CVE-2026-73564
frp: Unauthenticated Remote Denial of Service in the frp SSH Tunnel Gateway via Integer Overflow
frp is a fast reverse proxy. From 0.53.0 until 0.70.1, frp's optional SSH Tunnel Gateway in pkg/ssh/server.go parses an SSH exec channel request by adding 4 to an attacker-controlled four-byte big-endian length. A length of 0xFFFFFFFF makes the uint32 addition wrap to 3, defeats the payload bounds check, and causes payload[4:3] to panic in TunnelServer.handleNewChannel. When no authorized-keys file is configured, sshConfig.NoClientAuth permits an unauthenticated peer to reach this channel phase before the frp token is checked, so a single five-byte request terminates the frps process and drops every active tunnel. This issue is fixed in version 0.70.1.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
8.7
frp: Unauthenticated Remote Denial of Service in the frp SSH Tunnel Gateway via Integer Overflow
frp is a fast reverse proxy. From 0.53.0 until 0.70.1, frp's optional SSH Tunnel Gateway in pkg/ssh/server.go parses an SSH exec channel request by adding 4 to an attacker-controlled four-byte big-endian length. A length of 0xFFFFFFFF makes the uint32 addition wrap to 3, defeats the payload bounds check, and causes payload[4:3] to panic in TunnelServer.handleNewChannel. When no authorized-keys file is configured, sshConfig.NoClientAuth permits an unauthenticated peer to reach this channel phase before the frp token is checked, so a single five-byte request terminates the frps process and drops every active tunnel. This issue is fixed in version 0.70.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-73564- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-129, CWE-190
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-58179
8.7
frp is a fast reverse proxy. From 0.53.0 until 0.70.1, frp's optional SSH Tunnel Gateway in pkg/ssh/server.go parses an SSH exec channel request by adding 4 to an attacker-controlled four-byte big-endian length. A length of 0xFFFFFFFF makes the uint32 addition wrap to 3, defeats the payload bounds check, and causes payload[4:3] to panic in TunnelServer.handleNewChannel. When no authorized-keys file is configured, sshConfig.NoClientAuth permits an unauthenticated peer to reach this channel phase before the frp token is checked, so a single five-byte request terminates the frps process and drops every active tunnel. This issue is fixed in version 0.70.1.
- Record
EUVD-2026-58179- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp
8.2
frp: Unauthenticated Remote Denial of Service in the frp SSH Tunnel Gateway via Integer Overflow
Summary
An integer-overflow vulnerability in the frp server's optional SSH Tunnel Gateway lets any unauthenticated remote attacker crash the entire frps process with a single five-byte message. When the gateway parses an SSH exec channel request in pkg/ssh/server.go, it adds a small constant to a four-byte length value taken directly from the request. Because that length is fully attacker-controlled, a value of 0xFFFFFFFF makes the addition wrap around to a tiny number, defeating the only bounds check and forcing an out-of-range slice. Go raises a panic that nothing recovers, so the whole server exits. In the default gateway mode SSH clients are not authenticated and the request is handled before any frp token is checked, so the crash is reachable pre-authentication. It carries no state and is trivially repeatable, turning one crash into a sustained outage that drops every tunnel for every user.
