GHSA-h4fw-6r7f-w494
Webauthn has a User Verification Downgrade via Default-Open ClientOverridePolicy
GHSA-h4fw-6r7f-w494 is a low vulnerability (CVSS 2.1) in web-auth/webauthn-framework, published May 7, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. Fixed in web-auth/webauthn-framework 5.3.1.
- Severity
- 2.1 LowCVSS 3.1, GitHub Advisories
- Exploit chance
- UnscoredNo EPSS score yet
- Exploitation
- None knownNot on CISA’s or ENISA’s lists
- Fixed in
5.3.1web-auth/webauthn-framework
Description
Summary
In version 5.3.0 of the Symfony bundle, Webauthn\Bundle\Policy\ClientOverridePolicy defaulted to allowing all client overrides, including userVerification. A client could send {"userVerification": "discouraged"} in the assertion or attestation options request to override a server-configured userVerification: required, causing the emitted WebAuthn options to instruct the authenticator to skip user verification. The CheckUserVerification ceremony step then read the same downgraded options and skipped its check.
Affected versions
- Vulnerable: 5.3.0
- Patched: 5.3.1
5.3.0 was released on 2026-05-01 and 5.3.1 was published roughly 18 hours later, on 2026-05-02. Practical exposure window was minimal.
Note on earlier 5.x versions
Versions 5.0.0 to 5.2.x did not ship ClientOverridePolicy (introduced in 5.3.0), so the exact code path described above does not apply. However, on those versions the ProfileBasedRequestOptionsBuilder and ProfileBasedCreationOptionsBuilder already passed the client-supplied userVerification value directly to the options factory, where the profile value is only applied via ??=. The functional outcome (a client can downgrade userVerification) is the same. The recommended mitigation (see below) applies regardless of the version, and users on 5.0.x – 5.2.x are encouraged to upgrade to 5.3.1 or later.
Severity
This is a defense-in-depth issue rather than a primitive that grants authentication on its own:
- The attacker must already possess the victim's authenticator (a stolen security key, an unlocked device). Without that, the downgrade is inconsequential.
- The framework exposes the actual UV outcome on the returned authenticator data (
AuthenticatorData::isUserVerified()). Applications that gate sensitive operations on this flag — as documented — remain protected even on the vulnerable version.
Mitigation
Applications gating sensitive operations on user verification MUST re-check the UV flag on the returned authenticator data after a
successful ceremony, regardless of what was requested in the options:
if (! $authenticatorData->isUserVerified()) {
throw new AccessDeniedHttpException('User verification is required.');
}
This is the authoritative signal that user verification actually occurred. The hardened default in 5.3.1 closes the implicit profile-bypass; the application-level check remains the recommended defense in depth and is now documented explicitly in the User Verification guide.
Fix
ClientOverridePolicy::canOverride() now defaults to false instead of true. The Symfony bundle DI configuration ships user_verification overrides as disabled by default, with a default allowed_values list that excludes discouraged even when an operator opts in.
Credit
Reported by @offset.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Physical
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- Required
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
web-auth/webauthn-frameworkPackagist | 5.3.0 up to 5.3.1 | 5.3.1 |
What each source reports
GitHub Advisories Score used 2.1
Webauthn has a User Verification Downgrade via Default-Open ClientOverridePolicy
Summary
In version 5.3.0 of the Symfony bundle, Webauthn\Bundle\Policy\ClientOverridePolicy defaulted to allowing all client overrides, including userVerification. A client could send {"userVerification": "discouraged"} in the assertion or attestation options request to override a server-configured userVerification: required, causing the emitted WebAuthn options to instruct the authenticator to skip user verification. The CheckUserVerification ceremony step then read the same downgraded options and skipped its check.
Affected versions
- Vulnerable: 5.3.0
- Patched: 5.3.1
5.3.0 was released on 2026-05-01 and 5.3.1 was published roughly 18 hours later, on 2026-05-02. Practical exposure window was minimal.
