CVE-2026-32105
xrdp: RDP MAC signature (dataSignature) never verified on receive — integrity bypass in non-TLS mode
xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- Low
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
9.3
xrdp: RDP MAC signature (dataSignature) never verified on receive — integrity bypass in non-TLS mode
xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.
- Record
CVE-2026-32105- CVSS 4.0
- 9.3 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L - Weakness
- CWE-354
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-23472
9.3
xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.
- Record
EUVD-2026-23472- CVSS 4.0
- 9.3 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
9.3
xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.
- Record
CVE-2026-32105- CVSS 4.0
- 9.3 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 7.7 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-354
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2026-32105
7.7
xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.
- Record
ALPINE-CVE-2026-32105- CVSS 3.1
- 7.7 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L - Updated
- 2026-11-03
OSV
9.3
xrdp: RDP MAC signature (dataSignature) never verified on receive — integrity bypass in non-TLS mode
xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.
- Record
CVE-2026-32105- CVSS 4.0
- 9.3 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L - Weakness
- CWE-354
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-32105
7.7
xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-32105- CVSS 3.1
- 7.7 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-32105
9.3
xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-32105- CVSS 4.0
- 9.3 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L - CVSS 3.1
- 7.7 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:10816-1 No score
libpainter0-0.9.27-2.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the libpainter0-0.9.27-2.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:10816-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
xrdpAlpine:v3.23 |
before 0.10.6-r0 | 0.10.6-r0 |
xrdpAlpine:v3.24 |
before 0.10.6-r0 | 0.10.6-r0 |
xrdpDebian:12 |
before 0.9.21.1-1+deb12u3, plus listed versions 0.9.21.1-10.9.21.1-1+deb12u10.9.21.1-1+deb12u2 |
0.9.21.1-1+deb12u3 |
xrdpDebian:13 |
before 0.10.1-3.1+deb13u2, plus listed versions 0.10.1-3.10.10.1-3.1+deb13u1 |
0.10.1-3.1+deb13u2 |
xrdpDebian:14 |
before 0.10.6-1, plus listed versions 0.10.1-3.10.10.1-40.10.1-4.10.10.2-10.10.2-2 Show 7 moreShow less0.10.4.1-10.10.4.1-20.10.5-10.10.5-20.10.5-30.10.5-40.10.5-5 |
0.10.6-1 |
xrdpUbuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.6.0-10.6.0-1ubuntu0.10.6.0-1ubuntu0.1+esm10.6.0-1ubuntu0.1+esm20.6.0-1ubuntu0.1+esm3 |
None known |
xrdpUbuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.6.1-20.6.1-2ubuntu0.10.6.1-2ubuntu0.30.6.1-2ubuntu0.3+esm10.6.1-2ubuntu0.3+esm20.6.1-2ubuntu0.3+esm3 |
None known |
xrdpUbuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.9.1-90.9.4-10.9.4-20.9.4-30.9.4-4 Show 7 moreShow less0.9.4-50.9.5-10.9.5-1build10.9.5-20.9.5-2ubuntu0.1~esm10.9.5-2ubuntu0.1~esm20.9.5-2ubuntu0.1~esm3 |
None known |
xrdpUbuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.9.9-10.9.12-10.9.12-1ubuntu0.10.9.12-1ubuntu0.1+esm10.9.12-1ubuntu0.1+esm2 |
None known |
xrdpUbuntu:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.9.15-1ubuntu10.9.17-10.9.17-20.9.17-2ubuntu10.9.17-2ubuntu2 Show 5 moreShow less0.9.17-2ubuntu2+esm10.9.17-2ubuntu30.9.17-2ubuntu3+esm10.9.17-2ubuntu3+esm20.9.17-2ubuntu3.1 |
None known |
Show 5 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
xrdpUbuntu:24.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.9.21.1-10.9.24-20.9.24-30.9.24-3build10.9.24-3build20.9.24-40.9.24-4ubuntu0.1~esm10.9.24-4ubuntu0.1 |
None known |
xrdpUbuntu:25.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.10.1-30.10.1-3.10.10.1-3.1+deb13u1build0.25.10.1 |
None known |
xrdpUbuntu:26.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.10.1-4.10.10.6.1-2ubuntu1 |
None known |
xrdpUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.10.1-3.10.10.1-40.10.1-4.10.10.1-4.1ubuntu0.1 |
None known |
xrdpopenSUSE:Tumbleweed From an advisory covering 8 CVEs |
before 0.9.27-2.1 | 0.9.27-2.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| affected, aliases, references | OSV | |
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-32105 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.3) in Neutrinolabs Xrdp, published April 17, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.17%, the 6th percentile. Fixed in xrdp 0.10.6-r0.
References
github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/security/advisories/GHSA-j2jm-c596-c5q3
github.com/neutrinolabs/xrdp/releases/tag/v0.10.6
security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2026-32105
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/32xxx/CVE-2026-32105.json
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-32105
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-32105
Show 10 moreShow less
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-32105
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-32105
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-39917
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32105
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32107
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32623
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32624
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33145
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33689
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35512