Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-55834

Pocket ID: Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none

4.3 MediumFix available

Pocket ID is an OIDC provider that allows users to authenticate with their passkeys to services. From 2.6.0 until 2.9.0, frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts reads the redirect_uri query parameter and frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte uses the raw callbackURL in redirectWithError when prompt=none cannot complete silent authorization. The client-side path only blocks javascript and data schemes and does not invoke the backend callback allow-list validation, so an unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid client_id can redirect a victim browser to an arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS origin for phishing or OIDC error and state smuggling. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.0.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
Required

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.37%Up 0.1 points since Aug 29, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 4.3

Pocket ID: Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none

Pocket ID is an OIDC provider that allows users to authenticate with their passkeys to services. From 2.6.0 until 2.9.0, frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts reads the redirect_uri query parameter and frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte uses the raw callbackURL in redirectWithError when prompt=none cannot complete silent authorization. The client-side path only blocks javascript and data schemes and does not invoke the backend callback allow-list validation, so an unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid client_id can redirect a victim browser to an arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS origin for phishing or OIDC error and state smuggling. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.0.

Record
CVE-2026-55834
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-601
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-67828 4.3

Pocket ID is an OIDC provider that allows users to authenticate with their passkeys to services. From 2.6.0 until 2.9.0, frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts reads the redirect_uri query parameter and frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte uses the raw callbackURL in redirectWithError when prompt=none cannot complete silent authorization. The client-side path only blocks javascript and data schemes and does not invoke the backend callback allow-list validation, so an unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid client_id can redirect a victim browser to an arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS origin for phishing or OIDC error and state smuggling. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.0.

Record
EUVD-2026-67828
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv 4.3

Pocket-ID has an Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none

Summary

The OIDC authorization page in the pocket-id frontend redirects the browser to an attacker-controlled URL without consulting the backend redirect_uri allow-list when the request uses prompt=none. An attacker who knows a valid client_id can craft an /authorize link that sends a victim (or a victim's browser doing a silent re-auth) to any external https URL, enabling phishing and OAuth response smuggling. The backend allow-list validation that protects the normal authenticated flow is bypassed because this path is handled entirely client-side.

Details

For an OIDC authorization request with prompt=none, the SvelteKit frontend short-circuits the flow before the backend ever validates the redirect_uri against the client's registered callback list.

File: frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts (line 14) parses the raw redirect_uri query parameter from the incoming URL.

File: frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte - in onMount(), when the request carries prompt=none and the user cannot be silently authorized (for example the visitor is not logged in, so login_required must be returned), the page builds the callback URL from the raw redirect_uri and performs:

window.location.href = `${callbackURL}?error=login_required...`

The callbackURL is taken directly from the user-supplied redirect_uri. The only filtering applied is a scheme check that blocks javascript: and data: URLs; any http: or https: origin passes through. The backend allow-list validator GetCallbackURLFromList (which the authenticated code path uses to confirm the redirect_uri matches one of the client's registered callback URLs) is never invoked on this branch.

This means the per-client redirect_uri allow-list, the central control that makes redirect_uri safe in OAuth/OIDC, is not enforced for the prompt=none error-return path. A client_id is not a secret: client metadata is retrievable at /api/oidc/clients/:id/meta, and client_ids appear in any integration's authorization links.

Confirmation that the bypass is purely frontend: an unauthenticated POST to the backend /api/oidc/authorize endpoint correctly returns 401 ({"error":"You are not signed in"}), so the backend never authorizes the request. The redirect nonetheless happens in the browser because +page.svelte issues window.location.href before/without a successful backend authorization.

A second variant exists for an authenticated victim: when prompt=none is combined with a first-time (not yet consented) authorization of a client, the same client-side path can be reached.

Contrast: the standard interactive flow (no prompt=none) posts to the backend, which validates redirect_uri against the registered list before returning a callback. The defect is specific to the client-side prompt=none short-circuit.

PoC

Prerequisites: a running pocket-id instance, a registered OIDC client whose client_id is known to the attacker (obtainable from /api/oidc/clients/:id/meta or any existing integration), and a victim whose browser opens the link (the victim need not be logged in for the login_required branch).

