Every CVESearch/Get API key

GHSA-jhjp-4c2q-xmx4

k8saudit shipped rules do not detect privileged/sensitive settings on init or ephemeral containers

4.3 MediumFix available

The k8saudit plugin's per-container fields (ka.req.pod.containers.*) and the shipped k8s_audit_rules.yaml evaluated only requestObject.spec.containers. Security-relevant settings on a pod's initContainers or ephemeralContainers were not inspected, so the shipped Create Privileged Pod rule did not fire for a privileged container placed in either list.

Impact

An actor able to create pods (the activity k8saudit is intended to audit) could run a privileged container without triggering the default Create Privileged Pod rule, by declaring it as an initContainer or ephemeralContainer instead of a regular container. Kubernetes runs such containers with the requested privileges, but the shipped rule did not see them. The same gap applied to other per-container security settings (capabilities, allowPrivilegeEscalation, runAsUser, etc.) and, for deployments using a customized image allowlist, to disallowed images placed in those lists.

This is a detection bypass of the default k8saudit ruleset, not a direct privilege escalation, and it requires the ability to create pods. The cloud-provider variants (k8saudit-eks, k8saudit-gke, k8saudit-aks, k8saudit-ovh) embed the same extraction logic and ship the same ruleset, and were affected equally.

Note: adding an ephemeral container goes through the pods/ephemeralcontainers subresource, so the EphemeralContainers Created rule still logged that event at NOTICE, but without any privileged/security evaluation.

Patches

Fixed in k8saudit 0.18.0, and in the cloud-variant releases that depend on it — k8saudit-eks 0.12.0, k8saudit-gke 0.9.0, k8saudit-aks 0.6.0, k8saudit-ovh 0.6.0 — all released on 2026-06-19.

The fix (falcosecurity/plugins#1400, merged 2026-06-18) adds dedicated ka.req.pod.initContainers.* and ka.req.pod.ephemeralContainers.* field families and updates Create Privileged Pod (via a new any_container_privileged macro) to evaluate all three container lists.

Operators upgrading should review any custom rules built on ka.req.pod.containers.* — in particular tuned Create Disallowed Pod image allowlists — and extend them to the new initContainers/ephemeralContainers image fields.

Workarounds

For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, restrict who can create pods (RBAC) and enforce Pod Security Admission (baseline/restricted) or an admission controller (Kyverno, OPA/Gatekeeper) to block privileged init/ephemeral containers at admission time, as defense-in-depth.

Credits

kanywst — discovery and fix.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
Low
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

What each source reports

GitHub Advisories Score used4.3

k8saudit shipped rules do not detect privileged/sensitive settings on init or ephemeral containers

The k8saudit plugin's per-container fields (ka.req.pod.containers.*) and the shipped k8s_audit_rules.yaml evaluated only requestObject.spec.containers. Security-relevant settings on a pod's initContainers or ephemeralContainers were not inspected, so the shipped Create Privileged Pod rule did not fire for a privileged container placed in either list.

Impact

An actor able to create pods (the activity k8saudit is intended to audit) could run a privileged container without triggering the default Create Privileged Pod rule, by declaring it as an initContainer or ephemeralContainer instead of a regular container. Kubernetes runs such containers with the requested privileges, but the shipped rule did not see them. The same gap applied to other per-container security settings (capabilities, allowPrivilegeEscalation, runAsUser, etc.) and, for deployments using a customized image allowlist, to disallowed images placed in those lists.

This is a detection bypass of the default k8saudit ruleset, not a direct privilege escalation, and it requires the ability to create pods. The cloud-provider variants (k8saudit-eks, k8saudit-gke, k8saudit-aks, k8saudit-ovh) embed the same extraction logic and ship the same ruleset, and were affected equally.

Note: adding an ephemeral container goes through the pods/ephemeralcontainers subresource, so the EphemeralContainers Created rule still logged that event at NOTICE, but without any privileged/security evaluation.

