CVE-2026-29080
Rucio SQL Injection in FilterEngine Oracle JSON Path via DID Search API
A SQL injection vulnerability in FilterEngine.create_sqla_query() allows any authenticated Rucio user to execute arbitrary SQL against the backend database through the DID search endpoint (GET /dids/<scope>/dids/search). On Oracle deployments attacker-controlled filter keys and values are interpolated directly into sqlalchemy.text() via Python .format(), completely bypassing parameterization. This enables full database compromise including extraction of authentication tokens, password hashes, and all managed data identifiers. This affects versions 1.27.0 and later before 35.8.5, 38.5.5, 39.4.2, and 40.1.1.
The vulnerability exists in lib/rucio/core/did_meta_plugins/filter_engine.py within the create_sqla_query() method. When the database dialect is Oracle, filter expressions for JSON metadata columns are constructed using text() with Python string formatting. Both key and value are attacker-controlled strings derived from HTTP query parameters. The text() function creates a raw SQL fragment — it does not escape or parameterize its contents.
Any authenticated Rucio user can exploit this through the DID search API to execute arbitrary SQL against the backend database. This can expose all managed data identifiers and sensitive tables such as identities, tokens, accounts, rse_settings, and rules, and may allow modification of database contents. The issue affects Oracle deployments using the default json_meta plugin and does not affect PostgreSQL or MySQL deployments using that plugin.
This vulnerability has been fixed in versions 35.8.5, 38.5.5, 39.4.2, and 40.1.1.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
9.4
Rucio SQL Injection in FilterEngine Oracle JSON Path via DID Search API
A SQL injection vulnerability in FilterEngine.create_sqla_query() allows any authenticated Rucio user to execute arbitrary SQL against the backend database through the DID search endpoint (GET /dids/<scope>/dids/search). On Oracle deployments attacker-controlled filter keys and values are interpolated directly into sqlalchemy.text() via Python .format(), completely bypassing parameterization. This enables full database compromise including extraction of authentication tokens, password hashes, and all managed data identifiers. This affects versions 1.27.0 and later before 35.8.5, 38.5.5, 39.4.2, and 40.1.1.
The vulnerability exists in lib/rucio/core/did_meta_plugins/filter_engine.py within the create_sqla_query() method. When the database dialect is Oracle, filter expressions for JSON metadata columns are constructed using text() with Python string formatting. Both key and value are attacker-controlled strings derived from HTTP query parameters. The text() function creates a raw SQL fragment — it does not escape or parameterize its contents.
Any authenticated Rucio user can exploit this through the DID search API to execute arbitrary SQL against the backend database. This can expose all managed data identifiers and sensitive tables such as identities, tokens, accounts, rse_settings, and rules, and may allow modification of database contents. The issue affects Oracle deployments using the default json_meta plugin and does not affect PostgreSQL or MySQL deployments using that plugin.
This vulnerability has been fixed in versions 35.8.5, 38.5.5, 39.4.2, and 40.1.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-29080- CVSS 4.0
- 9.4 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H - Weakness
- CWE-89
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-27869
9.4
A SQL injection vulnerability in FilterEngine.create_sqla_query() allows any authenticated Rucio user to execute arbitrary SQL against the backend database through the DID search endpoint (GET /dids/<scope>/dids/search). On Oracle deployments attacker-controlled filter keys and values are interpolated directly into sqlalchemy.text() via Python .format(), completely bypassing parameterization. This enables full database compromise including extraction of authentication tokens, password hashes, and all managed data identifiers. This affects versions 1.27.0 and later before 35.8.5, 38.5.5, 39.4.2, and 40.1.1.
The vulnerability exists in lib/rucio/core/did_meta_plugins/filter_engine.py within the create_sqla_query() method. When the database dialect is Oracle, filter expressions for JSON metadata columns are constructed using text() with Python string formatting. Both key and value are attacker-controlled strings derived from HTTP query parameters. The text() function creates a raw SQL fragment — it does not escape or parameterize its contents.
