CVE-2026-14457
RPK Server Signature Algorithm Selection Can Dereference a Missing Certificate
CVE-2026-14457 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.5) in Openssl, published August 25, 2026. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 1.17%, the 67th percentile. Fixed in openssl 3.5.8-r0.
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.
Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.
CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference
Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).
When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.
Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
7.5
RPK Server Signature Algorithm Selection Can Dereference a Missing Certificate
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.
Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.
CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference
Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).
When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.
Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
CVE-2026-14457- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-476
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2026-65479
7.5
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.
Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.
CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference
Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).
When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.
Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
EUVD-2026-65479- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8
7.5
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled,...
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.
Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.
CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference
Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).
When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.
Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
GHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-476
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
7.5
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.
Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.
CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference
Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).
When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.
Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
CVE-2026-14457- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-476
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2026-14457
7.5
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.
Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.
CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference
Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).
When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.
Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
ALPINE-CVE-2026-14457- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBELL-CVE-2026-14457
7.5
- Record
BELL-CVE-2026-14457- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 26 moreShow less
OSV
7.5
RPK Server Signature Algorithm Selection Can Dereference a Missing Certificate
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.
Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.
CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference
Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).
When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.
Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
CVE-2026-14457- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-476
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2026-14457
7.5
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible. CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA). When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key. Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below. FIPS impact: no No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2026-14457- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2026-3830
7.5
openssl security update
OpenSSL is a robust, commercial-grade, and full-featured toolkit for the Transport Layer Security (TLS) and Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) protocols.
Security Fix(es):
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension.
Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible.
CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference
Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA).
When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key.
Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below.
FIPS impact: no
No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-14457)
Issue summary: QUIC server may double free QRX (QUIC record layer RX) object when channel creation fails for initial packet.
Impact summary: Double free leads to heap corruption, which typically results in termination of QUIC server process, leading to Denial of Service. There is so far no evidence that this double free is exploitable for remote code execution, thus it is considered highly improbable.
CWE: CWE-415: Double Free
Description: In order to validate initial packet, OpenSSL QUIC stack default packet handler (port_default_packet_handler()) creates a so-called QRX object. If the initial packet validates successfully with QRX object, the default packet handler proceeds to channel (connection object) creation. The QRX object used for packet validation is passed to port_bind_channel(), so it becomes part of the newly created connection. If port_bind_channel() fails, then it also frees the QRX object. Once port_bind_channel() returns, the port_default_packet_handler() detects the failure and proceeds to the error branch, where the same QRX object is freed for the second time.
The failure in port_bind_channel() function can be induced with a relatively low effort by a malformed (non RFC 9000 compliant) INITIAL packet. If the packet carries DCID (destination connection ID) which is shorter than 8 bytes, then port_bind_channel() jumps to the error path after ossl_quic_lcidm_enrol_odcid() detects that the DCID has invalid length.
FIPS impact: no The FIPS module is not affected, as the QUIC implementation is outside of the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.(CVE-2026-18798)
Issue summary: Receiving a DTLS record for a future epoch while a handshake is in progress causes OpenSSL to buffer far more memory than the record itself requires.
Impact summary: A peer can use a small amount of network traffic to make an OpenSSL DTLS endpoint retain a disproportionately large amount of memory, which may lead to a Denial of Service.
CWE: CWE-405: Asymmetric Resource Consumption (Amplification)
Description: While a DTLS handshake is in progress, a peer may legitimately have already moved on to the next epoch (for example, having sent its ChangeCipherSpec and Finished messages) before the local endpoint has processed the same transition, typically because of reordering on the underlying UDP transport. OpenSSL buffers such early…
- Record
OESA-2026-3830- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:59635
9.1
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:59635- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:59641
9.1
Red Hat Security Advisory: Red Hat Hardened Images RPMs bug fix and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:59641- CVSS 3.1
- 9.1 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:67154
7.5
Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:67154- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRHSA-2026:67165
7.5
Red Hat Security Advisory: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update
- Record
RHSA-2026:67165- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRLSA-2026:67154
7.5
Important: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update
OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.
Security Fix(es):
-
openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)
-
openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)
-
openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)
-
openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)
-
openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)
-
openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)
-
openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)
-
openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)
-
openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)
Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):
- openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [Rocky Linux 10.2.z] (JIRA:Rocky Linux-212362)
For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.