Details
The exec request payload is a four-byte big-endian length followed by that many command bytes, and the length field is fully attacker-controlled. The gateway computes the end of the command as 4 + length. The constant 4 takes the uint32 type of the length field, so 4 + 0xFFFFFFFF wraps modulo 2^32 to 3. The only guard compares the real payload size against this wrapped value, so a five-byte payload passes the test 5 < 3, and the slice runs from index 4 to index 3:
// pkg/ssh/server.go:315-319
end := 4 + binary.BigEndian.Uint32(req.Payload[:4]) // 4 + 0xFFFFFFFF wraps to 3
if len(req.Payload) < int(end) { // 5 < 3 is false, so it passes
continue
}
extraPayload := string(req.Payload[4:end]) // payload[4:3] -> panic
The handler runs in a bare goroutine and no function in the call chain installs a recover, so the panic unwinds to the top of the goroutine and terminates the whole process rather than the single connection:
// pkg/ssh/server.go:226
go s.handleNewChannel(newChannel, extraPayloadCh) // no recover anywhere in the chain
The sink is reachable without credentials in the default configuration. When no authorized-keys file is set, the gateway disables SSH client authentication, which is the default and documented mode where users authenticate through the frp token embedded in the SSH command. The exec request is processed during the channel phase, before that token is validated, so an unauthenticated peer reaches the sink:
// pkg/ssh/gateway.go:74
sshConfig.NoClientAuth = cfg.AuthorizedKeysFile == "" // default: no client auth
Affected product: frp (fatedier), frps server, SSH Tunnel Gateway
Affected versions: v0.53.0 (when the gateway was introduced) through v0.70.0, confirmed against a v0.70.0 build
PoC
The SSH Tunnel Gateway must be enabled with no authorized-keys file, which is the default mode of any deployment that turns the gateway on. No credentials and no knowledge of the target are required.
Enable the gateway on a stock v0.70.0 build:
bindPort = 7000
[sshTunnelGateway]
bindPort = 2200
As an unauthenticated SSH client, open a session channel and send one exec request whose four-byte length prefix is 0xFFFFFFFF followed by a single byte, giving the five-byte payload ff ff ff ff 41. The server immediately panics and exits:
panic: runtime error: slice bounds out of range [4:3]
...github.com/fatedier/frp/pkg/ssh.(*TunnelServer).handleNewChannel
.../frp/pkg/ssh/server.go:319
The shell prompt returns in the server terminal, confirming the whole process has terminated and every other client tunnel is dropped at the same instant. A well-formed request of the same length (prefix 1) leaves the server running, proving the crash is caused by the overflow value and not by the exec request itself. The attacker can re-send the payload after any restart to hold the server down indefinitely.
Impact
This is an unauthenticated remote denial of service (CWE-190) leading…
- Record
GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp- CVSS 4.0
- 8.2 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-129, CWE-190
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
8.7
frp is a fast reverse proxy. From 0.53.0 until 0.70.1, frp's optional SSH Tunnel Gateway in pkg/ssh/server.go parses an SSH exec channel request by adding 4 to an attacker-controlled four-byte big-endian length. A length of 0xFFFFFFFF makes the uint32 addition wrap to 3, defeats the payload bounds check, and causes payload[4:3] to panic in TunnelServer.handleNewChannel. When no authorized-keys file is configured, sshConfig.NoClientAuth permits an unauthenticated peer to reach this channel phase before the frp token is checked, so a single five-byte request terminates the frps process and drops every active tunnel. This issue is fixed in version 0.70.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-73564- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - Weakness
- CWE-129, CWE-190
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
8.7
frp: Unauthenticated Remote Denial of Service in the frp SSH Tunnel Gateway via Integer Overflow
frp is a fast reverse proxy. From 0.53.0 until 0.70.1, frp's optional SSH Tunnel Gateway in pkg/ssh/server.go parses an SSH exec channel request by adding 4 to an attacker-controlled four-byte big-endian length. A length of 0xFFFFFFFF makes the uint32 addition wrap to 3, defeats the payload bounds check, and causes payload[4:3] to panic in TunnelServer.handleNewChannel. When no authorized-keys file is configured, sshConfig.NoClientAuth permits an unauthenticated peer to reach this channel phase before the frp token is checked, so a single five-byte request terminates the frps process and drops every active tunnel. This issue is fixed in version 0.70.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-73564- CVSS 4.0
- 8.7 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-129, CWE-190
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp
8.2
frp: Unauthenticated Remote Denial of Service in the frp SSH Tunnel Gateway via Integer Overflow
Summary
An integer-overflow vulnerability in the frp server's optional SSH Tunnel Gateway lets any unauthenticated remote attacker crash the entire frps process with a single five-byte message. When the gateway parses an SSH exec channel request in pkg/ssh/server.go, it adds a small constant to a four-byte length value taken directly from the request. Because that length is fully attacker-controlled, a value of 0xFFFFFFFF makes the addition wrap around to a tiny number, defeating the only bounds check and forcing an out-of-range slice. Go raises a panic that nothing recovers, so the whole server exits. In the default gateway mode SSH clients are not authenticated and the request is handled before any frp token is checked, so the crash is reachable pre-authentication. It carries no state and is trivially repeatable, turning one crash into a sustained outage that drops every tunnel for every user.
