CVE-2026-67330
better-auth SCIM 1.4.0-beta.27 through 1.6.21 Account Takeover via Provider-ID Collision
@better-auth/scim (a better-auth plugin) versions >= 1.4.0-beta.27 through <= 1.6.21 and >= 1.7.0-beta.0 through <= 1.7.0-beta.9 contain an authorization bypass. SCIM token issuance did not reject provider IDs already used by existing SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social account providers, and the same logical provider ID was used for both SCIM provider configuration and account ownership. An authenticated user could mint a SCIM token whose provider ID collided with an existing provider namespace, causing SCIM user routes to resolve account rows the token never provisioned. This allowed listing, reading, updating (including rewriting global profile/email fields without uniqueness checks), and deleting global user accounts and sessions, resulting in account takeover and unauthorized deprovisioning. Fixed in 1.6.22 and 1.7.0-beta.10 (1.7.0-rc.0).
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
9.4
better-auth SCIM 1.4.0-beta.27 through 1.6.21 Account Takeover via Provider-ID Collision
@better-auth/scim (a better-auth plugin) versions >= 1.4.0-beta.27 through <= 1.6.21 and >= 1.7.0-beta.0 through <= 1.7.0-beta.9 contain an authorization bypass. SCIM token issuance did not reject provider IDs already used by existing SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social account providers, and the same logical provider ID was used for both SCIM provider configuration and account ownership. An authenticated user could mint a SCIM token whose provider ID collided with an existing provider namespace, causing SCIM user routes to resolve account rows the token never provisioned. This allowed listing, reading, updating (including rewriting global profile/email fields without uniqueness checks), and deleting global user accounts and sessions, resulting in account takeover and unauthorized deprovisioning. Fixed in 1.6.22 and 1.7.0-beta.10 (1.7.0-rc.0).
- Record
CVE-2026-67330- CVSS 4.0
- 9.4 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H - CVSS 3.1
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-20
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-51859
9.4
@better-auth/scim (a better-auth plugin) versions >= 1.4.0-beta.27 through <= 1.6.21 and >= 1.7.0-beta.0 through <= 1.7.0-beta.9 contain an authorization bypass. SCIM token issuance did not reject provider IDs already used by existing SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social account providers, and the same logical provider ID was used for both SCIM provider configuration and account ownership. An authenticated user could mint a SCIM token whose provider ID collided with an existing provider namespace, causing SCIM user routes to resolve account rows the token never provisioned. This allowed listing, reading, updating (including rewriting global profile/email fields without uniqueness checks), and deleting global user accounts and sessions, resulting in account takeover and unauthorized deprovisioning. Fixed in 1.6.22 and 1.7.0-beta.10 (1.7.0-rc.0).
- Record
EUVD-2026-51859- CVSS 4.0
- 9.4 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-6mwf-73fj-3358
9.4
@better-auth/scim (a better-auth plugin) versions >= 1.4.0-beta.27 through <= 1.6.21 and >= 1.7.0...
@better-auth/scim (a better-auth plugin) versions >= 1.4.0-beta.27 through <= 1.6.21 and >= 1.7.0-beta.0 through <= 1.7.0-beta.9 contain an authorization bypass. SCIM token issuance did not reject provider IDs already used by existing SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social account providers, and the same logical provider ID was used for both SCIM provider configuration and account ownership. An authenticated user could mint a SCIM token whose provider ID collided with an existing provider namespace, causing SCIM user routes to resolve account rows the token never provisioned. This allowed listing, reading, updating (including rewriting global profile/email fields without uniqueness checks), and deleting global user accounts and sessions, resulting in account takeover and unauthorized deprovisioning. Fixed in 1.6.22 and 1.7.0-beta.10 (1.7.0-rc.0).
- Record
GHSA-6mwf-73fj-3358- CVSS 4.0
- 9.4 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-20
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-rjg6-39jm-rgg4
9.9
@better-auth/scim: account takeover and stale access via SCIM provider-id collision
Am I affected?
You are affected if your application registers the @better-auth/scim plugin and lets authenticated users generate SCIM tokens. The default canGenerateToken policy was affected, and custom policies were affected when they did not reject provider IDs already used by other account providers. The provider-ID collision issue additionally requires SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social providers whose account rows use custom provider IDs, plus existing account rows under those IDs.
The deprovisioning and email-update issues require only the SCIM plugin and a valid SCIM bearer token. Published versions from @better-auth/[email protected] through 1.6.21 are affected. Beta versions from 1.7.0-beta.0 through 1.7.0-beta.9 are affected. Upgrade to @better-auth/[email protected] or 1.7.0-beta.10.
