CVE-2026-68904
node-opcua: TCP Socket Leak (FIN-WAIT-2) via keepalive reconnection cycle - Resource Exhaustion
node-opcua is an OPC UA implementation for TypeScript and Node.js. From 2.0.0 until 2.170.0, node-opcua clients using the default keepSessionAlive setting can enter a repeated reconnection cycle when an OPC UA server's clock skew causes BadInvalidTimestamp responses. ClientSessionKeepAliveManager._ping_server treated the server-originated ServiceFault as a network outage and forced a transport reconnect, while ClientTCP_transport._on_ACK_response used socket.end() after failed HEL/ACK negotiation and could leave the connection in FIN-WAIT-2 when the peer did not close. Repetition at the keepAliveInterval accumulates file descriptors and memory until the client process or container can be terminated by resource exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 2.170.0.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
7.0
node-opcua: TCP Socket Leak (FIN-WAIT-2) via keepalive reconnection cycle - Resource Exhaustion
node-opcua is an OPC UA implementation for TypeScript and Node.js. From 2.0.0 until 2.170.0, node-opcua clients using the default keepSessionAlive setting can enter a repeated reconnection cycle when an OPC UA server's clock skew causes BadInvalidTimestamp responses. ClientSessionKeepAliveManager._ping_server treated the server-originated ServiceFault as a network outage and forced a transport reconnect, while ClientTCP_transport._on_ACK_response used socket.end() after failed HEL/ACK negotiation and could leave the connection in FIN-WAIT-2 when the peer did not close. Repetition at the keepAliveInterval accumulates file descriptors and memory until the client process or container can be terminated by resource exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 2.170.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-68904- CVSS 3.1
- 7.0 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-80869
7.0
node-opcua is an OPC UA implementation for TypeScript and Node.js. From 2.0.0 until 2.170.0, node-opcua clients using the default keepSessionAlive setting can enter a repeated reconnection cycle when an OPC UA server's clock skew causes BadInvalidTimestamp responses. ClientSessionKeepAliveManager._ping_server treated the server-originated ServiceFault as a network outage and forced a transport reconnect, while ClientTCP_transport._on_ACK_response used socket.end() after failed HEL/ACK negotiation and could leave the connection in FIN-WAIT-2 when the peer did not close. Repetition at the keepAliveInterval accumulates file descriptors and memory until the client process or container can be terminated by resource exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 2.170.0.
- Record
EUVD-2026-80869- CVSS 3.1
- 7.0 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-r2pf-9cw4-5j65
7.0
node-opcua: TCP Socket Leak (FIN-WAIT-2) via keepalive reconnection cycle - Resource Exhaustion
SUMMARY
A combination of bugs in node-opcua causes unlimited TCP socket accumulation (FIN-WAIT-2 state) during automatic reconnection, leading to memory exhaustion and eventual container/process crash (OOM kill). The issue is triggered by the default configuration (keepSessionAlive: true) when the OPC UA server has clock skew relative to the client.
Affected version: Tested on 2.169.0 (latest as of April 2026).
ENVIRONMENT
- Node.js: v24.11.0
- node-opcua: 2.169.0
- OS: Linux (containerized via Podman, slirp4netns networking)
- OPC UA Server: Industrial PLC (opc.tcp endpoint), clock skew of ~50 minutes ahead of client
- Client config: keepSessionAlive: true (default), keepAliveInterval: 3000, securityMode: None, securityPolicy: None
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Bug #1 - ClientTCP_transport._on_ACK_response() uses socket.end() instead of socket.destroy()
File: node-opcua-transport/src/client_tcp_transport.ts, _on_ACK_response() method
When the HEL/ACK handshake fails during a reconnection attempt, the error handler calls socket.end():
if (err || !data) {
externalCallback(err || new Error("no data"));
if (this._socket) {
this._socket.end(); // <- sends TCP FIN, leaves socket in FIN-WAIT-2
}
}
socket.end() sends a TCP FIN and waits for the peer to close its side. If the peer doesn't respond (common with PLCs), the socket remains in FIN-WAIT-2 state indefinitely, leaking file descriptors and memory. During rapid reconnection cycles (triggered by Bug #2 below), every failed HEL/ACK creates a new leaked socket.
