CVE-2021-25216
A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack
In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
8.1
A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack
In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.
- Record
CVE-2021-25216- CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2021-12127
8.1
In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.
- Record
EUVD-2021-12127- CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-03
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-4vh7-r4m9-4w3v
9.8
In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8...
In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.
- Record
GHSA-4vh7-r4m9-4w3v- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-125, CWE-190, CWE-617
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
8.1
In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.
- Record
CVE-2021-25216- CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - CVSS 2.0
- 6.8 Medium
AV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P - Weakness
- CWE-125
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2021-25216
9.8
In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.
- Record
ALPINE-CVE-2021-25216- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVBELL-CVE-2021-25216
9.8
CVE-2021-25216 does not affect BellSoft software
- Record
BELL-CVE-2021-25216- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 11 moreShow less
OSV
9.8
In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.
- Record
CVE-2021-25216- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2021-25216
9.8
In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2021-25216- CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2021-25216
8.1
In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2021-25216- CVSS 3.1
- 8.1 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - CVSS 3.1
- 9.8 Critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2021-1632261705 No score
Fix of CVE: CVE-2021-25215, CVE-2021-25214, CVE-2021-25216
- A broken inbound incremental zone update (IXFR) can cause named to terminate unexpectedly (CVE-2021-25214)
- An assertion check can fail while answering queries for DNAME records that require the DNAME to be processed to resolve itself (CVE-2021-25215)
- A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack (CVE-2021-25216)
- Record
CLSA-2021-1632261705- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2021-1634922250 No score
Fixed CVEs in bind: CVE-2021-25214, CVE-2021-25216, CVE-2021-25215
- A broken inbound incremental zone update (IXFR) can cause named to terminate unexpectedly (CVE-2021-25214)
- An assertion check can fail while answering queries for DNAME records that require the DNAME to be processed to resolve itself (CVE-2021-25215)
- A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack (CVE-2021-25216)
- Record
CLSA-2021-1634922250- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVMGASA-2021-0220 No score
Updated bind packages fix security vulnerabilities
A broken inbound incremental zone update (IXFR) can cause named to terminate unexpectedly(CVE-2021-25214). Mageia 7 version not affected.
An assertion check can fail while answering queries for DNAME records that require the DNAME to be processed to resolve itself (CVE-2021-25215). This affects both versions.
A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack (CVE-2021-25216). Mageia 7 version not affected.
- Record
MGASA-2021-0220- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2024:10650-1 No score
bind-9.16.20-1.4 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the bind-9.16.20-1.4 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2024:10650-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2021:1469-1 No score
Security update for bind
This update for bind fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2021-25214: Fixed a broken inbound incremental zone update (IXFR) which could have caused named to terminate unexpectedly (bsc#1185345).
- CVE-2021-25215: Fixed an assertion check which could have failed while answering queries for DNAME records that required the DNAME to be processed to resolve itself (bsc#1185345).
- CVE-2021-25216: Fixed an issue where policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack (bsc#1185345).
- MD5 warning message using host, dig, nslookup (bind-utils) with FIPS enabled (bsc#1181495).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2021:1469-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2021:14714-1 No score
Security update for bind
This update for bind fixes the following issues:
- CVE-2021-25214: Fixed a broken inbound incremental zone update (IXFR) which could have caused named to terminate unexpectedly (bsc#1185345).
- CVE-2021-25215: Fixed an assertion check which could have failed while answering queries for DNAME records that required the DNAME to be processed to resolve itself (bsc#1185345).
- CVE-2021-25216: Fixed an issue where policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack (bsc#1185345).
