CVE-2023-5363
Incorrect cipher key & IV length processing
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
NVD Score used
7.5
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
- Record
CVE-2023-5363- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-684
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
CVE List
7.5
Incorrect cipher key & IV length processing
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
- Record
CVE-2023-5363- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-684
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2023-57679
7.5
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
- Record
EUVD-2023-57679- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-xw78-pcr6-wrg8
7.5
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV)...
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
- Record
GHSA-xw78-pcr6-wrg8- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-684
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2023-5363
7.5
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
- Record
ALPINE-CVE-2023-5363- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-42712
7.5
CVE-2023-5363 affecting package cloud-hypervisor-cvm for versions less than 38.0.72.2-1
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
- Record
AZL-42712- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 20 moreShow less
OSVAZL-42751
7.5
CVE-2023-5363 affecting package cloud-hypervisor-cvm for versions less than 38.0.72.2-1
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
- Record
AZL-42751- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-78558
7.5
CVE-2023-5363 affecting package openssl-fips-provider 3.1.2-2
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
- Record
AZL-78558- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-05
OSVBELL-CVE-2023-5363
7.5
- Record
BELL-CVE-2023-5363- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
7.5
Incorrect cipher key & IV length processing
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
- Record
CVE-2023-5363- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-684
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2023-5363
7.5
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers. Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes. When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB. For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse. Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical. Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary. OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2023-5363- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVJLSEC-2026-243
7.5
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV)...
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or
EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after
the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length,
via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter,
within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially
causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers
and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
- Record
JLSEC-2026-243- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2025-1191
7.5
edk2 security update
EDK II is a modern, feature-rich, cross-platform firmware development environment for the UEFI and PI specifications.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.(CVE-2023-5363)
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow recovering the private key exists in the ECDSA signature computation.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computations could allow recovering the private key by an attacker. However, measuring the timing would require either local access to the signing application or a very fast network connection with low latency.
There is a timing signal of around 300 nanoseconds when the top word of the inverted ECDSA nonce value is zero. This can happen with significant probability only for some of the supported elliptic curves. In particular the NIST P-521 curve is affected. To be able to measure this leak, the attacker process must either be located in the same physical computer or must have a very fast network connection with low latency. For that reason the severity of this vulnerability is Low.(CVE-2024-13176)
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause memory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are affected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not vulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by applications.
The SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used when processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected to succeed if the buffer is not…
- Record
OESA-2025-1191- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2025-1192
7.5
edk2 security update
EDK II is a modern, feature-rich, cross-platform firmware development environment for the UEFI and PI specifications.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers.
Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes.
When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB.
For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse.
Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical.
Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall.
The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue.
The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary.
OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.(CVE-2023-5363)
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow recovering the private key exists in the ECDSA signature computation.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computations could allow recovering the private key by an attacker. However, measuring the timing would require either local access to the signing application or a very fast network connection with low latency.
There is a timing signal of around 300 nanoseconds when the top word of the inverted ECDSA nonce value is zero. This can happen with significant probability only for some of the supported elliptic curves. In particular the NIST P-521 curve is affected. To be able to measure this leak, the attacker process must either be located in the same physical computer or must have a very fast network connection with low latency. For that reason the severity of this vulnerability is Low.(CVE-2024-13176)
Issue summary: Calling the OpenSSL API function SSL_free_buffers may cause memory to be accessed that was previously freed in some situations
Impact summary: A use after free can have a range of potential consequences such as the corruption of valid data, crashes or execution of arbitrary code. However, only applications that directly call the SSL_free_buffers function are affected by this issue. Applications that do not call this function are not vulnerable. Our investigations indicate that this function is rarely used by applications.