Bug #2 - ClientSessionKeepAliveManager._ping_server() treats BadInvalidTimestamp as network outage
File: node-opcua-client/src/client_session_keepalive_manager.ts, _ping_server() method
The keepalive manager reads Server.ServerStatus.CurrentTime on each ping cycle. If the server responds with BadInvalidTimestamp (because the client's RequestHeader.timestamp falls outside the server's tolerance window due to clock skew), the manager treats this as a fatal network error:
// Any error -> emit("failure") -> terminateConnection() -> forceConnectionBreak()
This triggers a full transport-level reconnection on every keepalive cycle (every keepAliveInterval ms). Combined with Bug #1, each reconnection attempt leaks one TCP socket in FIN-WAIT-2. Impact amplification: With keepAliveInterval: 3000 (3 seconds), the client leaks ~20 sockets/minute, ~1200/hour, exhausting resources in hours.
REPRODUCTION STEPS
- Set up an OPC UA server with a clock skewed more than the server's timestamp tolerance ahead of the client.
- Connect using node-opcua with default settings (keepSessionAlive: true).
- Monitor TCP sockets: ss -antp | grep FIN-WAIT-2 | wc -l
- Observe FIN-WAIT-2 count growing continuously (approximately one per keepalive interval).
- Eventually the process runs out of file descriptors or memory and crashes.
SUGGESTED FIXES
For Bug #1 (_on_ACK_response):
// Replace socket.end() with socket.destroy()
if (this._socket) {
this._socket.destroy();
}
For Bug #2 (_ping_server): Distinguish between transport-level errors (actual network outage) and application-level OPC UA status codes like BadInvalidTimestamp. The latter indicates the server is reachable and the session is alive - only the timestamp validation failed. The keepalive should not trigger reconnection.
REPORTER
Marco Velluso @Velluso [email protected] Requesting CVE assignment and credit as reporter upon fix publication.
- Record
GHSA-r2pf-9cw4-5j65- CVSS 3.1
- 7.0 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
7.0
node-opcua is an OPC UA implementation for TypeScript and Node.js. From 2.0.0 until 2.170.0, node-opcua clients using the default keepSessionAlive setting can enter a repeated reconnection cycle when an OPC UA server's clock skew causes BadInvalidTimestamp responses. ClientSessionKeepAliveManager._ping_server treated the server-originated ServiceFault as a network outage and forced a transport reconnect, while ClientTCP_transport._on_ACK_response used socket.end() after failed HEL/ACK negotiation and could leave the connection in FIN-WAIT-2 when the peer did not close. Repetition at the keepAliveInterval accumulates file descriptors and memory until the client process or container can be terminated by resource exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 2.170.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-68904- CVSS 3.1
- 7.0 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
7.0
node-opcua: TCP Socket Leak (FIN-WAIT-2) via keepalive reconnection cycle - Resource Exhaustion
node-opcua is an OPC UA implementation for TypeScript and Node.js. From 2.0.0 until 2.170.0, node-opcua clients using the default keepSessionAlive setting can enter a repeated reconnection cycle when an OPC UA server's clock skew causes BadInvalidTimestamp responses. ClientSessionKeepAliveManager._ping_server treated the server-originated ServiceFault as a network outage and forced a transport reconnect, while ClientTCP_transport._on_ACK_response used socket.end() after failed HEL/ACK negotiation and could leave the connection in FIN-WAIT-2 when the peer did not close. Repetition at the keepAliveInterval accumulates file descriptors and memory until the client process or container can be terminated by resource exhaustion. This issue is fixed in version 2.170.0.
- Record
CVE-2026-68904- CVSS 3.1
- 7.0 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-r2pf-9cw4-5j65
7.0
node-opcua: TCP Socket Leak (FIN-WAIT-2) via keepalive reconnection cycle - Resource Exhaustion
SUMMARY
A combination of bugs in node-opcua causes unlimited TCP socket accumulation (FIN-WAIT-2 state) during automatic reconnection, leading to memory exhaustion and eventual container/process crash (OOM kill). The issue is triggered by the default configuration (keepSessionAlive: true) when the OPC UA server has clock skew relative to the client.
