Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-34177

VM lowlevel restriction bypass via raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf

9.1 CriticalFix available

Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7 contain an incomplete denylist in isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden (lxd/project/limits/permissions.go), which omits raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf from the set of keys blocked under the restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block project restriction. A remote attacker with can_edit permission on a VM instance in a restricted project can inject an AppArmor rule and a QEMU chardev configuration that bridges the LXD Unix socket into the guest VM, enabling privilege escalation to LXD cluster administrator and subsequently to host root.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
High
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

0.36%Up 0.3 points since Apr 9, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 9.1

VM lowlevel restriction bypass via raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf

Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7 contain an incomplete denylist in isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden (lxd/project/limits/permissions.go), which omits raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf from the set of keys blocked under the restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block project restriction. A remote attacker with can_edit permission on a VM instance in a restricted project can inject an AppArmor rule and a QEMU chardev configuration that bridges the LXD Unix socket into the guest VM, enabling privilege escalation to LXD cluster administrator and subsequently to host root.

Record
CVE-2026-34177
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-184
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-20872 9.1

Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7 contain an incomplete denylist in isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden (lxd/project/limits/permissions.go), which omits raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf from the set of keys blocked under the restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block project restriction. A remote attacker with can_edit permission on a VM instance in a restricted project can inject an AppArmor rule and a QEMU chardev configuration that bridges the LXD Unix socket into the guest VM, enabling privilege escalation to LXD cluster administrator and subsequently to host root.

Record
EUVD-2026-20872
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-fm2x-c5qw-4h6f 9.1

LXD: VM lowlevel restriction bypass via raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf

Summary

The isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden function in lxd/project/limits/permissions.go is missing raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf from its hardcoded forbidden list. A user with can_edit permission on a VM instance in a restricted project can combine these two omissions to bridge the LXD unix socket into the guest VM and gain full cluster administrator access. This bypasses the restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block project restriction, which is the security control specifically designed to prevent raw config injection.

Details

Affected code

The enforcement point for VM lowlevel restrictions is isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden at lxd/project/limits/permissions.go:924-926:

func isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden(key string) bool {
    return slices.Contains([]string{"boot.host_shutdown_timeout", "limits.memory.hugepages", "raw.idmap", "raw.qemu"}, key)
}

This list is missing two security-critical config keys:

  • raw.apparmor -- allows injecting arbitrary AppArmor rules into the QEMU process confinement profile
  • raw.qemu.conf -- allows injecting arbitrary sections into the QEMU configuration file

The container equivalent (isContainerLowLevelOptionForbidden at line 916) correctly includes raw.apparmor in its forbidden list.

Attack mechanism

Both raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf are valid VM config keys (defined in lxd/instance/instancetype/instance.go). When a restricted user sets them on a VM in a project with restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block, the entity config checker at line 779 calls isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden for each key, which returns false for both. The config is accepted without error.

On VM startup:

  1. instanceProfile (lxd/apparmor/instance.go:150) reads raw.apparmor from the expanded config and injects it verbatim into the QEMU AppArmor profile template (lxd/apparmor/instance_qemu.go:114-118). An attacker-supplied rule like /var/snap/lxd/common/lxd/unix.socket rw, grants the QEMU process read-write access to the LXD unix socket.

  2. qemuRawCfgOverride (lxd/instance/drivers/driver_qemu_config_override.go:242) reads raw.qemu.conf and appends new sections to the generated QEMU config. The attacker adds a [chardev] section with backend = "socket" pointing at the LXD unix socket, and a [device] section creating a virtserialport connected to it.

  3. QEMU starts with -readconfig containing the injected drive definition. The QEMU process connects to /var/snap/lxd/common/lxd/unix.socket (permitted by the injected AppArmor rule) and exposes the connection as /dev/virtio-ports/lxd.exploit inside the VM.

The exposed socket grants full administrative access to the entire LXD cluster, which can be used to create privileged containers, mount the host root filesystem, and escape to host root.

Affected deployments

Any LXD deployment where:

  • A project has restricted=true and restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block (the default when restricted=true)
  • A user has can_edit on a VM instance in that project (also implied by project-level operator, can_edit_instances, or instance_manager entitlements)

The minimum required entitlements are can_create_instances (to create a VM), can_edit on the instance (to set config keys -- lxc config set), can_update_state (to start the VM), and can_exec (to read the block device from inside the VM). Any of the broader project-level roles (operator, instance_manager) include all of these.

