CVE-2025-9231
Timing side-channel in SM2 algorithm on 64 bit ARM
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..
While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.
OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
5.9
Timing side-channel in SM2 algorithm on 64 bit ARM
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..
While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.
OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.
- Record
CVE-2025-9231- CVSS 3.1
- 5.9 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-385
- Updated
- 2026-11-06
EUVDEUVD-2025-31728
5.9
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..
While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.
OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.
- Record
EUVD-2025-31728- CVSS 3.1
- 5.9 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-06
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-9mrx-mqmg-gwj9
6.5
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private...
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..
While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.
OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.
- Record
GHSA-9mrx-mqmg-gwj9- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L - Weakness
- CWE-385
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
5.9
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..
While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.
OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.
- Record
CVE-2025-9231- CVSS 3.1
- 5.9 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-385
- Updated
- 2026-11-07
OSVALPINE-CVE-2025-9231
5.9
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..
While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.
OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.
- Record
ALPINE-CVE-2025-9231- CVSS 3.1
- 5.9 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-07
OSVBELL-CVE-2025-9231
6.5
- Record
BELL-CVE-2025-9231- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 12 moreShow less
OSV
5.9
Timing side-channel in SM2 algorithm on 64 bit ARM
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..
While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.
OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.
- Record
CVE-2025-9231- CVSS 3.1
- 5.9 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Weakness
- CWE-385
- Updated
- 2026-11-07
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2025-9231
5.9
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms. Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker.. While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack. OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2025-9231- CVSS 3.1
- 5.9 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-07
OSVJLSEC-2026-267
6.5
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private...
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms.
Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker..
While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack.
OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue.
The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.
- Record
JLSEC-2026-267- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:7261
9.8
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:7261- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2025-9231
6.5
Issue summary: A timing side-channel which could potentially allow remote recovery of the private key exists in the SM2 algorithm implementation on 64 bit ARM platforms. Impact summary: A timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on 64 bit ARM platforms could allow recovering the private key by an attacker.. While remote key recovery over a network was not attempted by the reporter, timing measurements revealed a timing signal which may allow such an attack. OpenSSL does not directly support certificates with SM2 keys in TLS, and so this CVE is not relevant in most TLS contexts. However, given that it is possible to add support for such certificates via a custom provider, coupled with the fact that in such a custom provider context the private key may be recoverable via remote timing measurements, we consider this to be a Moderate severity issue. The FIPS modules in 3.5, 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue, as SM2 is not an approved algorithm.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2025-9231- CVSS 3.1
- 6.5 Medium
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2025:15723-1 No score
regclient-0.10.0-1.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the regclient-0.10.0-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2025:15723-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2025:20164-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2025-9230: Fixed out-of-bounds read & write in RFC 3211 KEK unwrap (bsc#1250232)
- CVE-2025-9231: Fixedk timing side-channel in SM2 algorithm on 64 bit ARM (bsc#1250233)
- CVE-2025-9232: Fixed out-of-bounds read in HTTP client no_proxy handling (bsc#1250234)
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2025:20164-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:10237-1 No score
libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-2.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-2.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:10237-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2025:21213-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2025-9230: Fixed out-of-bounds read & write in RFC 3211 KEK unwrap (bsc#1250232)
- CVE-2025-9231: Fixedk timing side-channel in SM2 algorithm on 64 bit ARM (bsc#1250233)
- CVE-2025-9232: Fixed out-of-bounds read in HTTP client no_proxy handling (bsc#1250234)
- Record
SUSE-SU-2025:21213-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2025:21224-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2025-9230: Fixed out-of-bounds read & write in RFC 3211 KEK unwrap (bsc#1250232)
- CVE-2025-9231: Fixedk timing side-channel in SM2 algorithm on 64 bit ARM (bsc#1250233)
- CVE-2025-9232: Fixed out-of-bounds read in HTTP client no_proxy handling (bsc#1250234)
- Record
SUSE-SU-2025:21224-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:3835-1 No score
Security update for openssl, openssl-3
This update for openssl, openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
OpenSSL is updated to 3.5.0 in SLE-15-SP7: (jsc#PED-16072)
- Enables Post-Quantum Cryptography (PQC) TLS support
Security issues fixed:
- CVE-2026-42764: NULL pointer dereference in QUIC server initial packet handling (bsc#1266347)
- CVE-2026-34182: CMS AuthEnvelopedData Processing May Accept Forged Messages (bsc#1266344)
- CVE-2025-9231: Fix timing side-channel in SM2 algorithm on 64 bit ARM (bsc#1250233)
- CVE-2024-13176: Fix timing side-channel in ECDSA signature computation (bsc#1236136)
POWER performance enhancements:
- Optimized MLDSA NTT, supports p8 and above architectures (jsc#PED-14569)
-
Adapt spec file for immutability via systemd-tmpfiles (jsc#PED-14813)
-
Fix check %{suse_version} > 1600 (jsc#PED-15816)
-
Fix NULL pointer dereference when processing an OCSP response
-
Remove showciphers.c in favor of openssl ciphers
-
Use %ldconfig_scriptlets
-
Enable livepatching support for ppc64le [bsc#1257274]
-
Move ssl configuration files to the libopenssl package [bsc#1247463]
-
Don't install unneeded NOTES
-
Disable LTO for userspace livepatching [jsc#PED-13245]
-
Fix P-384 curve on lower-than-P9 PPC64 targets [bsc#1243014]
-
FIPS: Fix the speed command in FIPS mode for KMAC
-
FIPS: Restore the check to deny SHA1 signatures in FIPS mode and the functionality to allow/deny via crypto-policies. [jsc#PED-12224]
Update to 3.5.0:
-
Changes:
- Default encryption cipher for the req, cms, and smime applications changed from des-ede3-cbc to aes-256-cbc.