- Record
RLSA-2026:67154- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVRLSA-2026:67165
7.5
Important: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update
OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.
Security Fix(es):
-
openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)
-
openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)
-
openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)
-
openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)
-
openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)
-
openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)
-
openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)
-
openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)
-
openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)
Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):
- openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [Rocky Linux 9.8.z] (JIRA:Rocky Linux-232828)
For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.
- Record
RLSA-2026:67165- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2026-14457
7.5
Issue summary: In a server or client configuration with RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) enabled, and only the private key (with no associated certificate) configured locally, a NULL pointer dereference may occur when the remote peer solicits raw public keys and also sends the typically omitted "signature_algorithms_cert" TLS extension. Impact summary: The impact is limited to a possible Denial of Service as a result of an application abort, no data disclosure or remote command execution are possible. CWE: CWE-476: NULL Pointer Dereference Description: While a passing comment in sample code in the documentation suggests that key-only RPK configurations are supported, the best-practice RPK configuration is to always configure a corresponding certificate (possibly self-signed or signed by any convenient CA). When the private key is configured along with a matching certificate, the "signature_algorithms_cert" extension is handled reliably even without the fix, and peer clients or servers that don't support raw public keys may be able to complete a TLS connection by pinning or verifying the corresponding certificate or its public key. Deployments that prefer to configure just a private key with no certificate need to upgrade to an updated release as noted below. FIPS impact: no No FIPS modules are affected by this issue, as the SSL protocol implementation is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2026-14457- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALSA-2026:67154 No score
Important: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update
OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.
Security Fix(es):
- openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)
- openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)
- openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)
- openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)
- openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)
- openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)
- openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)
- openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)
- openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)
Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):
- openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [AlmaLinux 10.2.z] (JIRA:AlmaLinux-212362)
For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.
- Record
ALSA-2026:67154- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALSA-2026:67165 No score
Important: openssl security, bug fix, and enhancement update
OpenSSL is a toolkit that implements the Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) and Transport Layer Security (TLS) protocols, as well as a full-strength general-purpose cryptography library.
Security Fix(es):
- openssl: OpenSSL: Denial of Service via unbounded memory growth in QUIC server (CVE-2026-14456)
- openssl: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (CVE-2026-18798)
- openssl: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (CVE-2026-63072)
- openssl: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted protectionAlg (CVE-2026-63076)
- openssl: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (CVE-2026-14457)
- openssl: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (CVE-2026-54874)
- openssl: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (CVE-2026-63073)
- openssl: CMP indefinite cache growth of ExtraCerts (CVE-2026-63074)
- openssl: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (CVE-2026-63075)
Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):
- openssl: HollowByte remote memory-exhaustion DoS fix may be missing [AlmaLinux 9.8.z] (JIRA:AlmaLinux-232828)
For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.
- Record
ALSA-2026:67165- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2026-1789738618 No score
openssl: Fix of 4 CVEs
- CVE-2026-63074: roll cached CMP extraCerts back off ctx->untrusted on both message-rejection paths, so a client that repeatedly sends rejected messages can no longer grow a long-lived OSSL_CMP_CTX without bound
- CVE-2026-63076: require the CMP protectionAlg parameter to be a V_ASN1_SEQUENCE before it is used as a PBMParameter, so a crafted parameter of another ASN.1 type is no longer dereferenced as a bogus pointer
- CVE-2026-14457: skip the signature_algorithms_cert restriction when RFC 7250 raw public keys are negotiated and reject a key-only slot when they are not, so a peer soliciting raw public keys against a key-only configuration can no longer trigger a NULL pointer dereference in check_cert_usable()
- CVE-2026-63075: stop recording ACK-only QUIC packets in the TX history while still advancing the history's highest sent packet number, so a peer that withholds acknowledgements can no longer drive unbounded memory growth
- Record
CLSA-2026-1789738618- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVMGASA-2026-0353 No score
Updated openssl packages fix security vulnerabilities
Unbounded Memory Growth in QUIC Server Incoming Channel Queue. (CVE-2026-14456) QUIC Server May Trigger Double Free When Processing INITIAL Packet. (CVE-2026-18798) Heap Buffer Overflow in CMS Key Unwrapping. (CVE-2026-63072) Invalid Pointer Dereference in CMP Server via Crafted protectionAlg. (CVE-2026-63076) RPK Server Signature Algorithm Selection Can Dereference a Missing Certificate. (CVE-2026-14457) Excessive Memory Use Buffering DTLS Records for a Future Epoch. (CVE-2026-54874) Untrusted Sender DN Used as Format String in CMP Response Validation. (CVE-2026-63073) CMP Indefinite Cache Growth of ExtraCerts. (CVE-2026-63074) QUIC ACK-only Packet Retention Can Cause Memory Exhaustion. (CVE-2026-63075)
- Record
MGASA-2026-0353- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:11623-1 No score
libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-8.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the libopenssl-3-devel-3.5.3-8.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:11623-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2026:21744-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
August 2026 release.