Note on earlier 5.x versions
Versions 5.0.0 to 5.2.x did not ship ClientOverridePolicy (introduced in 5.3.0), so the exact code path described above does not apply. However, on those versions the ProfileBasedRequestOptionsBuilder and ProfileBasedCreationOptionsBuilder already passed the client-supplied userVerification value directly to the options factory, where the profile value is only applied via ??=. The functional outcome (a client can downgrade userVerification) is the same. The recommended mitigation (see below) applies regardless of the version, and users on 5.0.x – 5.2.x are encouraged to upgrade to 5.3.1 or later.
Severity
This is a defense-in-depth issue rather than a primitive that grants authentication on its own:
- The attacker must already possess the victim's authenticator (a stolen security key, an unlocked device). Without that, the downgrade is inconsequential.
- The framework exposes the actual UV outcome on the returned authenticator data (
AuthenticatorData::isUserVerified()). Applications that gate sensitive operations on this flag — as documented — remain protected even on the vulnerable version.
Mitigation
Applications gating sensitive operations on user verification MUST re-check the UV flag on the returned authenticator data after a
successful ceremony, regardless of what was requested in the options:
if (! $authenticatorData->isUserVerified()) {
throw new AccessDeniedHttpException('User verification is required.');
}
This is the authoritative signal that user verification actually occurred. The hardened default in 5.3.1 closes the implicit profile-bypass; the application-level check remains the recommended defense in depth and is now documented explicitly in the User Verification guide.
Fix
ClientOverridePolicy::canOverride() now defaults to false instead of true. The Symfony bundle DI configuration ships user_verification overrides as disabled by default, with a default allowed_values list that excludes discouraged even when an operator opts in.
Credit
Reported by @offset.
- Record
GHSA-h4fw-6r7f-w494- CVSS 3.1
- 2.1 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV 2.1
Webauthn has a User Verification Downgrade via Default-Open ClientOverridePolicy
Summary
In version 5.3.0 of the Symfony bundle, Webauthn\Bundle\Policy\ClientOverridePolicy defaulted to allowing all client overrides, including userVerification. A client could send {"userVerification": "discouraged"} in the assertion or attestation options request to override a server-configured userVerification: required, causing the emitted WebAuthn options to instruct the authenticator to skip user verification. The CheckUserVerification ceremony step then read the same downgraded options and skipped its check.
Affected versions
- Vulnerable: 5.3.0
- Patched: 5.3.1
5.3.0 was released on 2026-05-01 and 5.3.1 was published roughly 18 hours later, on 2026-05-02. Practical exposure window was minimal.
Note on earlier 5.x versions
Versions 5.0.0 to 5.2.x did not ship ClientOverridePolicy (introduced in 5.3.0), so the exact code path described above does not apply. However, on those versions the ProfileBasedRequestOptionsBuilder and ProfileBasedCreationOptionsBuilder already passed the client-supplied userVerification value directly to the options factory, where the profile value is only applied via ??=. The functional outcome (a client can downgrade userVerification) is the same. The recommended mitigation (see below) applies regardless of the version, and users on 5.0.x – 5.2.x are encouraged to upgrade to 5.3.1 or later.
Severity
This is a defense-in-depth issue rather than a primitive that grants authentication on its own:
- The attacker must already possess the victim's authenticator (a stolen security key, an unlocked device). Without that, the downgrade is inconsequential.
- The framework exposes the actual UV outcome on the returned authenticator data (
AuthenticatorData::isUserVerified()). Applications that gate sensitive operations on this flag — as documented — remain protected even on the vulnerable version.
Mitigation
Applications gating sensitive operations on user verification MUST re-check the UV flag on the returned authenticator data after a
successful ceremony, regardless of what was requested in the options:
if (! $authenticatorData->isUserVerified()) {
throw new AccessDeniedHttpException('User verification is required.');
}
This is the authoritative signal that user verification actually occurred. The hardened default in 5.3.1 closes the implicit profile-bypass; the application-level check remains the recommended defense in depth and is now documented explicitly in the User Verification guide.
Fix
ClientOverridePolicy::canOverride() now defaults to false instead of true. The Symfony bundle DI configuration ships user_verification overrides as disabled by default, with a default allowed_values list that excludes discouraged even when an operator opts in.
Credit
Reported by @offset.
- Record
GHSA-h4fw-6r7f-w494- CVSS 3.1
- 2.1 Low
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-863
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | GitHub Advisories, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.