Any authenticated Rucio user can exploit this through the DID search API to execute arbitrary SQL against the backend database. This can expose all managed data identifiers and sensitive tables such as identities, tokens, accounts, rse_settings, and rules, and may allow modification of database contents. The issue affects Oracle deployments using the default json_meta plugin and does not affect PostgreSQL or MySQL deployments using that plugin.
This vulnerability has been fixed in versions 35.8.5, 38.5.5, 39.4.2, and 40.1.1.
- Record
EUVD-2026-27869- CVSS 4.0
- 9.4 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-vjr5-c9qv-hgm3
9.4
Rucio has SQL Injection in FilterEngine Oracle JSON Path via DID Search API
Summary
A SQL injection vulnerability in the Oracle path of FilterEngine.create_sqla_query allows any authenticated Rucio user to execute arbitrary SQL against the backend database through the DID search endpoint (GET /dids/<scope>/dids/search). Attacker-controlled filter keys and values are interpolated directly into sqlalchemy.text via Python str.format, completely bypassing parameterization. This enables full database compromise including extraction of authentication tokens, password hashes, and all managed data identifiers. The vulnerability is affecting deployments using the default metadata plugin configuration json_meta with Oracle database backends.
Details
The vulnerability exists in lib/rucio/core/did_meta_plugins/filter_engine.py within the create_sqla_query() method. When the database dialect is Oracle, filter expressions for JSON metadata columns are constructed using text() with Python string formatting:
filter_engine.py:552 (string equality — default branch):
expression = text("json_exists({},'$?(@.{} {} \"{}\")')".format(
json_column.key, key, ORACLE_OP_MAP[oper], value))
filter_engine.py:548 (boolean branch):
expression = text("json_exists({},'$?(@.{}.boolean() {} \"{}\")')".format(
json_column.key, key, ORACLE_OP_MAP[oper], value))
filter_engine.py:550 (numeric branch — value unquoted):
expression = text("json_exists({},'$?(@.{} {} {})')".format(
json_column.key, key, ORACLE_OP_MAP[oper], value))
filter_engine.py:542 (wildcard/LIKE branch):
expression = text("json_exists({},'$?(@.{} like \"{}\")')".format(
json_column.key, key, value.replace('*', '%')))
Both key and value are attacker-controlled strings derived from HTTP query parameters. The text() function creates a raw SQL fragment — it does not escape or parameterize its contents.
Why no existing defense blocks this
The complete data flow from HTTP request to SQL execution passes through 7 layers with no effective sanitization:
-
HTTP input (
dids.py:265-274): Filter keys and values are accepted from query parameters viaast.literal_eval()(which accepts arbitrary Python string literals) or directly from individual query argument names/values. -
Plugin routing (
did_meta_plugins/__init__.py:227-248): Each filter key is checked viamanages_key(). For keys that are NOT columns of theDataIdentifiermodel (e.g., custom metadata keys likecustom_key),did_column_meta.manages_key()returnsFalse, and the request falls through tojson_meta.manages_key(), which returnsTruefor any key on Oracle ≥12 (json_meta.py:234→json_implemented()→True). -
FilterEngine initialization (
filter_engine.py:260): Thejson_metaplugin instantiatesFilterEnginewithstrict_coerce=False(json_meta.py:178). In_coerce_filter_word_to_model_attribute()(line 116), when the key is not an attribute ofmodels.DidMetaandstrict=False, the raw string is returned without validation. -
Value typecasting (
filter_engine.py:275-297):_try_typecast_string()attempts to parse the value as a boolean, datetime, or number. SQL injection strings fail all these parsers and are returned unchanged as strings. -
Sanity checks (
filter_engine.py:149-190):_sanity_check_translated_filters()only validatesdid_type,name,length, wildcard operators,created_atformat, and duplicates. It does not validate arbitrary key names or values for SQL-unsafe characters. -
SQL construction (
filter_engine.py:536-554): On Oracle, the unsanitized key and value strings are interpolated directly intotext()via.format(). -
SQL execution (
json_meta.py:199,212): The resultingSelectstatement containing the injectedtext()clause is executed viasession.execute(stmt).
