Every CVESearch/Get API key

GHSA-98x5-vq43-vc5p

semantic-router exposed to compromised litellm wheel (CVE-2026-42208) via unbounded transitive pin

No scoreFix available

GHSA-98x5-vq43-vc5p is a vulnerability with no CVSS score yet in semantic-router, published June 26, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. Fixed in semantic-router 0.1.15.

What does this mean?
Severity
UnratedNo CVSS score yet
Exploit chance
UnscoredNo EPSS score yet
Exploitation
None knownNot on CISA’s or ENISA’s lists

Description

Impact

semantic-router versions 0.1.8 through 0.1.14 declare litellm>=1.61.3 with no upper bound. During the window in which litellm==1.82.8 was the latest release on PyPI, a fresh install of any affected semantic-router version could resolve to that compromised wheel.

The malicious litellm==1.82.8 wheel ships a litellm_init.pth file that executes on Python interpreter startup — no import required. It collects and exfiltrates:

  • Process environment variables
  • AWS / GCP / Azure credentials
  • SSH keys, Kubernetes configs, shell history
  • Database credentials and CI/CD secrets
  • Cryptocurrency wallets

Stage-two payload encrypts the collected data (AES-256 + embedded RSA pubkey) and POSTs it to https://models.litellm.cloud/.

See upstream: BerriAI/litellm#24512 and CVE-2026-42208.

Patches

Fixed in semantic-router 0.1.15, which raises the floor to litellm>=1.83.7.

Workarounds

If developers cannot upgrade immediately:

  • Pin litellm>=1.83.7,!=1.82.8 explicitly in their own project.
  • Audit site-packages/ for litellm_init.pth and delete if present.
  • Rotate any credentials reachable from environments where an affected install ran.

Credit

Upstream report and triage by the litellm maintainers — see issue #24512.

One caveat before publishing

CVE-2026-42208 specifically names 1.82.8. Pip's resolver picks "latest matching", so the real affected blast radius for semantic-router is users who ran pip install during the window that 1.82.8 was on PyPI — not everyone who ever installed 0.1.8–0.1.14. The advisory is still correct (an affected install could have pulled the bad wheel), but consider whether a Severity: Critical / Exploitability: time-bounded note would help downstream readers understand the exposure model.

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
semantic-router
PyPI
0.1.8 up to 0.1.15
0.1.15
semantic-router
PyPI
0.1.8 up to 0.1.15, plus listed versions
0.1.100.1.110.1.120.1.130.1.140.1.9
0.1.15

What each source reports

GitHub AdvisoriesNo score

semantic-router exposed to compromised litellm wheel (CVE-2026-42208) via unbounded transitive pin

Impact

semantic-router versions 0.1.8 through 0.1.14 declare litellm>=1.61.3 with no upper bound. During the window in which litellm==1.82.8 was the latest release on PyPI, a fresh install of any affected semantic-router version could resolve to that compromised wheel.

The malicious litellm==1.82.8 wheel ships a litellm_init.pth file that executes on Python interpreter startup — no import required. It collects and exfiltrates:

  • Process environment variables
  • AWS / GCP / Azure credentials
  • SSH keys, Kubernetes configs, shell history
  • Database credentials and CI/CD secrets
  • Cryptocurrency wallets

Stage-two payload encrypts the collected data (AES-256 + embedded RSA pubkey) and POSTs it to https://models.litellm.cloud/.

See upstream: BerriAI/litellm#24512 and CVE-2026-42208.

Patches

Fixed in semantic-router 0.1.15, which raises the floor to litellm>=1.83.7.

Workarounds

If developers cannot upgrade immediately:

  • Pin litellm>=1.83.7,!=1.82.8 explicitly in their own project.
  • Audit site-packages/ for litellm_init.pth and delete if present.
  • Rotate any credentials reachable from environments where an affected install ran.

Credit

Upstream report and triage by the litellm maintainers — see issue #24512.

One caveat before publishing

CVE-2026-42208 specifically names 1.82.8. Pip's resolver picks "latest matching", so the real affected blast radius for semantic-router is users who ran pip install during the window that 1.82.8 was on PyPI — not everyone who ever installed 0.1.8–0.1.14. The advisory is still correct (an affected install could have pulled the bad wheel), but consider whether a Severity: Critical / Exploitability: time-bounded note would help downstream readers understand the exposure model.

Record
GHSA-98x5-vq43-vc5p
Weakness
CWE-506
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVNo score

semantic-router exposed to compromised litellm wheel (CVE-2026-42208) via unbounded transitive pin

Impact

semantic-router versions 0.1.8 through 0.1.14 declare litellm>=1.61.3 with no upper bound. During the window in which litellm==1.82.8 was the latest release on PyPI, a fresh install of any affected semantic-router version could resolve to that compromised wheel.

The malicious litellm==1.82.8 wheel ships a litellm_init.pth file that executes on Python interpreter startup — no import required. It collects and exfiltrates:

  • Process environment variables
  • AWS / GCP / Azure credentials
  • SSH keys, Kubernetes configs, shell history
  • Database credentials and CI/CD secrets
  • Cryptocurrency wallets

Stage-two payload encrypts the collected data (AES-256 + embedded RSA pubkey) and POSTs it to https://models.litellm.cloud/.

See upstream: BerriAI/litellm#24512 and CVE-2026-42208.

Patches

Fixed in semantic-router 0.1.15, which raises the floor to litellm>=1.83.7.

Workarounds

If developers cannot upgrade immediately:

  • Pin litellm>=1.83.7,!=1.82.8 explicitly in their own project.
  • Audit site-packages/ for litellm_init.pth and delete if present.
  • Rotate any credentials reachable from environments where an affected install ran.

Credit

Upstream report and triage by the litellm maintainers — see issue #24512.

One caveat before publishing

CVE-2026-42208 specifically names 1.82.8. Pip's resolver picks "latest matching", so the real affected blast radius for semantic-router is users who ran pip install during the window that 1.82.8 was on PyPI — not everyone who ever installed 0.1.8–0.1.14. The advisory is still correct (an affected install could have pulled the bad wheel), but consider whether a Severity: Critical / Exploitability: time-bounded note would help downstream readers understand the exposure model.

Record
GHSA-98x5-vq43-vc5p
Weakness
CWE-506
Updated
2026-11-02

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedGitHub Advisories, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

References

MoveEnter Open