg-41.65.0+dfsg-11.65.0+dfsg-21.69.3+dfsg-11.69.3+dfsg-21.69.3+dfsg-3
 None known
rclone
Debian:13
 All versions, plus listed versions
1.60.1+dfsg-41.65.0+dfsg-11.65.0+dfsg-21.69.3+dfsg-11.69.3+dfsg-21.69.3+dfsg-3
 None known
github.com/rclone/rclone
Go
 1.64.0 up to 1.75.1
1.75.1
github.com/rclone/rclone
Root:Go
 before v1.74.1-0.20260628215305-6bbc28cf02dc-aikido.4
v1.74.1-0.20260628215305-6bbc28cf02dc-aikido.4v1.74.1-0.20260628215305-6bbc28cf02dc-aikido.5
rootio-github.com/rclone/rclone
Root:Go
 before v1.74.1-0.20260628215305-6bbc28cf02dc-root.io.4
v1.74.1-0.20260628215305-6bbc28cf02dc-root.io.4v1.74.1-0.20260628215305-6bbc28cf02dc-root.io.5
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0
From an advisory covering 91 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260916T180043-160000.1.1
0.0.20260916T180043-160000.1.1
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0
From an advisory covering 91 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260916T180043-160000.1.1
0.0.20260916T180043-160000.1.1
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 91 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260916T180043-160000.1.1
0.0.20260916T180043-160000.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
affected
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-88017 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.3) in Rclone, published September 10, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.23%, the 14th percentile. Fixed in github.com/rclone/rclone 1.75.1.

References

Show 97 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 5 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

Pages All vulnerabilities Browse Docs Sources Guide Get API key
MoveEnter Open