Note on the non-Oracle path
The non-Oracle branch of create_sqla_query() (lines…
- Record
GHSA-vjr5-c9qv-hgm3- CVSS 4.0
- 9.4 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-89
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
9.4
A SQL injection vulnerability in FilterEngine.create_sqla_query() allows any authenticated Rucio user to execute arbitrary SQL against the backend database through the DID search endpoint (GET /dids/<scope>/dids/search). On Oracle deployments attacker-controlled filter keys and values are interpolated directly into sqlalchemy.text() via Python .format(), completely bypassing parameterization. This enables full database compromise including extraction of authentication tokens, password hashes, and all managed data identifiers. This affects versions 1.27.0 and later before 35.8.5, 38.5.5, 39.4.2, and 40.1.1.
The vulnerability exists in lib/rucio/core/did_meta_plugins/filter_engine.py within the create_sqla_query() method. When the database dialect is Oracle, filter expressions for JSON metadata columns are constructed using text() with Python string formatting. Both key and value are attacker-controlled strings derived from HTTP query parameters. The text() function creates a raw SQL fragment — it does not escape or parameterize its contents.
Any authenticated Rucio user can exploit this through the DID search API to execute arbitrary SQL against the backend database. This can expose all managed data identifiers and sensitive tables such as identities, tokens, accounts, rse_settings, and rules, and may allow modification of database contents. The issue affects Oracle deployments using the default json_meta plugin and does not affect PostgreSQL or MySQL deployments using that plugin.
This vulnerability has been fixed in versions 35.8.5, 38.5.5, 39.4.2, and 40.1.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-29080- CVSS 4.0
- 9.4 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 8.8 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-89
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
9.4
Rucio SQL Injection in FilterEngine Oracle JSON Path via DID Search API
A SQL injection vulnerability in FilterEngine.create_sqla_query() allows any authenticated Rucio user to execute arbitrary SQL against the backend database through the DID search endpoint (GET /dids/<scope>/dids/search). On Oracle deployments attacker-controlled filter keys and values are interpolated directly into sqlalchemy.text() via Python .format(), completely bypassing parameterization. This enables full database compromise including extraction of authentication tokens, password hashes, and all managed data identifiers. This affects versions 1.27.0 and later before 35.8.5, 38.5.5, 39.4.2, and 40.1.1.
The vulnerability exists in lib/rucio/core/did_meta_plugins/filter_engine.py within the create_sqla_query() method. When the database dialect is Oracle, filter expressions for JSON metadata columns are constructed using text() with Python string formatting. Both key and value are attacker-controlled strings derived from HTTP query parameters. The text() function creates a raw SQL fragment — it does not escape or parameterize its contents.
Any authenticated Rucio user can exploit this through the DID search API to execute arbitrary SQL against the backend database. This can expose all managed data identifiers and sensitive tables such as identities, tokens, accounts, rse_settings, and rules, and may allow modification of database contents. The issue affects Oracle deployments using the default json_meta plugin and does not affect PostgreSQL or MySQL deployments using that plugin.
This vulnerability has been fixed in versions 35.8.5, 38.5.5, 39.4.2, and 40.1.1.
- Record
CVE-2026-29080- CVSS 4.0
- 9.4 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H - Weakness
- CWE-89
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-vjr5-c9qv-hgm3
9.4
Rucio has SQL Injection in FilterEngine Oracle JSON Path via DID Search API
Summary
A SQL injection vulnerability in the Oracle path of FilterEngine.create_sqla_query allows any authenticated Rucio user to execute arbitrary SQL against the backend database through the DID search endpoint (GET /dids/<scope>/dids/search). Attacker-controlled filter keys and values are interpolated directly into sqlalchemy.text via Python str.format, completely bypassing parameterization. This enables full database compromise including extraction of authentication tokens, password hashes, and all managed data identifiers. The vulnerability is affecting deployments using the default metadata plugin configuration json_meta with Oracle database backends.
