Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-92000

adm-zip 0.5.14 through 0.6.0 Denial of Service via Zero Declared Uncompressed Size

8.7 HighFix available

adm-zip versions 0.5.14 through 0.6.0 fail to apply zlib decompression output limits when ZIP entries declare zero uncompressed size. Attackers can craft malicious ZIP archives with highly compressible entries declaring zero size to exhaust memory and cause denial of service.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

0.68%Up 0.3 points since Sep 16, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 8.7

adm-zip 0.5.14 through 0.6.0 Denial of Service via Zero Declared Uncompressed Size

adm-zip versions 0.5.14 through 0.6.0 fail to apply zlib decompression output limits when ZIP entries declare zero uncompressed size. Attackers can craft malicious ZIP archives with highly compressible entries declaring zero size to exhaust memory and cause denial of service.

Record
CVE-2026-92000
CVSS 4.0
8.7 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness
CWE-409
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-80001 8.7

adm-zip versions 0.5.14 through 0.6.0 fail to apply zlib decompression output limits when ZIP entries declare zero uncompressed size. Attackers can craft malicious ZIP archives with highly compressible entries declaring zero size to exhaust memory and cause denial of service.

Record
EUVD-2026-80001
CVSS 4.0
8.7 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-c6fg-446q-cg94 5.3

adm-zip: getDataAsync() bypasses the maxOutputLength size guard enforced by the synchronous getData() path

Summary

adm-zip enforces a maxOutputLength guard against decompression bombs on its synchronous getData() path, but the equivalent asynchronous getDataAsync() path does not enforce it — it accumulates and returns the entire decompressed output regardless of the entry's declared size. An application that checks an entry's declared size before deciding to process it, then reads the entry via getDataAsync() (a completely ordinary, often-recommended choice for I/O in Node.js), gets none of the protection it believes it has.

Details

  • methods/inflater.js:3-10 passes {maxOutputLength: expectedLength} to inflateRawSync, which Node enforces.
  • methods/inflater.js:12-31 passes the same option to createInflateRaw but never enforces it on the streaming path — it just accumulates every chunk and allocates a final Buffer of whatever size resulted.

PoC

const AdmZip = require('adm-zip');
const zip = new AdmZip();
zip.addFile('p', Buffer.alloc(64 * 1024 * 1024, 0x41)); // 64 MiB
const raw = Buffer.from(zip.toBuffer());
// patch the local + central declared uncompressed size to 1 byte
raw.writeUInt32LE(1, localHeaderSizeOffset);
raw.writeUInt32LE(1, centralHeaderSizeOffset);
const entry = new AdmZip(raw).getEntry('p');

entry.getData();
// throws: ERR_BUFFER_TOO_LARGE: Cannot create a Buffer larger than 1 bytes

entry.getDataAsync((data, error) => { ... });
// returns the full 67,108,864-byte buffer, error is undefined

Impact

An application that validates a declared size before reading an entry, then uses the async API, gets no protection against a high-ratio DEFLATE payload. Repeated or larger requests could contribute to memory exhaustion.

Record
GHSA-c6fg-446q-cg94
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Weakness
CWE-400, CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-ffxc-vw9f-x2cp 8.7

adm-zip versions 0.5.14 through 0.6.0 fail to apply zlib decompression output limits when ZIP...

adm-zip versions 0.5.14 through 0.6.0 fail to apply zlib decompression output limits when ZIP entries declare zero uncompressed size. Attackers can craft malicious ZIP archives with highly compressible entries declaring zero size to exhaust memory and cause denial of service.

Record
GHSA-ffxc-vw9f-x2cp
CVSS 4.0
8.7 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness
CWE-409
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-rcw4-f5rp-g42v 7.5

adm-zip: Decompression-bomb protection (fix for CVE-2026-39244) can be bypassed by declaring uncompressed size as 0

Affected package: adm-zip (npm) Affected version: 0.6.0

Summary

The fix shipped for CVE-2026-39244 (methods/inflater.js) caps zlib's decompression output via maxOutputLength: expectedLength, where expectedLength is read directly from the ZIP entry's attacker-controlled "uncompressed size" header field (CENLEN/LOCLEN). This cap is only applied when expectedLength > 0:

const option = version >= 15 && expectedLength > 0 ? { maxOutputLength: expectedLength } : {};
return zlib.inflateRawSync(inbuf, option);

