Every CVESearch/Get API key

GHSA-8c37-7qx3-4c4p

Blst has logical error in SigValidate in Go bindings

No scoreFix available

GHSA-8c37-7qx3-4c4p is a vulnerability with no CVSS score yet in github.com/supranational/blst, published August 9, 2023. No source lists public exploit code. Fixed in github.com/supranational/blst 0.3.11.

What does this mean?
Severity
UnratedNo CVSS score yet
Exploit chance
UnscoredNo EPSS score yet
Exploitation
None knownNot on CISA’s or ENISA’s lists
Fixed in
0.3.11github.com/supranational/blst

Description

Impact

Blst versions v0.3.0 through 0.3.10 failed to perform a signature group-check if the call to SigValidate in the Go bindings was complemented with a check for infinity. Formally speaking, infinity, or the identity element of the elliptic curve group, is a member of the group, and the group-check should allow it. An initial review of blst users on GitHub did not uncover any use of this function with the complementary infinity check. This optional check was added as a convenience feature because despite infinity being a legitimate member of the group, individual signatures should never be infinite (as it is equivalent to having zero for the secret key), and observing one should raise a flag.

Description

The vulnerable function is declared as SigValidate(sigInfcheck bool) bool and if called with sigInfcheck argument set to true, the group-check was omitted. The group-check is required to be performed on untrusted input, because the pairing, the corner-stone operation of the signature scheme, is defined only on points that are members of a specific cyclic group, which is a subset of all the possible points on elliptic curves in question. Submitting an untrusted point outside the group opens up the possibility of accepting an alternative signature for a chosen message.

It should be noted that the SigValidate call is not the only way to perform the group-checks. There are optional checks integrated into various other verification methods, such as Verify, AggregateVerify, etc., as well as signature aggregation methods, such as PairingAggregate*. The reason why there are multiple options is that the group-check is a relatively expensive operation, and application developers are arguably entitled the freedom to choose when it's performed.

Patches

This issue has been resolved in the v0.3.11 release and users are advised to update if their application is affected or alternatively omit the complementary infinity check.

Credits

A special thanks to Yunjong Jeong (@blukat29) for the discovery and disclosure of this vulnerability.

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/supranational/blst
Go
0.3.0 up to 0.3.11
0.3.11

What each source reports

GitHub AdvisoriesNo score

Blst has logical error in SigValidate in Go bindings

Impact

Blst versions v0.3.0 through 0.3.10 failed to perform a signature group-check if the call to SigValidate in the Go bindings was complemented with a check for infinity. Formally speaking, infinity, or the identity element of the elliptic curve group, is a member of the group, and the group-check should allow it. An initial review of blst users on GitHub did not uncover any use of this function with the complementary infinity check. This optional check was added as a convenience feature because despite infinity being a legitimate member of the group, individual signatures should never be infinite (as it is equivalent to having zero for the secret key), and observing one should raise a flag.

Description

The vulnerable function is declared as SigValidate(sigInfcheck bool) bool and if called with sigInfcheck argument set to true, the group-check was omitted. The group-check is required to be performed on untrusted input, because the pairing, the corner-stone operation of the signature scheme, is defined only on points that are members of a specific cyclic group, which is a subset of all the possible points on elliptic curves in question. Submitting an untrusted point outside the group opens up the possibility of accepting an alternative signature for a chosen message.

It should be noted that the SigValidate call is not the only way to perform the group-checks. There are optional checks integrated into various other verification methods, such as Verify, AggregateVerify, etc., as well as signature aggregation methods, such as PairingAggregate*. The reason why there are multiple options is that the group-check is a relatively expensive operation, and application developers are arguably entitled the freedom to choose when it's performed.

Patches

This issue has been resolved in the v0.3.11 release and users are advised to update if their application is affected or alternatively omit the complementary infinity check.

Credits

A special thanks to Yunjong Jeong (@blukat29) for the discovery and disclosure of this vulnerability.

Record
GHSA-8c37-7qx3-4c4p
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVNo score

Blst has logical error in SigValidate in Go bindings

Impact

Blst versions v0.3.0 through 0.3.10 failed to perform a signature group-check if the call to SigValidate in the Go bindings was complemented with a check for infinity. Formally speaking, infinity, or the identity element of the elliptic curve group, is a member of the group, and the group-check should allow it. An initial review of blst users on GitHub did not uncover any use of this function with the complementary infinity check. This optional check was added as a convenience feature because despite infinity being a legitimate member of the group, individual signatures should never be infinite (as it is equivalent to having zero for the secret key), and observing one should raise a flag.

Description

The vulnerable function is declared as SigValidate(sigInfcheck bool) bool and if called with sigInfcheck argument set to true, the group-check was omitted. The group-check is required to be performed on untrusted input, because the pairing, the corner-stone operation of the signature scheme, is defined only on points that are members of a specific cyclic group, which is a subset of all the possible points on elliptic curves in question. Submitting an untrusted point outside the group opens up the possibility of accepting an alternative signature for a chosen message.

It should be noted that the SigValidate call is not the only way to perform the group-checks. There are optional checks integrated into various other verification methods, such as Verify, AggregateVerify, etc., as well as signature aggregation methods, such as PairingAggregate*. The reason why there are multiple options is that the group-check is a relatively expensive operation, and application developers are arguably entitled the freedom to choose when it's performed.

Patches

This issue has been resolved in the v0.3.11 release and users are advised to update if their application is affected or alternatively omit the complementary infinity check.

Credits

A special thanks to Yunjong Jeong (@blukat29) for the discovery and disclosure of this vulnerability.

Record
GHSA-8c37-7qx3-4c4p
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2023-2003No score

Group signature validation bypass in github.com/supranational/blst

When complemented with a check for infinity, blst skips performing a signature group-check. Formally speaking, infinity is the identity element of the elliptic curve group and as such it is a member of the group, so the group-check should be performed. The fix performs the check even in the presence of infinity.

Record
GO-2023-2003
Updated
2026-11-02

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedGitHub Advisories, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

References

MoveEnter Open