Every CVE Search/ Get API key

CVE-2021-25216

A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack

8.1 HighFix available

In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.

Attack profile

How easy it is to exploit

Attack vector
Network
Complexity
High
Privileges needed
None
User interaction
None

What an attacker can affect

Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Exploit likelihood

83.0%Up 81.6 points since Apr 29, 2021
90%50%10%1%

What each source reports

CVE List Score used 8.1

A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack

In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.

Record
CVE-2021-25216
CVSS 3.1
8.1 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2021-12127 8.1

In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.

Record
EUVD-2021-12127
CVSS 3.1
8.1 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-03
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-4vh7-r4m9-4w3v 9.8

In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8...

In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.

Record
GHSA-4vh7-r4m9-4w3v
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Weakness
CWE-125, CWE-190, CWE-617
Updated
2026-11-02
NVD 8.1

In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.

Record
CVE-2021-25216
CVSS 3.1
8.1 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 2.0
6.8 MediumAV:N/AC:M/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
Weakness
CWE-125
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2021-25216 9.8

In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.

Record
ALPINE-CVE-2021-25216
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVBELL-CVE-2021-25216 9.8

CVE-2021-25216 does not affect BellSoft software

Record
BELL-CVE-2021-25216
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
Show 11 moreShow less
OSV 9.8

In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.

Record
CVE-2021-25216
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2021-25216 9.8

In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.

Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2021-25216
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2021-25216 8.1

In BIND 9.5.0 -> 9.11.29, 9.12.0 -> 9.16.13, and versions BIND 9.11.3-S1 -> 9.11.29-S1 and 9.16.8-S1 -> 9.16.13-S1 of BIND Supported Preview Edition, as well as release versions 9.17.0 -> 9.17.1 of the BIND 9.17 development branch, BIND servers are vulnerable if they are running an affected version and are configured to use GSS-TSIG features. In a configuration which uses BIND's default settings the vulnerable code path is not exposed, but a server can be rendered vulnerable by explicitly setting values for the tkey-gssapi-keytab or tkey-gssapi-credential configuration options. Although the default configuration is not vulnerable, GSS-TSIG is frequently used in networks where BIND is integrated with Samba, as well as in mixed-server environments that combine BIND servers with Active Directory domain controllers. For servers that meet these conditions, the ISC SPNEGO implementation is vulnerable to various attacks, depending on the CPU architecture for which BIND was built: For named binaries compiled for 64-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a buffer over-read, leading to a server crash. For named binaries compiled for 32-bit platforms, this flaw can be used to trigger a server crash due to a buffer overflow and possibly also to achieve remote code execution. We have determined that standard SPNEGO implementations are available in the MIT and Heimdal Kerberos libraries, which support a broad range of operating systems, rendering the ISC implementation unnecessary and obsolete. Therefore, to reduce the attack surface for BIND users, we will be removing the ISC SPNEGO implementation in the April releases of BIND 9.11 and 9.16 (it had already been dropped from BIND 9.17). We would not normally remove something from a stable ESV (Extended Support Version) of BIND, but since system libraries can replace the ISC SPNEGO implementation, we have made an exception in this case for reasons of stability and security.

Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2021-25216
CVSS 3.1
8.1 HighCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS 3.1
9.8 CriticalCVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2021-1632261705 No score

Fix of CVE: CVE-2021-25215, CVE-2021-25214, CVE-2021-25216

  • A broken inbound incremental zone update (IXFR) can cause named to terminate unexpectedly (CVE-2021-25214)
  • An assertion check can fail while answering queries for DNAME records that require the DNAME to be processed to resolve itself (CVE-2021-25215)
  • A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack (CVE-2021-25216)
Record
CLSA-2021-1632261705
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVCLSA-2021-1634922250 No score

Fixed CVEs in bind: CVE-2021-25214, CVE-2021-25216, CVE-2021-25215

  • A broken inbound incremental zone update (IXFR) can cause named to terminate unexpectedly (CVE-2021-25214)
  • An assertion check can fail while answering queries for DNAME records that require the DNAME to be processed to resolve itself (CVE-2021-25215)
  • A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack (CVE-2021-25216)
Record
CLSA-2021-1634922250
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVMGASA-2021-0220 No score

Updated bind packages fix security vulnerabilities

A broken inbound incremental zone update (IXFR) can cause named to terminate unexpectedly(CVE-2021-25214). Mageia 7 version not affected.

An assertion check can fail while answering queries for DNAME records that require the DNAME to be processed to resolve itself (CVE-2021-25215). This affects both versions.

A second vulnerability in BIND's GSSAPI security policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack (CVE-2021-25216). Mageia 7 version not affected.

Record
MGASA-2021-0220
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2024:10650-1 No score

bind-9.16.20-1.4 on GA media

These are all security issues fixed in the bind-9.16.20-1.4 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.