If an attacker sets the declared uncompressed-size field to exactly 0, this condition is false, option becomes {}, and no output cap is passed to zlib at all. Node then falls back to zlib's own internal default limit (several GB), so a small, highly-compressible payload can still be decompressed to a very large size in memory -- the same class of resource-exhaustion issue the original CVE addressed, just triggered differently.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Build a ZIP archive containing one DEFLATE-compressed entry whose real content is highly redundant (e.g. several MB of a repeated byte, achieving close to the ~1032:1 theoretical raw-DEFLATE compression ratio).
  2. Patch the entry's declared uncompressed-size fields (both the local file header copy and the central directory copy, 4-byte little-endian values) to 0. The compressed bytes and CRC32 are left untouched -- CRC validation still passes because CRC is computed over the real decompressed output, not the declared size.
  3. Load the archive with new AdmZip(buffer) and call .getEntries()[0].getData() (or readFile/readAsText/extractAllTo/etc. -- all share the same code path).
  4. Observe: decompression succeeds and returns the full-size buffer with no size restriction applied, whereas the same real data with an honest (but undersized) declared value correctly throws Cannot create a Buffer larger than N bytes.

Proof of Concept

Attached script demonstrates a controlled A/B comparison using the identical real payload in both cases -- only the declared-size header field differs:

  • Control (declared size = 1024 bytes, deliberately smaller than the true 4MB output): correctly throws, proving the cap mechanism works when expectedLength > 0.
  • Bypass (declared size = 0, identical real payload): succeeds and returns the full 4,194,304-byte buffer with zero restriction.

Verified reproducible across 3 independent runs.

Impact

Any application that calls adm-zip's read/extract methods on an untrusted ZIP file (upload handlers, CI artifact extraction, email attachment scanning, etc.) can be made to allocate an amount of memory bounded only by zlib's own internal default rather than any limit the application or adm-zip intends -- a small (tens-of-MB) upload can trigger multi-GB memory consumption, risking process crash/OOM.

Suggested Fix

Apply maxOutputLength unconditionally (e.g. defaulting to a sane absolute ceiling, or always passing the declared size regardless of whether it's 0), and/or add an independent compression-ratio check that doesn't rely solely on the attacker-supplied size field.

Record
GHSA-rcw4-f5rp-g42v
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness
CWE-409
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 8.7

adm-zip versions 0.5.14 through 0.6.0 fail to apply zlib decompression output limits when ZIP entries declare zero uncompressed size. Attackers can craft malicious ZIP archives with highly compressible entries declaring zero size to exhaust memory and cause denial of service.

Record
CVE-2026-92000
CVSS 4.0
8.7 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness
CWE-409
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 11 moreShow less
OSV 8.7

adm-zip 0.5.14 through 0.6.0 Denial of Service via Zero Declared Uncompressed Size

adm-zip versions 0.5.14 through 0.6.0 fail to apply zlib decompression output limits when ZIP entries declare zero uncompressed size. Attackers can craft malicious ZIP archives with highly compressible entries declaring zero size to exhaust memory and cause denial of service.

Record
CVE-2026-92000
CVSS 4.0
8.7 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Weakness
CWE-409
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-c6fg-446q-cg94 5.3

adm-zip: getDataAsync() bypasses the maxOutputLength size guard enforced by the synchronous getData() path

Summary

adm-zip enforces a maxOutputLength guard against decompression bombs on its synchronous getData() path, but the equivalent asynchronous getDataAsync() path does not enforce it — it accumulates and returns the entire decompressed output regardless of the entry's declared size. An application that checks an entry's declared size before deciding to process it, then reads the entry via getDataAsync() (a completely ordinary, often-recommended choice for I/O in Node.js), gets none of the protection it believes it has.

Details

  • methods/inflater.js:3-10 passes {maxOutputLength: expectedLength} to inflateRawSync, which Node enforces.
  • methods/inflater.js:12-31 passes the same option to createInflateRaw but never enforces it on the streaming path — it just accumulates every chunk and allocates a final Buffer of whatever size resulted.