- The default TLS supported groups list has been changed to include and prefer hybrid PQC KEM groups. Some practically unused groups were removed from the default list.
- The default TLS keyshares have been changed to offer X25519MLKEM768 and and X25519.
- All BIO_meth_get_*() functions were deprecated.
-
New features:
- Support for server side QUIC (RFC 9000)
- Support for 3rd party QUIC stacks including 0-RTT support
- Support for PQC algorithms (ML-KEM, ML-DSA and SLH-DSA)
- A new configuration option no-tls-deprecated-ec to disable support for TLS groups deprecated in RFC8422
- A new configuration option enable-fips-jitter to make the FIPS provider to use the JITTER seed source
- Support for central key generation in CMP
- Support added for opaque symmetric key objects (EVP_SKEY)
- Support for multiple TLS keyshares and improved TLS key establishment group configurability
- API support for pipelining in provided cipher algorithms
Changes between 3.3.0 and 3.4.0:
-
Changes:
- Deprecation of TS_VERIFY_CTX_set_* functions and addition of replacement TS_VERIFY_CTX_set0_* functions with improved semantics
- The X25519 and X448 key exchange implementation in the FIPS provider is unapproved and has fips=no property.
- SHAKE-128 and SHAKE-256 implementations have no default digest length anymore. That means these algorithms cannot be used with EVP_DigestFinal/_ex() unless the xoflen param is set before.
- Setting config_diagnostics=1 in the config file will cause errors to be returned from SSL_CTX_new() and SSL_CTX_new_ex() if there is an error in the ssl module configuration.
- An empty renegotiate extension will be used in TLS client hellos instead of the empty renegotiation SCSV, for all connections with a minimum TLS version > 1.0.
- Deprecation of SSL_SESSION_get_time(), SSL_SESSION_set_time() and SSL_CTX_flush_sessions() functions in favor of their respective _ex functions which are Y2038-safe on platforms with Y2038-safe time_t
-
New features:
- Support for directly fetched composite signature algorithms such as RSA-SHA2-256 including new API functions
- FIPS indicators support in the FIPS provider and various updates of the FIPS provider required for future FIPS 140-3 validations -…
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:3835-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUSN-7786-1 No score
openssl, openssl1.0 vulnerabilities
Stanislav Fort discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled memory when trying to decrypt CMS messages encrypted with password-based encryption. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service or execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2025-9230)
Stanislav Fort discovered that OpenSSL had a timing side-channel in SM2 signature computations on ARM platforms. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to recover private data. This issue only affected Ubuntu 25.04. (CVE-2025-9231)
Stanislav Fort discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled memory during HTTP requests when "no_proxy" environment variable is set. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 25.04. (CVE-2025-9232)
- Record
USN-7786-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
- openssl
- siemens ruggedcom rst2428p
- siemens scalance xc-300/xr-300/xc-400/xr-500wg/xr-500 family
- siemens scalance xch328
- siemens scalance xcm324
- siemens scalance xcm328
- siemens scalance xcm332
- siemens scalance xrh334 (24 v dc, 8xfo, cc)
- siemens scalance xrm334 (230 v ac, 12xfo)
- siemens scalance xrm334 (230 v ac, 8xfo)
- siemens scalance xrm334 (230v ac, 2x10g, 24xsfp, 8xsfp+)
- siemens scalance xrm334 (24 v dc, 12xfo)
Show 7 moreShow less
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
opensslAlpine:v3.20 |
before 3.3.5-r0 | 3.3.5-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.21 |
before 3.3.5-r0 | 3.3.5-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.22 |
before 3.5.4-r0 | 3.5.4-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.23 |
before 3.5.4-r0 | 3.5.4-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.24 |
before 3.5.4-r0 | 3.5.4-r0 |
opensslAlpaquita:25 |
3.5.0-r0 up to 3.5.4-r0 | 3.5.4-r0 |
opensslAlpaquita:stream |
3.1.1-r1 up to 3.5.4-r0 | 3.5.4-r0 |
opensslBellSoft Hardened Containers:25 |
3.5.0-r0 up to 3.5.4-r0 | 3.5.4-r0 |
opensslBellSoft Hardened Containers:stream |
3.1.1-r1 up to 3.5.4-r0 | 3.5.4-r0 |
opensslDebian:13 |
before 3.5.1-1+deb13u1, plus listed versions 3.5.1-1 |
3.5.1-1+deb13u1 |
Show 29 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
opensslDebian:14 |
before 3.5.4-1, plus listed versions 3.5.1-13.5.2-13.5.3-13.5.4-1~deb13u13.5.4-1~deb13u2 |
3.5.4-1 |
OpenSSL_jllJulia |
3.5.0+0 up to 3.5.4+0 | 3.5.4+0 |
opensslRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 23 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-config-fipsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 23 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-develRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 23 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-devel-engineRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 23 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-libsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 23 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-perlRed Hat:hummingbird:1 From an advisory covering 23 CVEs |
before 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.6-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.4.1 | 3.5.0-160000.4.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.4.1 | 3.5.0-160000.4.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.4.1 | 3.5.0-160000.4.1 |
opensslSUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-150700.3.4.1 | 3.5.0-150700.3.4.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-150700.5.45.2 | 3.5.0-150700.5.45.2 |
nodejs24SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Web and Scripting 15 SP7 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 24.18.1-150700.15.18.1 | 24.18.1-150700.15.18.1 |
nodejsUbuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.10.25~dfsg2-2ubuntu14.2.2~dfsg-14.2.3~dfsg-14.2.4~dfsg-1ubuntu14.2.4~dfsg-2 Show 7 moreShow less4.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu14.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu44.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.14.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.24.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2+esm14.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2+esm24.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2+esm3 |
None known |
nodejsUbuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 6.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu16.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu26.12.0~dfsg-1ubuntu16.12.0~dfsg-2ubuntu16.12.0~dfsg-2ubuntu2 Show 10 moreShow less8.10.0~dfsg-28.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.28.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.38.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.48.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm18.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm28.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm38.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm48.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm58.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm6 |
None known |
nodejsUbuntu:Pro:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 12.22.5~dfsg-5ubuntu112.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu112.22.7~dfsg-2ubuntu312.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu212.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3 Show 7 moreShow less12.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.112.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.212.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.312.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.412.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.512.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.612.22.9~dfsg-1ubuntu3.6+esm2 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:25.10 |
before 3.5.3-1ubuntu2, plus listed versions 3.4.1-1ubuntu33.5.0-2ubuntu13.5.2-1ubuntu1 |
3.5.3-1ubuntu2 |
opensslUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
before 3.5.3-1ubuntu2 | 3.5.3-1ubuntu2 |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm11, plus listed versions 1.0.1e-3ubuntu11.0.1e-4ubuntu11.0.1e-4ubuntu21.0.1e-4ubuntu31.0.1e-4ubuntu4 Show 33 moreShow less1.0.1f-1ubuntu11.0.1f-1ubuntu21.0.1f-1ubuntu2.11.0.1f-1ubuntu2.21.0.1f-1ubuntu2.31.0.1f-1ubuntu2.41.0.1f-1ubuntu2.51.0.1f-1ubuntu2.71.0.1f-1ubuntu2.81.0.1f-1ubuntu2.111.0.1f-1ubuntu2.121.0.1f-1ubuntu2.151.0.1f-1ubuntu2.161.0.1f-1ubuntu2.171.0.1f-1ubuntu2.181.0.1f-1ubuntu2.191.0.1f-1ubuntu2.201.0.1f-1ubuntu2.211.0.1f-1ubuntu2.221.0.1f-1ubuntu2.231.0.1f-1ubuntu2.241.0.1f-1ubuntu2.251.0.1f-1ubuntu2.261.0.1f-1ubuntu2.271.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm11.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm21.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm31.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm41.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm51.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm61.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm71.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm91.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm10 |
1.0.1f-1ubuntu2.27+esm11 |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm13, plus listed versions 1.0.2d-0ubuntu11.0.2d-0ubuntu21.0.2e-1ubuntu11.0.2f-2ubuntu11.0.2g-1ubuntu2 Show 31 moreShow less1.0.2g-1ubuntu31.0.2g-1ubuntu41.0.2g-1ubuntu4.11.0.2g-1ubuntu4.21.0.2g-1ubuntu4.41.0.2g-1ubuntu4.51.0.2g-1ubuntu4.61.0.2g-1ubuntu4.81.0.2g-1ubuntu4.91.0.2g-1ubuntu4.101.0.2g-1ubuntu4.111.0.2g-1ubuntu4.121.0.2g-1ubuntu4.131.0.2g-1ubuntu4.141.0.2g-1ubuntu4.151.0.2g-1ubuntu4.161.0.2g-1ubuntu4.171.0.2g-1ubuntu4.181.0.2g-1ubuntu4.191.0.2g-1ubuntu4.201.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm11.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm21.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm31.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm41.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm51.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm61.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm71.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm91.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm101.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm111.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm12 |
1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.20+esm13 |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm6, plus listed versions 1.0.2g-1ubuntu131.0.2g-1ubuntu141.0.2n-1ubuntu11.1.0g-2ubuntu11.1.0g-2ubuntu2 Show 27 moreShow less1.1.0g-2ubuntu31.1.0g-2ubuntu41.1.0g-2ubuntu4.11.1.0g-2ubuntu4.31.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.11.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.21.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.31.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.41.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.51.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.61.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.71.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.81.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.91.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.101.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.131.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.141.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.151.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.171.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.191.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.201.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.211.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.221.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.231.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm11.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm31.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm41.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm5 |
1.1.1-1ubuntu2.1~18.04.23+esm6 |
