CVE-2026-96400
Gitea migration SSRF to reserved addresses through ALLOWED_DOMAINS
With [migrations] ALLOWED_DOMAINS set to a matching entry such as * or a hostname wildcard, Gitea's migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as 169.254.169.254, even when ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false. The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gitea server; the default empty ALLOWED_DOMAINS configuration is not affected.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- Low
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
4.3
Gitea migration SSRF to reserved addresses through ALLOWED_DOMAINS
With [migrations] ALLOWED_DOMAINS set to a matching entry such as * or a hostname wildcard, Gitea's migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as 169.254.169.254, even when ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false. The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gitea server; the default empty ALLOWED_DOMAINS configuration is not affected.
- Record
CVE-2026-96400- CVSS 3.1
- 4.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-93922
4.3
With [migrations] ALLOWED_DOMAINS set to a matching entry such as * or a hostname wildcard, Gitea's migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as 169.254.169.254, even when ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false. The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gitea server; the default empty ALLOWED_DOMAINS configuration is not affected.
- Record
EUVD-2026-93922- CVSS 3.1
- 4.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
4.3
With [migrations] ALLOWED_DOMAINS set to a matching entry such as * or a hostname wildcard, Gitea's migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as 169.254.169.254, even when ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false. The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gitea server; the default empty ALLOWED_DOMAINS configuration is not affected.
- Record
CVE-2026-96400- CVSS 3.1
- 4.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV
4.3
Gitea migration SSRF to reserved addresses through ALLOWED_DOMAINS
With [migrations] ALLOWED_DOMAINS set to a matching entry such as * or a hostname wildcard, Gitea's migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as 169.254.169.254, even when ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false. The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gitea server; the default empty ALLOWED_DOMAINS configuration is not affected.
- Record
CVE-2026-96400- CVSS 3.1
- 4.3 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-918
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBIT-gitea-2026-96400 No score
Gitea migration SSRF to reserved addresses through ALLOWED_DOMAINS
With [migrations] ALLOWED_DOMAINS set to a matching entry such as * or a hostname wildcard, Gitea's migration URL validation could permit reserved and link-local addresses, such as 169.254.169.254, even when ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS = false. The local-network block list did not cover these ranges, and a hostname matching the allow list was accepted regardless of its resolved address. A user who can start migrations on such an instance could reach these addresses from the Gitea server; the default empty ALLOWED_DOMAINS configuration is not affected.
- Record
BIT-gitea-2026-96400- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
giteaBitnami |
before 28.0.0 | 28.0.0 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2026-96400 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 4.3) in Gitea, published October 6, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.20%, the 9th percentile. Fixed in gitea 28.0.0.