- CVE-2026-14456: unbounded memory growth in QUIC server incoming channel queue (bsc#1274791).
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-18798: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (bsc#1274777).
- CVE-2026-34181: PKCS#12 files with PBMAC1 are accepted with short HMAC keys (bsc#1266343).
- CVE-2026-54874: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (bsc#1274795).
- CVE-2026-63072: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63073: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (bsc#1274796).
- CVE-2026-63074: CMP indefinite cache growth of
ExtraCerts(bsc#1274797). - CVE-2026-63075: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (bsc#1274798).
- CVE-2026-63076: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted
protectionAlg(bsc#1274790). - CVE-2026-75803: AEAD forgeries with empty ciphertext when using
EVP_Cipher()(bsc#1275837).
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2026:21744-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23463-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
August 2026 release.
- CVE-2026-14456: unbounded memory growth in QUIC server incoming channel queue (bsc#1274791).
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-18798: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (bsc#1274777).
- CVE-2026-34181: PKCS#12 files with PBMAC1 are accepted with short HMAC keys (bsc#1266343).
- CVE-2026-54874: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (bsc#1274795).
- CVE-2026-63072: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63073: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (bsc#1274796).
- CVE-2026-63074: CMP indefinite cache growth of
ExtraCerts(bsc#1274797). - CVE-2026-63075: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (bsc#1274798).
- CVE-2026-63076: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted
protectionAlg(bsc#1274790). - CVE-2026-75803: AEAD forgeries with empty ciphertext when using
EVP_Cipher()(bsc#1275837).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23463-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23538-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3-livepatches
This update for openssl-3-livepatches fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (bsc#1275145, bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-63072: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (bsc#1275133, bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63076: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted
protectionAlg(bsc#1275143, bsc#1274790).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23538-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23585-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3-x86_64-v3-livepatches
This update for openssl-3-x86_64-v3-livepatches fixes the following issues:
- HollowByte: DoS vector against OpenSSL TLS ClientHello via remote, attacker-controlled memory allocations (bsc#1271713, bsc#1271712).
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (bsc#1275145, bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-63072: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (bsc#1275133, bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63076: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted
protectionAlg(bsc#1275143, bsc#1274790).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23585-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23609-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
August 2026 release.
- CVE-2026-14456: unbounded memory growth in QUIC server incoming channel queue (bsc#1274791).
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-18798: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (bsc#1274777).
- CVE-2026-34181: PKCS#12 files with PBMAC1 are accepted with short HMAC keys (bsc#1266343).
- CVE-2026-54874: excessive memory use buffering DTLS records for a future epoch (bsc#1274795).
- CVE-2026-63072: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63073: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (bsc#1274796).
- CVE-2026-63074: CMP indefinite cache growth of
ExtraCerts(bsc#1274797). - CVE-2026-63075: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (bsc#1274798).
- CVE-2026-63076: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted
protectionAlg(bsc#1274790). - CVE-2026-75803: AEAD forgeries with empty ciphertext when using
EVP_Cipher()(bsc#1275837).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23609-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23788-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3-livepatches
This update for openssl-3-livepatches fixes the following issues:
- "HollowByte" DoS via attacker-controlled memory allocation (bsc#1271712).