  1. Attacker constructs an authorization URL pointing at the victim's pocket-id, supplying an external redirect_uri and prompt=none:

    https://idp.victim.example/authorize?client_id=<known_client_id>&redirect_uri=https://attacker.example/collect&response_type=code&scope=openid&prompt=none

  2. Victim opens the link. The frontend authorize page loads, determines the silent auth cannot succeed (login_required), and executes:

    window.location.href = "https://attacker.example/collect?error=login_required&state=..."

  3. The browser is redirected to https://attacker.example/collect. Expected result on a fixed build: the page would refuse the redirect because redirect_uri does not match the client's registered callback list and would render an error in place instead of navigating off-origin.

Validation level: code-level confirmation at commit fc42f62. This is a browser-side…

Record
GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-601
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 4.3

Pocket ID is an OIDC provider that allows users to authenticate with their passkeys to services. From 2.6.0 until 2.9.0, frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts reads the redirect_uri query parameter and frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte uses the raw callbackURL in redirectWithError when prompt=none cannot complete silent authorization. The client-side path only blocks javascript and data schemes and does not invoke the backend callback allow-list validation, so an unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid client_id can redirect a victim browser to an arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS origin for phishing or OIDC error and state smuggling. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.0.

Record
CVE-2026-55834
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-601
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 4.3

Pocket ID: Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none

Pocket ID is an OIDC provider that allows users to authenticate with their passkeys to services. From 2.6.0 until 2.9.0, frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts reads the redirect_uri query parameter and frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte uses the raw callbackURL in redirectWithError when prompt=none cannot complete silent authorization. The client-side path only blocks javascript and data schemes and does not invoke the backend callback allow-list validation, so an unauthenticated attacker who knows a valid client_id can redirect a victim browser to an arbitrary HTTP or HTTPS origin for phishing or OIDC error and state smuggling. This issue is fixed in version 2.9.0.

Record
CVE-2026-55834
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-601
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv 4.3

Pocket-ID has an Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none

Summary

The OIDC authorization page in the pocket-id frontend redirects the browser to an attacker-controlled URL without consulting the backend redirect_uri allow-list when the request uses prompt=none. An attacker who knows a valid client_id can craft an /authorize link that sends a victim (or a victim's browser doing a silent re-auth) to any external https URL, enabling phishing and OAuth response smuggling. The backend allow-list validation that protects the normal authenticated flow is bypassed because this path is handled entirely client-side.

Details

For an OIDC authorization request with prompt=none, the SvelteKit frontend short-circuits the flow before the backend ever validates the redirect_uri against the client's registered callback list.

File: frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.ts (line 14) parses the raw redirect_uri query parameter from the incoming URL.

File: frontend/src/routes/authorize/+page.svelte - in onMount(), when the request carries prompt=none and the user cannot be silently authorized (for example the visitor is not logged in, so login_required must be returned), the page builds the callback URL from the raw redirect_uri and performs:

window.location.href = `${callbackURL}?error=login_required...`

The callbackURL is taken directly from the user-supplied redirect_uri. The only filtering applied is a scheme check that blocks javascript: and data: URLs; any http: or https: origin passes through. The backend allow-list validator GetCallbackURLFromList (which the authenticated code path uses to confirm the redirect_uri matches one of the client's registered callback URLs) is never invoked on this branch.

This means the per-client redirect_uri allow-list, the central control that makes redirect_uri safe in OAuth/OIDC, is not enforced for the prompt=none error-return path. A client_id is not a secret: client metadata is retrievable at /api/oidc/clients/:id/meta, and client_ids appear in any integration's authorization links.

Confirmation that the bypass is purely frontend: an unauthenticated POST to the backend /api/oidc/authorize endpoint correctly returns 401 ({"error":"You are not signed in"}), so the backend never authorizes the request. The redirect nonetheless happens in the browser because +page.svelte issues window.location.href before/without a successful backend authorization.

A second variant exists for an authenticated victim: when prompt=none is combined with a first-time (not yet consented) authorization of a client, the same client-side path can be reached.

Contrast: the standard interactive flow (no prompt=none) posts to the backend, which validates redirect_uri against the registered list before returning a callback. The defect is specific to the client-side prompt=none short-circuit.

PoC

Prerequisites: a running pocket-id instance, a registered OIDC client whose client_id is known to the attacker (obtainable from /api/oidc/clients/:id/meta or any existing integration), and a victim whose browser opens the link (the victim need not be logged in for the login_required branch).

