Every CVESearch/Get API key

GHSA-56f2-hvwg-5743

OpenClaw affected by SSRF in Image Tool Remote Fetch

7.6 HighFix available

Summary

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Image tool allowed attackers to force OpenClaw to make HTTP requests to arbitrary internal or restricted network targets.

Affected Versions

  • npm: openclaw <= 2026.2.1

Patched Versions

  • npm: openclaw 2026.2.2 and later

Fix Commits

  • 81c68f582d4a9a20d9cca9f367d2da9edc5a65ae (guard remote media fetches with SSRF checks)
  • 9bd64c8a1f91dda602afc1d5246a2ff2be164647 (expand SSRF guard coverage)

Details

The Image tool accepts file paths, file:// URLs, data: URLs, and http(s) URLs. In vulnerable versions, http(s) URLs were fetched without SSRF protections, enabling requests to localhost, RFC1918, link-local, and cloud metadata targets.

This was fixed by routing remote media fetching through the SSRF guard (private/internal IP + hostname blocking, redirect hardening, DNS pinning).

Exploitability Notes

  • Requires attacker-controlled invocation of the Image tool (direct tool access, or a gateway/channel surface that forwards untrusted image arguments into tool calls).
  • The image tool expects the fetched content to be an image. Many high-value SSRF targets return text/JSON (for example cloud metadata endpoints), which will typically fail media-type validation. In practice, the most direct confidentiality impact comes from internal endpoints that actually return images (screenshots/renderers, camera snapshots, chart exports, etc.).
  • Remote fetches are GET-only with no custom headers. Some metadata services require special headers or session tokens (for example GCP Metadata-Flavor, AWS IMDSv2 token), which can further reduce the likelihood of direct credential theft in some environments.
  • Despite the above constraints, SSRF remains a powerful primitive: it can enable internal network probing and access to unauthenticated/internal HTTP endpoints, and can chain with other weaknesses if present.

Thanks @p80n-sec for reporting.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
Low

What each source reports

GitHub Advisories Score used7.6

OpenClaw affected by SSRF in Image Tool Remote Fetch

Summary

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Image tool allowed attackers to force OpenClaw to make HTTP requests to arbitrary internal or restricted network targets.

Affected Versions

  • npm: openclaw <= 2026.2.1

Patched Versions

  • npm: openclaw 2026.2.2 and later

Fix Commits

  • 81c68f582d4a9a20d9cca9f367d2da9edc5a65ae (guard remote media fetches with SSRF checks)
  • 9bd64c8a1f91dda602afc1d5246a2ff2be164647 (expand SSRF guard coverage)

Details

The Image tool accepts file paths, file:// URLs, data: URLs, and http(s) URLs. In vulnerable versions, http(s) URLs were fetched without SSRF protections, enabling requests to localhost, RFC1918, link-local, and cloud metadata targets.

This was fixed by routing remote media fetching through the SSRF guard (private/internal IP + hostname blocking, redirect hardening, DNS pinning).

Exploitability Notes

  • Requires attacker-controlled invocation of the Image tool (direct tool access, or a gateway/channel surface that forwards untrusted image arguments into tool calls).
  • The image tool expects the fetched content to be an image. Many high-value SSRF targets return text/JSON (for example cloud metadata endpoints), which will typically fail media-type validation. In practice, the most direct confidentiality impact comes from internal endpoints that actually return images (screenshots/renderers, camera snapshots, chart exports, etc.).
  • Remote fetches are GET-only with no custom headers. Some metadata services require special headers or session tokens (for example GCP Metadata-Flavor, AWS IMDSv2 token), which can further reduce the likelihood of direct credential theft in some environments.
  • Despite the above constraints, SSRF remains a powerful primitive: it can enable internal network probing and access to unauthenticated/internal HTTP endpoints, and can chain with other weaknesses if present.

Thanks @p80n-sec for reporting.

Record
GHSA-56f2-hvwg-5743
CVSS 3.1
7.6 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV7.6

OpenClaw affected by SSRF in Image Tool Remote Fetch

Summary

A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Image tool allowed attackers to force OpenClaw to make HTTP requests to arbitrary internal or restricted network targets.

Affected Versions

  • npm: openclaw <= 2026.2.1

Patched Versions

  • npm: openclaw 2026.2.2 and later

Fix Commits

  • 81c68f582d4a9a20d9cca9f367d2da9edc5a65ae (guard remote media fetches with SSRF checks)
  • 9bd64c8a1f91dda602afc1d5246a2ff2be164647 (expand SSRF guard coverage)

Details

The Image tool accepts file paths, file:// URLs, data: URLs, and http(s) URLs. In vulnerable versions, http(s) URLs were fetched without SSRF protections, enabling requests to localhost, RFC1918, link-local, and cloud metadata targets.

This was fixed by routing remote media fetching through the SSRF guard (private/internal IP + hostname blocking, redirect hardening, DNS pinning).

Exploitability Notes

  • Requires attacker-controlled invocation of the Image tool (direct tool access, or a gateway/channel surface that forwards untrusted image arguments into tool calls).
  • The image tool expects the fetched content to be an image. Many high-value SSRF targets return text/JSON (for example cloud metadata endpoints), which will typically fail media-type validation. In practice, the most direct confidentiality impact comes from internal endpoints that actually return images (screenshots/renderers, camera snapshots, chart exports, etc.).
  • Remote fetches are GET-only with no custom headers. Some metadata services require special headers or session tokens (for example GCP Metadata-Flavor, AWS IMDSv2 token), which can further reduce the likelihood of direct credential theft in some environments.
  • Despite the above constraints, SSRF remains a powerful primitive: it can enable internal network probing and access to unauthenticated/internal HTTP endpoints, and can chain with other weaknesses if present.

Thanks @p80n-sec for reporting.

Record
GHSA-56f2-hvwg-5743
CVSS 3.1
7.6 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Weakness
CWE-918
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
openclaw
npm
before 2026.2.2
2026.2.2

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedGitHub Advisories, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

GHSA-56f2-hvwg-5743 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.6) in openclaw, published February 17, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. Fixed in openclaw 2026.2.2.

References

MoveEnter Open