CVE-2024-0760
A flood of DNS messages over TCP may make the server unstable
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.
Attack profile
How easy it is to exploit
- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges needed
- None
- User interaction
- None
What an attacker can affect
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
Exploit likelihood
What each source reports
CVE List Score used
7.5
A flood of DNS messages over TCP may make the server unstable
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.
- Record
CVE-2024-0760- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-770
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
EUVDEUVD-2024-16548
7.5
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.
- Record
EUVD-2024-16548- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-03
GitHub AdvisoriesGHSA-v3r3-642v-rqj8
7.5
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become...
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.
- Record
GHSA-v3r3-642v-rqj8- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-770
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
NVD
7.5
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.
- Record
CVE-2024-0760- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Weakness
- CWE-770
- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVALPINE-CVE-2024-0760
7.5
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.
- Record
ALPINE-CVE-2024-0760- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVAZL-46972
7.5
CVE-2024-0760 affecting package bind for versions less than 9.20.0-1
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.
- Record
AZL-46972- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
Show 12 moreShow less
OSVBELL-CVE-2024-0760
7.5
- Record
BELL-CVE-2024-0760- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVDEBIAN-CVE-2024-0760
7.5
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.
- Record
DEBIAN-CVE-2024-0760- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2024-2014
7.5
bind security update
Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols and provides an openly redistributable reference implementation of the major components of the Domain Name System. This package includes the components to operate a DNS server.
Security Fix(es):
The Closest Encloser Proof aspect of the DNS protocol (in RFC 5155 when RFC 9276 guidance is skipped) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption for SHA-1 computations) via DNSSEC responses in a random subdomain attack, aka the "NSEC3" issue. The RFC 5155 specification implies that an algorithm must perform thousands of iterations of a hash function in certain situations.(CVE-2023-50868)
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.(CVE-2024-0760)
- Record
OESA-2024-2014- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2024-2015
7.5
bind security update
Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols and provides an openly redistributable reference implementation of the major components of the Domain Name System. This package includes the components to operate a DNS server.
Security Fix(es):
The Closest Encloser Proof aspect of the DNS protocol (in RFC 5155 when RFC 9276 guidance is skipped) allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption for SHA-1 computations) via DNSSEC responses in a random subdomain attack, aka the "NSEC3" issue. The RFC 5155 specification implies that an algorithm must perform thousands of iterations of a hash function in certain situations.(CVE-2023-50868)
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.(CVE-2024-0760)
- Record
OESA-2024-2015- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2024-2016
7.5
bind security update
Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols and provides an openly redistributable reference implementation of the major components of the Domain Name System. This package includes the components to operate a DNS server.
Security Fix(es):
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.(CVE-2024-0760)
- Record
OESA-2024-2016- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVOESA-2024-2017
7.5
bind security update
Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols and provides an openly redistributable reference implementation of the major components of the Domain Name System. This package includes the components to operate a DNS server.
Security Fix(es):
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.(CVE-2024-0760)
- Record
OESA-2024-2017- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUBUNTU-CVE-2024-0760
7.5
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.
- Record
UBUNTU-CVE-2024-0760- CVSS 3.1
- 7.5 High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H - Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSV No score
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.18.1 through 9.18.27, 9.19.0 through 9.19.24, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.27-S1.
- Record
CVE-2024-0760- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVMGASA-2024-0342 No score
Updated bind packages fix security vulnerabilities
A malicious client can send many DNS messages over TCP, potentially causing the server to become unstable while the attack is in progress. The server may recover after the attack ceases. Use of ACLs will not mitigate the attack. (CVE-2024-0760) Resolver caches and authoritative zone databases that hold significant numbers of RRs for the same hostname (of any RTYPE) can suffer from degraded performance as content is being added or updated, and also when handling client queries for this name. (CVE-2024-1737) If a server hosts a zone containing a "KEY" Resource Record, or a resolver DNSSEC-validates a "KEY" Resource Record from a DNSSEC-signed domain in cache, a client can exhaust resolver CPU resources by sending a stream of SIG(0) signed requests. (CVE-2024-1975) Client queries that trigger serving stale data and that also require lookups in local authoritative zone data may result in an assertion failure. (CVE-2024-4076)
- Record
MGASA-2024-0342- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVopenSUSE-SU-2024:14217-1 No score
bind-9.20.0-1.1 on GA media
These are all security issues fixed in the bind-9.20.0-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.
- Record
openSUSE-SU-2024:14217-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVSUSE-SU-2024:2636-1 No score
Security update for bind
This update for bind fixes the following issues:
Update to release 9.18.28
Security fixes:
- CVE-2024-0760: Fixed a flood of DNS messages over TCP may make the server unstable (bsc#1228255)
- CVE-2024-1737: Fixed BIND's database will be slow if a very large number of RRs exist at the same name (bsc#1228256)
- CVE-2024-1975: Fixed SIG(0) can be used to exhaust CPU resources (bsc#1228257)
- CVE-2024-4076: Fixed assertion failure when serving both stale cache data and authoritative zone content (bsc#1228258)
Changelog:
- Command-line options for IPv4-only (named -4) and IPv6-only (named -6) modes are now respected for zone primaries, also-notify, and parental-agents.
- An RPZ response’s SOA record TTL was set to 1 instead of the SOA TTL, if add-soa was used. This has been fixed.