PoC

const AdmZip = require('adm-zip');
const zip = new AdmZip();
zip.addFile('p', Buffer.alloc(64 * 1024 * 1024, 0x41)); // 64 MiB
const raw = Buffer.from(zip.toBuffer());
// patch the local + central declared uncompressed size to 1 byte
raw.writeUInt32LE(1, localHeaderSizeOffset);
raw.writeUInt32LE(1, centralHeaderSizeOffset);
const entry = new AdmZip(raw).getEntry('p');

entry.getData();
// throws: ERR_BUFFER_TOO_LARGE: Cannot create a Buffer larger than 1 bytes

entry.getDataAsync((data, error) => { ... });
// returns the full 67,108,864-byte buffer, error is undefined

Impact

An application that validates a declared size before reading an entry, then uses the async API, gets no protection against a high-ratio DEFLATE payload. Repeated or larger requests could contribute to memory exhaustion.

Record
GHSA-c6fg-446q-cg94
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Weakness
CWE-400, CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-rcw4-f5rp-g42v 7.5

adm-zip: Decompression-bomb protection (fix for CVE-2026-39244) can be bypassed by declaring uncompressed size as 0

Affected package: adm-zip (npm) Affected version: 0.6.0

Summary

The fix shipped for CVE-2026-39244 (methods/inflater.js) caps zlib's decompression output via maxOutputLength: expectedLength, where expectedLength is read directly from the ZIP entry's attacker-controlled "uncompressed size" header field (CENLEN/LOCLEN). This cap is only applied when expectedLength > 0:

const option = version >= 15 && expectedLength > 0 ? { maxOutputLength: expectedLength } : {};
return zlib.inflateRawSync(inbuf, option);

If an attacker sets the declared uncompressed-size field to exactly 0, this condition is false, option becomes {}, and no output cap is passed to zlib at all. Node then falls back to zlib's own internal default limit (several GB), so a small, highly-compressible payload can still be decompressed to a very large size in memory -- the same class of resource-exhaustion issue the original CVE addressed, just triggered differently.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Build a ZIP archive containing one DEFLATE-compressed entry whose real content is highly redundant (e.g. several MB of a repeated byte, achieving close to the ~1032:1 theoretical raw-DEFLATE compression ratio).
  2. Patch the entry's declared uncompressed-size fields (both the local file header copy and the central directory copy, 4-byte little-endian values) to 0. The compressed bytes and CRC32 are left untouched -- CRC validation still passes because CRC is computed over the real decompressed output, not the declared size.
  3. Load the archive with new AdmZip(buffer) and call .getEntries()[0].getData() (or readFile/readAsText/extractAllTo/etc. -- all share the same code path).
  4. Observe: decompression succeeds and returns the full-size buffer with no size restriction applied, whereas the same real data with an honest (but undersized) declared value correctly throws Cannot create a Buffer larger than N bytes.

Proof of Concept

Attached script demonstrates a controlled A/B comparison using the identical real payload in both cases -- only the declared-size header field differs:

  • Control (declared size = 1024 bytes, deliberately smaller than the true 4MB output): correctly throws, proving the cap mechanism works when expectedLength > 0.
  • Bypass (declared size = 0, identical real payload): succeeds and returns the full 4,194,304-byte buffer with zero restriction.

Verified reproducible across 3 independent runs.

Impact

Any application that calls adm-zip's read/extract methods on an untrusted ZIP file (upload handlers, CI artifact extraction, email attachment scanning, etc.) can be made to allocate an amount of memory bounded only by zlib's own internal default rather than any limit the application or adm-zip intends -- a small (tens-of-MB) upload can trigger multi-GB memory consumption, risking process crash/OOM.

Suggested Fix

Apply maxOutputLength unconditionally (e.g. defaulting to a sane absolute ceiling, or always passing the declared size regardless of whether it's 0), and/or add an independent compression-ratio check that doesn't rely solely on the attacker-supplied size field.

Record
GHSA-rcw4-f5rp-g42v
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Weakness
CWE-409
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVROOT-APP-NPM-GHSA-rcw4-f5rp-g42v 7.5

GHSA-rcw4-f5rp-g42v in adm-zip - Patched by Root

Root has patched GHSA-rcw4-f5rp-g42v in the adm-zip package for Root:npm. Multiple fixed versions available.

Record
ROOT-APP-NPM-GHSA-rcw4-f5rp-g42v
CVSS 3.1
7.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Updated
2026-11-06
OSVCLSA-2026-1790718594 No score

TuxCare security update for adm-zip (1 CVE)

TuxCare rebuilt adm-zip to address 1 CVE. Fixed in 0.5.18-tuxcare.4.