Record
openSUSE-SU-2024:10650-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2021:1469-1 No score

Security update for bind

This update for bind fixes the following issues:

  • CVE-2021-25214: Fixed a broken inbound incremental zone update (IXFR) which could have caused named to terminate unexpectedly (bsc#1185345).
  • CVE-2021-25215: Fixed an assertion check which could have failed while answering queries for DNAME records that required the DNAME to be processed to resolve itself (bsc#1185345).
  • CVE-2021-25216: Fixed an issue where policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack (bsc#1185345).
  • MD5 warning message using host, dig, nslookup (bind-utils) with FIPS enabled (bsc#1181495).
Record
SUSE-SU-2021:1469-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2021:14714-1 No score

Security update for bind

This update for bind fixes the following issues:

  • CVE-2021-25214: Fixed a broken inbound incremental zone update (IXFR) which could have caused named to terminate unexpectedly (bsc#1185345).
  • CVE-2021-25215: Fixed an assertion check which could have failed while answering queries for DNAME records that required the DNAME to be processed to resolve itself (bsc#1185345).
  • CVE-2021-25216: Fixed an issue where policy negotiation can be targeted by a buffer overflow attack (bsc#1185345).
Record
SUSE-SU-2021:14714-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVUSN-4929-1 No score

bind9 vulnerabilities

Greg Kuechle discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain incremental zone updates. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2021-25214)

Siva Kakarla discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain DNAME records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2021-25215)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled GSSAPI security policy negotiation. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or possibly execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2021-25216)

Record
USN-4929-1
Updated
2026-11-02
OSVUSN-7739-1 No score

bind9 vulnerabilities

Greg Kuechle discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain incremental zone updates. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2021-25214)

Siva Kakarla discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain DNAME records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2021-25215)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled GSSAPI security policy negotiation. A remote attacker could use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service, or possibly execute arbitrary code. (CVE-2021-25216)

