Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-32105

xrdp: RDP MAC signature (dataSignature) never verified on receive — integrity bypass in non-TLS mode

9.3 CriticalFix available

xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

Exploit likelihood

0.17%Up 0.1 points since Apr 18, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 9.3

xrdp: RDP MAC signature (dataSignature) never verified on receive — integrity bypass in non-TLS mode

xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.

Record
CVE-2026-32105
CVSS 4.0
9.3 CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L
Weakness
CWE-354
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-23472 9.3

xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.

Record
EUVD-2026-23472
CVSS 4.0
9.3 CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 9.3

xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.

Record
CVE-2026-32105
CVSS 4.0
9.3 CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
CVSS 3.1
7.7 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Weakness
CWE-354
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2026-32105 7.7

xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.

Record
ALPINE-CVE-2026-32105
CVSS 3.1
7.7 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Updated
2026-11-03
OSV 9.3

xrdp: RDP MAC signature (dataSignature) never verified on receive — integrity bypass in non-TLS mode

xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.

Record
CVE-2026-32105
CVSS 4.0
9.3 CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L
Weakness
CWE-354
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-32105 7.7

xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.

Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-32105
CVSS 3.1
7.7 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-32105 9.3

xrdp is an open source RDP server. In versions through 0.10.5, xrdp does not implement verification for the Message Authentication Code (MAC) signature of encrypted RDP packets when using the "Classic RDP Security" layer. While the sender correctly generates signatures, the receiving logic lacks the necessary implementation to validate the 8-byte integrity signature, causing it to be silently ignored. An unauthenticated attacker with man-in-the-middle (MITM) capabilities can exploit this missing check to modify encrypted traffic in transit without detection. It does not affect connections where the TLS security layer is enforced. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.6. If users are unable to immediately upgrade, they should configure xrdp.ini to enforce TLS security (security_layer=tls) to ensure end-to-end integrity.

Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-32105
CVSS 4.0
9.3 CriticalCVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L
CVSS 3.1
7.7 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:10816-1 No score

libpainter0-0.9.27-2.1 on GA media

These are all security issues fixed in the libpainter0-0.9.27-2.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.

Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:10816-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
xrdp
Alpine:v3.23
before 0.10.6-r0
0.10.6-r0
xrdp
Alpine:v3.24
before 0.10.6-r0
0.10.6-r0
xrdp
Debian:12
before 0.9.21.1-1+deb12u3, plus listed versions
0.9.21.1-10.9.21.1-1+deb12u10.9.21.1-1+deb12u2
0.9.21.1-1+deb12u3
xrdp
Debian:13
before 0.10.1-3.1+deb13u2, plus listed versions
0.10.1-3.10.10.1-3.1+deb13u1
0.10.1-3.1+deb13u2
xrdp
Debian:14
before 0.10.6-1, plus listed versions
0.10.1-3.10.10.1-40.10.1-4.10.10.2-10.10.2-2
Show 7 moreShow less
0.10.4.1-10.10.4.1-20.10.5-10.10.5-20.10.5-30.10.5-40.10.5-5
0.10.6-1
xrdp
Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS
All versions, plus listed versions
0.6.0-10.6.0-1ubuntu0.10.6.0-1ubuntu0.1+esm10.6.0-1ubuntu0.1+esm20.6.0-1ubuntu0.1+esm3
None known
xrdp
Ubuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS
All versions, plus listed versions
0.6.1-20.6.1-2ubuntu0.10.6.1-2ubuntu0.30.6.1-2ubuntu0.3+esm10.6.1-2ubuntu0.3+esm20.6.1-2ubuntu0.3+esm3
None known
xrdp
Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS
All versions, plus listed versions
0.9.1-90.9.4-10.9.4-20.9.4-30.9.4-4
Show 7 moreShow less
0.9.4-50.9.5-10.9.5-1build10.9.5-20.9.5-2ubuntu0.1~esm10.9.5-2ubuntu0.1~esm20.9.5-2ubuntu0.1~esm3
None known
xrdp
Ubuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS
All versions, plus listed versions
0.9.9-10.9.12-10.9.12-1ubuntu0.10.9.12-1ubuntu0.1+esm10.9.12-1ubuntu0.1+esm2
None known
xrdp
Ubuntu:22.04:LTS
All versions, plus listed versions
0.9.15-1ubuntu10.9.17-10.9.17-20.9.17-2ubuntu10.9.17-2ubuntu2
Show 5 moreShow less
0.9.17-2ubuntu2+esm10.9.17-2ubuntu30.9.17-2ubuntu3+esm10.9.17-2ubuntu3+esm20.9.17-2ubuntu3.1
None known
Show 5 moreShow less
Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
xrdp
Ubuntu:24.04:LTS
All versions, plus listed versions
0.9.21.1-10.9.24-20.9.24-30.9.24-3build10.9.24-3build20.9.24-40.9.24-4ubuntu0.1~esm10.9.24-4ubuntu0.1
None known
xrdp
Ubuntu:25.10
All versions, plus listed versions
0.10.1-30.10.1-3.10.10.1-3.1+deb13u1build0.25.10.1
None known
xrdp
Ubuntu:26.10
All versions, plus listed versions
0.10.1-4.10.10.6.1-2ubuntu1
None known
xrdp
Ubuntu:26.04:LTS
All versions, plus listed versions
0.10.1-3.10.10.1-40.10.1-4.10.10.1-4.1ubuntu0.1
None known
xrdp
openSUSE:Tumbleweed
From an advisory covering 8 CVEs
before 0.9.27-2.1
0.9.27-2.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
affected, aliases, referencesOSV
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-32105 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.3) in Neutrinolabs Xrdp, published April 17, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.17%, the 6th percentile. Fixed in xrdp 0.10.6-r0.

References

Show 10 moreShow less
MoveEnter Open