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK Server Signature Algorithm Selection Can Dereference a Missing Certificate (bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-63072: Heap Buffer Overflow in CMS Key Unwrapping (bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63076: Invalid Pointer Dereference in CMP Server via Crafted protectionAlg (bsc#1274790).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23788-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:23794-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3-livepatches
This update for openssl-3-livepatches fixes the following issues:
- "HollowByte" DoS via attacker-controlled memory allocation (bsc#1271712).
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK Server Signature Algorithm Selection Can Dereference a Missing Certificate (bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-63072: Heap Buffer Overflow in CMS Key Unwrapping (bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63076: Invalid Pointer Dereference in CMP Server via Crafted protectionAlg (bsc#1274790).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:23794-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:4038-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3-livepatches
This update for openssl-3-livepatches fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (bsc#1275145, bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-63072: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (bsc#1275133, bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63076: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted
protectionAlg(bsc#1275143, bsc#1274790).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:4038-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:4039-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3
This update for openssl-3 fixes the following issues:
August 2026 release.
- CVE-2026-14456: unbounded memory growth in QUIC server incoming channel queue (bsc#1274791).
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-18798: QUIC server may trigger double free when processing INITIAL packet (bsc#1274777).
- CVE-2026-34181: PKCS#12 files with PBMAC1 are accepted with short HMAC keys (bsc#1266343).
- CVE-2026-54874: excessive Memory Use Buffering DTLS Records for a Future Epoch (bsc#1274795).
- CVE-2026-63072: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63073: untrusted sender DN used as format string in CMP response validation (bsc#1274796).
- CVE-2026-63074: CMP indefinite cache growth of
ExtraCerts(bsc#1274797). - CVE-2026-63075: QUIC ACK-only packet retention can cause memory exhaustion (bsc#1274798).
- CVE-2026-63076: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted
protectionAlg(bsc#1274790). - CVE-2026-75803: AEAD forgeries with empty ciphertext when using
EVP_Cipher()(bsc#1275837).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:4039-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2026:4040-1 No score
Security update for openssl-3-livepatches
This update for openssl-3-livepatches fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2026-14457: RPK server signature algorithm selection can dereference a missing certificate (bsc#1275145, bsc#1274792).
- CVE-2026-63072: heap buffer overflow in CMS key unwrapping (bsc#1275133, bsc#1274788).
- CVE-2026-63076: invalid pointer dereference in CMP server via crafted
protectionAlg(bsc#1275143, bsc#1274790).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2026:4040-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUSN-8678-1 No score
openssl vulnerabilities
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled the QUIC server incoming channel queue. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-14456)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled signature algorithm selection when using Raw Public Keys. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-14457)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled QUIC INITIAL packet processing. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-18798)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled buffering of DTLS records for a future epoch. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2026-54874)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled CMS key unwrapping. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause a heap buffer overflow, leading to a denial of service or arbitrary code execution. (CVE-2026-63072)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly validated the sender distinguished name in CMP response messages. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-63073)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly limited the growth of an internal certificate cache used during CMP operations. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2026-63074)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled QUIC ACK-only packet retention. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to use excessive resources, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.04 LTS. (CVE-2026-63075)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly handled CMP protection algorithm validation. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause OpenSSL to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2026-63076)
It was discovered that OpenSSL incorrectly verified authentication tags when using certain AEAD ciphers via the EVP_Cipher() interface. An attacker could possibly use this issue to perform AEAD forgery attacks. (CVE-2026-75803)
- Record
USN-8678-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
opensslAlpine:v3.22 |
3.4.0 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.23 |
3.4.0 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslAlpine:v3.24 |
3.4.0 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslAlmaLinux:10 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 |
openssl-develAlmaLinux:10 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 |
openssl-libsAlmaLinux:10 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 |
openssl-perlAlmaLinux:10 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2.alma.1 |
opensslAlmaLinux:9 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-develAlmaLinux:9 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-libsAlmaLinux:9 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
Show 67 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
openssl-perlAlmaLinux:9 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
opensslAlpaquita:25 |
3.5.0-r0 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslAlpaquita:stream |
3.1.1-r1 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslBellSoft Hardened Containers:25 |
3.5.0-r0 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslBellSoft Hardened Containers:stream |
