CVE-2026-47413
praisonai-platform: Any workspace member can add arbitrary user as owner via POST /workspaces/{id}/members
PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have aprivilege escalation / cross-tenant member injection. The POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members endpoint is gated only by require_workspace_member(workspace_id) (default min_role="member") and forwards the request body's user_id and role straight into MemberService.add(workspace_id, user_id, role), which has no caller-permission check. A user with the lowest workspace privilege can add any user (including a new attacker-controlled second account, or an existing account they want to grief) as owner of the workspace. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
9.6
praisonai-platform: Any workspace member can add arbitrary user as owner via POST /workspaces/{id}/members
PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have aprivilege escalation / cross-tenant member injection. The POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members endpoint is gated only by require_workspace_member(workspace_id) (default min_role="member") and forwards the request body's user_id and role straight into MemberService.add(workspace_id, user_id, role), which has no caller-permission check. A user with the lowest workspace privilege can add any user (including a new attacker-controlled second account, or an existing account they want to grief) as owner of the workspace. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue.
- Record
CVE-2026-47413- CVSS 3.1
- 9.6 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-269, CWE-862
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-46331
9.6
PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have aprivilege escalation / cross-tenant member injection. The POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members endpoint is gated only by require_workspace_member(workspace_id) (default min_role="member") and forwards the request body's user_id and role straight into MemberService.add(workspace_id, user_id, role), which has no caller-permission check. A user with the lowest workspace privilege can add any user (including a new attacker-controlled second account, or an existing account they want to grief) as owner of the workspace. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue.
- Record
EUVD-2026-46331- CVSS 3.1
- 9.6 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-8g2p-pqm3-fcfh
9.6
praisonai-platform: Any workspace member can add arbitrary user as owner via POST /workspaces/{id}/members
Summary
Type: Privilege escalation / cross-tenant member injection. The POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members endpoint is gated only by require_workspace_member(workspace_id) (default min_role="member") and forwards the request body's user_id and role straight into MemberService.add(workspace_id, user_id, role), which has no caller-permission check. A user with the lowest workspace privilege can add any user (including a new attacker-controlled second account, or an existing account they want to grief) as owner of the workspace.
File: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py, lines 92-101; services/member_service.py, lines 26-38.
Root cause: MemberService.add validates only that role is in VALID_ROLES = {"owner", "admin", "member"} — the value, not the caller's right to assign it. The route's Depends(require_workspace_member) resolves to the default min_role="member". So a member-level token plus one POST gives the attacker an alternate identity with owner role inside the same workspace, bypassing every owner-only operation that would otherwise gate them.
Affected Code
File 1: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py, lines 92-101.
@router.post("/{workspace_id}/members", response_model=MemberResponse, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)
async def add_member(
workspace_id: str,
body: MemberAdd,
user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member), # <-- BUG: defaults to min_role="member"
session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
):
member_svc = MemberService(session)
member = await member_svc.add(workspace_id, body.user_id, body.role) # <-- writes any (user, role)
return MemberResponse.model_validate(member)
File 2: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/services/member_service.py, lines 26-38.
async def add(
self,
workspace_id: str,
user_id: str,
role: str = "member",
) -> Member:
"""Add a user to a workspace."""
if role not in VALID_ROLES: # only validates the value
raise ValueError(f"Invalid role: {role}. Must be one of {VALID_ROLES}")
member = Member(workspace_id=workspace_id, user_id=user_id, role=role)
self._session.add(member) # <-- BUG: no caller-permission check
await self._session.flush()
return member
Why it's wrong: workspace member management is the textbook capability that must be gated on owner role. The role hierarchy is implemented (MemberService.has_role, member_service.py:80-96), the dependency-tunable min_role parameter exists (require_workspace_member(min_role), deps.py:58), but the POST .../members route uses neither. The VALID_ROLES enum check is purely cosmetic — it accepts "owner" from any caller because the route never asked whether the caller has the right to assign that role.