- Record
SUSE-SU-2021:14714-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUSN-4929-1 No score
bind9 vulnerabilities
Greg Kuechle discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain incremental zone updates. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2021-25214)
Siva Kakarla discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain DNAME records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2021-25215)
It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled GSSAPI security policy negotiation. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or possibly execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2021-25216)
- Record
USN-4929-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUSN-7739-1 No score
bind9 vulnerabilities
Greg Kuechle discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain incremental zone updates. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2021-25214)
Siva Kakarla discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain DNAME records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2021-25215)
It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled GSSAPI security policy negotiation. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or possibly execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2021-25216)
- Record
USN-7739-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
bindAlpine:v3.10 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.11 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.12 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.13 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.14 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.15 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.16 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.17 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.18 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.19 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
Show 42 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
bindAlpine:v3.20 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.21 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.22 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.23 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.24 |
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0 | 9.16.15-r0 |
bindTuxCare:CentOS:6 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els | 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els |
bind-chrootTuxCare:CentOS:6 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els | 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els |
bind-develTuxCare:CentOS:6 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els | 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els |
bind-libsTuxCare:CentOS:6 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els | 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els |
bind-sdbTuxCare:CentOS:6 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els | 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els |
bind-utilsTuxCare:CentOS:6 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els | 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els |
bindTuxCare:OracleLinux:6 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els | 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els |
bind-chrootTuxCare:OracleLinux:6 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els | 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els |
bind-develTuxCare:OracleLinux:6 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els | 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els |
bind-libsTuxCare:OracleLinux:6 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els | 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els |
bind-sdbTuxCare:OracleLinux:6 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els | 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els |
bind-utilsTuxCare:OracleLinux:6 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els | 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els |
bind9Debian:12 |
before 1:9.16.15-1 | 1:9.16.15-1 |
bind9Debian:13 |
before 1:9.16.15-1 | 1:9.16.15-1 |
bind9Debian:14 |
before 1:9.16.15-1 | 1:9.16.15-1 |
bind9Debian:9 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9, plus listed versions 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.31:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u11:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u21:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u31:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u4 Show 4 moreShow less1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u61:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u71:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u8 |
1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9 |
bind9Debian:10 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u5, plus listed versions 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.11:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u11:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u21:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u31:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u4 |
1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u5 |
bindMageia:7 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 9.11.6-1.4.mga7 | 9.11.6-1.4.mga7 |
bindMageia:8 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 9.11.31-1.1.mga8 | 9.11.31-1.1.mga8 |
bindSUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 | 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 |
bindSUSE:OpenStack Cloud 8 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 | 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 |
bindSUSE:OpenStack Cloud Crowbar 8 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 | 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 |
bindSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP3 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 | 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 |
bindSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP2-BCL From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 | 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 |
bindSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP3-LTSS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 | 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 |
bindSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP3-BCL From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 | 9.9.9P1-63.25.1 |
bindSUSE:Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11 SP3 From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 9.9.6P1-0.51.26.1 | 9.9.6P1-0.51.26.1 |
bindSUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 9.9.6P1-0.51.26.1 | 9.9.6P1-0.51.26.1 |
bind9Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS |
before 1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm13, plus listed versions 1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4ubuntu11:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4ubuntu21:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4ubuntu31:9.9.5.dfsg-21:9.9.5.dfsg-3 Show 30 moreShow less1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.11:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.21:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.31:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.41:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.51:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.61:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.71:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.81:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.91:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.101:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.111:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.121:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.131:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.141:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.151:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.161:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.171:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.181:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.191:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm11:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm21:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm31:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm41:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm51:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm61:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm71:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm91:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm101:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm111:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm12 |
1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm13 |
bind9Ubuntu:16.04:LTS |
before 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.19, plus listed versions 1:9.9.5.dfsg-11ubuntu11:9.9.5.dfsg-121:9.9.5.dfsg-12.11:9.9.5.dfsg-12.1ubuntu11:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-4 Show 23 moreShow less1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-31:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-41:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-81:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu11:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.11:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.21:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.31:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.41:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.61:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.71:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.81:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.91:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.101:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.111:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.121:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.141:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.151:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.161:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.171:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.18 |
1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.19 |
bind9Ubuntu:18.04:LTS |
before 1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.15, plus listed versions 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.6ubuntu11:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu21:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu31:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu41:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu5 Show 13 moreShow less1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu11:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.11:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.21:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.31:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.51:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.71:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.81:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.91:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.101:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.111:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.121:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.131:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.14 |