Details
The exec request payload is a four-byte big-endian length followed by that many command bytes, and the length field is fully attacker-controlled. The gateway computes the end of the command as 4 + length. The constant 4 takes the uint32 type of the length field, so 4 + 0xFFFFFFFF wraps modulo 2^32 to 3. The only guard compares the real payload size against this wrapped value, so a five-byte payload passes the test 5 < 3, and the slice runs from index 4 to index 3:
// pkg/ssh/server.go:315-319
end := 4 + binary.BigEndian.Uint32(req.Payload[:4]) // 4 + 0xFFFFFFFF wraps to 3
if len(req.Payload) < int(end) { // 5 < 3 is false, so it passes
continue
}
extraPayload := string(req.Payload[4:end]) // payload[4:3] -> panic
The handler runs in a bare goroutine and no function in the call chain installs a recover, so the panic unwinds to the top of the goroutine and terminates the whole process rather than the single connection:
// pkg/ssh/server.go:226
go s.handleNewChannel(newChannel, extraPayloadCh) // no recover anywhere in the chain
The sink is reachable without credentials in the default configuration. When no authorized-keys file is set, the gateway disables SSH client authentication, which is the default and documented mode where users authenticate through the frp token embedded in the SSH command. The exec request is processed during the channel phase, before that token is validated, so an unauthenticated peer reaches the sink:
// pkg/ssh/gateway.go:74
sshConfig.NoClientAuth = cfg.AuthorizedKeysFile == "" // default: no client auth
Affected product: frp (fatedier), frps server, SSH Tunnel Gateway
Affected versions: v0.53.0 (when the gateway was introduced) through v0.70.0, confirmed against a v0.70.0 build
PoC
The SSH Tunnel Gateway must be enabled with no authorized-keys file, which is the default mode of any deployment that turns the gateway on. No credentials and no knowledge of the target are required.
Enable the gateway on a stock v0.70.0 build:
bindPort = 7000
[sshTunnelGateway]
bindPort = 2200
As an unauthenticated SSH client, open a session channel and send one exec request whose four-byte length prefix is 0xFFFFFFFF followed by a single byte, giving the five-byte payload ff ff ff ff 41. The server immediately panics and exits:
panic: runtime error: slice bounds out of range [4:3]
...github.com/fatedier/frp/pkg/ssh.(*TunnelServer).handleNewChannel
.../frp/pkg/ssh/server.go:319
The shell prompt returns in the server terminal, confirming the whole process has terminated and every other client tunnel is dropped at the same instant. A well-formed request of the same length (prefix 1) leaves the server running, proving the crash is caused by the overflow value and not by the exec request itself. The attacker can re-send the payload after any restart to hold the server down indefinitely.
Impact
This is an unauthenticated remote denial of service (CWE-190) leading…
- Record
GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp- CVSS 4.0
- 8.2 High
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - Weakness
- CWE-129, CWE-190
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-6103 No score
frp: Unauthenticated Remote Denial of Service in the frp SSH Tunnel Gateway via Integer Overflow in github.com/fatedier/frp
frp: Unauthenticated Remote Denial of Service in the frp SSH Tunnel Gateway via Integer Overflow in github.com/fatedier/frp
- Record
GO-2026-6103- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21761-1 No score
Security update for govulncheck-vulndb
This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:
-
Update to version 0.0.20260827T195228 2026-08-27T19:52:28Z (jsc#PED-11136).
Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:
- GO-2026-5026 CVE-2026-39821
- GO-2026-6225
- GO-2026-6250 CVE-2026-63328 GHSA-8rc5-4fr6-64pw
- GO-2026-6253 CVE-2026-17106 GHSA-hfg8-hc9c-6c3h
- GO-2026-6254 CVE-2026-53941 GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6q
- GO-2026-6255 CVE-2026-61711 GHSA-7236-3392-c5c6
- GO-2026-6256 CVE-2026-61712 GHSA-72x6-4j93-7w86
- GO-2026-6258 CVE-2026-45404 GHSA-42cj-99w8-cp2p
- GO-2026-6259 CVE-2026-32637 GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6
- GO-2026-6260 CVE-2026-55149 GHSA-qqff-5854-px68
- GO-2026-6261 CVE-2026-54061 GHSA-rrwh-6jrq-wp5v
- GO-2026-6262 GHSA-22w5-2fxg-vrwx
- GO-2026-6263 CVE-2026-54168 GHSA-6f2p-296r-cc28
- GO-2026-6264 CVE-2026-54245 GHSA-7q96-f8xw-jv5j
- GO-2026-6265 GHSA-8fxq-53rx-ph5f
- GO-2026-6266 CVE-2026-54167 GHSA-f5f4-3hh4-f54m
- GO-2026-6267 GHSA-h58c-xccx-75m3
- GO-2026-6268 GHSA-q9c5-pp7m-fm2g
- GO-2026-6269 GHSA-rxhg-vcww-2mpw
- GO-2026-6270 CVE-2026-54162 GHSA-x3g7-qrwc-f6c5
- GO-2026-6271 CVE-2026-67448 GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m
- GO-2026-6272 CVE-2026-67447 GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97
- GO-2026-6273 CVE-2026-64679 GHSA-26w5-6g95-gj28
- GO-2026-6274 CVE-2026-76905 GHSA-mmfr-pmjx-hw9w
- GO-2026-6275 CVE-2026-77354 GHSA-xhj3-7xw9-vr34
- GO-2026-6277 GHSA-4ph6-mjv7-3fq6
- GO-2026-6278 GHSA-w67g-5rqw-f597
- GO-2026-6279 CVE-2026-6046 GHSA-3vmp-whvv-5v9v
- GO-2026-6280 CVE-2026-7387 GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw
- GO-2026-6281 CVE-2026-6961 GHSA-8qq9-cqj8-82w4
- GO-2026-6282 CVE-2026-7184 GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9
- GO-2026-6283 CVE-2026-6689 GHSA-c28q-m4gf-vg4q
- GO-2026-6284 CVE-2026-55477 GHSA-jm48-m3rr-9hgg
- GO-2026-6285 CVE-2026-6739 GHSA-m2w9-h2mm-79qr
- GO-2026-6286 CVE-2026-3433 GHSA-rp4v-qc77-phm4
- GO-2026-6287 GHSA-vx2m-jpxr-xv7w
- GO-2026-6288 CVE-2026-11624 GHSA-76g7-m3xw-x9gr
- GO-2026-6289 GHSA-w8j7-39hp-8x59
- GO-2026-6290 CVE-2026-55581 GHSA-3x77-wg38-92r3
- GO-2026-6291 CVE-2026-55582 GHSA-74hp-mggr-hv58
- GO-2026-6292 CVE-2026-55580 GHSA-f5pj-2738-996m
- GO-2026-6293 CVE-2026-55677 GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq
- GO-2026-6294 CVE-2026-55092 GHSA-mcj4-mphf-j9ff
- GO-2026-6295 CVE-2026-55637 GHSA-cmwv-wf9p-p8wx
- GO-2026-6296 CVE-2026-54523 GHSA-79gf-7frw-68m9
- GO-2026-6297 CVE-2026-50879 GHSA-g743-m6x3-v6wm
- GO-2026-6298 CVE-2026-54563 GHSA-w5fv-7x5q-g8qp
- GO-2026-6299 CVE-2026-50884 GHSA-5442-mh7f-72px
- GO-2026-6300 CVE-2026-50891 GHSA-rcqf-cpv9-g5jf
- GO-2026-6301 CVE-2026-42350 GHSA-g7gw-m874-7rmf
-
Update to version 0.0.20260819T170606 2026-08-19T17:06:06Z.
Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:
- GO-2026-4720 GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
- GO-2026-4942 CVE-2026-35172 GHSA-f2g3-hh2r-cwgc
- GO-2026-4950
- GO-2026-6093 GHSA-464c-974j-9xm6
- GO-2026-6094 GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g
- GO-2026-6095 GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw
- GO-2026-6097 CVE-2026-55495 GHSA-49h3-cwhj-4737
- GO-2026-6098 CVE-2026-55496 GHSA-8r7f-r8hj-r3rv
- GO-2026-6099 CVE-2026-57497 GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q
- GO-2026-6100 CVE-2026-55497 GHSA-g9j2-8w95-3vwv
- GO-2026-6101 CVE-2026-55502 GHSA-hq88-5x99-x3gf
- GO-2026-6102 CVE-2026-55499 GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8
- GO-2026-6103 CVE-2026-73564 GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp
- GO-2026-6104 CVE-2026-62323 GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp
- GO-2026-6105 GHSA-c534-2w9c-x7fm
- GO-2026-6106 GHSA-v6w6-358x-2433
- GO-2026-6107 CVE-2026-73500 GHSA-6vch-q96h-7gc3
- GO-2026-6108 CVE-2026-73505 GHSA-6xj8-qv9j-xcjq
- GO-2026-6109 GHSA-86cx-wwf4-phq4
- GO-2026-6110 CVE-2026-73509 GHSA-95cv-r8x4-vh75
- GO-2026-6111 CVE-2026-73506 GHSA-fwjx-9p69-h25h
- GO-2026-6112 CVE-2026-73502 GHSA-jpcw-4wr7-c3vq
- GO-2026-6113 GHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337
- GO-2026-6114 CVE-2026-73499 GHSA-xg4h-6gfc-h4m8
- GO-2026-6115 CVE-2026-56867
- GO-2026-6117 GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5
- GO-2026-6118 CVE-2026-47427 GHSA-w4q6-qw23-4rg7
- GO-2026-6119 CVE-2026-43983…
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21761-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23625-1 No score
Security update for govulncheck-vulndb
This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:
-
Update to version 0.0.20260827T195228 2026-08-27T19:52:28Z (jsc#PED-11136).
Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:
- GO-2026-5026 CVE-2026-39821
- GO-2026-6225
- GO-2026-6250 CVE-2026-63328 GHSA-8rc5-4fr6-64pw
- GO-2026-6253 CVE-2026-17106 GHSA-hfg8-hc9c-6c3h
- GO-2026-6254 CVE-2026-53941 GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6q
- GO-2026-6255 CVE-2026-61711 GHSA-7236-3392-c5c6
- GO-2026-6256 CVE-2026-61712 GHSA-72x6-4j93-7w86