Summary
@better-auth/scim used the same logical provider ID for SCIM provider configuration and account ownership. SCIM token issuance did not reject all account-provider namespaces. An authenticated user could therefore mint a SCIM token whose provider ID matched an existing SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social provider. SCIM user routes then selected account rows by that provider ID and treated those users as SCIM-managed, even when the SCIM token had never provisioned them.
The same write path had 2 additional validation issues. First, SCIM active: false was not modeled, so identity providers could receive a successful response while the user stayed active. Second, SCIM PUT and PATCH updates changed global email addresses without the same uniqueness check used by create, and emailVerified stayed unchanged after an email reassignment.
Details
The SCIM bearer middleware decoded the provider ID from the bearer token and loaded the matching scimProvider row. User listing and user lookup then queried ordinary account rows by account.providerId. This made the provider ID a user-controlled authorization key. If a SCIM token used a provider ID that belonged to SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or another account provider, the SCIM routes could resolve users that the token did not own.
The highest-impact path was non-organization deletion. On affected versions, DELETE /scim/v2/Users/:id for a non-organization SCIM token deleted the global Better Auth user and their sessions after resolving the user through the colliding provider ID. A low-privileged authenticated user could therefore delete users associated with a colliding provider namespace.
Organization-scoped tokens were also affected by the provider-ID collision. If the colliding provider ID matched the organization's SSO or OIDC connection, SCIM PUT or PATCH could resolve an SSO-provisioned organization member and rewrite global profile fields. Before the patch, changing a user's email through SCIM skipped the uniqueness check and left emailVerified unchanged.
SCIM deactivation had a separate failure mode. The SCIM active attribute was missing from the user schemas and PATCH mapping, so active: false was stripped from requests. A standard identity-provider deactivation signal could return success while the user kept their identity, sessions, and access.
Patches
Fixed in @better-auth/[email protected] and @better-auth/[email protected].
The patch rejects SCIM provider IDs that collide with built-in providers, configured social providers, generic OAuth providers, and SSO provider rows before a token is minted. It also scopes SCIM deletion to the SCIM account link when the user has other identities. The global user is deleted only when the SCIM account is the user's sole linked account.
The patch models the SCIM active attribute. App-level SCIM deactivation maps active: false to the admin plugin's enforced disabled-user state and revokes sessions. If the admin plugin is absent, the request is rejected instead of being silently dropped.
The patch adds the email uniqueness check to SCIM PUT and PATCH updates and resets…
- Record
GHSA-rjg6-39jm-rgg4- CVSS 3.1
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-20, CWE-639, CWE-862
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
9.4
@better-auth/scim (a better-auth plugin) versions >= 1.4.0-beta.27 through <= 1.6.21 and >= 1.7.0-beta.0 through <= 1.7.0-beta.9 contain an authorization bypass. SCIM token issuance did not reject provider IDs already used by existing SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social account providers, and the same logical provider ID was used for both SCIM provider configuration and account ownership. An authenticated user could mint a SCIM token whose provider ID collided with an existing provider namespace, causing SCIM user routes to resolve account rows the token never provisioned. This allowed listing, reading, updating (including rewriting global profile/email fields without uniqueness checks), and deleting global user accounts and sessions, resulting in account takeover and unauthorized deprovisioning. Fixed in 1.6.22 and 1.7.0-beta.10 (1.7.0-rc.0).
- Record
CVE-2026-67330- CVSS 4.0
- 9.4 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X - CVSS 3.1
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-20
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
9.4
better-auth SCIM 1.4.0-beta.27 through 1.6.21 Account Takeover via Provider-ID Collision
@better-auth/scim (a better-auth plugin) versions >= 1.4.0-beta.27 through <= 1.6.21 and >= 1.7.0-beta.0 through <= 1.7.0-beta.9 contain an authorization bypass. SCIM token issuance did not reject provider IDs already used by existing SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social account providers, and the same logical provider ID was used for both SCIM provider configuration and account ownership. An authenticated user could mint a SCIM token whose provider ID collided with an existing provider namespace, causing SCIM user routes to resolve account rows the token never provisioned. This allowed listing, reading, updating (including rewriting global profile/email fields without uniqueness checks), and deleting global user accounts and sessions, resulting in account takeover and unauthorized deprovisioning. Fixed in 1.6.22 and 1.7.0-beta.10 (1.7.0-rc.0).