The SSL_free_buffers function is used to free the internal OpenSSL buffer used when processing an incoming record from the network. The call is only expected to succeed if the buffer is not…
- Record
OESA-2025-1192- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2024:0310
7.5
Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security update
- Record
RHSA-2024:0310- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2024:0500
7.5
Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security update
- Record
RHSA-2024:0500- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2023-5363
7.5
Issue summary: A bug has been identified in the processing of key and initialisation vector (IV) lengths. This can lead to potential truncation or overruns during the initialisation of some symmetric ciphers. Impact summary: A truncation in the IV can result in non-uniqueness, which could result in loss of confidentiality for some cipher modes. When calling EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() or EVP_CipherInit_ex2() the provided OSSL_PARAM array is processed after the key and IV have been established. Any alterations to the key length, via the "keylen" parameter or the IV length, via the "ivlen" parameter, within the OSSL_PARAM array will not take effect as intended, potentially causing truncation or overreading of these values. The following ciphers and cipher modes are impacted: RC2, RC4, RC5, CCM, GCM and OCB. For the CCM, GCM and OCB cipher modes, truncation of the IV can result in loss of confidentiality. For example, when following NIST's SP 800-38D section 8.2.1 guidance for constructing a deterministic IV for AES in GCM mode, truncation of the counter portion could lead to IV reuse. Both truncations and overruns of the key and overruns of the IV will produce incorrect results and could, in some cases, trigger a memory exception. However, these issues are not currently assessed as security critical. Changing the key and/or IV lengths is not considered to be a common operation and the vulnerable API was recently introduced. Furthermore it is likely that application developers will have spotted this problem during testing since decryption would fail unless both peers in the communication were similarly vulnerable. For these reasons we expect the probability of an application being vulnerable to this to be quite low. However if an application is vulnerable then this issue is considered very serious. For these reasons we have assessed this issue as Moderate severity overall. The OpenSSL SSL/TLS implementation is not affected by this issue. The OpenSSL 3.0 and 3.1 FIPS providers are not affected by this because the issue lies outside of the FIPS provider boundary. OpenSSL 3.1 and 3.0 are vulnerable to this issue.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2023-5363- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALSA-2024:0310 No score
Moderate: openssl security update
OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.
Security Fix(es):
- openssl: Incorrect cipher key and IV length processing (CVE-2023-5363)
For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.
- Record
ALSA-2024:0310- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2023-1702495193 No score
openssl: Fix of CVE-2023-5363
- CVE-2023-5363: evp: process key length and iv length early if present
- Record
CLSA-2023-1702495193- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2024-1709548308 No score
openssl: Fix of CVE-2023-5363
- CVE-2023-5363: process key length and iv length early if present
- Record
CLSA-2024-1709548308- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVMGASA-2023-0313 No score
Updated openssl packages fix a security vulnerability
The updated packages fix a security vulnerability:
Incorrect cipher key & IV length processing. (CVE-2023-5363)
- Record
MGASA-2023-0313- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVMGASA-2023-0317 No score
Updated quictls packages fix a security vulnerability
The updated packages fix a security vulnerability:
Incorrect cipher key & IV length processing. (CVE-2023-5363)
- Record
MGASA-2023-0317- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2024:13372-1 No score
libopenssl-3-devel-3.1.4-1.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl-3-devel-3.1.4-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2024:13372-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2023:4189-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2023-5363: Incorrect cipher key and IV length processing. (bsc#1216163)
- CVE-2023-3817: Add test of DH_check() with q = p + 1. (bsc#1213853)
- Record
SUSE-SU-2023:4189-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2023:4190-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2023-5363: Incorrect cipher key and IV length processing. (bsc#1216163)
- CVE-2023-3817: Add test of DH_check() with q = p + 1. (bsc#1213853)
- Record
SUSE-SU-2023:4190-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUSN-6450-1 No score
openssl vulnerabilities
Tony Battersby discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled key and initialization vector (IV) lengths. This could lead to truncation issues and result in loss of confidentiality for some symmetric cipher modes. (CVE-2023-5363)
Juerg Wullschleger discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the AES-SIV cipher. This could lead to empty data entries being ignored, resulting in certain applications being misled. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and Ubuntu 23.04. (CVE-2023-2975)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled checking excessively long DH keys or parameters. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to consume resources, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 22.04 LTS and Ubuntu 23.04. (CVE-2023-3446, CVE-2023-3817)
- Record
USN-6450-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
opensslAlpine:v3.17 |
3.0.0 up to 3.0.12-r0 | 3.0.12-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.18 |
3.0.0 up to 3.1.4-r0 | 3.1.4-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.19 |
3.0.0 up to 3.1.4-r0 | 3.1.4-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.20 |
3.0.0 up to 3.1.4-r0 | 3.1.4-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.21 |
3.0.0 up to 3.1.4-r0 | 3.1.4-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.22 |