  1. Attacker constructs an authorization URL pointing at the victim's pocket-id, supplying an external redirect_uri and prompt=none:

    https://idp.victim.example/authorize?client_id=<known_client_id>&redirect_uri=https://attacker.example/collect&response_type=code&scope=openid&prompt=none

  2. Victim opens the link. The frontend authorize page loads, determines the silent auth cannot succeed (login_required), and executes:

    window.location.href = "https://attacker.example/collect?error=login_required&state=..."

  3. The browser is redirected to https://attacker.example/collect. Expected result on a fixed build: the page would refuse the redirect because redirect_uri does not match the client's registered callback list and would render an error in place instead of navigating off-origin.

Validation level: code-level confirmation at commit fc42f62. This is a browser-side…

Record
GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv
CVSS 3.1
4.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Weakness
CWE-601
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 4 moreShow less
OSVGO-2026-6305 No score

Pocket-ID has an Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none in github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend

Pocket-ID has an Open Redirect on the OIDC /authorize page via unvalidated redirect_uri with prompt=none in github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend.

NOTE: The source advisory for this report contains additional versions that could not be automatically mapped to standard Go module versions.

(If this is causing false-positive reports from vulnerability scanners, please suggest an edit to the report.)

The additional affected modules and versions are: github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend from v2.6.0 before v2.9.0.