- Record
CVE-2026-67330- CVSS 4.0
- 9.4 Critical
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H - Weakness
- CWE-20
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-rjg6-39jm-rgg4
9.9
@better-auth/scim: account takeover and stale access via SCIM provider-id collision
Am I affected?
You are affected if your application registers the @better-auth/scim plugin and lets authenticated users generate SCIM tokens. The default canGenerateToken policy was affected, and custom policies were affected when they did not reject provider IDs already used by other account providers. The provider-ID collision issue additionally requires SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social providers whose account rows use custom provider IDs, plus existing account rows under those IDs.
The deprovisioning and email-update issues require only the SCIM plugin and a valid SCIM bearer token. Published versions from @better-auth/[email protected] through 1.6.21 are affected. Beta versions from 1.7.0-beta.0 through 1.7.0-beta.9 are affected. Upgrade to @better-auth/[email protected] or 1.7.0-beta.10.
Summary
@better-auth/scim used the same logical provider ID for SCIM provider configuration and account ownership. SCIM token issuance did not reject all account-provider namespaces. An authenticated user could therefore mint a SCIM token whose provider ID matched an existing SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or social provider. SCIM user routes then selected account rows by that provider ID and treated those users as SCIM-managed, even when the SCIM token had never provisioned them.
The same write path had 2 additional validation issues. First, SCIM active: false was not modeled, so identity providers could receive a successful response while the user stayed active. Second, SCIM PUT and PATCH updates changed global email addresses without the same uniqueness check used by create, and emailVerified stayed unchanged after an email reassignment.
Details
The SCIM bearer middleware decoded the provider ID from the bearer token and loaded the matching scimProvider row. User listing and user lookup then queried ordinary account rows by account.providerId. This made the provider ID a user-controlled authorization key. If a SCIM token used a provider ID that belonged to SSO, SAML, OIDC, generic OAuth, or another account provider, the SCIM routes could resolve users that the token did not own.
The highest-impact path was non-organization deletion. On affected versions, DELETE /scim/v2/Users/:id for a non-organization SCIM token deleted the global Better Auth user and their sessions after resolving the user through the colliding provider ID. A low-privileged authenticated user could therefore delete users associated with a colliding provider namespace.
Organization-scoped tokens were also affected by the provider-ID collision. If the colliding provider ID matched the organization's SSO or OIDC connection, SCIM PUT or PATCH could resolve an SSO-provisioned organization member and rewrite global profile fields. Before the patch, changing a user's email through SCIM skipped the uniqueness check and left emailVerified unchanged.
SCIM deactivation had a separate failure mode. The SCIM active attribute was missing from the user schemas and PATCH mapping, so active: false was stripped from requests. A standard identity-provider deactivation signal could return success while the user kept their identity, sessions, and access.
Patches
Fixed in @better-auth/[email protected] and @better-auth/[email protected].
The patch rejects SCIM provider IDs that collide with built-in providers, configured social providers, generic OAuth providers, and SSO provider rows before a token is minted. It also scopes SCIM deletion to the SCIM account link when the user has other identities. The global user is deleted only when the SCIM account is the user's sole linked account.
The patch models the SCIM active attribute. App-level SCIM deactivation maps active: false to the admin plugin's enforced disabled-user state and revokes sessions. If the admin plugin is absent, the request is rejected instead of being silently dropped.
The patch adds the email uniqueness check to SCIM PUT and PATCH updates and resets…
- Record
GHSA-rjg6-39jm-rgg4- CVSS 3.1
- 9.9 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-20, CWE-639, CWE-862
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
@better-auth/scimnpm |
1.4.0-beta.27 to 1.6.21 | 1.6.22 |
@better-auth/scimnpm |
1.7.0-beta.0 to 1.7.0-beta.9 | 1.7.0-beta.10 |
@better-auth/scimnpm |
1.4.0-beta.27 up to 1.6.22 | 1.6.22 |
@better-auth/scimnpm |
1.7.0-beta.0 up to 1.7.0-beta.10 | 1.7.0-beta.10 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-67330 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.4) in Better-auth Scim, published July 24, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.60%, the 48th percentile. Fixed in @better-auth/scim 1.6.22.
References
github.com/better-auth/better-auth/security/advisories/GHSA-rjg6-39jm-rgg4
vulncheck.com/advisories/better-auth-scim-beta-27-through-account-takeover-via-provider-id-collision
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-67330
github.com/advisories/GHSA-6mwf-73fj-3358
github.com/better-auth/better-auth/pull/10242
github.com/better-auth/better-auth/commit/7c126dcd1aad24468ec37e876545c1d083d8acca
Left out here: the rest of 2 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.