- GO-2026-6258 CVE-2026-45404 GHSA-42cj-99w8-cp2p
- GO-2026-6259 CVE-2026-32637 GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6
- GO-2026-6260 CVE-2026-55149 GHSA-qqff-5854-px68
- GO-2026-6261 CVE-2026-54061 GHSA-rrwh-6jrq-wp5v
- GO-2026-6262 GHSA-22w5-2fxg-vrwx
- GO-2026-6263 CVE-2026-54168 GHSA-6f2p-296r-cc28
- GO-2026-6264 CVE-2026-54245 GHSA-7q96-f8xw-jv5j
- GO-2026-6265 GHSA-8fxq-53rx-ph5f
- GO-2026-6266 CVE-2026-54167 GHSA-f5f4-3hh4-f54m
- GO-2026-6267 GHSA-h58c-xccx-75m3
- GO-2026-6268 GHSA-q9c5-pp7m-fm2g
- GO-2026-6269 GHSA-rxhg-vcww-2mpw
- GO-2026-6270 CVE-2026-54162 GHSA-x3g7-qrwc-f6c5
- GO-2026-6271 CVE-2026-67448 GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m
- GO-2026-6272 CVE-2026-67447 GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97
- GO-2026-6273 CVE-2026-64679 GHSA-26w5-6g95-gj28
- GO-2026-6274 CVE-2026-76905 GHSA-mmfr-pmjx-hw9w
- GO-2026-6275 CVE-2026-77354 GHSA-xhj3-7xw9-vr34
- GO-2026-6277 GHSA-4ph6-mjv7-3fq6
- GO-2026-6278 GHSA-w67g-5rqw-f597
- GO-2026-6279 CVE-2026-6046 GHSA-3vmp-whvv-5v9v
- GO-2026-6280 CVE-2026-7387 GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw
- GO-2026-6281 CVE-2026-6961 GHSA-8qq9-cqj8-82w4
- GO-2026-6282 CVE-2026-7184 GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9
- GO-2026-6283 CVE-2026-6689 GHSA-c28q-m4gf-vg4q
- GO-2026-6284 CVE-2026-55477 GHSA-jm48-m3rr-9hgg
- GO-2026-6285 CVE-2026-6739 GHSA-m2w9-h2mm-79qr
- GO-2026-6286 CVE-2026-3433 GHSA-rp4v-qc77-phm4
- GO-2026-6287 GHSA-vx2m-jpxr-xv7w
- GO-2026-6288 CVE-2026-11624 GHSA-76g7-m3xw-x9gr
- GO-2026-6289 GHSA-w8j7-39hp-8x59
- GO-2026-6290 CVE-2026-55581 GHSA-3x77-wg38-92r3
- GO-2026-6291 CVE-2026-55582 GHSA-74hp-mggr-hv58
- GO-2026-6292 CVE-2026-55580 GHSA-f5pj-2738-996m
- GO-2026-6293 CVE-2026-55677 GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq
- GO-2026-6294 CVE-2026-55092 GHSA-mcj4-mphf-j9ff
- GO-2026-6295 CVE-2026-55637 GHSA-cmwv-wf9p-p8wx
- GO-2026-6296 CVE-2026-54523 GHSA-79gf-7frw-68m9
- GO-2026-6297 CVE-2026-50879 GHSA-g743-m6x3-v6wm
- GO-2026-6298 CVE-2026-54563 GHSA-w5fv-7x5q-g8qp
- GO-2026-6299 CVE-2026-50884 GHSA-5442-mh7f-72px
- GO-2026-6300 CVE-2026-50891 GHSA-rcqf-cpv9-g5jf
- GO-2026-6301 CVE-2026-42350 GHSA-g7gw-m874-7rmf
-
Update to version 0.0.20260819T170606 2026-08-19T17:06:06Z.
Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:
- GO-2026-4720 GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
- GO-2026-4942 CVE-2026-35172 GHSA-f2g3-hh2r-cwgc
- GO-2026-4950
- GO-2026-6093 GHSA-464c-974j-9xm6
- GO-2026-6094 GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g
- GO-2026-6095 GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw
- GO-2026-6097 CVE-2026-55495 GHSA-49h3-cwhj-4737
- GO-2026-6098 CVE-2026-55496 GHSA-8r7f-r8hj-r3rv
- GO-2026-6099 CVE-2026-57497 GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q
- GO-2026-6100 CVE-2026-55497 GHSA-g9j2-8w95-3vwv
- GO-2026-6101 CVE-2026-55502 GHSA-hq88-5x99-x3gf
- GO-2026-6102 CVE-2026-55499 GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8
- GO-2026-6103 CVE-2026-73564 GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp
- GO-2026-6104 CVE-2026-62323 GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp
- GO-2026-6105 GHSA-c534-2w9c-x7fm
- GO-2026-6106 GHSA-v6w6-358x-2433
- GO-2026-6107 CVE-2026-73500 GHSA-6vch-q96h-7gc3
- GO-2026-6108 CVE-2026-73505 GHSA-6xj8-qv9j-xcjq
- GO-2026-6109 GHSA-86cx-wwf4-phq4
- GO-2026-6110 CVE-2026-73509 GHSA-95cv-r8x4-vh75
- GO-2026-6111 CVE-2026-73506 GHSA-fwjx-9p69-h25h
- GO-2026-6112 CVE-2026-73502 GHSA-jpcw-4wr7-c3vq
- GO-2026-6113 GHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337
- GO-2026-6114 CVE-2026-73499 GHSA-xg4h-6gfc-h4m8
- GO-2026-6115 CVE-2026-56867
- GO-2026-6117 GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5
- GO-2026-6118 CVE-2026-47427 GHSA-w4q6-qw23-4rg7
- GO-2026-6119 CVE-2026-43983…
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23625-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
github.com/fatedier/frpGo |
0.53.0 to 0.70.0 | 0.70.1 |
github.com/fatedier/frpGo |
0.53.0 up to 0.70.1 | 0.70.1 |
govulncheck-vulndbSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 From an advisory covering 181 CVEs |
before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 | 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 |
govulncheck-vulndbSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 From an advisory covering 181 CVEs |
before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 | 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 |
govulncheck-vulndbopenSUSE:Leap 16.0 From an advisory covering 181 CVEs |
before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 | 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-73564 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.7) in Fatedier Frp, published July 24, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.52%, the 44th percentile. Fixed in github.com/fatedier/frp 0.70.1.
References
github.com/fatedier/frp/security/advisories/GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp
github.com/fatedier/frp/pull/5428
github.com/fatedier/frp/commit/7dc7be930e2452ae93fd32f2a77f8c6fcd0b652b
github.com/fatedier/frp/releases/tag/v0.70.1
github.com/advisories/GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/73xxx/CVE-2026-73564.json
Show 184 moreShow less
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-73564
github.com/fatedier/frp
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623625-1
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-10722
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11465
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11479
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11481
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11500
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-11624
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-17106
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25688
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25699
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-25700
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-32637
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33582
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-33818
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34031
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34033
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34177
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34178
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34179
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-3433
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34905
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34976
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35172
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35511
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-39821
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-39832
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-39833
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-39904
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-40173
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41179
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41181
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41327
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-41568
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42350
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42508
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-43983
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45099
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45404
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-46600
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-46603
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-47427
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48119
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48491
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-48786
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49446
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49447
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-49980
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50567
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50568
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50569
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50570
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50879
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50884
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-50891
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-52855
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-52856
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-52857
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53469
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53470
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53471
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53474
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53475
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53476
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53551
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53622
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53657
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53658
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-53941
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54061
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54162
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54167
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54168
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54245
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54332
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54345
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54523
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54526
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54563
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54572
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54593
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54638
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54650
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54680
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54693
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54719
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54725
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54735
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54763
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54764
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54765
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54787
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54908
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54909
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54910
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54917
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55061
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55062
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55092
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55149
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55477
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55495
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55496
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55497
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55499
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55502
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55580
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55581
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55582
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55637
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-55677
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56852
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56853
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56858
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56859
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56860
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56862
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56864
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56865
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56867
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56868
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56869
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56870
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56871
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56872
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56873
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-56874
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-57210
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-57497
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-59732
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-59733
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6046
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-61711
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-61712
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-62323
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-62325
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63328
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64679
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64859
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64863
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64865
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64866
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-64868
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65600
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65601
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65602
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65834
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-65835
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-66063
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-66064
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6689
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67309
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6739
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67437
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67438
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67439
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67447
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-67448
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-6961
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71309
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71310
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71311
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71312
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71313
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71324
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71325
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71326
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71327
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71479
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71556
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-71557
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7184
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73080
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73499
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73500
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73502
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73505
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73506
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73509
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-73564
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7387
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-76905
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-77354
Left out here: the rest of 4 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.