Affected version: Tested on 2.169.0 (latest as of April 2026).
ENVIRONMENT
- Node.js: v24.11.0
- node-opcua: 2.169.0
- OS: Linux (containerized via Podman, slirp4netns networking)
- OPC UA Server: Industrial PLC (opc.tcp endpoint), clock skew of ~50 minutes ahead of client
- Client config: keepSessionAlive: true (default), keepAliveInterval: 3000, securityMode: None, securityPolicy: None
ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS
Bug #1 - ClientTCP_transport._on_ACK_response() uses socket.end() instead of socket.destroy()
File: node-opcua-transport/src/client_tcp_transport.ts, _on_ACK_response() method
When the HEL/ACK handshake fails during a reconnection attempt, the error handler calls socket.end():
if (err || !data) {
externalCallback(err || new Error("no data"));
if (this._socket) {
this._socket.end(); // <- sends TCP FIN, leaves socket in FIN-WAIT-2
}
}
socket.end() sends a TCP FIN and waits for the peer to close its side. If the peer doesn't respond (common with PLCs), the socket remains in FIN-WAIT-2 state indefinitely, leaking file descriptors and memory. During rapid reconnection cycles (triggered by Bug #2 below), every failed HEL/ACK creates a new leaked socket.
Bug #2 - ClientSessionKeepAliveManager._ping_server() treats BadInvalidTimestamp as network outage
File: node-opcua-client/src/client_session_keepalive_manager.ts, _ping_server() method
The keepalive manager reads Server.ServerStatus.CurrentTime on each ping cycle. If the server responds with BadInvalidTimestamp (because the client's RequestHeader.timestamp falls outside the server's tolerance window due to clock skew), the manager treats this as a fatal network error:
// Any error -> emit("failure") -> terminateConnection() -> forceConnectionBreak()
This triggers a full transport-level reconnection on every keepalive cycle (every keepAliveInterval ms). Combined with Bug #1, each reconnection attempt leaks one TCP socket in FIN-WAIT-2. Impact amplification: With keepAliveInterval: 3000 (3 seconds), the client leaks ~20 sockets/minute, ~1200/hour, exhausting resources in hours.
REPRODUCTION STEPS
- Set up an OPC UA server with a clock skewed more than the server's timestamp tolerance ahead of the client.
- Connect using node-opcua with default settings (keepSessionAlive: true).
- Monitor TCP sockets: ss -antp | grep FIN-WAIT-2 | wc -l
- Observe FIN-WAIT-2 count growing continuously (approximately one per keepalive interval).
- Eventually the process runs out of file descriptors or memory and crashes.
SUGGESTED FIXES
For Bug #1 (_on_ACK_response):
// Replace socket.end() with socket.destroy()
if (this._socket) {
this._socket.destroy();
}
For Bug #2 (_ping_server): Distinguish between transport-level errors (actual network outage) and application-level OPC UA status codes like BadInvalidTimestamp. The latter indicates the server is reachable and the session is alive - only the timestamp validation failed. The keepalive should not trigger reconnection.
REPORTER
Marco Velluso @Velluso [email protected] Requesting CVE assignment and credit as reporter upon fix publication.
- Record
GHSA-r2pf-9cw4-5j65- CVSS 3.1
- 7.0 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-400
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
node-opcua-transportnpm |
2.0.0 up to 2.170.0 | 2.170.0 |
node-opcua-clientnpm |
2.0.0 up to 2.170.0 | 2.170.0 |
node-opcuanpm |
2.0.0 up to 2.170.0 | 2.170.0 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-68904 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.0) in Node-opcua, published September 16, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.44%, the 38th percentile. Fixed in node-opcua-transport 2.170.0.
References
github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/security/advisories/GHSA-r2pf-9cw4-5j65
github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/pull/1497
github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/1959cbb8946b386d2e24a1cce05b7148099d36e7
github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/481664fa6ba8204737c5a92797ff68c3ae780c1c
github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/4d59197e2dbd82791d7f36dad7da178715e0c27a
github.com/node-opcua/node-opcua/commit/dc406fd2d364aa69dd173be21ed32a7ff425017a