3.0.0 up to 3.1.4-r0 | 3.1.4-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.23 |
3.0.0 up to 3.1.4-r0 | 3.1.4-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.24 |
3.0.0 up to 3.1.4-r0 | 3.1.4-r0 |
opensslAlmaLinux:9 |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
openssl-develAlmaLinux:9 |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
Show 60 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
openssl-libsAlmaLinux:9 |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
openssl-perlAlmaLinux:9 |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
cloud-hypervisor-cvmAzure Linux:2 |
before 38.0.72.2-1 | 38.0.72.2-1 |
cloud-hypervisor-cvmAzure Linux:3 |
before 38.0.72.2-1 | 38.0.72.2-1 |
openssl-fips-providerAzure Linux:3 |
through 3.1.2-2 | None known |
opensslAlpaquita:23 |
3.0.8-r4 up to 3.0.12-r0 | 3.0.12-r0 |
opensslAlpaquita:stream |
3.1.1-r1 up to 3.1.4-r0 | 3.1.4-r0 |
opensslBellSoft Hardened Containers:23 |
3.0.8-r4 up to 3.0.12-r0 | 3.0.12-r0 |
opensslBellSoft Hardened Containers:stream |
3.1.1-r1 up to 3.1.4-r0 | 3.1.4-r0 |
opensslTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.2 |
before 1:3.0.7-17.el9_2.tuxcare.els1 | 1:3.0.7-17.el9_2.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl-develTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.2 |
before 1:3.0.7-17.el9_2.tuxcare.els1 | 1:3.0.7-17.el9_2.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl-libsTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.2 |
before 1:3.0.7-17.el9_2.tuxcare.els1 | 1:3.0.7-17.el9_2.tuxcare.els1 |
openssl-perlTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.2 |
before 1:3.0.7-17.el9_2.tuxcare.els1 | 1:3.0.7-17.el9_2.tuxcare.els1 |
opensslTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.2 |
before 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els1 | 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els1 |
openssl-develTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.2 |
before 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els1 | 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els1 |
openssl-libsTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.2 |
before 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els1 | 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els1 |
openssl-perlTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.2 |
before 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els1 | 1:3.0.7-20.el9_2.tuxcare.1.els1 |
opensslDebian:12 |
before 3.0.11-1~deb12u2, plus listed versions 3.0.10-13.0.10-1~deb12u13.0.11-1~deb12u13.0.9-1 |
3.0.11-1~deb12u2 |
opensslDebian:13 |
before 3.0.12-1 | 3.0.12-1 |
opensslDebian:14 |
before 3.0.12-1 | 3.0.12-1 |
OpenSSL_jllJulia |
3.0.8+0 up to 3.0.12+0 | 3.0.12+0 |
opensslMageia:9 |
before 3.0.12-1.mga9 | 3.0.12-1.mga9 |
quictlsMageia:9 |
before 3.0.12-1.mga9 | 3.0.12-1.mga9 |
edk2openEuler:24.03-LTS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 202308-17.oe2403 | 202308-17.oe2403 |
edk2openEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 202308-18.oe2403sp1 | 202308-18.oe2403sp1 |
openssl-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
openssl-debugsourceRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
openssl-develRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
openssl-libs-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
openssl-perlRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
opensslRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
openssl-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
openssl-debugsourceRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
openssl-libsRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
openssl-libs-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 | 1:3.0.7-25.el9_3 |
openssl-debuginfoRed Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream |
before 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 | 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 |
openssl-debugsourceRed Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream |
before 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 | 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 |
openssl-develRed Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream |
before 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 | 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 |
openssl-libs-debuginfoRed Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream |
before 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 | 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 |
openssl-perlRed Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::appstream |
before 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 | 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 |
opensslRed Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::baseos |
before 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 | 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 |
openssl-debuginfoRed Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::baseos |
before 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 | 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 |
openssl-debugsourceRed Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::baseos |
before 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 | 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 |
openssl-libsRed Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::baseos |
before 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 | 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 |
openssl-libs-debuginfoRed Hat:rhel_eus:9.2::baseos |
before 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 | 1:3.0.7-18.el9_2 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150400.4.37.1 | 3.0.8-150400.4.37.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150400.4.37.1 | 3.0.8-150400.4.37.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP4 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150400.4.37.1 | 3.0.8-150400.4.37.1 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.3 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150400.4.37.1 | 3.0.8-150400.4.37.1 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Leap Micro 5.4 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150400.4.37.1 | 3.0.8-150400.4.37.1 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Leap 15.4 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150400.4.37.1 | 3.0.8-150400.4.37.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP5 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150500.5.14.1 | 3.0.8-150500.5.14.1 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Leap 15.5 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 3.0.8-150500.5.14.1 | 3.0.8-150500.5.14.1 |