This includes the lxd-user multi-user daemon (shipped in the LXD snap), which auto-creates restricted projects for system users, and any multi-tenant, lab, CI/CD, or hosting deployment using restricted projects. These users are explicitly untrusted -- the restriction model exists to safely confine them. The LXD documentation states that restricted projects "prevent users from gaining root access" (doc/howto/projects_confine.md).

Version

Tested and confirmed on LXD…

Record
GHSA-fm2x-c5qw-4h6f
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-184
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 9.1

Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7 contain an incomplete denylist in isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden (lxd/project/limits/permissions.go), which omits raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf from the set of keys blocked under the restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block project restriction. A remote attacker with can_edit permission on a VM instance in a restricted project can inject an AppArmor rule and a QEMU chardev configuration that bridges the LXD Unix socket into the guest VM, enabling privilege escalation to LXD cluster administrator and subsequently to host root.

Record
CVE-2026-34177
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-184
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 9.1

VM lowlevel restriction bypass via raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf

Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7 contain an incomplete denylist in isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden (lxd/project/limits/permissions.go), which omits raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf from the set of keys blocked under the restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block project restriction. A remote attacker with can_edit permission on a VM instance in a restricted project can inject an AppArmor rule and a QEMU chardev configuration that bridges the LXD Unix socket into the guest VM, enabling privilege escalation to LXD cluster administrator and subsequently to host root.

Record
CVE-2026-34177
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-184
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-34177 9.1

Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7 contain an incomplete denylist in isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden (lxd/project/limits/permissions.go), which omits raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf from the set of keys blocked under the restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block project restriction. A remote attacker with can_edit permission on a VM instance in a restricted project can inject an AppArmor rule and a QEMU chardev configuration that bridges the LXD Unix socket into the guest VM, enabling privilege escalation to LXD cluster administrator and subsequently to host root.

Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-34177
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 5 moreShow less
OSVGHSA-fm2x-c5qw-4h6f 9.1

LXD: VM lowlevel restriction bypass via raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf

Summary

The isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden function in lxd/project/limits/permissions.go is missing raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf from its hardcoded forbidden list. A user with can_edit permission on a VM instance in a restricted project can combine these two omissions to bridge the LXD unix socket into the guest VM and gain full cluster administrator access. This bypasses the restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block project restriction, which is the security control specifically designed to prevent raw config injection.

Details

Affected code

The enforcement point for VM lowlevel restrictions is isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden at lxd/project/limits/permissions.go:924-926:

func isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden(key string) bool {
    return slices.Contains([]string{"boot.host_shutdown_timeout", "limits.memory.hugepages", "raw.idmap", "raw.qemu"}, key)
}

This list is missing two security-critical config keys:

  • raw.apparmor -- allows injecting arbitrary AppArmor rules into the QEMU process confinement profile
  • raw.qemu.conf -- allows injecting arbitrary sections into the QEMU configuration file

The container equivalent (isContainerLowLevelOptionForbidden at line 916) correctly includes raw.apparmor in its forbidden list.

Attack mechanism

Both raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf are valid VM config keys (defined in lxd/instance/instancetype/instance.go). When a restricted user sets them on a VM in a project with restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block, the entity config checker at line 779 calls isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden for each key, which returns false for both. The config is accepted without error.

On VM startup:

  1. instanceProfile (lxd/apparmor/instance.go:150) reads raw.apparmor from the expanded config and injects it verbatim into the QEMU AppArmor profile template (lxd/apparmor/instance_qemu.go:114-118). An attacker-supplied rule like /var/snap/lxd/common/lxd/unix.socket rw, grants the QEMU process read-write access to the LXD unix socket.

  2. qemuRawCfgOverride (lxd/instance/drivers/driver_qemu_config_override.go:242) reads raw.qemu.conf and appends new sections to the generated QEMU config. The attacker adds a [chardev] section with backend = "socket" pointing at the LXD unix socket, and a [device] section creating a virtserialport connected to it.

  3. QEMU starts with -readconfig containing the injected drive definition. The QEMU process connects to /var/snap/lxd/common/lxd/unix.socket (permitted by the injected AppArmor rule) and exposes the connection as /dev/virtio-ports/lxd.exploit inside the VM.

The exposed socket grants full administrative access to the entire LXD cluster, which can be used to create privileged containers, mount the host root filesystem, and escape to host root.