Exploit Chain
- Attacker registers two accounts (or recruits a member account on the target workspace
W). Account A is an existing member ofW; Account B is a fresh signup the attacker controls (any account on the platform —auth/registeris open by default). State: attacker holds tokens for both A and B. - Attacker authenticates as Account A and POSTs
Authorization: Bearer <A_jwt>toPOST /workspaces/W/memberswith body{"user_id": "<B_user_id>", "role": "owner"}. State: control flow entersadd_member. require_workspace_member(W, A)passes (A is a member).MemberService.add(W, B, "owner")writes a new rowMember(workspace_id=W, user_id=B, role="owner"). State: Account B is now a workspace-W owner.- Attacker switches to Account B and acts as workspace owner — change settings, add/remove members, delete the workspace, or pivot to the companion advisories' primitives. State: attacker holds owner of any workspace they had member access to, via a fresh…
- Record
GHSA-8g2p-pqm3-fcfh- CVSS 3.1
- 9.6 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-269, CWE-862
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
9.6
PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have aprivilege escalation / cross-tenant member injection. The POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members endpoint is gated only by require_workspace_member(workspace_id) (default min_role="member") and forwards the request body's user_id and role straight into MemberService.add(workspace_id, user_id, role), which has no caller-permission check. A user with the lowest workspace privilege can add any user (including a new attacker-controlled second account, or an existing account they want to grief) as owner of the workspace. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue.
- Record
CVE-2026-47413- CVSS 3.1
- 9.6 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-269, CWE-862
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
9.6
praisonai-platform: Any workspace member can add arbitrary user as owner via POST /workspaces/{id}/members
PraisonAI Platform is the platform layer for the PraisonAI multi-agent teams system. Versions prior to 0.1.4 have aprivilege escalation / cross-tenant member injection. The POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members endpoint is gated only by require_workspace_member(workspace_id) (default min_role="member") and forwards the request body's user_id and role straight into MemberService.add(workspace_id, user_id, role), which has no caller-permission check. A user with the lowest workspace privilege can add any user (including a new attacker-controlled second account, or an existing account they want to grief) as owner of the workspace. PraisonAI Platform version 0.1.4 patches the issue.
- Record
CVE-2026-47413- CVSS 3.1
- 9.6 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-269, CWE-862
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-8g2p-pqm3-fcfh
9.6
praisonai-platform: Any workspace member can add arbitrary user as owner via POST /workspaces/{id}/members
Summary
Type: Privilege escalation / cross-tenant member injection. The POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members endpoint is gated only by require_workspace_member(workspace_id) (default min_role="member") and forwards the request body's user_id and role straight into MemberService.add(workspace_id, user_id, role), which has no caller-permission check. A user with the lowest workspace privilege can add any user (including a new attacker-controlled second account, or an existing account they want to grief) as owner of the workspace.
File: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py, lines 92-101; services/member_service.py, lines 26-38.
Root cause: MemberService.add validates only that role is in VALID_ROLES = {"owner", "admin", "member"} — the value, not the caller's right to assign it. The route's Depends(require_workspace_member) resolves to the default min_role="member". So a member-level token plus one POST gives the attacker an alternate identity with owner role inside the same workspace, bypassing every owner-only operation that would otherwise gate them.
Affected Code
File 1: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py, lines 92-101.
@router.post("/{workspace_id}/members", response_model=MemberResponse, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)
async def add_member(
workspace_id: str,
body: MemberAdd,
user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member), # <-- BUG: defaults to min_role="member"
session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
):
member_svc = MemberService(session)
member = await member_svc.add(workspace_id, body.user_id, body.role) # <-- writes any (user, role)
return MemberResponse.model_validate(member)
File 2: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/services/member_service.py, lines 26-38.
async def add(
self,
workspace_id: str,
user_id: str,
role: str = "member",
) -> Member:
"""Add a user to a workspace."""
if role not in VALID_ROLES: # only validates the value
raise ValueError(f"Invalid role: {role}. Must be one of {VALID_ROLES}")
member = Member(workspace_id=workspace_id, user_id=user_id, role=role)
self._session.add(member) # <-- BUG: no caller-permission check
await self._session.flush()
return member
Why it's wrong: workspace member management is the textbook capability that must be gated on owner role. The role hierarchy is implemented (MemberService.has_role, member_service.py:80-96), the dependency-tunable min_role parameter exists (require_workspace_member(min_role), deps.py:58), but the POST .../members route uses neither. The VALID_ROLES enum check is purely cosmetic — it accepts "owner" from any caller because the route never asked whether the caller has the right to assign that role.
