Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-92958

vm2 before 3.11.7 Denylist Bypass via fs/promises

8.4 HighFix available

vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

Exploit likelihood

0.38%Up 0.1 points since Sep 18, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 8.4

vm2 before 3.11.7 Denylist Bypass via fs/promises

vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.

Record
CVE-2026-92958
CVSS 4.0
8.4 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L
CVSS 3.1
8.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L
Weakness
CWE-269
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-81607 8.4

vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.

Record
EUVD-2026-81607
CVSS 4.0
8.4 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh 8.5

vm2: NodeVM builtin denylist bypass via fs/promises despite -fs, allowing host filesystem writes

Summary

NodeVM's builtin wildcard policy can allow sandboxed code to access fs/promises even when the embedder denies fs.

With the following configuration:

require: {
  builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
}

require('fs') and require('child_process') are blocked, but require('fs/promises') and require('node:fs/promises') are still available. This allows sandboxed code to create and write files on the host filesystem through the promise-based filesystem API.

Affected Mode

NodeVM.

Affected Configuration

new NodeVM({
  require: {
    builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
  }
});

This affects configurations where users rely on negative builtin entries such as -fs to deny filesystem access while using the '*' builtin wildcard.

Affected Files / Functions

  • lib/builtin.js
    • DANGEROUS_BUILTINS
    • BUILTIN_MODULES
    • makeBuiltinsFromLegacyOptions
    • addDefaultBuiltin
  • lib/resolver.js
    • Resolver.resolve
    • Resolver.loadBuiltinModule
  • lib/setup-node-sandbox.js
    • requireImpl

Root Cause

lib/builtin.js builds BUILTIN_MODULES from Node's builtin module list and filters dangerous/default-denied modules. In wildcard mode, negative entries are checked by exact name:

if (builtins.indexOf(`-${name}`) === -1) {
  addDefaultBuiltin(res, name, hostRequire);
}

This means -fs removes only the exact builtin named fs. It does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises.

There is also inconsistent node: prefix handling. require('node:fs/promises') resolves through the same builtin capability, but a negative entry such as -node:fs/promises does not block require('fs/promises').

Security Boundary Crossed

Sandboxed code can perform host filesystem writes even though the embedder denied fs.

Impact

Confirmed impact:

  • Host file creation
  • Host file write

The proof uses fs/promises.writeFile() to create a harmless temporary file containing a marker string.

Additional reachable APIs on fs/promises include filesystem operations such as cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, and others. These were not used destructively in the proof.

Safe Local Reproduction

Tested on Node.js v24.14.0.

This proof does not execute OS commands and does not use destructive filesystem operations. It creates a temporary proof file, verifies the marker, then removes the file.

'use strict';

const fs = require('fs');
const os = require('os');
const path = require('path');
const { NodeVM } = require('./');

const proofPath = path.join(os.tmpdir(), `vm2-fs-promises-proof-${process.pid}.txt`);
const marker = `vm2-fs-promises-marker-${process.pid}`;

try {
  fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
} catch (_) {}

(async () => {
  const vm = new NodeVM({
    require: {
      builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
    }
  });

  const result = await vm.run(`
    module.exports = (async () => {
      const r = {};

      try {
        require('fs');
        r.fsLoaded = true;
      } catch (e) {
        r.fsBlocked = true;
        r.fsError = e && e.code;
      }

      try {
        require('child_process');
        r.childProcessLoaded = true;
      } catch (e) {
        r.childProcessBlocked = true;
        r.childProcessError = e && e.code;
      }

      const fsp = require('fs/promises');
      r.fsPromisesLoaded = true;
      r.fsPromisesKeys = Object.keys(fsp).slice(0, 12).sort();

      await fsp.writeFile(${JSON.stringify(proofPath)}, ${JSON.stringify(marker)}, 'utf8');
      r.wrote = true;

      return r;
    })();
  `);

  const exists = fs.existsSync(proofPath);
  const content = exists ? fs.readFileSync(proofPath, 'utf8') : null;

  console.log(JSON.stringify({
    result,
    hostFileExists: exists,
    hostFileContent: content
  }, null, 2));

  try {
    fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
  } catch (_) {}
})().catch(error => {
  try {
    fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
  } catch (_) {}
  console.error(error);
 …
Record
GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh
CVSS 3.1
8.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L
Weakness
CWE-269, CWE-284
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-7c3p-84r8-h79q 8.4

Duplicate Advisory: vm2: NodeVM builtin denylist bypass via fs/promises despite -fs, allowing host filesystem writes

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.

