CVE-2026-32936
CoreDNS DoH GET path missing size validation causes CPU and memory amplification
CoreDNS is a DNS server that chains plugins. In versions prior to 1.14.3, the DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) GET path accepts oversized dns= query parameter values and performs URL query parsing, base64 decoding, and DNS message unpacking before rejecting the request. Unlike the POST path, which applies a bounded read via http.MaxBytesReader limited to 65536 bytes, the GET path has no equivalent size validation before expensive processing. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can repeatedly send oversized DoH GET requests to force high CPU usage, large transient memory allocations, and elevated garbage-collection pressure, leading to denial of service. This issue has been fixed in version 1.14.3.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
8.7
CoreDNS DoH GET path missing size validation causes CPU and memory amplification
CoreDNS is a DNS server that chains plugins. In versions prior to 1.14.3, the DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) GET path accepts oversized dns= query parameter values and performs URL query parsing, base64 decoding, and DNS message unpacking before rejecting the request. Unlike the POST path, which applies a bounded read via http.MaxBytesReader limited to 65536 bytes, the GET path has no equivalent size validation before expensive processing. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can repeatedly send oversized DoH GET requests to force high CPU usage, large transient memory allocations, and elevated garbage-collection pressure, leading to denial of service. This issue has been fixed in version 1.14.3.
- Record
CVE-2026-32936- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-27442
8.7
CoreDNS is a DNS server that chains plugins. In versions prior to 1.14.3, the DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) GET path accepts oversized dns= query parameter values and performs URL query parsing, base64 decoding, and DNS message unpacking before rejecting the request. Unlike the POST path, which applies a bounded read via http.MaxBytesReader limited to 65536 bytes, the GET path has no equivalent size validation before expensive processing. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can repeatedly send oversized DoH GET requests to force high CPU usage, large transient memory allocations, and elevated garbage-collection pressure, leading to denial of service. This issue has been fixed in version 1.14.3.
- Record
EUVD-2026-27442- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-63cw-r7xf-jmwr
8.7
CoreDNS DoH GET oversized dns= query parameter causes pre-validation CPU and memory amplification
Summary
CoreDNS's DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) GET path accepts oversized dns= query values and performs substantial request parsing, query unescaping, base64 decoding, and message unpacking work before returning 400 Bad Request.
A remote, unauthenticated attacker can repeatedly send oversized DoH GET requests to /dns-query?dns=... and force high CPU usage, large transient allocations, elevated garbage-collection pressure, and increased resident memory consumption even though the requests are ultimately rejected.
This is a denial-of-service issue caused by expensive pre-validation processing on the DoH GET path.
Details
The vulnerable flow is in plugin/pkg/doh/doh.go:
RequestToMsg()dispatches GET requests torequestToMsgGet():plugin/pkg/doh/doh.go:79-89
requestToMsgGet()callsreq.URL.Query(), extractsdns, and passes it directly tobase64ToMsg():plugin/pkg/doh/doh.go:99-108
base64ToMsg()decodes the full attacker-controlled value viab64Enc.DecodeString()and only then attempts to unpack it into a DNS message:plugin/pkg/doh/doh.go:121-130
Relevant snippet:
func requestToMsgGet(req *http.Request) (*dns.Msg, error) {
values := req.URL.Query()
b64, ok := values["dns"]
if !ok {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("no 'dns' query parameter found")
}
if len(b64) != 1 {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("multiple 'dns' query values found")
}
return base64ToMsg(b64[0])
}
func base64ToMsg(b64 string) (*dns.Msg, error) {
buf, err := b64Enc.DecodeString(b64)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
m := new(dns.Msg)
err = m.Unpack(buf)
return m, err
}
By contrast, the POST path applies a bounded read before unpacking:
func toMsg(r io.ReadCloser) (*dns.Msg, error) {
buf, err := io.ReadAll(http.MaxBytesReader(nil, r, 65536))
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
m := new(dns.Msg)
err = m.Unpack(buf)
return m, err
}
So, POST is explicitly size-bounded, while GET is not equivalently bounded before expensive parsing and decoding work occurs.