1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.15 |
bind9Ubuntu:20.04:LTS |
before 1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.8, plus listed versions 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu21:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu31:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu41:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu51:9.11.14+dfsg-1ubuntu1 Show 12 moreShow less1:9.11.14+dfsg-3ubuntu11:9.16.0-1ubuntu31:9.16.0-1ubuntu41:9.16.0-1ubuntu51:9.16.1-0ubuntu11:9.16.1-0ubuntu21:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.11:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.21:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.31:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.41:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.61:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.7 |
1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.8 |
bind9Ubuntu:16.04:LTS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.19, plus listed versions 1:9.9.5.dfsg-11ubuntu11:9.9.5.dfsg-121:9.9.5.dfsg-12.11:9.9.5.dfsg-12.1ubuntu11:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-4 Show 23 moreShow less1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-31:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-41:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-81:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu11:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.11:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.21:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.31:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.41:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.61:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.71:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.81:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.91:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.101:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.111:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.121:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.141:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.151:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.161:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.171:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.18 |
1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.19 |
bind9Ubuntu:18.04:LTS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.15, plus listed versions 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.6ubuntu11:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu21:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu31:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu41:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu5 Show 13 moreShow less1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu11:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.11:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.21:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.31:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.51:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.71:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.81:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.91:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.101:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.111:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.121:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.131:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.14 |
1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.15 |
bind9Ubuntu:20.04:LTS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.8, plus listed versions 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu21:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu31:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu41:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu51:9.11.14+dfsg-1ubuntu1 Show 12 moreShow less1:9.11.14+dfsg-3ubuntu11:9.16.0-1ubuntu31:9.16.0-1ubuntu41:9.16.0-1ubuntu51:9.16.1-0ubuntu11:9.16.1-0ubuntu21:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.11:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.21:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.31:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.41:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.61:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.7 |
1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.8 |
bind9Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS From an advisory covering 3 CVEs |
before 1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm13, plus listed versions 1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4ubuntu11:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4ubuntu21:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4ubuntu31:9.9.5.dfsg-21:9.9.5.dfsg-3 Show 30 moreShow less1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.11:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.21:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.31:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.41:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.51:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.61:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.71:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.81:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.91:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.101:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.111:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.121:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.131:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.141:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.151:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.161:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.171:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.181:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.191:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm11:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm21:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm31:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm41:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm51:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm61:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm71:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm91:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm101:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm111:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm12 |
1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm13 |
bindopenSUSE:Tumbleweed From an advisory covering 32 CVEs |
before 9.16.20-1.4 | 9.16.20-1.4 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| aliases | EUVD | |
| first indexed | CVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2021-25216 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.1) in Isc Bind, published April 28, 2021. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 83.0%, the 99th percentile. Fixed in bind 9.16.15-r0.
References
kb.isc.org/v1/docs/cve-2021-25215
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/1
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/2
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/3
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2021/04/29/4
debian.org/security/2021/dsa-4909
Show 59 moreShow less
lists.debian.org/debian-lts-announce/2021/05/msg00001.html
security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20210521-0006
zerodayinitiative.com/advisories/ZDI-21-657
cert-portal.siemens.com/productcert/pdf/ssa-389290.pdf
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2021-25216
github.com/advisories/GHSA-4vh7-r4m9-4w3v
security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2021-25216
docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2021-25216
errata.cloudlinux.com/els6/CLSA-2021-1632261705.html
errata.cloudlinux.com/ol6/CLSA-2021-1634922250.html
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2021-25216
advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2021-0220.html
bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=28873
access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:1469
kb.isc.org/v1/docs/cve-2021-25214
kb.isc.org/v1/docs/cve-2021-25216
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2021/suse-su-20211469-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1181495
bugzilla.suse.com/1185345
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25214
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25215
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25216
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2021/suse-su-202114714-1
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-25216
kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2021-25216
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-4929-1
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2021-25216
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-7739-1
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-25214
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2021-25215
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2006-4339
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2007-2925
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2007-2926
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2015-8461
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-2775
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9131
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2016-9778
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-3135
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-3141
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-3142
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2017-3145
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-5737
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-5743
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2018-5745
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-6465
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-6471
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-6476
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2019-6477
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8616
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8617
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8618
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8619
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8620
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8621
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8622
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8623
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8624
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2020-8625
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2021-25218