GHSA-7ww3-xvf5-cxwm
ciguard: Web UI is missing HTTP defence-in-depth headers
GHSA-7ww3-xvf5-cxwm is a low vulnerability (CVSS 2.1) in ciguard, published May 5, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. Fixed in ciguard 0.8.2.
- Severity
- 2.1 LowCVSS 4.0, GitHub Advisories
- Exploit chance
- UnscoredNo EPSS score yet
- Exploitation
- None knownNot on CISA’s or ENISA’s lists
- Fixed in
0.8.2ciguard +1 more
Description
Summary
ciguard's FastAPI Web UI (src/ciguard/web/app.py) does not set HTTP defence-in-depth headers. OWASP ZAP baseline scan flagged 11 alerts: missing Content-Security-Policy (Medium), X-Frame-Options (Medium), Sub-Resource-Integrity on /api/docs (Medium), COOP / COEP / CORP (Low), Permissions-Policy (Low), X-Content-Type-Options (Low).
Threat scenario
For local-only deployment (current intent): minimal — there's no untrusted browser context, no third-party hosting, no auth surface to protect.
For public hosting (PRD Slice 9 GitHub App or hosted dashboard, future): each missing header reduces a defence layer:
- Missing CSP → injected XSS would have no second-line defence (first-line Jinja autoescape remains intact)
- Missing X-Frame-Options → clickjacking against any UI button would be possible
- Missing SRI on jsdelivr-hosted Swagger UI → if jsdelivr were compromised, attacker JS would run in the docs page context
Patch
- New
SecurityHeadersMiddlewareatsrc/ciguard/web/security_headers.pyinjecting: X-Content-Type-Options nosniff, X-Frame-Options DENY, Referrer-Policy no-referrer, Permissions-Policyinterest-cohort=(), Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy same-origin, Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy same-origin, plus per-path CSP with/api/docs+/api/redoccarve-out for cdn.jsdelivr.net (Swagger UI / ReDoc dependency). - COEP intentionally NOT set: would break Swagger UI's cross-origin assets, and ciguard makes no SharedArrayBuffer use that would benefit.
- Registered via
app.add_middleware(SecurityHeadersMiddleware). - 6 regression tests in
tests/test_web.py::TestSecurityHeaders.
Discovery
Found by OWASP ZAP baseline scan during ciguard's first self-conducted pentest cycle, 2026-04-26.
CVSS Scoring
- CVSS v3.1:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N— 4.3 (Medium per v3.1 thresholds) - CVSS v4.0:
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N— first.org calc 4.3 (Low); GitHub's calc 2.1 (Low). All consistent at Low/borderline.
Verification
$ curl -sI http://127.0.0.1:8080/ | grep -E '^(X-Frame|X-Content|Referrer|Permissions|Cross-Origin|Content-Security):'
# Pre-fix: empty
# Post-fix: 7 headers present
Resources
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- Active
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Affected packages
What each source reports
GitHub Advisories Score used 2.1
ciguard: Web UI is missing HTTP defence-in-depth headers
Summary
ciguard's FastAPI Web UI (src/ciguard/web/app.py) does not set HTTP defence-in-depth headers. OWASP ZAP baseline scan flagged 11 alerts: missing Content-Security-Policy (Medium), X-Frame-Options (Medium), Sub-Resource-Integrity on /api/docs (Medium), COOP / COEP / CORP (Low), Permissions-Policy (Low), X-Content-Type-Options (Low).
Threat scenario
For local-only deployment (current intent): minimal — there's no untrusted browser context, no third-party hosting, no auth surface to protect.