opensslUbuntu:22.04:LTS |
before 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.12, plus listed versions 1.1.1l-1ubuntu13.0.0-1ubuntu13.0.1-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu1.1 Show 8 moreShow less3.0.2-0ubuntu1.23.0.2-0ubuntu1.43.0.2-0ubuntu1.53.0.2-0ubuntu1.63.0.2-0ubuntu1.73.0.2-0ubuntu1.83.0.2-0ubuntu1.93.0.2-0ubuntu1.10 |
3.0.2-0ubuntu1.12 |
nodejsUbuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 12.22.5~dfsg-5ubuntu112.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu112.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu312.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu212.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3 Show 7 moreShow less12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.112.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.212.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.312.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.412.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.512.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.612.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6+esm2 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:FIPS-preview:22.04:LTS |
before 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.12+Fips1, plus listed versions 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.10+Fips1 |
3.0.2-0ubuntu1.12+Fips1 |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:FIPS-updates:22.04:LTS |
before 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.12+Fips1, plus listed versions 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.10+Fips1 |
3.0.2-0ubuntu1.12+Fips1 |
opensslUbuntu:24.04:LTS |
before 3.0.10-1ubuntu2.1, plus listed versions 3.0.10-1ubuntu2 |
3.0.10-1ubuntu2.1 |
opensslUbuntu:22.04:LTS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.12, plus listed versions 1.1.1l-1ubuntu13.0.0-1ubuntu13.0.1-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu1.1 Show 8 moreShow less3.0.2-0ubuntu1.23.0.2-0ubuntu1.43.0.2-0ubuntu1.53.0.2-0ubuntu1.63.0.2-0ubuntu1.73.0.2-0ubuntu1.83.0.2-0ubuntu1.93.0.2-0ubuntu1.10 |
3.0.2-0ubuntu1.12 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Tumbleweed |
before 3.1.4-1.1 | 3.1.4-1.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected | ||
| facts | OSV | |
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2023-5363 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.5) in Openssl, published October 24, 2023. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 3.94%, the 90th percentile. Fixed in openssl 3.0.12-r0.
References
openssl.org/news/secadv/20231024.txt
git.openssl.org/gitweb?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=5f69f5c65e483928c4b28ed16af6e5742929f1ee
git.openssl.org/gitweb?p=openssl.git;a=commitdiff;h=0df40630850fb2740e6be6890bb905d3fc623b2d
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/24/1
debian.org/security/2023/dsa-5532
security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20231027-0010
Show 49 moreShow less
security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240201-0003
security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240201-0004
security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20241108-0002
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-093430.html
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-331112.html
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-769027.html
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-277137.html
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-082556.html
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-5363
github.com/advisories/GHSA-xw78-pcr6-wrg8
security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2023-5363
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0310
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-5363
bugzilla.redhat.com/2243839
errata.almalinux.org/9/ALSA-2024-0310.html
docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2023-5363
docs.bell-sw.com/security/advisories/BELL-SA-2023-5
errata.tuxcare.com/almalinux9.2-esu/CLSA-2023-1702495193.html
errata.tuxcare.com/almalinux9.2-fips/CLSA-2024-1709548308.html
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2023/5xxx/CVE-2023-5363.json
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2023-5363
advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2023-0313.html
bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32452
advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2023-0317.html
bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32484
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1191
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-13176
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-4741
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2025-1192
access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2243839
issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-15993
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2024/rhsa-2024_0310.json
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2023-5363
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2024:0500
issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-14578
issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-15992
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2024/rhsa-2024_0500.json
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20234189-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1213853
bugzilla.suse.com/1216163
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-3817
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-5363
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2023/suse-su-20234190-1
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-5363
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6450-1
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-2975
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-3446
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2023-3817
Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.