In addition, the HTTPS server is created in core/dnsserver/server_https.go:87-92 without an explicit early GET-path size guard in this path:
srv := &http.Server{
ReadTimeout: s.ReadTimeout,
WriteTimeout: s.WriteTimeout,
IdleTimeout: s.IdleTimeout,
ErrorLog: stdlog.New(&loggerAdapter{}, "", 0),
}
As a result, oversized DoH GET request targets are processed through:
- HTTP request-line parsing
- URL query parsing / unescaping
- DoH GET extraction
- base64 decoding
- DNS message unpacking
before the request is rejected.
Root cause
The root cause is missing early size validation on the DoH GET path.
More specifically:
requestToMsgGet()performsreq.URL.Query()on attacker-controlled oversized request targets.- The extracted
dnsvalue is passed tobase64ToMsg()without an encoded-length or decoded-length bound. base64ToMsg()fully decodes the attacker-controlled string before any DNS-size rejection.- The POST path already has an explicit bounded read, but GET does not have an equivalent pre-decode bound.
This creates a pre-validation resource-amplification path for DoH GET.
PoC
Local test setup
I reproduced this locally against CoreDNS 1.14.2 over HTTPS with pprof enabled.
Create a self-signed certificate:
openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -sha256 -days 1 -nodes \
-keyout key.pem -out cert.pem \
-subj "/CN=127.0.0.1"
Create this Corefile:
https://127.0.0.1:8443 {
whoami
log
errors
tls cert.pem key.pem
pprof 127.0.0.1:6060
}
Run CoreDNS:
./coredns -conf Corefile
Proof-of-concept script
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import argparse
import base64
import collections
import concurrent.futures
import http.client
import ssl
import time
def send_one(host, port, path, timeout):
ctx =…
- Record
GHSA-63cw-r7xf-jmwr- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
8.7
CoreDNS is a DNS server that chains plugins. In versions prior to 1.14.3, the DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) GET path accepts oversized dns= query parameter values and performs URL query parsing, base64 decoding, and DNS message unpacking before rejecting the request. Unlike the POST path, which applies a bounded read via http.MaxBytesReader limited to 65536 bytes, the GET path has no equivalent size validation before expensive processing. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can repeatedly send oversized DoH GET requests to force high CPU usage, large transient memory allocations, and elevated garbage-collection pressure, leading to denial of service. This issue has been fixed in version 1.14.3.
- Record
CVE-2026-32936- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
8.7
CoreDNS DoH GET path missing size validation causes CPU and memory amplification
CoreDNS is a DNS server that chains plugins. In versions prior to 1.14.3, the DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) GET path accepts oversized dns= query parameter values and performs URL query parsing, base64 decoding, and DNS message unpacking before rejecting the request. Unlike the POST path, which applies a bounded read via http.MaxBytesReader limited to 65536 bytes, the GET path has no equivalent size validation before expensive processing. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can repeatedly send oversized DoH GET requests to force high CPU usage, large transient memory allocations, and elevated garbage-collection pressure, leading to denial of service. This issue has been fixed in version 1.14.3.
- Record
CVE-2026-32936- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-63cw-r7xf-jmwr
8.7
CoreDNS DoH GET oversized dns= query parameter causes pre-validation CPU and memory amplification
Summary
CoreDNS's DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) GET path accepts oversized dns= query values and performs substantial request parsing, query unescaping, base64 decoding, and message unpacking work before returning 400 Bad Request.
A remote, unauthenticated attacker can repeatedly send oversized DoH GET requests to /dns-query?dns=... and force high CPU usage, large transient allocations, elevated garbage-collection pressure, and increased resident memory consumption even though the requests are ultimately rejected.
This is a denial-of-service issue caused by expensive pre-validation processing on the DoH GET path.