Record
CLSA-2026-1790718594
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1791979104 No score

TuxCare security update for adm-zip (2 CVEs)

TuxCare rebuilt adm-zip to address 2 CVEs. Fixed in 0.4.4-tuxcare.5.

Record
CLSA-2026-1791979104
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1791979197 No score

TuxCare security update for adm-zip (2 CVEs)

TuxCare rebuilt adm-zip to address 2 CVEs. Fixed in 0.4.7-tuxcare.4.

Record
CLSA-2026-1791979197
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1791980535 No score

TuxCare security update for adm-zip (2 CVEs)

TuxCare rebuilt adm-zip to address 2 CVEs. Fixed in 0.4.16-tuxcare.3.

Record
CLSA-2026-1791980535
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1791981819 No score

TuxCare security update for adm-zip (4 CVEs)

TuxCare rebuilt adm-zip to address 4 CVEs. Fixed in 0.5.10-tuxcare.5.

Record
CLSA-2026-1791981819
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1791989313 No score

TuxCare security update for adm-zip (4 CVEs)

TuxCare rebuilt adm-zip to address 4 CVEs. Fixed in 0.5.12-tuxcare.4.

Record
CLSA-2026-1791989313
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1793986304 No score

TuxCare security update for adm-zip (2 CVEs)

TuxCare rebuilt adm-zip to address 2 CVEs. Fixed in 0.5.17-tuxcare.5.

Record
CLSA-2026-1793986304
Updated
2026-11-07

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
adm-zip
npm
through 0.6.0
0.6.1
adm-zip
TuxCare:npm
0.5.18-tuxcare.0 up to 0.5.18-tuxcare.4, plus listed versions
0.5.180.5.18-tuxcare.10.5.18-tuxcare.20.5.18-tuxcare.3
0.5.18-tuxcare.4
adm-zip
TuxCare:npm
0.4.4-tuxcare.0 up to 0.4.4-tuxcare.5, plus listed versions
0.4.40.4.4-tuxcare.10.4.4-tuxcare.20.4.4-tuxcare.30.4.4-tuxcare.4
0.4.4-tuxcare.5
adm-zip
TuxCare:npm
0.4.7-tuxcare.0 up to 0.4.7-tuxcare.4, plus listed versions
0.4.70.4.7-tuxcare.10.4.7-tuxcare.20.4.7-tuxcare.3
0.4.7-tuxcare.4
adm-zip
TuxCare:npm
0.4.16-tuxcare.0 up to 0.4.16-tuxcare.3, plus listed versions
0.4.160.4.16-tuxcare.10.4.16-tuxcare.2
0.4.16-tuxcare.3
adm-zip
TuxCare:npm
From an advisory covering 2 CVEs
0.5.10-tuxcare.0 up to 0.5.10-tuxcare.5, plus listed versions
0.5.100.5.10-tuxcare.10.5.10-tuxcare.20.5.10-tuxcare.30.5.10-tuxcare.4
0.5.10-tuxcare.5
adm-zip
TuxCare:npm
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
0.5.12-tuxcare.0 up to 0.5.12-tuxcare.4, plus listed versions
0.5.120.5.12-tuxcare.10.5.12-tuxcare.20.5.12-tuxcare.3
0.5.12-tuxcare.4
adm-zip
TuxCare:npm
From an advisory covering 2 CVEs
0.5.17-tuxcare.0 up to 0.5.17-tuxcare.5, plus listed versions
0.5.170.5.17-tuxcare.10.5.17-tuxcare.20.5.17-tuxcare.30.5.17-tuxcare.4
0.5.17-tuxcare.5
adm-zip
npm
before 0.6.1
0.6.1
adm-zip
Root:npm
before 0.6.0-aikido.2
0.6.0-aikido.20.6.0-aikido.30.5.10-aikido.40.5.10-aikido.50.5.9-aikido.20.5.18-aikido.30.5.9-aikido.3
@rootio/adm-zip
Root:npm
before 0.6.0-root.io.2
0.6.0-root.io.20.6.0-root.io.30.5.10-root.io.40.5.10-root.io.50.5.9-root.io.20.5.18-root.io.30.5.9-root.io.3

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, aliases, cwes, references
affected, aliasesOSV
affected, factsOSV
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-92000 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.7) in Cthackers Adm-zip, published September 15, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.68%, the 52nd percentile. Fixed in adm-zip 0.6.1.

References

Show 8 moreShow less
MoveEnter Open