Every CVESearch/Get API key

GHSA-785h-76cm-cpmf

Django TomSelect incomplete escaping of dangerous characters in widget attributes

1.7 LowFix available

Summary

User supplied values passed through to certain attributes in form widgets are not fully escaped for potentially dangerous tokens, and in some cases are rendered in browser as valid html tags.

Details

Attributes passed to the widget (such as label_field) containing <, >, and similar tokens are not fully escaped. This results in some raw values reaching the widget, and rendering in part or fully.

For example, a label of: "Test User <script>I can pass this to the label_field and it gets rendered</script>" is rendered in the choices's label visually as "Test User " with the trailing space, and what appears as an un-executed script tag following it (which is visible when viewing source).

The actual output rendered in the browser for this example is: <div role="option" data-value="63f205b6" class="item" data-ts-item="">Test User <script>I can pass this to the label_field and it gets rendered</script></div>

The script tags appears to be valid in Chrome dev tools, but doesn't appear execute code.

Impact

Although the risk may be mediated since the content within the rendered <script></script> tags does not seem to actually/immediately run, potential may exist for other ways of increasing the risk (e.g.: code injection). In addition, the widget does not display correctly for valid strings containing < or >. Valid use-cases for printing these characters include widget label fields displaying email addresses (e.g.: "User Jane <user.jane@example.com>"

Because of the relatively small number of users at this moment, our plan to yank affected releases on PyPI and GitHub, and because raw text is rendered but does not seem to be executable, I am marking the Severity Low.

Update to version 5.3.3. The only difference from 5.3.2 is the code and documentation changes to resolve this vulnerability, so the update process should not be problematic.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
None

What each source reports

GitHub Advisories Score used1.7

Django TomSelect incomplete escaping of dangerous characters in widget attributes

Summary

User supplied values passed through to certain attributes in form widgets are not fully escaped for potentially dangerous tokens, and in some cases are rendered in browser as valid html tags.

Details

Attributes passed to the widget (such as label_field) containing <, >, and similar tokens are not fully escaped. This results in some raw values reaching the widget, and rendering in part or fully.

For example, a label of: "Test User <script>I can pass this to the label_field and it gets rendered</script>" is rendered in the choices's label visually as "Test User " with the trailing space, and what appears as an un-executed script tag following it (which is visible when viewing source).

The actual output rendered in the browser for this example is: <div role="option" data-value="63f205b6" class="item" data-ts-item="">Test User <script>I can pass this to the label_field and it gets rendered</script></div>

The script tags appears to be valid in Chrome dev tools, but doesn't appear execute code.

Impact

Although the risk may be mediated since the content within the rendered <script></script> tags does not seem to actually/immediately run, potential may exist for other ways of increasing the risk (e.g.: code injection). In addition, the widget does not display correctly for valid strings containing < or >. Valid use-cases for printing these characters include widget label fields displaying email addresses (e.g.: "User Jane <user.jane@example.com>"

Because of the relatively small number of users at this moment, our plan to yank affected releases on PyPI and GitHub, and because raw text is rendered but does not seem to be executable, I am marking the Severity Low.

Update to version 5.3.3. The only difference from 5.3.2 is the code and documentation changes to resolve this vulnerability, so the update process should not be problematic.

Record
GHSA-785h-76cm-cpmf
CVSS 4.0
1.7 LowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:U
Weakness
CWE-79, CWE-116
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV1.7

Django TomSelect incomplete escaping of dangerous characters in widget attributes

Summary

User supplied values passed through to certain attributes in form widgets are not fully escaped for potentially dangerous tokens, and in some cases are rendered in browser as valid html tags.

Details

Attributes passed to the widget (such as label_field) containing <, >, and similar tokens are not fully escaped. This results in some raw values reaching the widget, and rendering in part or fully.

For example, a label of: "Test User <script>I can pass this to the label_field and it gets rendered</script>" is rendered in the choices's label visually as "Test User " with the trailing space, and what appears as an un-executed script tag following it (which is visible when viewing source).

The actual output rendered in the browser for this example is: <div role="option" data-value="63f205b6" class="item" data-ts-item="">Test User <script>I can pass this to the label_field and it gets rendered</script></div>

The script tags appears to be valid in Chrome dev tools, but doesn't appear execute code.

Impact

Although the risk may be mediated since the content within the rendered <script></script> tags does not seem to actually/immediately run, potential may exist for other ways of increasing the risk (e.g.: code injection). In addition, the widget does not display correctly for valid strings containing < or >. Valid use-cases for printing these characters include widget label fields displaying email addresses (e.g.: "User Jane <user.jane@example.com>"

Because of the relatively small number of users at this moment, our plan to yank affected releases on PyPI and GitHub, and because raw text is rendered but does not seem to be executable, I am marking the Severity Low.

Update to version 5.3.3. The only difference from 5.3.2 is the code and documentation changes to resolve this vulnerability, so the update process should not be problematic.

Record
GHSA-785h-76cm-cpmf
CVSS 4.0
1.7 LowCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:U
Weakness
CWE-116, CWE-79
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
django-tomselect
PyPI
before 2025.3.3
2025.3.3
django-tomselect
PyPI
before 2025.3.3, plus listed versions
0.4.00.4.10.4.20.4.30.4.4
Show 26 moreShow less
0.5.1b00.5.1b10.5.1b100.5.1b110.5.1b20.5.1b30.5.1b40.5.1b50.5.1b60.5.1b70.5.1b80.5.1b92024.12.12024.12.22024.12.32024.12.42024.12.52024.12.62024.12.72025.1.12025.1.22025.2.12025.2.22025.2.32025.3.12025.3.2
2025.3.3

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedGitHub Advisories, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

GHSA-785h-76cm-cpmf is a low vulnerability (CVSS 1.7) in django-tomselect, published March 26, 2025. No source lists public exploit code. Fixed in django-tomselect 2025.3.3.

References

MoveEnter Open