Details
The vulnerable flow is in plugin/pkg/doh/doh.go:
RequestToMsg()dispatches GET requests torequestToMsgGet():plugin/pkg/doh/doh.go:79-89
requestToMsgGet()callsreq.URL.Query(), extractsdns, and passes it directly tobase64ToMsg():plugin/pkg/doh/doh.go:99-108
base64ToMsg()decodes the full attacker-controlled value viab64Enc.DecodeString()and only then attempts to unpack it into a DNS message:plugin/pkg/doh/doh.go:121-130
Relevant snippet:
func requestToMsgGet(req *http.Request) (*dns.Msg, error) {
values := req.URL.Query()
b64, ok := values["dns"]
if !ok {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("no 'dns' query parameter found")
}
if len(b64) != 1 {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("multiple 'dns' query values found")
}
return base64ToMsg(b64[0])
}
func base64ToMsg(b64 string) (*dns.Msg, error) {
buf, err := b64Enc.DecodeString(b64)
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
m := new(dns.Msg)
err = m.Unpack(buf)
return m, err
}
By contrast, the POST path applies a bounded read before unpacking:
func toMsg(r io.ReadCloser) (*dns.Msg, error) {
buf, err := io.ReadAll(http.MaxBytesReader(nil, r, 65536))
if err != nil {
return nil, err
}
m := new(dns.Msg)
err = m.Unpack(buf)
return m, err
}
So, POST is explicitly size-bounded, while GET is not equivalently bounded before expensive parsing and decoding work occurs.
In addition, the HTTPS server is created in core/dnsserver/server_https.go:87-92 without an explicit early GET-path size guard in this path:
srv := &http.Server{
ReadTimeout: s.ReadTimeout,
WriteTimeout: s.WriteTimeout,
IdleTimeout: s.IdleTimeout,
ErrorLog: stdlog.New(&loggerAdapter{}, "", 0),
}
As a result, oversized DoH GET request targets are processed through:
- HTTP request-line parsing
- URL query parsing / unescaping
- DoH GET extraction
- base64 decoding
- DNS message unpacking
before the request is rejected.
Root cause
The root cause is missing early size validation on the DoH GET path.
More specifically:
requestToMsgGet()performsreq.URL.Query()on attacker-controlled oversized request targets.- The extracted
dnsvalue is passed tobase64ToMsg()without an encoded-length or decoded-length bound. base64ToMsg()fully decodes the attacker-controlled string before any DNS-size rejection.- The POST path already has an explicit bounded read, but GET does not have an equivalent pre-decode bound.
This creates a pre-validation resource-amplification path for DoH GET.
PoC
Local test setup
I reproduced this locally against CoreDNS 1.14.2 over HTTPS with pprof enabled.
Create a self-signed certificate:
openssl req -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -sha256 -days 1 -nodes \
-keyout key.pem -out cert.pem \
-subj "/CN=127.0.0.1"
Create this Corefile:
https://127.0.0.1:8443 {
whoami
log
errors
tls cert.pem key.pem
pprof 127.0.0.1:6060
}
Run CoreDNS:
./coredns -conf Corefile
Proof-of-concept script
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import argparse
import base64
import collections
import concurrent.futures
import http.client
import ssl
import time
def send_one(host, port, path, timeout):
ctx =…
- Record
GHSA-63cw-r7xf-jmwr- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 5 moreShow less
OSVOESA-2026-4018
7.5
coredns security update
CoreDNS is a fast and flexible DNS server. The key word here is flexible: with CoreDNS you are able to do what you want with your DNS data by utilizing plugins.
Security Fix(es):
An issue was discovered in CoreDNS through 1.10.1. There is a vulnerability in DNS resolving software, which triggers a resolver to ignore valid responses, thus causing denial of service for normal resolution. In an exploit, the attacker could just forge a response targeting the source port of a vulnerable resolver without the need to guess the correct TXID.(CVE-2023-28452)
CoreDNS through 1.10.1 enables attackers to achieve DNS cache poisoning and inject fake responses via a birthday attack.(CVE-2023-30464)
CoreDNS is a DNS server that chains plugins. In versions prior to 1.14.3, the DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) GET path accepts oversized dns= query parameter values and performs URL query parsing, base64 decoding, and DNS message unpacking before rejecting the request. Unlike the POST path, which applies a bounded read via http.MaxBytesReader limited to 65536 bytes, the GET path has no equivalent size validation before expensive processing. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can repeatedly send oversized DoH GET requests to force high CPU usage, large transient memory allocations, and elevated garbage-collection pressure, leading to denial of service. This issue has been fixed in version 1.14.3.(CVE-2026-32936)
- Record
OESA-2026-4018- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-85724 No score
CVE-2026-32936 affecting package coredns for versions less than 1.11.4-17
CoreDNS is a DNS server that chains plugins. In versions prior to 1.14.3, the DNS-over-HTTPS (DoH) GET path accepts oversized dns= query parameter values and performs URL query parsing, base64 decoding, and DNS message unpacking before rejecting the request. Unlike the POST path, which applies a bounded read via http.MaxBytesReader limited to 65536 bytes, the GET path has no equivalent size validation before expensive processing. A remote, unauthenticated attacker can repeatedly send oversized DoH GET requests to force high CPU usage, large transient memory allocations, and elevated garbage-collection pressure, leading to denial of service. This issue has been fixed in version 1.14.3.