Record
GHSA-7c3p-84r8-h79q
CVSS 4.0
8.4 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
8.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L
Weakness
CWE-269
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 8.4

vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.

Record
CVE-2026-92958
CVSS 4.0
8.4 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
8.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L
Weakness
CWE-269
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 8.4

vm2 before 3.11.7 Denylist Bypass via fs/promises

vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.

Record
CVE-2026-92958
CVSS 4.0
8.4 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L
Weakness
CWE-269
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 5 moreShow less
OSVGHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh 8.5

vm2: NodeVM builtin denylist bypass via fs/promises despite -fs, allowing host filesystem writes

Summary

NodeVM's builtin wildcard policy can allow sandboxed code to access fs/promises even when the embedder denies fs.

With the following configuration:

require: {
  builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
}

require('fs') and require('child_process') are blocked, but require('fs/promises') and require('node:fs/promises') are still available. This allows sandboxed code to create and write files on the host filesystem through the promise-based filesystem API.

Affected Mode

NodeVM.

Affected Configuration

new NodeVM({
  require: {
    builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
  }
});

This affects configurations where users rely on negative builtin entries such as -fs to deny filesystem access while using the '*' builtin wildcard.

Affected Files / Functions

  • lib/builtin.js
    • DANGEROUS_BUILTINS
    • BUILTIN_MODULES
    • makeBuiltinsFromLegacyOptions
    • addDefaultBuiltin
  • lib/resolver.js
    • Resolver.resolve
    • Resolver.loadBuiltinModule
  • lib/setup-node-sandbox.js
    • requireImpl

Root Cause

lib/builtin.js builds BUILTIN_MODULES from Node's builtin module list and filters dangerous/default-denied modules. In wildcard mode, negative entries are checked by exact name:

if (builtins.indexOf(`-${name}`) === -1) {
  addDefaultBuiltin(res, name, hostRequire);
}

This means -fs removes only the exact builtin named fs. It does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises.

There is also inconsistent node: prefix handling. require('node:fs/promises') resolves through the same builtin capability, but a negative entry such as -node:fs/promises does not block require('fs/promises').

Security Boundary Crossed

Sandboxed code can perform host filesystem writes even though the embedder denied fs.

Impact

Confirmed impact:

  • Host file creation
  • Host file write

The proof uses fs/promises.writeFile() to create a harmless temporary file containing a marker string.

Additional reachable APIs on fs/promises include filesystem operations such as cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, and others. These were not used destructively in the proof.

Safe Local Reproduction

Tested on Node.js v24.14.0.

This proof does not execute OS commands and does not use destructive filesystem operations. It creates a temporary proof file, verifies the marker, then removes the file.

'use strict';

const fs = require('fs');
const os = require('os');
const path = require('path');
const { NodeVM } = require('./');

const proofPath = path.join(os.tmpdir(), `vm2-fs-promises-proof-${process.pid}.txt`);
const marker = `vm2-fs-promises-marker-${process.pid}`;

try {
  fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
} catch (_) {}

(async () => {
  const vm = new NodeVM({
    require: {
      builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process']
    }
  });

  const result = await vm.run(`
    module.exports = (async () => {
      const r = {};

      try {
        require('fs');
        r.fsLoaded = true;
      } catch (e) {
        r.fsBlocked = true;
        r.fsError = e && e.code;
      }

      try {
        require('child_process');
        r.childProcessLoaded = true;
      } catch (e) {
        r.childProcessBlocked = true;
        r.childProcessError = e && e.code;
      }

