GHSA-56f2-hvwg-5743
OpenClaw affected by SSRF in Image Tool Remote Fetch
Summary
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Image tool allowed attackers to force OpenClaw to make HTTP requests to arbitrary internal or restricted network targets.
Affected Versions
- npm: openclaw <= 2026.2.1
Patched Versions
- npm: openclaw 2026.2.2 and later
Fix Commits
- 81c68f582d4a9a20d9cca9f367d2da9edc5a65ae (guard remote media fetches with SSRF checks)
- 9bd64c8a1f91dda602afc1d5246a2ff2be164647 (expand SSRF guard coverage)
Details
The Image tool accepts file paths, file:// URLs, data: URLs, and http(s) URLs. In vulnerable versions, http(s) URLs were fetched without SSRF protections, enabling requests to localhost, RFC1918, link-local, and cloud metadata targets.
This was fixed by routing remote media fetching through the SSRF guard (private/internal IP + hostname blocking, redirect hardening, DNS pinning).
Exploitability Notes
- Requires attacker-controlled invocation of the Image tool (direct tool access, or a gateway/channel surface that forwards untrusted
imagearguments into tool calls). - The image tool expects the fetched content to be an image. Many high-value SSRF targets return text/JSON (for example cloud metadata endpoints), which will typically fail media-type validation. In practice, the most direct confidentiality impact comes from internal endpoints that actually return images (screenshots/renderers, camera snapshots, chart exports, etc.).
- Remote fetches are GET-only with no custom headers. Some metadata services require special headers or session tokens (for example GCP
Metadata-Flavor, AWS IMDSv2 token), which can further reduce the likelihood of direct credential theft in some environments. - Despite the above constraints, SSRF remains a powerful primitive: it can enable internal network probing and access to unauthenticated/internal HTTP endpoints, and can chain with other weaknesses if present.
Thanks @p80n-sec for reporting.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- Low
What each source reports
GitHub Advisories Score used 7.6
OpenClaw affected by SSRF in Image Tool Remote Fetch
Summary
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Image tool allowed attackers to force OpenClaw to make HTTP requests to arbitrary internal or restricted network targets.
Affected Versions
- npm: openclaw <= 2026.2.1
Patched Versions
- npm: openclaw 2026.2.2 and later
Fix Commits
- 81c68f582d4a9a20d9cca9f367d2da9edc5a65ae (guard remote media fetches with SSRF checks)
- 9bd64c8a1f91dda602afc1d5246a2ff2be164647 (expand SSRF guard coverage)
Details
The Image tool accepts file paths, file:// URLs, data: URLs, and http(s) URLs. In vulnerable versions, http(s) URLs were fetched without SSRF protections, enabling requests to localhost, RFC1918, link-local, and cloud metadata targets.
This was fixed by routing remote media fetching through the SSRF guard (private/internal IP + hostname blocking, redirect hardening, DNS pinning).
Exploitability Notes
- Requires attacker-controlled invocation of the Image tool (direct tool access, or a gateway/channel surface that forwards untrusted
imagearguments into tool calls). - The image tool expects the fetched content to be an image. Many high-value SSRF targets return text/JSON (for example cloud metadata endpoints), which will typically fail media-type validation. In practice, the most direct confidentiality impact comes from internal endpoints that actually return images (screenshots/renderers, camera snapshots, chart exports, etc.).
- Remote fetches are GET-only with no custom headers. Some metadata services require special headers or session tokens (for example GCP
Metadata-Flavor, AWS IMDSv2 token), which can further reduce the likelihood of direct credential theft in some environments. - Despite the above constraints, SSRF remains a powerful primitive: it can enable internal network probing and access to unauthenticated/internal HTTP endpoints, and can chain with other weaknesses if present.
Thanks @p80n-sec for reporting.
- Record
GHSA-56f2-hvwg-5743- CVSS 3.1
- 7.6 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV 7.6
OpenClaw affected by SSRF in Image Tool Remote Fetch
Summary
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Image tool allowed attackers to force OpenClaw to make HTTP requests to arbitrary internal or restricted network targets.
Affected Versions
- npm: openclaw <= 2026.2.1
Patched Versions
- npm: openclaw 2026.2.2 and later
Fix Commits
- 81c68f582d4a9a20d9cca9f367d2da9edc5a65ae (guard remote media fetches with SSRF checks)
- 9bd64c8a1f91dda602afc1d5246a2ff2be164647 (expand SSRF guard coverage)
Details
The Image tool accepts file paths, file:// URLs, data: URLs, and http(s) URLs. In vulnerable versions, http(s) URLs were fetched without SSRF protections, enabling requests to localhost, RFC1918, link-local, and cloud metadata targets.
This was fixed by routing remote media fetching through the SSRF guard (private/internal IP + hostname blocking, redirect hardening, DNS pinning).
Exploitability Notes
- Requires attacker-controlled invocation of the Image tool (direct tool access, or a gateway/channel surface that forwards untrusted
imagearguments into tool calls). - The image tool expects the fetched content to be an image. Many high-value SSRF targets return text/JSON (for example cloud metadata endpoints), which will typically fail media-type validation. In practice, the most direct confidentiality impact comes from internal endpoints that actually return images (screenshots/renderers, camera snapshots, chart exports, etc.).
- Remote fetches are GET-only with no custom headers. Some metadata services require special headers or session tokens (for example GCP
Metadata-Flavor, AWS IMDSv2 token), which can further reduce the likelihood of direct credential theft in some environments. - Despite the above constraints, SSRF remains a powerful primitive: it can enable internal network probing and access to unauthenticated/internal HTTP endpoints, and can chain with other weaknesses if present.
Thanks @p80n-sec for reporting.
- Record
GHSA-56f2-hvwg-5743- CVSS 3.1
- 7.6 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
openclawnpm | before 2026.2.2 | 2026.2.2 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | GitHub Advisories, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
GHSA-56f2-hvwg-5743 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.6) in openclaw, published February 17, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. Fixed in openclaw 2026.2.2.
References
github.com/openclaw/openclaw/security/advisories/GHSA-56f2-hvwg-5743
github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/81c68f582d4a9a20d9cca9f367d2da9edc5a65ae
github.com/openclaw/openclaw/commit/9bd64c8a1f91dda602afc1d5246a2ff2be164647
github.com/openclaw/openclaw/releases/tag/v2026.2.2
github.com/advisories/GHSA-56f2-hvwg-5743
github.com/openclaw/openclaw