Record
USN-7739-1
Updated
2026-11-02

Affected products

Show 3 moreShow less

Affected packages

Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
bind
Alpine:v3.10
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
Alpine:v3.11
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
Alpine:v3.12
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
Alpine:v3.13
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
Alpine:v3.14
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
Alpine:v3.15
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
Alpine:v3.16
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
Alpine:v3.17
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
Alpine:v3.18
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
Alpine:v3.19
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
Show 42 moreShow less
Affected packages
PackageAffectedFixed
bind
Alpine:v3.20
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
Alpine:v3.21
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
Alpine:v3.22
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
Alpine:v3.23
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
Alpine:v3.24
9.0.0 up to 9.16.15-r0
9.16.15-r0
bind
TuxCare:CentOS:6
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
bind-chroot
TuxCare:CentOS:6
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
bind-devel
TuxCare:CentOS:6
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
bind-libs
TuxCare:CentOS:6
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
bind-sdb
TuxCare:CentOS:6
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
bind-utils
TuxCare:CentOS:6
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
bind
TuxCare:OracleLinux:6
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
bind-chroot
TuxCare:OracleLinux:6
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
bind-devel
TuxCare:OracleLinux:6
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
bind-libs
TuxCare:OracleLinux:6
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
bind-sdb
TuxCare:OracleLinux:6
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
bind-utils
TuxCare:OracleLinux:6
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
33:9.8.2-0.68.rc1.el6_10.10.cloudlinux.els
bind9
Debian:12
before 1:9.16.15-1
1:9.16.15-1
bind9
Debian:13
before 1:9.16.15-1
1:9.16.15-1
bind9
Debian:14
before 1:9.16.15-1
1:9.16.15-1
bind9
Debian:9
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9, plus listed versions
1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.31:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u11:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u21:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u31:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u4
Show 4 moreShow less
1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u61:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u71:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u8
1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.3+deb9u9
bind9
Debian:10
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u5, plus listed versions
1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.11:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u11:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u21:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u31:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u4
1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1+deb10u5
bind
Mageia:7
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 9.11.6-1.4.mga7
9.11.6-1.4.mga7
bind
Mageia:8
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 9.11.31-1.1.mga8
9.11.31-1.1.mga8
bind
SUSE:HPE Helion OpenStack 8
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1
9.9.9P1-63.25.1
bind
SUSE:OpenStack Cloud 8
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1
9.9.9P1-63.25.1
bind
SUSE:OpenStack Cloud Crowbar 8
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1
9.9.9P1-63.25.1
bind
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 12 SP3
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1
9.9.9P1-63.25.1
bind
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP2-BCL
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1
9.9.9P1-63.25.1
bind
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP3-LTSS
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1
9.9.9P1-63.25.1
bind
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP3-BCL
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 9.9.9P1-63.25.1
9.9.9P1-63.25.1
bind
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Point of Sale 11 SP3
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 9.9.6P1-0.51.26.1
9.9.6P1-0.51.26.1
bind
SUSE:Linux Enterprise Server 11 SP4-LTSS
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 9.9.6P1-0.51.26.1
9.9.6P1-0.51.26.1
bind9
Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS
before 1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm13, plus listed versions
1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4ubuntu11:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4ubuntu21:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4ubuntu31:9.9.5.dfsg-21:9.9.5.dfsg-3
Show 30 moreShow less
1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.11:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.21:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.31:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.41:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.51:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.61:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.71:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.81:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.91:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.101:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.111:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.121:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.131:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.141:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.151:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.161:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.171:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.181:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.191:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm11:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm21:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm31:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm41:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm51:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm61:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm71:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm91:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm101:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm111:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm12
1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm13
bind9
Ubuntu:16.04:LTS
before 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.19, plus listed versions
1:9.9.5.dfsg-11ubuntu11:9.9.5.dfsg-121:9.9.5.dfsg-12.11:9.9.5.dfsg-12.1ubuntu11:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-4
Show 23 moreShow less
1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-31:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-41:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-81:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu11:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.11:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.21:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.31:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.41:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.61:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.71:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.81:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.91:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.101:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.111:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.121:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.141:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.151:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.161:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.171:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.18
1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.19
bind9
Ubuntu:18.04:LTS
before 1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.15, plus listed versions
1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.6ubuntu11:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu21:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu31:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu41:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu5
Show 13 moreShow less
1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu11:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.11:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.21:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.31:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.51:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.71:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.81:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.91:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.101:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.111:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.121:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.131:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.14
1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.15
bind9
Ubuntu:20.04:LTS
before 1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.8, plus listed versions
1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu21:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu31:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu41:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu51:9.11.14+dfsg-1ubuntu1
Show 12 moreShow less
1:9.11.14+dfsg-3ubuntu11:9.16.0-1ubuntu31:9.16.0-1ubuntu41:9.16.0-1ubuntu51:9.16.1-0ubuntu11:9.16.1-0ubuntu21:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.11:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.21:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.31:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.41:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.61:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.7
1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.8
bind9
Ubuntu:16.04:LTS
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.19, plus listed versions
1:9.9.5.dfsg-11ubuntu11:9.9.5.dfsg-121:9.9.5.dfsg-12.11:9.9.5.dfsg-12.1ubuntu11:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-4
Show 23 moreShow less
1:9.10.3.dfsg.P2-51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-31:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-41:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-81:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu11:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.11:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.21:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.31:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.41:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.51:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.61:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.71:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.81:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.91:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.101:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.111:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.121:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.141:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.151:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.161:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.171:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.18
1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-8ubuntu1.19
bind9
Ubuntu:18.04:LTS
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.15, plus listed versions
1:9.10.3.dfsg.P4-12.6ubuntu11:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu21:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu31:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu41:9.11.2.P1-1ubuntu5
Show 13 moreShow less
1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu11:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.11:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.21:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.31:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.51:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.71:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.81:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.91:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.101:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.111:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.121:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.131:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.14
1:9.11.3+dfsg-1ubuntu1.15
bind9
Ubuntu:20.04:LTS
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.8, plus listed versions
1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu21:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu31:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu41:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu51:9.11.14+dfsg-1ubuntu1
Show 12 moreShow less
1:9.11.14+dfsg-3ubuntu11:9.16.0-1ubuntu31:9.16.0-1ubuntu41:9.16.0-1ubuntu51:9.16.1-0ubuntu11:9.16.1-0ubuntu21:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.11:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.21:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.31:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.41:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.61:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.7
1:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.8
bind9
Ubuntu:Pro:14.04:LTS
From an advisory covering 3 CVEs
before 1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm13, plus listed versions
1:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4ubuntu11:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4ubuntu21:9.9.3.dfsg.P2-4ubuntu31:9.9.5.dfsg-21:9.9.5.dfsg-3
Show 30 moreShow less
1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.11:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.21:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.31:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.41:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.51:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.61:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.71:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.81:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.91:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.101:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.111:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.121:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.131:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.141:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.151:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.161:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.171:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.181:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.191:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm11:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm21:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm31:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm41:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm51:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm61:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm71:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm91:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm101:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm111:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm12
1:9.9.5.dfsg-3ubuntu0.19+esm13
bind
openSUSE:Tumbleweed
From an advisory covering 32 CVEs
before 9.16.20-1.4
9.16.20-1.4

History

History
RecordedChangedSources
affected, facts
aliasesEUVD
first indexedCVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV

Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.

In short

CVE-2021-25216 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 8.1) in Isc Bind, published April 28, 2021. No source lists public exploit code. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 83.0%, the 99th percentile. Fixed in bind 9.16.15-r0.

References

Show 59 moreShow less
MoveEnter Open