3.1.1-r1 up to 3.5.8-r0 | 3.5.8-r0 |
opensslTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6 |
before 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els12 | 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els12 |
openssl-develTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6 |
before 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els12 | 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els12 |
openssl-libsTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6 |
before 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els12 | 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els12 |
openssl-perlTuxCare:AlmaLinux:9.6 |
before 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els12 | 1:3.2.2-7.el9_6.tuxcare.1.els12 |
opensslDebian:13 |
before 3.5.7-1~deb13u2, plus listed versions 3.5.1-13.5.1-1+deb13u13.5.2-13.5.3-13.5.4-1 Show 8 moreShow less3.5.4-1~deb13u13.5.4-1~deb13u23.5.5-13.5.5-1~deb13u13.5.5-1~deb13u23.5.6-1~deb13u13.5.6-1~deb13u23.5.7-1~deb13u1 |
3.5.7-1~deb13u2 |
opensslDebian:14 |
before 3.6.4-1, plus listed versions 3.5.1-13.5.2-13.5.3-13.5.4-13.5.4-1~deb13u1 Show 18 moreShow less3.5.4-1~deb13u23.5.5-13.5.5-1~deb13u13.5.5-1~deb13u23.5.6-1~deb13u13.5.6-1~deb13u23.5.7-1~deb13u13.5.7-1~deb13u23.5.7-1~deb13u33.6.0-13.6.0-23.6.0~~alpha1-13.6.0~~beta1-13.6.1-13.6.1-23.6.1-33.6.2-13.6.3-1 |
3.6.4-1 |
opensslMageia:10 |
before 3.5.8-1.mga10 | 3.5.8-1.mga10 |
opensslMageia:9 |
before 3.0.22-1.mga9 | 3.0.22-1.mga9 |
opensslopenEuler:24.03-LTS-SP4 |
before 3.5.6-7.oe2403sp4 | 3.5.6-7.oe2403sp4 |
openssl3Red Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl3-develRed Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl3-devel-engineRed Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl3-libsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
opensslRed Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-config-fipsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-develRed Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-devel-engineRed Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-fips-provider-upstreamRed Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-libsRed Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-perlRed Hat:hummingbird:1 |
before 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 | 0:3.5.8-0.1.hum1 |
openssl-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
openssl-debugsourceRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
openssl-develRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
openssl-libs-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
openssl-perlRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
opensslRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
openssl-libsRed Hat:enterprise_linux:10.2 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
openssl-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-debugsourceRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-develRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-libs-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-perlRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::appstream |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
opensslRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-debugsourceRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-libsRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-libs-debuginfoRed Hat:enterprise_linux:9::baseos |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
opensslRocky Linux:10 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 | 1:3.5.8-1.el10_2 |
opensslRocky Linux:9 |
before 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 | 1:3.5.8-1.el9_8 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 |
before 3.5.0-160000.10.1 | 3.5.0-160000.10.1 |
openssl-3-livepatchesSUSE:Linux Micro 6.1 |
before 0.6-slfo.1.1_1.1 | 0.6-slfo.1.1_1.1 |
openssl-3-x86_64-v3-livepatchesSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 |
before 0.6-160000.1.1 | 0.6-160000.1.1 |
openssl-3-x86_64-v3-livepatchesSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 |
before 0.6-160000.1.1 | 0.6-160000.1.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 |
before 3.5.0-160000.10.1 | 3.5.0-160000.10.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 |
before 3.5.0-160000.10.1 | 3.5.0-160000.10.1 |
openssl-3-livepatchesSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 |
before 0.6-160000.1.1 | 0.6-160000.1.1 |
openssl-3-livepatchesSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 |
before 0.6-160000.1.1 | 0.6-160000.1.1 |
openssl-3-livepatchesSUSE:Linux Micro 6.2 |
before 0.6-160000.1.1 | 0.6-160000.1.1 |
openssl-3-livepatchesSUSE:Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15 SP6 |
before 0.6-150600.13.19.1 | 0.6-150600.13.19.1 |
openssl-3SUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 |
before 3.5.0-150700.5.50.1 | 3.5.0-150700.5.50.1 |
openssl-3-livepatchesSUSE:Linux Enterprise Live Patching 15 SP7 |
before 0.6-150700.16.12.1 | 0.6-150700.16.12.1 |
nodejsUbuntu:Pro:16.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 0.10.25~dfsg2-2ubuntu14.2.2~dfsg-14.2.3~dfsg-14.2.4~dfsg-1ubuntu14.2.4~dfsg-2 Show 7 moreShow less4.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu14.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu44.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.14.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.24.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2+esm14.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2+esm24.2.6~dfsg-1ubuntu4.2+esm3 |
None known |
nodejsUbuntu:Pro:18.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 6.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu16.11.4~dfsg-1ubuntu26.12.0~dfsg-1ubuntu16.12.0~dfsg-2ubuntu16.12.0~dfsg-2ubuntu2 Show 10 moreShow less8.10.0~dfsg-28.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.28.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.38.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.48.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm18.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm28.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm38.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm48.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm58.10.0~dfsg-2ubuntu0.4+esm6 |
None known |
edk2Ubuntu:26.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.11-3ubuntu72025.11-3ubuntu82026.05-2ubuntu12026.05-2ubuntu22026.05-2ubuntu3 |
None known |
edk2-hweUbuntu:26.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.11-3ubuntu82025.11-3ubuntu92026.05-2ubuntu12026.05-2ubuntu22026.05-2ubuntu3 |
None known |
edk2Ubuntu:26.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.02-8ubuntu32025.11-3ubuntu62025.11-3ubuntu72025.11-3ubuntu7.22025.11-3ubuntu7.3 |
None known |