      const fsp = require('fs/promises');
      r.fsPromisesLoaded = true;
      r.fsPromisesKeys = Object.keys(fsp).slice(0, 12).sort();

      await fsp.writeFile(${JSON.stringify(proofPath)}, ${JSON.stringify(marker)}, 'utf8');
      r.wrote = true;

      return r;
    })();
  `);

  const exists = fs.existsSync(proofPath);
  const content = exists ? fs.readFileSync(proofPath, 'utf8') : null;

  console.log(JSON.stringify({
    result,
    hostFileExists: exists,
    hostFileContent: content
  }, null, 2));

  try {
    fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
  } catch (_) {}
})().catch(error => {
  try {
    fs.unlinkSync(proofPath);
  } catch (_) {}
  console.error(error);
 …
Record
GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh
CVSS 3.1
8.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L
Weakness
CWE-269, CWE-284
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-7c3p-84r8-h79q 8.4

Duplicate Advisory: vm2: NodeVM builtin denylist bypass via fs/promises despite -fs, allowing host filesystem writes

Duplicate Advisory

This advisory has been withdrawn because it is a duplicate of GHSA-6rh5-qq4q-97xh. This link is maintained to preserve external references.

Original Description

vm2 through 3.11.6 contains a builtin-module denylist bypass in NodeVM. When the embedder uses the builtin wildcard together with negative entries (e.g. require: { builtin: ['*', '-fs', '-child_process'] }), negative entries are matched by exact module name in lib/builtin.js, so -fs removes only the builtin named fs and does not remove builtin subpaths such as fs/promises. Sandboxed code can therefore call require('fs/promises') or require('node:fs/promises') and reach the promise-based filesystem API despite fs being denied; node: prefix handling is likewise inconsistent (a -node:fs/promises entry does not block require('fs/promises')). Host file creation and writing were confirmed via fsp.writeFile(), and other fs/promises operations (cp, mkdir, rename, rm, rmdir, truncate, read operations, etc.) are also reachable. This issue is fixed in vm2 3.11.7.

Record
GHSA-7c3p-84r8-h79q
CVSS 4.0
8.4 HighCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
8.5 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:L
Weakness
CWE-269
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1790888247 No score

TuxCare security update for vm2 (15 CVEs)

TuxCare rebuilt vm2 to address 15 CVEs. Fixed in 3.11.5-tuxcare.3.

Record
CLSA-2026-1790888247
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1790940570 No score

TuxCare security update for vm2 (1 CVE)

TuxCare rebuilt vm2 to address 1 CVE. Fixed in 3.10.0-tuxcare.3.

Record
CLSA-2026-1790940570
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVROOT-APP-NPM-CVE-2026-92958 No score

CVE-2026-92958 in vm2 - Patched by Root

Root has patched CVE-2026-92958 in the vm2 package for Root:npm. Multiple fixed versions available.

Record
ROOT-APP-NPM-CVE-2026-92958
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
vm2
npm
through 3.11.6
3.11.7
vm2
TuxCare:npm
From an advisory covering 13 CVEs
3.11.5-tuxcare.0 up to 3.11.5-tuxcare.3, plus listed versions
3.11.53.11.5-tuxcare.13.11.5-tuxcare.2
3.11.5-tuxcare.3
vm2
TuxCare:npm
3.10.0-tuxcare.0 up to 3.10.0-tuxcare.3, plus listed versions
3.10.03.10.0-tuxcare.13.10.0-tuxcare.2
3.10.0-tuxcare.3
vm2
npm
before 3.11.7
3.11.7
vm2
Root:npm
before 3.11.6-aikido.1
3.11.6-aikido.1
@rootio/vm2
Root:npm
before 3.11.6-root.io.1
3.11.6-root.io.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
affected
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-92958 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.4) in Patriksimek Vm2, published September 17, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.38%, the 32nd percentile. Fixed in vm2 3.11.7.

References

This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open