Affected deployments

Any LXD deployment where:

  • A project has restricted=true and restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block (the default when restricted=true)
  • A user has can_edit on a VM instance in that project (also implied by project-level operator, can_edit_instances, or instance_manager entitlements)

The minimum required entitlements are can_create_instances (to create a VM), can_edit on the instance (to set config keys -- lxc config set), can_update_state (to start the VM), and can_exec (to read the block device from inside the VM). Any of the broader project-level roles (operator, instance_manager) include all of these.

This includes the lxd-user multi-user daemon (shipped in the LXD snap), which auto-creates restricted projects for system users, and any multi-tenant, lab, CI/CD, or hosting deployment using restricted projects. These users are explicitly untrusted -- the restriction model exists to safely confine them. The LXD documentation states that restricted projects "prevent users from gaining root access" (doc/howto/projects_confine.md).

Version

Tested and confirmed on LXD…

Record
GHSA-fm2x-c5qw-4h6f
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-184
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-34177 9.1

Canonical LXD versions 4.12 through 6.7 contain an incomplete denylist in isVMLowLevelOptionForbidden (lxd/project/limits/permissions.go), which omits raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf from the set of keys blocked under the restricted.virtual-machines.lowlevel=block project restriction. A remote attacker with can_edit permission on a VM instance in a restricted project can inject an AppArmor rule and a QEMU chardev configuration that bridges the LXD Unix socket into the guest VM, enabling privilege escalation to LXD cluster administrator and subsequently to host root.

Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-34177
CVSS 3.1
9.1 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGO-2026-5368 No score

VM lowlevel restriction bypass via raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf in github.com/canonical/lxd

VM lowlevel restriction bypass via raw.apparmor and raw.qemu.conf in github.com/canonical/lxd

Record
GO-2026-5368
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21761-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260827T195228 2026-08-27T19:52:28Z (jsc#PED-11136).

    Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-5026 CVE-2026-39821
    • GO-2026-6225
    • GO-2026-6250 CVE-2026-63328 GHSA-8rc5-4fr6-64pw
    • GO-2026-6253 CVE-2026-17106 GHSA-hfg8-hc9c-6c3h
    • GO-2026-6254 CVE-2026-53941 GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6q
    • GO-2026-6255 CVE-2026-61711 GHSA-7236-3392-c5c6
    • GO-2026-6256 CVE-2026-61712 GHSA-72x6-4j93-7w86
    • GO-2026-6258 CVE-2026-45404 GHSA-42cj-99w8-cp2p
    • GO-2026-6259 CVE-2026-32637 GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6
    • GO-2026-6260 CVE-2026-55149 GHSA-qqff-5854-px68
    • GO-2026-6261 CVE-2026-54061 GHSA-rrwh-6jrq-wp5v
    • GO-2026-6262 GHSA-22w5-2fxg-vrwx
    • GO-2026-6263 CVE-2026-54168 GHSA-6f2p-296r-cc28
    • GO-2026-6264 CVE-2026-54245 GHSA-7q96-f8xw-jv5j
    • GO-2026-6265 GHSA-8fxq-53rx-ph5f
    • GO-2026-6266 CVE-2026-54167 GHSA-f5f4-3hh4-f54m
    • GO-2026-6267 GHSA-h58c-xccx-75m3
    • GO-2026-6268 GHSA-q9c5-pp7m-fm2g
    • GO-2026-6269 GHSA-rxhg-vcww-2mpw
    • GO-2026-6270 CVE-2026-54162 GHSA-x3g7-qrwc-f6c5
    • GO-2026-6271 CVE-2026-67448 GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m
    • GO-2026-6272 CVE-2026-67447 GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97
    • GO-2026-6273 CVE-2026-64679 GHSA-26w5-6g95-gj28
    • GO-2026-6274 CVE-2026-76905 GHSA-mmfr-pmjx-hw9w
    • GO-2026-6275 CVE-2026-77354 GHSA-xhj3-7xw9-vr34
    • GO-2026-6277 GHSA-4ph6-mjv7-3fq6
    • GO-2026-6278 GHSA-w67g-5rqw-f597
    • GO-2026-6279 CVE-2026-6046 GHSA-3vmp-whvv-5v9v
    • GO-2026-6280 CVE-2026-7387 GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw
    • GO-2026-6281 CVE-2026-6961 GHSA-8qq9-cqj8-82w4
    • GO-2026-6282 CVE-2026-7184 GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9
    • GO-2026-6283 CVE-2026-6689 GHSA-c28q-m4gf-vg4q
    • GO-2026-6284 CVE-2026-55477 GHSA-jm48-m3rr-9hgg
    • GO-2026-6285 CVE-2026-6739 GHSA-m2w9-h2mm-79qr
    • GO-2026-6286 CVE-2026-3433 GHSA-rp4v-qc77-phm4
    • GO-2026-6287 GHSA-vx2m-jpxr-xv7w
    • GO-2026-6288 CVE-2026-11624 GHSA-76g7-m3xw-x9gr
    • GO-2026-6289 GHSA-w8j7-39hp-8x59
    • GO-2026-6290 CVE-2026-55581 GHSA-3x77-wg38-92r3
    • GO-2026-6291 CVE-2026-55582 GHSA-74hp-mggr-hv58
    • GO-2026-6292 CVE-2026-55580 GHSA-f5pj-2738-996m
    • GO-2026-6293 CVE-2026-55677 GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq
    • GO-2026-6294 CVE-2026-55092 GHSA-mcj4-mphf-j9ff
    • GO-2026-6295 CVE-2026-55637 GHSA-cmwv-wf9p-p8wx
    • GO-2026-6296 CVE-2026-54523 GHSA-79gf-7frw-68m9
    • GO-2026-6297 CVE-2026-50879 GHSA-g743-m6x3-v6wm
    • GO-2026-6298 CVE-2026-54563 GHSA-w5fv-7x5q-g8qp
    • GO-2026-6299 CVE-2026-50884 GHSA-5442-mh7f-72px
    • GO-2026-6300 CVE-2026-50891 GHSA-rcqf-cpv9-g5jf
    • GO-2026-6301 CVE-2026-42350 GHSA-g7gw-m874-7rmf

