Every CVE Search/ Get API key

RUSTSEC-2026-0199

Panic in `bcrypt::verify` on non-ASCII hash input

5.3 MediumFix available

bcrypt::verify(password, hash) and HashParts::from_str(hash) panic in str::slice_error_fail when given a 60-byte &str containing a multi-byte UTF-8 character at certain byte positions.

Impact

Any Rust code that calls bcrypt::verify (or HashParts::from_str) with an attacker-controlled hash string will panic. The bcrypt crate is #![forbid(unsafe_code)], so this is limited to a denial-of-service and cannot lead to memory corruption.

Realistic attack contexts include:

  • Rust authentication services reading hashes from a database that was previously compromised via, e.g., SQL injection. The attacker can then crash the service on every login attempt against the tampered account.
  • CLI tools accepting hashes from stdin or command-line arguments.
  • Password managers or vault services loading hashes from untrusted configuration sources.

Root cause

split_hash performed five &str slicing operations on the input hash: &hash[1..3], &hash[4..6], &hash[7..], &salt_and_hash[..22], and &salt_and_hash[22..]. None of these were char-boundary-checked. Any input where a multi-byte UTF-8 character spanned one of those byte positions caused a panic.

This is a regression of the fix originally shipped in 2021 for issue #62 (commit 0833509). The regression was introduced in the parser rewrite in PR #95 (commit e9a8394, released as 0.19.0).

The pre-existing regression test does_no_error_on_char_boundary_splitting was not removed, but was silently rendered ineffective by the new bytes[0] != b'$' guard, which rejected its input earlier and prevented it from reaching the buggy slices — leaving CI green through the regression.

Fix

split_hash now rejects any hash string containing non-ASCII bytes up front. A valid bcrypt hash is always exactly 60 ASCII bytes, so this closes the entire class of byte-boundary panics rather than guarding each slice individually.

The fix was merged in PR #103 and released as bcrypt 0.19.2 on 2026-06-20.

Downstream impact

pyca/bcrypt (which depended on bcrypt 0.19.1) is not affected. Its Python-side wrapper performs its own byte-level salt parsing before invoking bcrypt::hash_with_salt, and never reaches the buggy code path in split_hash or verify.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

What each source reports

OSV Score used 5.3

Panic in `bcrypt::verify` on non-ASCII hash input

bcrypt::verify(password, hash) and HashParts::from_str(hash) panic in str::slice_error_fail when given a 60-byte &str containing a multi-byte UTF-8 character at certain byte positions.

Impact

Any Rust code that calls bcrypt::verify (or HashParts::from_str) with an attacker-controlled hash string will panic. The bcrypt crate is #![forbid(unsafe_code)], so this is limited to a denial-of-service and cannot lead to memory corruption.

Realistic attack contexts include:

  • Rust authentication services reading hashes from a database that was previously compromised via, e.g., SQL injection. The attacker can then crash the service on every login attempt against the tampered account.
  • CLI tools accepting hashes from stdin or command-line arguments.
  • Password managers or vault services loading hashes from untrusted configuration sources.

Root cause

split_hash performed five &str slicing operations on the input hash: &hash[1..3], &hash[4..6], &hash[7..], &salt_and_hash[..22], and &salt_and_hash[22..]. None of these were char-boundary-checked. Any input where a multi-byte UTF-8 character spanned one of those byte positions caused a panic.

This is a regression of the fix originally shipped in 2021 for issue #62 (commit 0833509). The regression was introduced in the parser rewrite in PR #95 (commit e9a8394, released as 0.19.0).

The pre-existing regression test does_no_error_on_char_boundary_splitting was not removed, but was silently rendered ineffective by the new bytes[0] != b'$' guard, which rejected its input earlier and prevented it from reaching the buggy slices — leaving CI green through the regression.

Fix

split_hash now rejects any hash string containing non-ASCII bytes up front. A valid bcrypt hash is always exactly 60 ASCII bytes, so this closes the entire class of byte-boundary panics rather than guarding each slice individually.

The fix was merged in PR #103 and released as bcrypt 0.19.2 on 2026-06-20.

Downstream impact

pyca/bcrypt (which depended on bcrypt 0.19.1) is not affected. Its Python-side wrapper performs its own byte-level salt parsing before invoking bcrypt::hash_with_salt, and never reaches the buggy code path in split_hash or verify.

Record
RUSTSEC-2026-0199
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
bcrypt
crates.io
0.19.0 up to 0.19.2
0.19.2

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedOSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

RUSTSEC-2026-0199 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 5.3) in bcrypt, published June 20, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. Fixed in bcrypt 0.19.2.

References

MoveEnter Open