Details
The vulnerability exists in lib/rucio/core/did_meta_plugins/filter_engine.py within the create_sqla_query() method. When the database dialect is Oracle, filter expressions for JSON metadata columns are constructed using text() with Python string formatting:
filter_engine.py:552 (string equality — default branch):
expression = text("json_exists({},'$?(@.{} {} \"{}\")')".format(
json_column.key, key, ORACLE_OP_MAP[oper], value))
filter_engine.py:548 (boolean branch):
expression = text("json_exists({},'$?(@.{}.boolean() {} \"{}\")')".format(
json_column.key, key, ORACLE_OP_MAP[oper], value))
filter_engine.py:550 (numeric branch — value unquoted):
expression = text("json_exists({},'$?(@.{} {} {})')".format(
json_column.key, key, ORACLE_OP_MAP[oper], value))
filter_engine.py:542 (wildcard/LIKE branch):
expression = text("json_exists({},'$?(@.{} like \"{}\")')".format(
json_column.key, key, value.replace('*', '%')))
Both key and value are attacker-controlled strings derived from HTTP query parameters. The text() function creates a raw SQL fragment — it does not escape or parameterize its contents.
Why no existing defense blocks this
The complete data flow from HTTP request to SQL execution passes through 7 layers with no effective sanitization:
-
HTTP input (
dids.py:265-274): Filter keys and values are accepted from query parameters viaast.literal_eval()(which accepts arbitrary Python string literals) or directly from individual query argument names/values. -
Plugin routing (
did_meta_plugins/__init__.py:227-248): Each filter key is checked viamanages_key(). For keys that are NOT columns of theDataIdentifiermodel (e.g., custom metadata keys likecustom_key),did_column_meta.manages_key()returnsFalse, and the request falls through tojson_meta.manages_key(), which returnsTruefor any key on Oracle ≥12 (json_meta.py:234→json_implemented()→True). -
FilterEngine initialization (
filter_engine.py:260): Thejson_metaplugin instantiatesFilterEnginewithstrict_coerce=False(json_meta.py:178). In_coerce_filter_word_to_model_attribute()(line 116), when the key is not an attribute ofmodels.DidMetaandstrict=False, the raw string is returned without validation. -
Value typecasting (
filter_engine.py:275-297):_try_typecast_string()attempts to parse the value as a boolean, datetime, or number. SQL injection strings fail all these parsers and are returned unchanged as strings. -
Sanity checks (
filter_engine.py:149-190):_sanity_check_translated_filters()only validatesdid_type,name,length, wildcard operators,created_atformat, and duplicates. It does not validate arbitrary key names or values for SQL-unsafe characters. -
SQL construction (
filter_engine.py:536-554): On Oracle, the unsanitized key and value strings are interpolated directly intotext()via.format(). -
SQL execution (
json_meta.py:199,212): The resultingSelectstatement containing the injectedtext()clause is executed viasession.execute(stmt).
Note on the non-Oracle path
The non-Oracle branch of create_sqla_query() (lines…
- Record
GHSA-vjr5-c9qv-hgm3- CVSS 4.0
- 9.4 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-89
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-528
9.4
Rucio has SQL Injection in FilterEngine Oracle JSON Path via DID Search API
Summary
A SQL injection vulnerability in the Oracle path of FilterEngine.create_sqla_query allows any authenticated Rucio user to execute arbitrary SQL against the backend database through the DID search endpoint (GET /dids/<scope>/dids/search). Attacker-controlled filter keys and values are interpolated directly into sqlalchemy.text via Python str.format, completely bypassing parameterization. This enables full database compromise including extraction of authentication tokens, password hashes, and all managed data identifiers. The vulnerability is affecting deployments using the default metadata plugin configuration json_meta with Oracle database backends.
Details
Will follow in two weeks (2025-05-19).
Impact
Vulnerability type: SQL Injection (CWE-89)
Who is impacted:
- All Oracle-based Rucio deployments using the default metadata plugin configuration (
json_meta). - Not affected are PostgreSQL/MySQL deployments using the default
json_metaplugin (SQLAlchemy parameterizes the JSON path operations via bind parameters on non-Oracle dialects).
What an attacker can do:
- Full database read access: Extract any table including
identities(password hashes and salts),tokens(active authentication sessions),accounts(user enumeration),rse_settings(storage endpoint credentials), andrules(data management policies). - Password hash extraction: Combined with Rucio's use of single-iteration SHA-256 for password hashing (no KDF), extracted hashes can be cracked at GPU speed.