  • Update to version 0.0.20260819T170606 2026-08-19T17:06:06Z.

    Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-4720 GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
    • GO-2026-4942 CVE-2026-35172 GHSA-f2g3-hh2r-cwgc
    • GO-2026-4950
    • GO-2026-6093 GHSA-464c-974j-9xm6
    • GO-2026-6094 GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g
    • GO-2026-6095 GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw
    • GO-2026-6097 CVE-2026-55495 GHSA-49h3-cwhj-4737
    • GO-2026-6098 CVE-2026-55496 GHSA-8r7f-r8hj-r3rv
    • GO-2026-6099 CVE-2026-57497 GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q
    • GO-2026-6100 CVE-2026-55497 GHSA-g9j2-8w95-3vwv
    • GO-2026-6101 CVE-2026-55502 GHSA-hq88-5x99-x3gf
    • GO-2026-6102 CVE-2026-55499 GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8
    • GO-2026-6103 CVE-2026-73564 GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp
    • GO-2026-6104 CVE-2026-62323 GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp
    • GO-2026-6105 GHSA-c534-2w9c-x7fm
    • GO-2026-6106 GHSA-v6w6-358x-2433
    • GO-2026-6107 CVE-2026-73500 GHSA-6vch-q96h-7gc3
    • GO-2026-6108 CVE-2026-73505 GHSA-6xj8-qv9j-xcjq
    • GO-2026-6109 GHSA-86cx-wwf4-phq4
    • GO-2026-6110 CVE-2026-73509 GHSA-95cv-r8x4-vh75
    • GO-2026-6111 CVE-2026-73506 GHSA-fwjx-9p69-h25h
    • GO-2026-6112 CVE-2026-73502 GHSA-jpcw-4wr7-c3vq
    • GO-2026-6113 GHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337
    • GO-2026-6114 CVE-2026-73499 GHSA-xg4h-6gfc-h4m8
    • GO-2026-6115 CVE-2026-56867
    • GO-2026-6117 GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5
    • GO-2026-6118 CVE-2026-47427 GHSA-w4q6-qw23-4rg7
    • GO-2026-6119 CVE-2026-43983…
Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21761-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23625-1 No score

Security update for govulncheck-vulndb

This update for govulncheck-vulndb fixes the following issues:

  • Update to version 0.0.20260827T195228 2026-08-27T19:52:28Z (jsc#PED-11136).

    Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-5026 CVE-2026-39821
    • GO-2026-6225
    • GO-2026-6250 CVE-2026-63328 GHSA-8rc5-4fr6-64pw
    • GO-2026-6253 CVE-2026-17106 GHSA-hfg8-hc9c-6c3h
    • GO-2026-6254 CVE-2026-53941 GHSA-vjhx-2cqw-3q6q
    • GO-2026-6255 CVE-2026-61711 GHSA-7236-3392-c5c6
    • GO-2026-6256 CVE-2026-61712 GHSA-72x6-4j93-7w86
    • GO-2026-6258 CVE-2026-45404 GHSA-42cj-99w8-cp2p
    • GO-2026-6259 CVE-2026-32637 GHSA-j2g6-362q-6qc6
    • GO-2026-6260 CVE-2026-55149 GHSA-qqff-5854-px68
    • GO-2026-6261 CVE-2026-54061 GHSA-rrwh-6jrq-wp5v
    • GO-2026-6262 GHSA-22w5-2fxg-vrwx
    • GO-2026-6263 CVE-2026-54168 GHSA-6f2p-296r-cc28
    • GO-2026-6264 CVE-2026-54245 GHSA-7q96-f8xw-jv5j
    • GO-2026-6265 GHSA-8fxq-53rx-ph5f
    • GO-2026-6266 CVE-2026-54167 GHSA-f5f4-3hh4-f54m
    • GO-2026-6267 GHSA-h58c-xccx-75m3
    • GO-2026-6268 GHSA-q9c5-pp7m-fm2g
    • GO-2026-6269 GHSA-rxhg-vcww-2mpw
    • GO-2026-6270 CVE-2026-54162 GHSA-x3g7-qrwc-f6c5
    • GO-2026-6271 CVE-2026-67448 GHSA-8r62-w5wh-fc5m
    • GO-2026-6272 CVE-2026-67447 GHSA-r553-m4fv-5v97
    • GO-2026-6273 CVE-2026-64679 GHSA-26w5-6g95-gj28
    • GO-2026-6274 CVE-2026-76905 GHSA-mmfr-pmjx-hw9w
    • GO-2026-6275 CVE-2026-77354 GHSA-xhj3-7xw9-vr34
    • GO-2026-6277 GHSA-4ph6-mjv7-3fq6
    • GO-2026-6278 GHSA-w67g-5rqw-f597
    • GO-2026-6279 CVE-2026-6046 GHSA-3vmp-whvv-5v9v
    • GO-2026-6280 CVE-2026-7387 GHSA-6hxm-w4hv-vgvw
    • GO-2026-6281 CVE-2026-6961 GHSA-8qq9-cqj8-82w4
    • GO-2026-6282 CVE-2026-7184 GHSA-9p44-r552-4wp9
    • GO-2026-6283 CVE-2026-6689 GHSA-c28q-m4gf-vg4q
    • GO-2026-6284 CVE-2026-55477 GHSA-jm48-m3rr-9hgg
    • GO-2026-6285 CVE-2026-6739 GHSA-m2w9-h2mm-79qr
    • GO-2026-6286 CVE-2026-3433 GHSA-rp4v-qc77-phm4
    • GO-2026-6287 GHSA-vx2m-jpxr-xv7w
    • GO-2026-6288 CVE-2026-11624 GHSA-76g7-m3xw-x9gr
    • GO-2026-6289 GHSA-w8j7-39hp-8x59
    • GO-2026-6290 CVE-2026-55581 GHSA-3x77-wg38-92r3
    • GO-2026-6291 CVE-2026-55582 GHSA-74hp-mggr-hv58
    • GO-2026-6292 CVE-2026-55580 GHSA-f5pj-2738-996m
    • GO-2026-6293 CVE-2026-55677 GHSA-vfp3-v2gw-7wfq
    • GO-2026-6294 CVE-2026-55092 GHSA-mcj4-mphf-j9ff
    • GO-2026-6295 CVE-2026-55637 GHSA-cmwv-wf9p-p8wx
    • GO-2026-6296 CVE-2026-54523 GHSA-79gf-7frw-68m9
    • GO-2026-6297 CVE-2026-50879 GHSA-g743-m6x3-v6wm
    • GO-2026-6298 CVE-2026-54563 GHSA-w5fv-7x5q-g8qp
    • GO-2026-6299 CVE-2026-50884 GHSA-5442-mh7f-72px
    • GO-2026-6300 CVE-2026-50891 GHSA-rcqf-cpv9-g5jf
    • GO-2026-6301 CVE-2026-42350 GHSA-g7gw-m874-7rmf

  • Update to version 0.0.20260819T170606 2026-08-19T17:06:06Z.