For public hosting (PRD Slice 9 GitHub App or hosted dashboard, future): each missing header reduces a defence layer:
- Missing CSP → injected XSS would have no second-line defence (first-line Jinja autoescape remains intact)
- Missing X-Frame-Options → clickjacking against any UI button would be possible
- Missing SRI on jsdelivr-hosted Swagger UI → if jsdelivr were compromised, attacker JS would run in the docs page context
Patch
- New
SecurityHeadersMiddlewareatsrc/ciguard/web/security_headers.pyinjecting: X-Content-Type-Options nosniff, X-Frame-Options DENY, Referrer-Policy no-referrer, Permissions-Policyinterest-cohort=(), Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy same-origin, Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy same-origin, plus per-path CSP with/api/docs+/api/redoccarve-out for cdn.jsdelivr.net (Swagger UI / ReDoc dependency). - COEP intentionally NOT set: would break Swagger UI's cross-origin assets, and ciguard makes no SharedArrayBuffer use that would benefit.
- Registered via
app.add_middleware(SecurityHeadersMiddleware). - 6 regression tests in
tests/test_web.py::TestSecurityHeaders.
Discovery
Found by OWASP ZAP baseline scan during ciguard's first self-conducted pentest cycle, 2026-04-26.
CVSS Scoring
- CVSS v3.1:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N— 4.3 (Medium per v3.1 thresholds) - CVSS v4.0:
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N— first.org calc 4.3 (Low); GitHub's calc 2.1 (Low). All consistent at Low/borderline.
Verification
$ curl -sI http://127.0.0.1:8080/ | grep -E '^(X-Frame|X-Content|Referrer|Permissions|Cross-Origin|Content-Security):'
# Pre-fix: empty
# Post-fix: 7 headers present
Resources
- Record
GHSA-7ww3-xvf5-cxwm- CVSS 4.0
- 2.1 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - CVSS 3.1
- 4.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-693
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV 2.1
ciguard: Web UI is missing HTTP defence-in-depth headers
Summary
ciguard's FastAPI Web UI (src/ciguard/web/app.py) does not set HTTP defence-in-depth headers. OWASP ZAP baseline scan flagged 11 alerts: missing Content-Security-Policy (Medium), X-Frame-Options (Medium), Sub-Resource-Integrity on /api/docs (Medium), COOP / COEP / CORP (Low), Permissions-Policy (Low), X-Content-Type-Options (Low).
Threat scenario
For local-only deployment (current intent): minimal — there's no untrusted browser context, no third-party hosting, no auth surface to protect.
For public hosting (PRD Slice 9 GitHub App or hosted dashboard, future): each missing header reduces a defence layer:
- Missing CSP → injected XSS would have no second-line defence (first-line Jinja autoescape remains intact)
- Missing X-Frame-Options → clickjacking against any UI button would be possible
- Missing SRI on jsdelivr-hosted Swagger UI → if jsdelivr were compromised, attacker JS would run in the docs page context
Patch
- New
SecurityHeadersMiddlewareatsrc/ciguard/web/security_headers.pyinjecting: X-Content-Type-Options nosniff, X-Frame-Options DENY, Referrer-Policy no-referrer, Permissions-Policyinterest-cohort=(), Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy same-origin, Cross-Origin-Resource-Policy same-origin, plus per-path CSP with/api/docs+/api/redoccarve-out for cdn.jsdelivr.net (Swagger UI / ReDoc dependency). - COEP intentionally NOT set: would break Swagger UI's cross-origin assets, and ciguard makes no SharedArrayBuffer use that would benefit.
- Registered via
app.add_middleware(SecurityHeadersMiddleware). - 6 regression tests in
tests/test_web.py::TestSecurityHeaders.
Discovery
Found by OWASP ZAP baseline scan during ciguard's first self-conducted pentest cycle, 2026-04-26.
CVSS Scoring
- CVSS v3.1:
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N— 4.3 (Medium per v3.1 thresholds) - CVSS v4.0:
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N— first.org calc 4.3 (Low); GitHub's calc 2.1 (Low). All consistent at Low/borderline.
Verification
$ curl -sI http://127.0.0.1:8080/ | grep -E '^(X-Frame|X-Content|Referrer|Permissions|Cross-Origin|Content-Security):'
# Pre-fix: empty
# Post-fix: 7 headers present
Resources
- Record
GHSA-7ww3-xvf5-cxwm- CVSS 4.0
- 2.1 Low
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - CVSS 3.1
- 4.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-693
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | GitHub Advisories, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.