- Authentication token theft: Active bearer tokens can be extracted and used for immediate session hijacking.
- Data modification: Oracle PL/SQL enables
INSERT/UPDATE/DELETEoperations via DML within subqueries and PL/SQL blocks. - Potential remote code execution: Via Oracle's
UTL_HTTP,DBMS_SCHEDULER, or Java stored procedures if the database user has elevated privileges.
Required attacker privileges: Any authenticated Rucio user. Authentication tokens can be obtained via any supported method (userpass, x509, OIDC, SAML, SSH, GSS). No special roles or administrative permissions are required. The GET /dids/<scope>/dids/search endpoint is available to all authenticated users.
- Record
PYSEC-2026-528- CVSS 4.0
- 9.4 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
rucioPyPI |
1.27.0 up to 35.8.5 | 35.8.5 |
rucioPyPI |
36.0.0 up to 38.5.5 | 38.5.5 |
rucioPyPI |
39.0.0 up to 39.4.2 | 39.4.2 |
rucioPyPI |
40.0.0 up to 40.1.1 | 40.1.1 |
rucioPyPI |
1.27.0 up to 35.8.5, plus listed versions 1.27.0.post11.27.11.27.101.27.111.27.12 Show 45 moreShow less1.27.21.27.31.27.41.27.4.post11.27.51.27.71.27.91.28.01.28.0rc11.28.0rc21.28.11.28.21.28.31.28.41.28.51.28.61.28.71.29.01.29.0rc11.29.0rc21.29.11.29.101.29.111.29.121.29.131.29.141.29.151.29.161.29.171.29.181.29.191.29.21.29.2.post11.29.2.post21.29.31.29.3.post11.29.41.29.51.29.61.29.71.29.7.post11.29.81.29.91.30.01.30.0rc1 |
35.8.5 |
rucioPyPI |
36.0.0 up to 38.5.5, plus listed versions 36.0.0.post136.0.0.post236.1.036.2.036.3.0 Show 29 moreShow less36.4.036.5.037.0.037.0.0rc137.0.0rc237.0.0rc337.0.0rc437.1.037.1.0.post137.2.037.3.037.4.037.5.037.6.037.7.037.7.138.0.038.0.0rc138.0.0rc238.0.0rc338.1.038.2.038.3.038.4.038.5.038.5.138.5.238.5.338.5.4 |
38.5.5 |
rucioPyPI |
39.0.0 up to 39.4.2, plus listed versions 39.1.039.2.039.3.039.3.139.4.039.4.1 |
39.4.2 |
rucioPyPI |
40.0.0 up to 40.1.1, plus listed versions 40.1.0 |
40.1.1 |
rucioPyPI |
1.27.0 up to 35.8.5, 36.0.0 up to 38.5.5, 39.0.0 up to 39.4.2, 40.0.0 up to 40.1.1, plus listed versions 1.27.0.post11.27.11.27.101.27.111.27.12 Show 45 moreShow less1.27.21.27.31.27.41.27.4.post11.27.51.27.71.27.91.28.01.28.0rc11.28.0rc21.28.11.28.21.28.31.28.41.28.51.28.61.28.71.29.01.29.0rc11.29.0rc21.29.11.29.101.29.111.29.121.29.131.29.141.29.151.29.161.29.171.29.181.29.191.29.21.29.2.post11.29.2.post21.29.31.29.3.post11.29.41.29.51.29.61.29.71.29.7.post11.29.81.29.91.30.01.30.0rc1 |
35.8.538.5.539.4.240.1.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-29080 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.4) in Cern Rucio, published May 6, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.28%, the 20th percentile. Fixed in rucio 35.8.5.
References
github.com/rucio/rucio/security/advisories/GHSA-vjr5-c9qv-hgm3
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-29080
github.com/advisories/GHSA-vjr5-c9qv-hgm3
github.com/pypa/advisory-database/tree/main/vulns/rucio/PYSEC-2026-528.yaml
github.com/rucio/rucio
pypi.org/project/rucio
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/29xxx/CVE-2026-29080.json
Left out here: 215 versions and the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.