openssl1.0Ubuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.13+esm2, plus listed versions 1.0.2n-1ubuntu21.0.2n-1ubuntu31.0.2n-1ubuntu41.0.2n-1ubuntu51.0.2n-1ubuntu5.1 Show 13 moreShow less1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.21.0.2n-1ubuntu5.31.0.2n-1ubuntu5.41.0.2n-1ubuntu5.51.0.2n-1ubuntu5.61.0.2n-1ubuntu5.71.0.2n-1ubuntu5.81.0.2n-1ubuntu5.91.0.2n-1ubuntu5.101.0.2n-1ubuntu5.111.0.2n-1ubuntu5.121.0.2n-1ubuntu5.131.0.2n-1ubuntu5.13+esm1 |
1.0.2n-1ubuntu5.13+esm2 |
opensslUbuntu:Pro:20.04:LTS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+esm1, plus listed versions 1.1.1c-1ubuntu41.1.1d-2ubuntu31.1.1d-2ubuntu61.1.1f-1ubuntu11.1.1f-1ubuntu2 Show 21 moreShow less1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.11.1.1f-1ubuntu2.21.1.1f-1ubuntu2.31.1.1f-1ubuntu2.41.1.1f-1ubuntu2.51.1.1f-1ubuntu2.81.1.1f-1ubuntu2.91.1.1f-1ubuntu2.101.1.1f-1ubuntu2.111.1.1f-1ubuntu2.121.1.1f-1ubuntu2.131.1.1f-1ubuntu2.151.1.1f-1ubuntu2.161.1.1f-1ubuntu2.171.1.1f-1ubuntu2.181.1.1f-1ubuntu2.191.1.1f-1ubuntu2.201.1.1f-1ubuntu2.211.1.1f-1ubuntu2.221.1.1f-1ubuntu2.231.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24 |
1.1.1f-1ubuntu2.24+esm1 |
opensslUbuntu:22.04:LTS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.20, plus listed versions 1.1.1l-1ubuntu13.0.0-1ubuntu13.0.1-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu1.1 Show 16 moreShow less3.0.2-0ubuntu1.23.0.2-0ubuntu1.43.0.2-0ubuntu1.53.0.2-0ubuntu1.63.0.2-0ubuntu1.73.0.2-0ubuntu1.83.0.2-0ubuntu1.93.0.2-0ubuntu1.103.0.2-0ubuntu1.123.0.2-0ubuntu1.133.0.2-0ubuntu1.143.0.2-0ubuntu1.153.0.2-0ubuntu1.163.0.2-0ubuntu1.173.0.2-0ubuntu1.183.0.2-0ubuntu1.19 |
3.0.2-0ubuntu1.20 |
opensslUbuntu:24.04:LTS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 3.0.13-0ubuntu3.6, plus listed versions 3.0.10-1ubuntu23.0.10-1ubuntu2.13.0.10-1ubuntu33.0.10-1ubuntu43.0.13-0ubuntu2 Show 6 moreShow less3.0.13-0ubuntu33.0.13-0ubuntu3.13.0.13-0ubuntu3.23.0.13-0ubuntu3.33.0.13-0ubuntu3.43.0.13-0ubuntu3.5 |
3.0.13-0ubuntu3.6 |
regclientopenSUSE:Tumbleweed From an advisory covering 11 CVEs |
before 0.10.0-1.1 | 0.10.0-1.1 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Leap 16.0 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 3.5.0-160000.4.1 | 3.5.0-160000.4.1 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Tumbleweed From an advisory covering 14 CVEs |
before 3.5.3-2.1 | 3.5.3-2.1 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| severity | CVE List, NVD | |
| affected, facts | ||
| first indexed | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2025-9231 is a medium vulnerability (CVSS 5.9) in Openssl, published September 30, 2025. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 2.24%, the 82nd percentile. Fixed in openssl 3.3.5-r0.
References
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20250930.txt
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/fc47a2ec078912b3e914fab5734535e76c4820c2
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/eed5adc9f969d77c94f213767acbb41ff923b6f4
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/567f64386e43683888212226824b6a179885a0fe
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/cba616c26ac8e7b37de5e77762e505ba5ca51698
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2025/09/30/5
Show 156 moreShow less
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/05/11/11
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-089022.html
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-032379.html
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-253495.html
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/html/ssa-585531.html
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9231
github.com/advisories/GHSA-9mrx-mqmg-gwj9
security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2025-9231
docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2025-9231
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2025/9xxx/CVE-2025-9231.json
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2025-9231
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:7261
images.redhat.com
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-9232
access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-9231
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-9230
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11187
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69421
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69420
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69419
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69418
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-68160
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-66199
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15469
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15468
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15467
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-31790
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-31789
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28389
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28388
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28387
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28386
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-28390
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-22795
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-2673
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-22796
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_7261.json
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2396054
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9230
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9230
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2396055
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9231
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2396056
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-9232
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-9232
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430375
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-11187
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-11187
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430376
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15467
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15467
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430377