edk2-hweUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 2025.11-3ubuntu62025.11-3ubuntu82025.11-3ubuntu8.2 |
None known |
opensslUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
before 3.5.5-1ubuntu3.4, plus listed versions 3.5.3-1ubuntu23.5.5-1ubuntu13.5.5-1ubuntu33.5.5-1ubuntu3.23.5.5-1ubuntu3.3 |
3.5.5-1ubuntu3.4 |
opensslUbuntu:22.04:LTS |
before 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.29, plus listed versions 1.1.1l-1ubuntu13.0.0-1ubuntu13.0.1-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu13.0.2-0ubuntu1.1 Show 21 moreShow less3.0.2-0ubuntu1.23.0.2-0ubuntu1.43.0.2-0ubuntu1.53.0.2-0ubuntu1.63.0.2-0ubuntu1.73.0.2-0ubuntu1.83.0.2-0ubuntu1.93.0.2-0ubuntu1.103.0.2-0ubuntu1.123.0.2-0ubuntu1.133.0.2-0ubuntu1.143.0.2-0ubuntu1.153.0.2-0ubuntu1.163.0.2-0ubuntu1.173.0.2-0ubuntu1.183.0.2-0ubuntu1.193.0.2-0ubuntu1.203.0.2-0ubuntu1.213.0.2-0ubuntu1.233.0.2-0ubuntu1.253.0.2-0ubuntu1.26 |
3.0.2-0ubuntu1.29 |
opensslUbuntu:24.04:LTS |
before 3.0.13-0ubuntu3.15, plus listed versions 3.0.10-1ubuntu23.0.10-1ubuntu2.13.0.10-1ubuntu33.0.10-1ubuntu43.0.13-0ubuntu2 Show 11 moreShow less3.0.13-0ubuntu33.0.13-0ubuntu3.13.0.13-0ubuntu3.23.0.13-0ubuntu3.33.0.13-0ubuntu3.43.0.13-0ubuntu3.53.0.13-0ubuntu3.63.0.13-0ubuntu3.73.0.13-0ubuntu3.93.0.13-0ubuntu3.113.0.13-0ubuntu3.12 |
3.0.13-0ubuntu3.15 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Tumbleweed |
before 3.5.3-8.1 | 3.5.3-8.1 |
openssl-3openSUSE:Leap 16.0 |
before 3.5.0-160000.10.1 | 3.5.0-160000.10.1 |
History
| When | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-11-02 | created | CVE List, EUVD, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
References
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260825.txt
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/dad836b071da6579510c968615848ba03cac593b
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/581aaa0f0a35d214740f0fe1f5283ec41f1212e1
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/d0af20478688a6aa2f59d61caa3f82136b181d7f
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/1e8c398db67404babd3e5af999bb6bd86f720c76
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-14457
Show 194 moreShow less
github.com/advisories/GHSA-6m2h-7hrp-6jw8
security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2026-14457
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:67154
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14456
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14457
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18798
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54874
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63072
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63073
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63074
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63075
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63076
bugzilla.redhat.com/2515348
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517559
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517560
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517561
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517562
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517564
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517565
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517566
bugzilla.redhat.com/2517570
errata.almalinux.org/10/ALSA-2026-67154.html
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:67165
errata.almalinux.org/9/ALSA-2026-67165.html
redhat.com/security/data/cve/CVE-2026-75803.html
docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2026-14457
errata.tuxcare.com/els_os/tuxcare9.6esu/CLSA-2026-1789738618.html
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63074
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63075
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63076
github.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/tree/main/cves/2026/14xxx/CVE-2026-14457.json
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2026-14457
advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2026-0353.html
bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36139
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/13/4
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260813.txt
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2026/08/25/3
lists.debian.org/debian-security-announce/2026/msg00376.html
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2026-3830
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-18798
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-54874
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63072
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-63073
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-75803
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2026:59635
images.redhat.com
access.redhat.com/security/updates/classification
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-75803
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42769
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42768
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34180
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-7383
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45447
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42766
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42767
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34183
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-45445
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-9076
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42765
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-42771
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-35188
access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34181
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_59635.json
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481879
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-7383
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-7383
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481880
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-9076
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-9076
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517562
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-14457
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2517559
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-18798
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481881
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34180
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34180
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481882
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34181
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34181
