Every CVESearch/Get API key

GHSA-mpcw-3j5p-p99x

Butterfly's parseJSON, getJSON functions eval malicious input, leading to remote code execution (RCE)

No scoreFix available

GHSA-mpcw-3j5p-p99x is a vulnerability with no CVSS score yet in org.openrefine.dependencies:butterfly, published October 24, 2024. No source lists public exploit code. Fixed in org.openrefine.dependencies:butterfly 1.2.6.

Severity
UnratedNo CVSS score yet
Exploit chance
UnscoredNo EPSS score yet
Exploitation
None knownNot on CISA’s or ENISA’s lists

Description

Summary

Usage of the Butterfly.prototype.parseJSON or getJSON functions on an attacker-controlled crafted input string allows the attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code on the server.

Since Butterfly JavaScript code has access to Java classes, it can run arbitrary programs.

Details

The parseJSON function (edu/mit/simile/butterfly/Butterfly.js:64) works by calling eval, an approach that goes back to the original library by Crockford, before JSON was part of the ECMAScript language. It uses a regular expression to remove strings from the input, then checks that there are no unexpected characters in the non-string remainder.

However, the regex is imperfect, as was discovered earlier by Mike Samuel; specifically, the "cleaner" can be tricked into treating part of the input as a string that the "evaluator" does not, because of a difference in interpretation regarding the the Unicode zero-width joiner character. Representing that character with a visible symbol, a malicious input looks like:

"\�\", Packages.java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec('gnome-calculator')) // "

This is understood...

  • by JSON_cleaning_RE as a single string, and because it is a string it can be collapsed to nothing, which is not problematic, so the original input proceeds to eval.
  • by the eval function, which ignores zero-width joiners entirely, as a string containing a single escaped backslash, followed by a comma, then a function call, closing parenthesis, and finally a line comment.

The function call is evaluated, and a calculator is opened.

Possible mitigations and additional defenses could include:

  • Replacing the JSON implementation with Rhino's built-in implementation.
  • Dropping all JSON-related and JSONP-related code entirely.
  • Restricting the access the JavaScript controller code has to the rest of the system by using initSafeStandardObjects instead of initStandardObjects, using setClassShutter, and so on.

PoC

Change OpenRefine core controller.js to add a call to the vulnerable getJSON function:

diff --git a/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js b/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js
index 4ceba0676..1ce0936d2 100644
--- a/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js
+++ b/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js
@@ -631,0 +632,5 @@ function process(path, request, response) {
+    if (path == "getjsontest") {
+      butterfly.getJSON(request);
+      return true;
+    }
+

Then, restart OpenRefine and submit the malicious request. For example, the following bash command (with $' quoting) should do it:

curl -H 'Content-Type: application/json;charset=utf-8' --data $'"\\\u200d\\", Packages.java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec(\'gnome-calculator\')) // "' http://localhost:3333/getjsontest

Impact

Any JavaScript controller that calls one of these functions is vulnerable to remote code execution.

OpenRefine itself seems unaffected; both OpenRefine and jQuery have their own functions also called parseJSON and getJSON, but those are unrelated.

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
org.openrefine.dependencies:butterfly
Maven
before 1.2.6
1.2.6
org.openrefine.dependencies:butterfly
Maven
before 1.2.6, plus listed versions
1.0.21.0.31.0.41.1.01.1.1
Show 6 moreShow less
1.2.01.2.11.2.21.2.31.2.41.2.5
1.2.6

What each source reports

GitHub AdvisoriesNo score

Butterfly's parseJSON, getJSON functions eval malicious input, leading to remote code execution (RCE)

Summary

Usage of the Butterfly.prototype.parseJSON or getJSON functions on an attacker-controlled crafted input string allows the attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code on the server.

Since Butterfly JavaScript code has access to Java classes, it can run arbitrary programs.

Details

The parseJSON function (edu/mit/simile/butterfly/Butterfly.js:64) works by calling eval, an approach that goes back to the original library by Crockford, before JSON was part of the ECMAScript language. It uses a regular expression to remove strings from the input, then checks that there are no unexpected characters in the non-string remainder.

However, the regex is imperfect, as was discovered earlier by Mike Samuel; specifically, the "cleaner" can be tricked into treating part of the input as a string that the "evaluator" does not, because of a difference in interpretation regarding the the Unicode zero-width joiner character. Representing that character with a visible symbol, a malicious input looks like:

"\�\", Packages.java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec('gnome-calculator')) // "

This is understood...

