Every CVESearch/Get API key

GHSA-m99c-q26r-m7m7

Evmos vulnerable to unauthorized account creation with vesting module

No score

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

Using the vesting module, a malicious attacker can create a new vesting account at a given address, before a contract is created on that address.

Addresses of smart contracts deployed to the EVM are deterministic. Therefore, it would be possible for an attacker to front-run a contract creation and create a vesting account at that address. When an address has been initialized without any contract code deployed to it, it will not be possible to upload any afterwards. In the described attack, this would mean that a malicious actor could prevent smart contracts from being deployed correctly.

In order to remediate this, an alternative user flow is being implemented for the vesting module:

  • only the account receiving the vesting funds will be able to create such an account by calling the CreateClawbackVestingAccount method and defining a funder address
  • vesting and lockup periods can then be created by that funder address using FundClawbackAccount

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

What each source reports

GitHub AdvisoriesNo score

Evmos vulnerable to unauthorized account creation with vesting module

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

Using the vesting module, a malicious attacker can create a new vesting account at a given address, before a contract is created on that address.

Addresses of smart contracts deployed to the EVM are deterministic. Therefore, it would be possible for an attacker to front-run a contract creation and create a vesting account at that address. When an address has been initialized without any contract code deployed to it, it will not be possible to upload any afterwards. In the described attack, this would mean that a malicious actor could prevent smart contracts from being deployed correctly.

In order to remediate this, an alternative user flow is being implemented for the vesting module:

  • only the account receiving the vesting funds will be able to create such an account by calling the CreateClawbackVestingAccount method and defining a funder address
  • vesting and lockup periods can then be created by that funder address using FundClawbackAccount

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Record
GHSA-m99c-q26r-m7m7
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVNo score

Evmos vulnerable to unauthorized account creation with vesting module

Impact

What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

Using the vesting module, a malicious attacker can create a new vesting account at a given address, before a contract is created on that address.

Addresses of smart contracts deployed to the EVM are deterministic. Therefore, it would be possible for an attacker to front-run a contract creation and create a vesting account at that address. When an address has been initialized without any contract code deployed to it, it will not be possible to upload any afterwards. In the described attack, this would mean that a malicious actor could prevent smart contracts from being deployed correctly.

In order to remediate this, an alternative user flow is being implemented for the vesting module:

  • only the account receiving the vesting funds will be able to create such an account by calling the CreateClawbackVestingAccount method and defining a funder address
  • vesting and lockup periods can then be created by that funder address using FundClawbackAccount

Patches

Has the problem been patched? What versions should users upgrade to?

Workarounds

Is there a way for users to fix or remediate the vulnerability without upgrading?

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

Record
GHSA-m99c-q26r-m7m7
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2024-2731No score

Evmos vulnerable to unauthorized account creation with vesting module in github.com/evmos/evmos

Evmos vulnerable to unauthorized account creation with vesting module in github.com/evmos/evmos

Record
GO-2024-2731
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/evmos/evmos/v13/x/vesting
Go
through 13.0.2None known
github.com/evmos/evmos/v13
Go
through 13.0.2None known
github.com/evmos/evmos
Go
All versionsNone known
github.com/evmos/evmos/v2
Go
All versionsNone known
github.com/evmos/evmos/v3
Go
All versionsNone known
github.com/evmos/evmos/v4
Go
All versionsNone known
github.com/evmos/evmos/v5
Go
All versionsNone known
github.com/evmos/evmos/v6
Go
All versionsNone known
github.com/evmos/evmos/v7
Go
All versionsNone known
github.com/evmos/evmos/v8
Go
All versionsNone known
Show 5 moreShow less
Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/evmos/evmos/v9
Go
All versionsNone known
github.com/evmos/evmos/v10
Go
All versionsNone known
github.com/evmos/evmos/v11
Go
All versionsNone known
github.com/evmos/evmos/v12
Go
All versionsNone known
github.com/evmos/evmos/v13
Go
All versionsNone known

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedGitHub Advisories, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

GHSA-m99c-q26r-m7m7 is a vulnerability with no CVSS score yet in github.com/evmos/evmos/v13/x/vesting, published April 17, 2024. No source lists public exploit code. No source names a fixed version.

References

MoveEnter Open