Patches

Fixed in k8saudit 0.18.0, and in the cloud-variant releases that depend on it — k8saudit-eks 0.12.0, k8saudit-gke 0.9.0, k8saudit-aks 0.6.0, k8saudit-ovh 0.6.0 — all released on 2026-06-19.

The fix (falcosecurity/plugins#1400, merged 2026-06-18) adds dedicated ka.req.pod.initContainers.* and ka.req.pod.ephemeralContainers.* field families and updates Create Privileged Pod (via a new any_container_privileged macro) to evaluate all three container lists.

Operators upgrading should review any custom rules built on ka.req.pod.containers.* — in particular tuned Create Disallowed Pod image allowlists — and extend them to the new initContainers/ephemeralContainers image fields.

Workarounds

For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, restrict who can create pods (RBAC) and enforce Pod Security Admission (baseline/restricted) or an admission controller (Kyverno, OPA/Gatekeeper) to block privileged init/ephemeral containers at admission time, as defense-in-depth.

Credits

kanywst — discovery and fix.

Record
GHSA-jhjp-4c2q-xmx4
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-693
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV4.3

k8saudit shipped rules do not detect privileged/sensitive settings on init or ephemeral containers

The k8saudit plugin's per-container fields (ka.req.pod.containers.*) and the shipped k8s_audit_rules.yaml evaluated only requestObject.spec.containers. Security-relevant settings on a pod's initContainers or ephemeralContainers were not inspected, so the shipped Create Privileged Pod rule did not fire for a privileged container placed in either list.

Impact

An actor able to create pods (the activity k8saudit is intended to audit) could run a privileged container without triggering the default Create Privileged Pod rule, by declaring it as an initContainer or ephemeralContainer instead of a regular container. Kubernetes runs such containers with the requested privileges, but the shipped rule did not see them. The same gap applied to other per-container security settings (capabilities, allowPrivilegeEscalation, runAsUser, etc.) and, for deployments using a customized image allowlist, to disallowed images placed in those lists.

This is a detection bypass of the default k8saudit ruleset, not a direct privilege escalation, and it requires the ability to create pods. The cloud-provider variants (k8saudit-eks, k8saudit-gke, k8saudit-aks, k8saudit-ovh) embed the same extraction logic and ship the same ruleset, and were affected equally.

Note: adding an ephemeral container goes through the pods/ephemeralcontainers subresource, so the EphemeralContainers Created rule still logged that event at NOTICE, but without any privileged/security evaluation.

Patches

Fixed in k8saudit 0.18.0, and in the cloud-variant releases that depend on it — k8saudit-eks 0.12.0, k8saudit-gke 0.9.0, k8saudit-aks 0.6.0, k8saudit-ovh 0.6.0 — all released on 2026-06-19.

The fix (falcosecurity/plugins#1400, merged 2026-06-18) adds dedicated ka.req.pod.initContainers.* and ka.req.pod.ephemeralContainers.* field families and updates Create Privileged Pod (via a new any_container_privileged macro) to evaluate all three container lists.

Operators upgrading should review any custom rules built on ka.req.pod.containers.* — in particular tuned Create Disallowed Pod image allowlists — and extend them to the new initContainers/ephemeralContainers image fields.

Workarounds

For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, restrict who can create pods (RBAC) and enforce Pod Security Admission (baseline/restricted) or an admission controller (Kyverno, OPA/Gatekeeper) to block privileged init/ephemeral containers at admission time, as defense-in-depth.

Credits

kanywst — discovery and fix.

Record
GHSA-jhjp-4c2q-xmx4
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-693
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-6538No score

k8saudit shipped rules do not detect privileged/sensitive settings on init or ephemeral containers in github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit

k8saudit shipped rules do not detect privileged/sensitive settings on init or ephemeral containers in github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit

Record
GO-2026-6538
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected packages

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedGitHub Advisories, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

GHSA-jhjp-4c2q-xmx4 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 4.3) in github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit, published September 21, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. Fixed in github.com/falcosecurity/plugins/plugins/k8saudit 0.18.0.

References

Show 4 moreShow less
MoveEnter Open