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481884
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34182
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34182
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481885
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-34183
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-34183
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481886
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-35188
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-35188
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481887
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42764
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42764
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481889
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42765
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42765
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481890
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42766
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42766
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481891
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42767
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42767
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481892
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42768
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42768
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481893
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42769
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42769
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481894
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42770
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42770
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481895
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-42771
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-42771
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481896
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45445
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45445
bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2481897
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45446
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45446
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-45447
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-45447
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-54874
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63072
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63073
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63074
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63075
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-63076
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-75803
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/119ab9555dc62275bbd71f6f49529b1a44feba42
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/3621257986e27e540bf96a11570929a6e5a9e05b
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/6c7aa6f8f6449b7fe0137ee8be65fcd239bd7d6a
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bdeb0cd994d915342787f117ee75044f0dc36f34
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/bf95f5f772e9362f87b25cfa2f8cb15d984865b9
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_59641.json
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2026-84783
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-84783
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/de97a1a54f43edefd43b5084ecac54ecadb33081
openssl-library.org/news/secadv/20260929.txt
issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-212362
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_67154.json
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/08e7756c3900bcfd77a720e7b74e27d6e4ed01a9
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/4084152e040329ca0194c4c1750b9b46d00a5b6b
github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f2f1465f2d2e5c61dfeac4d20fd093797d821139
issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-232828
security.access.redhat.com/data/csaf/v2/advisories/2026/rhsa-2026_67165.json
errata.rockylinux.org/RLSA-2026:67154
errata.rockylinux.org/RLSA-2026:67165
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623463-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1266343
bugzilla.suse.com/1274774
bugzilla.suse.com/1274777
bugzilla.suse.com/1274788
bugzilla.suse.com/1274790
bugzilla.suse.com/1274791
bugzilla.suse.com/1274792
bugzilla.suse.com/1274795
bugzilla.suse.com/1274796
bugzilla.suse.com/1274797
bugzilla.suse.com/1274798
bugzilla.suse.com/1275837
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14456
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14457
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-18798
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-34181
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-54874
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63072
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63073
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63074
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63075
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-63076
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-75803
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623538-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1275133
bugzilla.suse.com/1275143
bugzilla.suse.com/1275145
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623585-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1271712
bugzilla.suse.com/1271713
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623609-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623788-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-202623794-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20264038-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20264039-1
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2026/suse-su-20264040-1
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-14457
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-8678-1
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-14456
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-18798
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-54874
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-63072
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-63073
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-63074
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-63075
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-63076
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2026-75803
Left out here: 18 references and the rest of 1 source description. The JSON record has them.