    Go CVE Numbering Authority IDs added or updated with aliases:

    • GO-2026-4720 GHSA-v3mg-9v85-fcm7
    • GO-2026-4942 CVE-2026-35172 GHSA-f2g3-hh2r-cwgc
    • GO-2026-4950
    • GO-2026-6093 GHSA-464c-974j-9xm6
    • GO-2026-6094 GHSA-gcjh-h69q-9w9g
    • GO-2026-6095 GHSA-r277-6w6q-xmqw
    • GO-2026-6097 CVE-2026-55495 GHSA-49h3-cwhj-4737
    • GO-2026-6098 CVE-2026-55496 GHSA-8r7f-r8hj-r3rv
    • GO-2026-6099 CVE-2026-57497 GHSA-g35j-m5xg-vh3q
    • GO-2026-6100 CVE-2026-55497 GHSA-g9j2-8w95-3vwv
    • GO-2026-6101 CVE-2026-55502 GHSA-hq88-5x99-x3gf
    • GO-2026-6102 CVE-2026-55499 GHSA-w8x7-h2px-xmq8
    • GO-2026-6103 CVE-2026-73564 GHSA-26gq-p25f-99cp
    • GO-2026-6104 CVE-2026-62323 GHSA-c3jm-gv5r-9wcp
    • GO-2026-6105 GHSA-c534-2w9c-x7fm
    • GO-2026-6106 GHSA-v6w6-358x-2433
    • GO-2026-6107 CVE-2026-73500 GHSA-6vch-q96h-7gc3
    • GO-2026-6108 CVE-2026-73505 GHSA-6xj8-qv9j-xcjq
    • GO-2026-6109 GHSA-86cx-wwf4-phq4
    • GO-2026-6110 CVE-2026-73509 GHSA-95cv-r8x4-vh75
    • GO-2026-6111 CVE-2026-73506 GHSA-fwjx-9p69-h25h
    • GO-2026-6112 CVE-2026-73502 GHSA-jpcw-4wr7-c3vq
    • GO-2026-6113 GHSA-p6ph-3jx2-3337
    • GO-2026-6114 CVE-2026-73499 GHSA-xg4h-6gfc-h4m8
    • GO-2026-6115 CVE-2026-56867
    • GO-2026-6117 GHSA-hp74-gm6m-2qm5
    • GO-2026-6118 CVE-2026-47427 GHSA-w4q6-qw23-4rg7
    • GO-2026-6119 CVE-2026-43983…
Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23625-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
github.com/canonical/lxd
Go
 0.0.0-20210305023314-538ac3df036e to 0.0.0-20260226085519-736f34afb267 None known
incus
Debian:13
 before 6.0.2-1
6.0.2-1
incus
Debian:14
 before 6.0.2-1
6.0.2-1
lxd
Debian:12
 All versions, plus listed versions
5.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-15.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-25.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-35.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-45.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-5
Show 12 moreShow less
5.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-65.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-75.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-85.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-95.0.2-55.0.2-5+deb12u15.0.2-5+deb12u25.0.2-5+deb12u35.0.2-5+deb12u45.0.2-5+deb12u55.0.2-5+deb12u65.0.2-6
 None known
lxd
Debian:13
 before 5.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-9+deb13u5, plus listed versions
5.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-95.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-9+deb13u15.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-9+deb13u25.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-9+deb13u35.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-9+deb13u4
5.0.2+git20231211.1364ae4-9+deb13u5
github.com/canonical/lxd
Go
 0.0.0-20210305023314-538ac3df036e and later None known
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0
 before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
govulncheck-vulndb
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0
 before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
incus
Ubuntu:Pro:24.04:LTS
 All versions, plus listed versions
0.4-1ubuntu10.5.1-10.5.1-30.6-16.0.0-1
Show 7 moreShow less
6.0.0-1ubuntu0.16.0.0-1ubuntu0.26.0.0-1ubuntu0.2+esm16.0.0-1ubuntu0.36.0.0-1ubuntu0.3+esm16.0.0-1ubuntu0.3+esm26.0.0-1ubuntu0.3+esm3
 None known
govulncheck-vulndb
openSUSE:Leap 16.0
 before 0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1
0.0.20260827T195228-160000.1.1

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-34177 is a critical vulnerability (CVSS 9.1) in Canonical Lxd, published April 9, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.36%, the 30th percentile. Fixed in incus 6.0.2-1.

References

Show 186 moreShow less
This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 4 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

Pages All vulnerabilities Browse Docs Sources Guide Get API key
MoveEnter Open