Exploit Chain
- Attacker registers two accounts (or recruits a member account on the target workspace
W). Account A is an existing member ofW; Account B is a fresh signup the attacker controls (any account on the platform —auth/registeris open by default). State: attacker holds tokens for both A and B. - Attacker authenticates as Account A and POSTs
Authorization: Bearer <A_jwt>toPOST /workspaces/W/memberswith body{"user_id": "<B_user_id>", "role": "owner"}. State: control flow entersadd_member. require_workspace_member(W, A)passes (A is a member).MemberService.add(W, B, "owner")writes a new rowMember(workspace_id=W, user_id=B, role="owner"). State: Account B is now a workspace-W owner.- Attacker switches to Account B and acts as workspace owner — change settings, add/remove members, delete the workspace, or pivot to the companion advisories' primitives. State: attacker holds owner of any workspace they had member access to, via a fresh…
- Record
GHSA-8g2p-pqm3-fcfh- CVSS 3.1
- 9.6 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-269, CWE-862
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-480
9.6
praisonai-platform: Any workspace member can add arbitrary user as owner via POST /workspaces/{id}/members
Summary
Type: Privilege escalation / cross-tenant member injection. The POST /workspaces/{workspace_id}/members endpoint is gated only by require_workspace_member(workspace_id) (default min_role="member") and forwards the request body's user_id and role straight into MemberService.add(workspace_id, user_id, role), which has no caller-permission check. A user with the lowest workspace privilege can add any user (including a new attacker-controlled second account, or an existing account they want to grief) as owner of the workspace.
File: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py, lines 92-101; services/member_service.py, lines 26-38.
Root cause: MemberService.add validates only that role is in VALID_ROLES = {"owner", "admin", "member"} — the value, not the caller's right to assign it. The route's Depends(require_workspace_member) resolves to the default min_role="member". So a member-level token plus one POST gives the attacker an alternate identity with owner role inside the same workspace, bypassing every owner-only operation that would otherwise gate them.
Affected Code
File 1: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/api/routes/workspaces.py, lines 92-101.
@router.post("/{workspace_id}/members", response_model=MemberResponse, status_code=status.HTTP_201_CREATED)
async def add_member(
workspace_id: str,
body: MemberAdd,
user: AuthIdentity = Depends(require_workspace_member), # <-- BUG: defaults to min_role="member"
session: AsyncSession = Depends(get_db),
):
member_svc = MemberService(session)
member = await member_svc.add(workspace_id, body.user_id, body.role) # <-- writes any (user, role)
return MemberResponse.model_validate(member)
File 2: src/praisonai-platform/praisonai_platform/services/member_service.py, lines 26-38.
async def add(
self,
workspace_id: str,
user_id: str,
role: str = "member",
) -> Member:
"""Add a user to a workspace."""
if role not in VALID_ROLES: # only validates the value
raise ValueError(f"Invalid role: {role}. Must be one of {VALID_ROLES}")
member = Member(workspace_id=workspace_id, user_id=user_id, role=role)
self._session.add(member) # <-- BUG: no caller-permission check
await self._session.flush()
return member
Why it's wrong: workspace member management is the textbook capability that must be gated on owner role. The role hierarchy is implemented (MemberService.has_role, member_service.py:80-96), the dependency-tunable min_role parameter exists (require_workspace_member(min_role), deps.py:58), but the POST .../members route uses neither. The VALID_ROLES enum check is purely cosmetic — it accepts "owner" from any caller because the route never asked whether the caller has the right to assign that role.
Exploit Chain
- Attacker registers two accounts (or recruits a member account on the target workspace
W). Account A is an existing member ofW; Account B is a fresh signup the attacker controls (any account on the platform —auth/registeris open by default). State: attacker holds tokens for both A and B. - Attacker authenticates as Account A and POSTs
Authorization: Bearer <A_jwt>toPOST /workspaces/W/memberswith body{"user_id": "<B_user_id>", "role": "owner"}. State: control flow entersadd_member. require_workspace_member(W, A)passes (A is a member).MemberService.add(W, B, "owner")writes a new rowMember(workspace_id=W, user_id=B, role="owner"). State: Account B is now a workspace-W owner.- Attacker switches to Account B and acts as workspace owner — change settings, add/remove members, delete the workspace, or pivot to the companion advisories' primitives. State: attacker holds owner of any workspace they had member access to, via a fresh…
- Record
PYSEC-2026-480- CVSS 3.1
- 9.6 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
praisonai-platformPyPI |
before 0.1.4 | 0.1.4 |
praisonai-platformPyPI |
before 0.1.4, plus listed versions 0.1.00.1.10.1.20.1.3 |
0.1.4 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| aliases | EUVD | |
| first indexed | CVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-47413 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.6) in Mervinpraison Praisonai-platform, published June 1, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.26%, the 18th percentile. Fixed in praisonai-platform 0.1.4.
References
github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/security/advisories/GHSA-8g2p-pqm3-fcfh
github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI/commit/ef79b7a0561796ad9807f0f09538c25cc78d3619
github.com/advisories/GHSA-8g2p-pqm3-fcfh
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/47xxx/CVE-2026-47413.json
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-47413
github.com/MervinPraison/PraisonAI
pypi.org/project/praisonai-platform
Left out here: the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.