  • by JSON_cleaning_RE as a single string, and because it is a string it can be collapsed to nothing, which is not problematic, so the original input proceeds to eval.
  • by the eval function, which ignores zero-width joiners entirely, as a string containing a single escaped backslash, followed by a comma, then a function call, closing parenthesis, and finally a line comment.

The function call is evaluated, and a calculator is opened.

Possible mitigations and additional defenses could include:

  • Replacing the JSON implementation with Rhino's built-in implementation.
  • Dropping all JSON-related and JSONP-related code entirely.
  • Restricting the access the JavaScript controller code has to the rest of the system by using initSafeStandardObjects instead of initStandardObjects, using setClassShutter, and so on.

PoC

Change OpenRefine core controller.js to add a call to the vulnerable getJSON function:

diff --git a/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js b/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js
index 4ceba0676..1ce0936d2 100644
--- a/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js
+++ b/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js
@@ -631,0 +632,5 @@ function process(path, request, response) {
+    if (path == "getjsontest") {
+      butterfly.getJSON(request);
+      return true;
+    }
+

Then, restart OpenRefine and submit the malicious request. For example, the following bash command (with $' quoting) should do it:

curl -H 'Content-Type: application/json;charset=utf-8' --data $'"\\\u200d\\", Packages.java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec(\'gnome-calculator\')) // "' http://localhost:3333/getjsontest

Impact

Any JavaScript controller that calls one of these functions is vulnerable to remote code execution.

OpenRefine itself seems unaffected; both OpenRefine and jQuery have their own functions also called parseJSON and getJSON, but those are unrelated.

Record
GHSA-mpcw-3j5p-p99x
Weakness
CWE-95, CWE-185
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVNo score

Butterfly's parseJSON, getJSON functions eval malicious input, leading to remote code execution (RCE)

Summary

Usage of the Butterfly.prototype.parseJSON or getJSON functions on an attacker-controlled crafted input string allows the attacker to execute arbitrary JavaScript code on the server.

Since Butterfly JavaScript code has access to Java classes, it can run arbitrary programs.

Details

The parseJSON function (edu/mit/simile/butterfly/Butterfly.js:64) works by calling eval, an approach that goes back to the original library by Crockford, before JSON was part of the ECMAScript language. It uses a regular expression to remove strings from the input, then checks that there are no unexpected characters in the non-string remainder.

However, the regex is imperfect, as was discovered earlier by Mike Samuel; specifically, the "cleaner" can be tricked into treating part of the input as a string that the "evaluator" does not, because of a difference in interpretation regarding the the Unicode zero-width joiner character. Representing that character with a visible symbol, a malicious input looks like:

"\�\", Packages.java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec('gnome-calculator')) // "

This is understood...

  • by JSON_cleaning_RE as a single string, and because it is a string it can be collapsed to nothing, which is not problematic, so the original input proceeds to eval.
  • by the eval function, which ignores zero-width joiners entirely, as a string containing a single escaped backslash, followed by a comma, then a function call, closing parenthesis, and finally a line comment.

The function call is evaluated, and a calculator is opened.

Possible mitigations and additional defenses could include:

  • Replacing the JSON implementation with Rhino's built-in implementation.
  • Dropping all JSON-related and JSONP-related code entirely.
  • Restricting the access the JavaScript controller code has to the rest of the system by using initSafeStandardObjects instead of initStandardObjects, using setClassShutter, and so on.

PoC

Change OpenRefine core controller.js to add a call to the vulnerable getJSON function:

diff --git a/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js b/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js
index 4ceba0676..1ce0936d2 100644
--- a/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js
+++ b/main/webapp/modules/core/MOD-INF/controller.js
@@ -631,0 +632,5 @@ function process(path, request, response) {
+    if (path == "getjsontest") {
+      butterfly.getJSON(request);
+      return true;
+    }
+

Then, restart OpenRefine and submit the malicious request. For example, the following bash command (with $' quoting) should do it:

curl -H 'Content-Type: application/json;charset=utf-8' --data $'"\\\u200d\\", Packages.java.lang.Runtime.getRuntime().exec(\'gnome-calculator\')) // "' http://localhost:3333/getjsontest

Impact

Any JavaScript controller that calls one of these functions is vulnerable to remote code execution.

OpenRefine itself seems unaffected; both OpenRefine and jQuery have their own functions also called parseJSON and getJSON, but those are unrelated.

Record
GHSA-mpcw-3j5p-p99x
Weakness
CWE-185, CWE-95
Updated
2026-11-02

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedGitHub Advisories, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

References

MoveEnter Open