- Record
AZL-85724- Updated
- 2026-11-05
OSVGO-2026-5164 No score
CoreDNS DoH GET oversized dns= query parameter causes pre-validation CPU and memory amplification in github.com/coredns/coredns
CoreDNS DoH GET oversized dns= query parameter causes pre-validation CPU and memory amplification in github.com/coredns/coredns
- Record
GO-2026-5164- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:20703-1 No score
Security update for coredns
This update for coredns fixes the following issues:
Changes in coredns:
- Update to version 1.14.3:
- This release introduces Windows service support, along with full TSIG verification across DoH, DoH3, QUIC, and gRPC transports, and improved TSIG propagation and DoH request validation.
- It also adds optional TLS for the metrics endpoint.
- Performance and stability are improved through cache prefetching, QUIC optimizations, and a new max_age option in the forward plugin.
- Additional updates include enhanced SVCB/HTTPS support, improved zone transfer behavior, and various DNSSEC, PROXY protocol, and concurrency fixes.
- The release is built with Go 1.26.2, which includes security fixes addressing CVE-2026-32282, CVE-2026-32289, CVE-2026-33810, CVE-2026-27144, CVE-2026-27143, CVE-2026-32288, CVE-2026-32283, and CVE-2026-27140, and also includes fixes for CVE-2026-32936, CVE-2026-33190, CVE-2026-33489, CVE-2026-32934, and CVE-2026-35579.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:20703-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1 No score
Security update for govulncheck-vulndb
This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:
- Update to version 0.0.20260723T184607 2026-07-23T18:46:07Z (jsc#PED-11136).
Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:
- GO-2026-4730 CVE-2026-33022 GHSA-cv4x-93xx-wgfj
- GO-2026-4761 CVE-2026-33211 GHSA-j5q5-j9gm-2w5c
- GO-2026-5102 CVE-2026-45021 GHSA-3vcp-chfh-f6r2
- GO-2026-5272 CVE-2026-40938 GHSA-94jr-7pqp-xhcq
- GO-2026-5486 CVE-2026-40924 GHSA-m2cx-gpqf-qf74
- GO-2026-5542 CVE-2026-40090 GHSA-pj97-4p9w-gx3q
- GO-2026-5630 CVE-2026-25542 GHSA-rmx9-2pp3-xhcr
- GO-2026-5643 CVE-2026-40923 GHSA-rx35-6rhx-7858
- GO-2026-5675 CVE-2026-41492 GHSA-vvf7-6rmr-m29q
- GO-2026-5711 CVE-2026-40161 GHSA-wjxp-xrpv-xpff
- GO-2026-5746 CVE-2026-41567 GHSA-x86f-5xw2-fm2r
- GO-2026-5749 CVE-2026-41328 GHSA-x92x-px7w-4gx4
- GO-2026-5837 CVE-2026-44840 GHSA-q2m9-6jp9-c6mc
- GO-2026-5929 CVE-2026-44342 GHSA-26v7-h57m-gh9m
- GO-2026-5930 CVE-2026-33655 GHSA-6qcr-qxgr-m7fv
- GO-2026-5933 GHSA-3g4q-2f67-2gvh
- GO-2026-5934 GHSA-59qp-cfj3-rp64
- GO-2026-5935 GHSA-7856-g3gv-9wq8
- GO-2026-5936 CVE-2026-53552 GHSA-26rh-24rg-j3vv
- GO-2026-5937 CVE-2026-53508 GHSA-2jcc-mxv7-p3f9
- GO-2026-5938 CVE-2026-53553 GHSA-4g5x-hcwm-82jw
- GO-2026-5939 CVE-2026-10517 GHSA-698x-9w2p-7vvp
- GO-2026-5940 CVE-2026-53572 GHSA-6w3m-4hhp-775q
- GO-2026-5941 CVE-2026-53487 GHSA-gvhc-wv3v-7pf8
- GO-2026-5942 CVE-2026-46600
- GO-2026-5944 CVE-2026-50197 GHSA-659f-rgp5-w4wf
- GO-2026-5945 CVE-2026-6815 GHSA-rmxx-v9rj-vpvg
- GO-2026-5946 CVE-2026-52831 GHSA-v5px-423j-pf7p
- GO-2026-5947 CVE-2026-53649 GHSA-xqhv-chqm-fhcc
- GO-2026-5948 CVE-2026-50554 GHSA-588f-fvcv-xhvf
- GO-2026-5949 CVE-2026-50553 GHSA-rqrh-8wpv-x7hh
- GO-2026-5950 CVE-2026-53602 GHSA-339v-266x-79xr
- GO-2026-5951 CVE-2026-10219 GHSA-6jm8-4fhr-5w64
- GO-2026-5952 CVE-2026-49834 GHSA-9vcr-p3rj-q5q6
- GO-2026-5953 CVE-2026-9094 GHSA-c9w5-qp6m-m395
- GO-2026-5956 CVE-2026-55252 GHSA-h5g6-xmh4-hc37
- GO-2026-5957 CVE-2026-54158 GHSA-5xfx-xj4h-5p7r
- GO-2026-5958 CVE-2026-54068 GHSA-gcm7-57gf-953c
- GO-2026-5959 CVE-2026-54072 GHSA-h29v-hj44-q8cv
- GO-2026-5961 CVE-2026-54069 GHSA-hvr9-72v2-fff3
- GO-2026-5962 CVE-2026-54088 GHSA-m93h-4hw7-5qcm
- GO-2026-5963 CVE-2026-54067 GHSA-mvjr-vv3c-w4qv
- GO-2026-5964 CVE-2026-54066 GHSA-p4m3-mgmm-c664
- GO-2026-5965 CVE-2026-54070 GHSA-w7cg-whh7-xp28
- GO-2026-5966 CVE-2026-54089 GHSA-xqp3-jq6g-x3qm
- GO-2026-5967 CVE-2026-50551 GHSA-56mp-4f3v-fgj2
- GO-2026-5968 CVE-2026-54174 GHSA-fpg8-7664-jc5q
- GO-2026-5969 GHSA-g936-7jqj-mwv8
- GO-2026-5970 CVE-2026-56852
- GO-2026-5973 CVE-2026-54250 GHSA-jxr7-mqhw-9p98
- GO-2026-5974 CVE-2026-44300 GHSA-wmj8-9953-vff5
- GO-2026-5975 CVE-2026-50018 GHSA-42j2-w334-qxw7
- GO-2026-5976 CVE-2026-50141 GHSA-g7mm-9vx7-jm7h
- GO-2026-5977 CVE-2026-50013 GHSA-qrh4-p6v4-mrfg
- GO-2026-5978 CVE-2026-50125 GHSA-qw5r-ppcg-f8rj
- GO-2026-5979 CVE-2026-50006 GHSA-xrcf-6jh3-ggvx
- GO-2026-5980 CVE-2026-50158 GHSA-2c7f-fxww-6w6c
- GO-2026-5981 GHSA-mqxv-9rm6-w8qc
- GO-2026-5982 GHSA-pqg7-v6wh-3pfp
- GO-2026-5984 CVE-2026-53604 GHSA-2p2f-px33-4vv5
- GO-2026-5985 GHSA-7rx3-5wx3-5v76
- GO-2026-5986 CVE-2026-61699 GHSA-cm26-5974-52h8
- GO-2026-5987 CVE-2026-55513 GHSA-g4x6-jcvr-9m3g
- GO-2026-5988 CVE-2026-54628 GHSA-hwrq-8wxh-q4xv
- GO-2026-5989 CVE-2026-55512 GHSA-m3cx-mwpg-32jg
- GO-2026-5990 CVE-2026-54629 GHSA-mf78-3rpf-r784
- GO-2026-5991 CVE-2026-53603 GHSA-q4vm-pq3q-8wgq
- GO-2026-5992 CVE-2026-61549 GHSA-qf34-295c-26v8
- GO-2026-5996 CVE-2026-54450 GHSA-pph6-vfjv-vpjw
- GO-2026-5997 CVE-2026-54452 GHSA-xgch-x3mx-cm3c
- GO-2026-5998 CVE-2026-54495 GHSA-398h-7f66-3h4p
- GO-2026-5999 CVE-2026-10814 GHSA-jh6h-v6mp-h22v
- GO-2026-6002 CVE-2026-58196 GHSA-pr64-jmmf-jp54
- GO-2026-6003 CVE-2026-53714 GHSA-22xc-xg2r-9j7v
- GO-2026-6004 CVE-2026-52833 GHSA-3v79-m2cg-89ww
- GO-2026-6005 CVE-2026-53715 GHSA-8fv2-88gg-hm7q
- GO-2026-6006 CVE-2026-53716 GHSA-cxpq-8v7q-cg56 *…
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21483-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
github.com/coredns/corednsGo |
before 1.14.3 | 1.14.3 |
corednsAzure Linux:3 |
before 1.11.4-17 | 1.11.4-17 |
corednsopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP3 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.7.0-1.10.oe2403sp3 | 1.7.0-1.10.oe2403sp3 |
corednsopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP4 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.7.0-1.10.oe2403sp4 | 1.7.0-1.10.oe2403sp4 |
corednsopenEuler:20.03-LTS-SP4 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.7.0-1.7.oe2003sp4 | 1.7.0-1.7.oe2003sp4 |
corednsopenEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.7.0-1.9.oe2203sp4 | 1.7.0-1.9.oe2203sp4 |
corednsopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP1 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.7.0-1.10.oe2403sp1 | 1.7.0-1.10.oe2403sp1 |
govulncheck-vulndbopenSUSE:Leap 16.0 From an advisory covering 1734 CVEs |
before 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1 | 0.0.20260723T184607-160000.1.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected | ||
| facts | OSV | |
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-32936 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.7) in Coredns, published April 28, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.67%, the 52nd percentile. Fixed in github.com/coredns/coredns 1.14.3.
References
github.com/coredns/coredns/security/advisories/GHSA-63cw-r7xf-jmwr
github.com/coredns/coredns/releases/tag/v1.14.3
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32936
github.com/advisories/GHSA-63cw-r7xf-jmwr
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/32xxx/CVE-2026-32936.json
github.com/coredns/coredns
Show 194 moreShow less
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-4018
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-28452
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-30464
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-27140
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-27143
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-27144
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32282
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32283
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32288
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32289
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32934
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32936
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33190
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33489
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33810
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35579
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11063
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11066
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11067
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11068
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11069
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11070
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11071
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11072
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11073
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11074
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11075
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11076
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11077
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11078
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11079
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11080
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11081
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11082
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11083
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-11084
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18870
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18871
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18872
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18873
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18874
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18875
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18876
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18877
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18878
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18879
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18883
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18884
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18885
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18886
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18887
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18888
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18889
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18890
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18891
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18892
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18893
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18894
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18895
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18896
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18897
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18898
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18900
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18901
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18902
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18903
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18904
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18905
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18906
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18907
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18908
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18909
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18911
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18912
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18915
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18916
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18917
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-18918
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-21258
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-8400
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25320
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2022-45786
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-26154
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-32199
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-34620
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43630
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43631
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43632
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43633
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43634
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43635
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43636
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-43637
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2023-47108
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-12886
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-21635
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-25621
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-41260
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-41265
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-44905
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-52284
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-53412
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58259
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58260
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58267
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-58269
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-6717
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-0426
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10543
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10545
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10630
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10678
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-10954
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11374
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11375
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11393
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11579
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11621
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11776
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11777
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11794
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12044
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12419
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12421
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12559
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12689
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-12756
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13281
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13324
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13352
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13353
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13357
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13425
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13523
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13767
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13821
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13870
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-13888
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14273
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14350
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14435
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14443
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14525
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14573
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14764
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14822
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14986
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-14987
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15107
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15558
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-21613
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22870
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-22873
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23266
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-23267
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-26625
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-27093
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-2786
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-2842
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-2843
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-31133
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-34410
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-34429
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-34430
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41115
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41117
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41118
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41410
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41436
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-41443
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-44001
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-44004
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-44005
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47906
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47910
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47911
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47912
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47913
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47914
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-48731
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-49221
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-4953
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-50180
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-50946
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-51667
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-5187
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52490
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52565
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52881
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52894
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-52931
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53514
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53857
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-53884
Left out here: 1,543 references and the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.