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15468
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15468
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430378
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-15469
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-15469
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430379
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-66199
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-66199
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430380
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-68160
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-68160
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430381
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69418
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69418
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430386
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69419
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69419
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430388
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69420
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69420
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430387
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2025-69421
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-69421
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2447327
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-2673
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-2673
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2157c9d81f7b0bd7dfa25b960e928ec28e8dd63f
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/85977e013f32ceb96aa034c0e741adddc1a05e34
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260313.txt
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430389
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22795
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22795
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2430390
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-22796
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-22796
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451099
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28386
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28386
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260407.txt
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451098
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28387
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28387
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451097
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28388
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28388
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451096
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28389
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28389
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2456314
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-28390
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-28390
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/01194a8f1941115cd0383bfa91c736dd3993c8bc
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/2e39b7a6993be445fddb9fbce316fa756e0397b6
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/af2a5fecd3e71a29e7568f9c1453dec5cebbaff4
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/ea7b4ea4f9f853521ba34830cbcadc970d2e0788
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/fd2f1a6cf53b9ceeca723a001aa4b825d7c7ee75
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451095
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31789
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31789
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2451094
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-31790
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-31790
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202521213-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1250232
bugzilla.suse.com/1250233
bugzilla.suse.com/1250234
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-9230
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-9231
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-9232
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2025/suse-su-202521224-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20263835-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1216950
bugzilla.suse.com/1243014
bugzilla.suse.com/1247463
bugzilla.suse.com/1257274
bugzilla.suse.com/1266344
bugzilla.suse.com/1266347
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-13176
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34182
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42764
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-9231
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7786-1
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-9230
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2025-9232
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-47912
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-58183
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-58185
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-58186
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-58187
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-58188
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-58189
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-61723
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-11187
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15467
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15468
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-15469
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-66199
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-68160
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69418
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69419
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69420
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2025-69421
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-22795
Left out here: the rest of 1 source description. The JSON record has them.