Record
GO-2026-6305
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21812-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260902T191204 2026-09-02T19:12:04Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-6305 CVE-2026-55834 GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv
  • GO-2026-6306 CVE-2026-55064 GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4
  • GO-2026-6307 CVE-2026-55067 GHSA-569v-q83c-3j3g
  • GO-2026-6308 CVE-2026-55066 GHSA-5pg6-m483-7vrg
  • GO-2026-6309 CVE-2026-54746 GHSA-8x7x-83cf-c3pg
  • GO-2026-6310 CVE-2026-54755 GHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v
  • GO-2026-6311 CVE-2026-54766 GHSA-f27p-pw2p-9pr4
  • GO-2026-6312 CVE-2026-55108 GHSA-fmgp-q6jx-gg3x
  • GO-2026-6313 CVE-2026-55065 GHSA-gg93-x632-9ccv
  • GO-2026-6314 CVE-2026-55569 GHSA-mf5c-hw34-4hpp
  • GO-2026-6315 CVE-2026-54754 GHSA-p7gw-2pcp-5pf8
  • GO-2026-6316 CVE-2026-55068 GHSA-x8mj-6p3q-g5pp
  • GO-2026-6317 CVE-2026-55588 GHSA-298f-872v-2rcx
  • GO-2026-6318 CVE-2026-55621 GHSA-64f3-v33m-w89f
  • GO-2026-6319 CVE-2026-55622 GHSA-c9f5-j9c3-mhrg
  • GO-2026-6320 CVE-2026-55245 GHSA-w98g-5w9p-p3rc
  • GO-2026-6321 CVE-2026-55484 GHSA-hr6j-w4mw-g9mj
  • GO-2026-6322 CVE-2026-55678 GHSA-p378-jp5r-gpgw
  • GO-2026-6323 CVE-2026-55763 GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv
  • GO-2026-6324 CVE-2026-55761 GHSA-x626-fcwx-f5pc
  • GO-2026-6325 CVE-2026-27878 GHSA-6xff-cpcq-vpw2
  • GO-2026-6326 CVE-2026-55784 GHSA-334q-h5g3-fpxv
  • GO-2026-6327 CVE-2026-55874 GHSA-56wq-x3wv-3ff4
  • GO-2026-6328 CVE-2026-55785 GHSA-fp46-6vfw-gc9c
  • GO-2026-6329 CVE-2026-55873 GHSA-hgpf-8634-g44c
  • GO-2026-6330 CVE-2026-55764 GHSA-mrpp-v6pg-p54x
  • GO-2026-6333 CVE-2026-25712 GHSA-37w2-86g3-h4qh
  • GO-2026-6334 CVE-2026-24690 GHSA-47rq-xp99-92mx
  • GO-2026-6335 CVE-2026-27657 GHSA-4c8f-3m6h-m56r
  • GO-2026-6336 CVE-2026-26232 GHSA-5v69-g2m3-3hq3
  • GO-2026-6337 CVE-2026-28705 GHSA-7jvx-g65v-r899
  • GO-2026-6338 CVE-2026-22547 GHSA-922f-hfwp-p56f
  • GO-2026-6339 CVE-2026-20909 GHSA-fhq3-p242-2qpf
  • GO-2026-6340 CVE-2026-25718 GHSA-h697-89cp-24q8
  • GO-2026-6341 CVE-2026-26307 GHSA-h9c5-x7g8-4q7f
  • GO-2026-6342 CVE-2026-26247 GHSA-m5ch-ppfx-xv3v
  • GO-2026-6354 CVE-2026-78662
  • GO-2026-6355 CVE-2026-56855
  • Update to version 0.0.20260828T144745 2026-08-28T14:47:45Z.
  • GO-2026-6303 CVE-2026-56854
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21812-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23692-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260902T191204 2026-09-02T19:12:04Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-6305 CVE-2026-55834 GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv
  • GO-2026-6306 CVE-2026-55064 GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4
  • GO-2026-6307 CVE-2026-55067 GHSA-569v-q83c-3j3g
  • GO-2026-6308 CVE-2026-55066 GHSA-5pg6-m483-7vrg
  • GO-2026-6309 CVE-2026-54746 GHSA-8x7x-83cf-c3pg
  • GO-2026-6310 CVE-2026-54755 GHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v
  • GO-2026-6311 CVE-2026-54766 GHSA-f27p-pw2p-9pr4
  • GO-2026-6312 CVE-2026-55108 GHSA-fmgp-q6jx-gg3x
  • GO-2026-6313 CVE-2026-55065 GHSA-gg93-x632-9ccv
  • GO-2026-6314 CVE-2026-55569 GHSA-mf5c-hw34-4hpp
  • GO-2026-6315 CVE-2026-54754 GHSA-p7gw-2pcp-5pf8
  • GO-2026-6316 CVE-2026-55068 GHSA-x8mj-6p3q-g5pp
  • GO-2026-6317 CVE-2026-55588 GHSA-298f-872v-2rcx
  • GO-2026-6318 CVE-2026-55621 GHSA-64f3-v33m-w89f
  • GO-2026-6319 CVE-2026-55622 GHSA-c9f5-j9c3-mhrg
  • GO-2026-6320 CVE-2026-55245 GHSA-w98g-5w9p-p3rc
  • GO-2026-6321 CVE-2026-55484 GHSA-hr6j-w4mw-g9mj
  • GO-2026-6322 CVE-2026-55678 GHSA-p378-jp5r-gpgw
  • GO-2026-6323 CVE-2026-55763 GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv
  • GO-2026-6324 CVE-2026-55761 GHSA-x626-fcwx-f5pc
  • GO-2026-6325 CVE-2026-27878 GHSA-6xff-cpcq-vpw2
  • GO-2026-6326 CVE-2026-55784 GHSA-334q-h5g3-fpxv
  • GO-2026-6327 CVE-2026-55874 GHSA-56wq-x3wv-3ff4
  • GO-2026-6328 CVE-2026-55785 GHSA-fp46-6vfw-gc9c
  • GO-2026-6329 CVE-2026-55873 GHSA-hgpf-8634-g44c
  • GO-2026-6330 CVE-2026-55764 GHSA-mrpp-v6pg-p54x
  • GO-2026-6333 CVE-2026-25712 GHSA-37w2-86g3-h4qh
  • GO-2026-6334 CVE-2026-24690 GHSA-47rq-xp99-92mx
  • GO-2026-6335 CVE-2026-27657 GHSA-4c8f-3m6h-m56r
  • GO-2026-6336 CVE-2026-26232 GHSA-5v69-g2m3-3hq3
  • GO-2026-6337 CVE-2026-28705 GHSA-7jvx-g65v-r899
  • GO-2026-6338 CVE-2026-22547 GHSA-922f-hfwp-p56f
  • GO-2026-6339 CVE-2026-20909 GHSA-fhq3-p242-2qpf
  • GO-2026-6340 CVE-2026-25718 GHSA-h697-89cp-24q8
  • GO-2026-6341 CVE-2026-26307 GHSA-h9c5-x7g8-4q7f
  • GO-2026-6342 CVE-2026-26247 GHSA-m5ch-ppfx-xv3v
  • GO-2026-6354 CVE-2026-78662
  • GO-2026-6355 CVE-2026-56855
  • Update to version 0.0.20260828T144745 2026-08-28T14:47:45Z.
  • GO-2026-6303 CVE-2026-56854
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23692-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23712-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260902T191204 2026-09-02T19:12:04Z (jsc#PED-11136).

Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

  • GO-2026-6305 CVE-2026-55834 GHSA-2wvm-8mvp-22qv
  • GO-2026-6306 CVE-2026-55064 GHSA-44v6-7fxq-vgf4
  • GO-2026-6307 CVE-2026-55067 GHSA-569v-q83c-3j3g
  • GO-2026-6308 CVE-2026-55066 GHSA-5pg6-m483-7vrg
  • GO-2026-6309 CVE-2026-54746 GHSA-8x7x-83cf-c3pg
  • GO-2026-6310 CVE-2026-54755 GHSA-cgc5-v3f2-8m2v
  • GO-2026-6311 CVE-2026-54766 GHSA-f27p-pw2p-9pr4
  • GO-2026-6312 CVE-2026-55108 GHSA-fmgp-q6jx-gg3x
  • GO-2026-6313 CVE-2026-55065 GHSA-gg93-x632-9ccv
  • GO-2026-6314 CVE-2026-55569 GHSA-mf5c-hw34-4hpp
  • GO-2026-6315 CVE-2026-54754 GHSA-p7gw-2pcp-5pf8
  • GO-2026-6316 CVE-2026-55068 GHSA-x8mj-6p3q-g5pp
  • GO-2026-6317 CVE-2026-55588 GHSA-298f-872v-2rcx
  • GO-2026-6318 CVE-2026-55621 GHSA-64f3-v33m-w89f
  • GO-2026-6319 CVE-2026-55622 GHSA-c9f5-j9c3-mhrg
  • GO-2026-6320 CVE-2026-55245 GHSA-w98g-5w9p-p3rc
  • GO-2026-6321 CVE-2026-55484 GHSA-hr6j-w4mw-g9mj
  • GO-2026-6322 CVE-2026-55678 GHSA-p378-jp5r-gpgw
  • GO-2026-6323 CVE-2026-55763 GHSA-v358-wf77-39xv
  • GO-2026-6324 CVE-2026-55761 GHSA-x626-fcwx-f5pc
  • GO-2026-6325 CVE-2026-27878 GHSA-6xff-cpcq-vpw2
  • GO-2026-6326 CVE-2026-55784 GHSA-334q-h5g3-fpxv
  • GO-2026-6327 CVE-2026-55874 GHSA-56wq-x3wv-3ff4
  • GO-2026-6328 CVE-2026-55785 GHSA-fp46-6vfw-gc9c
  • GO-2026-6329 CVE-2026-55873 GHSA-hgpf-8634-g44c
  • GO-2026-6330 CVE-2026-55764 GHSA-mrpp-v6pg-p54x
  • GO-2026-6333 CVE-2026-25712 GHSA-37w2-86g3-h4qh
  • GO-2026-6334 CVE-2026-24690 GHSA-47rq-xp99-92mx
  • GO-2026-6335 CVE-2026-27657 GHSA-4c8f-3m6h-m56r
  • GO-2026-6336 CVE-2026-26232 GHSA-5v69-g2m3-3hq3
  • GO-2026-6337 CVE-2026-28705 GHSA-7jvx-g65v-r899
  • GO-2026-6338 CVE-2026-22547 GHSA-922f-hfwp-p56f
  • GO-2026-6339 CVE-2026-20909 GHSA-fhq3-p242-2qpf
  • GO-2026-6340 CVE-2026-25718 GHSA-h697-89cp-24q8
  • GO-2026-6341 CVE-2026-26307 GHSA-h9c5-x7g8-4q7f
  • GO-2026-6342 CVE-2026-26247 GHSA-m5ch-ppfx-xv3v
  • GO-2026-6354 CVE-2026-78662
  • GO-2026-6355 CVE-2026-56855
  • Update to version 0.0.20260828T144745 2026-08-28T14:47:45Z.
  • GO-2026-6303 CVE-2026-56854
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23712-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend
Go
2.6.0 to 2.8.0
2.9.0
github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend
Go
2.6.0 up to 2.9.0
2.9.0
github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend
Go
All versions None known
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0
From an advisory covering 39 CVEs
before 0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1
0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0
From an advisory covering 39 CVEs
before 0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1
0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 39 CVEs
before 0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1
0.0.20260902T191204-160000.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-55834 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 4.3) in Pocket-id, published August 28, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.37%, the 31st percentile. Fixed in github.com/pocket-id/pocket-id/backend 2.9.0.

References

Show 42 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open