Every CVESearch/Get API key

GHSA-wvc4-j7g5-4f79

NATS TLS certificate common name validation bypass

No scoreFix available

The NATS official Rust clients are vulnerable to MitM when using TLS.

A fix for the nats crate hasn't been released yet. Since the nats crate is going to be deprecated anyway, consider switching to async-nats >= 0.29 which already fixed this vulnerability.

The common name of the server's TLS certificate is validated against the hostname provided by the server's plaintext INFO message during the initial connection setup phase. A MitM proxy can tamper with the host field's value by substituting it with the common name of a valid certificate it controls, fooling the client into accepting it.

Reproduction steps

  1. The NATS Rust client tries to establish a new connection
  2. The connection is intercepted by a MitM proxy
  3. The proxy makes a separate connection to the NATS server
  4. The NATS server replies with an INFO message
  5. The proxy reads the INFO, alters the host JSON field and passes the tampered INFO back to the client
  6. The proxy upgrades the client connection to TLS, presenting a certificate issued by a certificate authority present in the client's keychain. In the previous step the host was set to the common name of said certificate
  7. rustls accepts the certificate, having verified that the common name matches the attacker-controlled value it was given
  8. The client has been fooled by the MitM proxy into accepting the attacker-controlled certificate

What each source reports

GitHub AdvisoriesNo score

NATS TLS certificate common name validation bypass

The NATS official Rust clients are vulnerable to MitM when using TLS.

A fix for the nats crate hasn't been released yet. Since the nats crate is going to be deprecated anyway, consider switching to async-nats >= 0.29 which already fixed this vulnerability.

The common name of the server's TLS certificate is validated against the hostname provided by the server's plaintext INFO message during the initial connection setup phase. A MitM proxy can tamper with the host field's value by substituting it with the common name of a valid certificate it controls, fooling the client into accepting it.

Reproduction steps

  1. The NATS Rust client tries to establish a new connection
  2. The connection is intercepted by a MitM proxy
  3. The proxy makes a separate connection to the NATS server
  4. The NATS server replies with an INFO message
  5. The proxy reads the INFO, alters the host JSON field and passes the tampered INFO back to the client
  6. The proxy upgrades the client connection to TLS, presenting a certificate issued by a certificate authority present in the client's keychain. In the previous step the host was set to the common name of said certificate
  7. rustls accepts the certificate, having verified that the common name matches the attacker-controlled value it was given
  8. The client has been fooled by the MitM proxy into accepting the attacker-controlled certificate
Record
GHSA-wvc4-j7g5-4f79
Weakness
CWE-347
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVNo score

NATS TLS certificate common name validation bypass

The NATS official Rust clients are vulnerable to MitM when using TLS.

A fix for the nats crate hasn't been released yet. Since the nats crate is going to be deprecated anyway, consider switching to async-nats >= 0.29 which already fixed this vulnerability.

The common name of the server's TLS certificate is validated against the hostname provided by the server's plaintext INFO message during the initial connection setup phase. A MitM proxy can tamper with the host field's value by substituting it with the common name of a valid certificate it controls, fooling the client into accepting it.

Reproduction steps

  1. The NATS Rust client tries to establish a new connection
  2. The connection is intercepted by a MitM proxy
  3. The proxy makes a separate connection to the NATS server
  4. The NATS server replies with an INFO message
  5. The proxy reads the INFO, alters the host JSON field and passes the tampered INFO back to the client
  6. The proxy upgrades the client connection to TLS, presenting a certificate issued by a certificate authority present in the client's keychain. In the previous step the host was set to the common name of said certificate
  7. rustls accepts the certificate, having verified that the common name matches the attacker-controlled value it was given
  8. The client has been fooled by the MitM proxy into accepting the attacker-controlled certificate
Record
GHSA-wvc4-j7g5-4f79
Weakness
CWE-347
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVRUSTSEC-2023-0029No score

TLS certificate common name validation bypass

The NATS official Rust clients are vulnerable to MitM when using TLS.

The common name of the server's TLS certificate is validated against the hostname provided by the server's plaintext INFO message during the initial connection setup phase. A MitM proxy can tamper with the host field's value by substituting it with the common name of a valid certificate it controls, fooling the client into accepting it.

Reproduction steps

  1. The NATS Rust client tries to establish a new connection
  2. The connection is intercepted by a MitM proxy
  3. The proxy makes a separate connection to the NATS server
  4. The NATS server replies with an INFO message
  5. The proxy reads the INFO, alters the host JSON field and passes the tampered INFO back to the client
  6. The proxy upgrades the client connection to TLS, presenting a certificate issued by a certificate authority present in the client's keychain. In the previous step the host was set to the common name of said certificate
  7. rustls accepts the certificate, having verified that the common name matches the attacker-controlled value it was given
  8. The client has been fooled by the MitM proxy into accepting the attacker-controlled certificate
Record
RUSTSEC-2023-0029
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
nats
crates.io
0.9.0 to 0.24.0
0.24.1
nats
crates.io
0.9.0 up to 0.24.1
0.24.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedGitHub Advisories, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

GHSA-wvc4-j7g5-4f79 is a vulnerability with no CVSS score yet in nats, published March 24, 2023. No source lists public exploit code. Fixed in nats 0.24.1.

References

MoveEnter Open