- When a query related to zone maintenance (NOTIFY, SOA) timed out close to a view shutdown (triggered e.g. by rndc reload), named could crash with an assertion failure. This has been fixed.
- The statistics channel counters that indicated the number of currently connected TCP IPv4/IPv6 clients were not properly adjusted in certain failure scenarios. This has been fixed.
- Some servers that could not be reached due to EHOSTDOWN or ENETDOWN conditions were incorrectly prioritized during server selection. These are now properly handled as unreachable.
- On some systems the libuv call may return an error code when sending a TCP reset for a connection, which triggers an assertion failure in named. This error condition is now dealt with in a more graceful manner, by logging the incident and shutting down the connection.
- Changes to listen-on statements were ignored on reconfiguration unless the port or interface address was changed, making it impossible to change a related listener transport type. That issue has been fixed.
- A bug in the keymgr code unintentionally slowed down some DNSSEC key rollovers. This has been fixed.
- Some ISO 8601 durations were accepted erroneously, leading to shorter durations than expected. This has been fixed
- A regression in cache-cleaning code enabled memory use to grow significantly more quickly than before, until the configured max-cache-size limit was reached. This has been fixed.
- Using rndc flush inadvertently caused cache cleaning to become less effective. This could ultimately lead to the configured max-cache-size limit being exceeded and has now been fixed.
- The logic for cleaning up expired cached DNS records was tweaked to be more aggressive. This change helps with enforcing max-cache-ttl and max-ncache-ttl in a timely manner.
- It was possible to trigger a use-after-free assertion when the overmem cache cleaning was initiated. This has been fixed. New Features:
- A new option signatures-jitter has been added to dnssec-policy to allow signature expirations to be spread out over a period of time.
- The statistics channel now includes counters that indicate the number of currently connected TCP IPv4/IPv6 clients.
- Added RESOLVER.ARPA to the built in empty zones. Feature Changes:
- DNSSEC signatures that are not valid because the current time falls outside the signature inception and expiration dates are skipped instead of causing an immediate validation failure. Security Fixes:
- A malicious DNS client that sent many queries over TCP but never read the responses could cause a server to respond slowly or not at all for other clients. This has been fixed. (CVE-2024-0760)
- It is possible to craft excessively large resource records sets, which have the effect of slowing down database processing. This has been addressed by adding a configurable limit to the number of records that can be stored per name and type in a cache or zone database. The default is 100, which can be tuned with the new max-records-per-type…
- Record
SUSE-SU-2024:2636-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
OSVUSN-6909-1 No score
bind9 vulnerabilities
It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled a flood of DNS messages over TCP. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to become unstable, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2024-0760)
Toshifumi Sakaguchi discovered that Bind incorrectly handled having a very large number of RRs existing at the same time. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to consume resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2024-1737)
It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled a large number of SIG(0) signed requests. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to consume resources, leading to a denial of service. (CVE-2024-1975)
Daniel Stränger discovered that Bind incorrectly handled serving both stable cache data and authoritative zone content. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. (CVE-2024-4076)
On Ubuntu 20.04 LTS, Bind has been updated from 9.16 to 9.18. In addition to security fixes, the updated packages contain bug fixes, new features, and possibly incompatible changes.
Please see the following for more information:
https://kb.isc.org/docs/changes-to-be-aware-of-when-moving-from-bind-916-to-918
- Record
USN-6909-1- Updated
- 2026-11-02
Affected products
Affected packages
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
bindAlpine:v3.17 |
before 9.18.31-r0 | 9.18.31-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.18 |
before 9.18.31-r0 | 9.18.31-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.19 |
before 9.18.31-r0 | 9.18.31-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.20 |
before 9.18.31-r0 | 9.18.31-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.21 |
before 9.18.28-r0 | 9.18.28-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.22 |
before 9.18.28-r0 | 9.18.28-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.23 |
before 9.18.28-r0 | 9.18.28-r0 |
bindAlpine:v3.24 |
before 9.18.28-r0 | 9.18.28-r0 |
bindAzure Linux:3 |
before 9.20.0-1 | 9.20.0-1 |
bindAlpaquita:23 |
9.18.11-r0 up to 9.18.28-r0 | 9.18.28-r0 |
Show 25 moreShow less
| Package | Affected | Fixed |
|---|---|---|
bindAlpaquita:stream |
9.18.16-r0 up to 9.18.28-r1 | 9.18.28-r1 |
bind9Debian:12 |
before 1:9.18.28-1~deb12u1, plus listed versions 1:9.18.12-11:9.18.13-11:9.18.16-11:9.18.16-1~deb12u11:9.18.16-1~deb12u1~bpo11+1 Show 4 moreShow less1:9.18.19-1~deb12u11:9.18.19-1~deb12u1~bpo11+11:9.18.24-11:9.18.24-1~bpo11+1 |
1:9.18.28-1~deb12u1 |
bind9Debian:13 |
before 1:9.20.0-1 | 1:9.20.0-1 |
bind9Debian:14 |
before 1:9.20.0-1 | 1:9.20.0-1 |
bindMageia:9 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 9.18.28-1.mga9 | 9.18.28-1.mga9 |
bindopenEuler:22.03-LTS-SP3 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 9.16.23-23.oe2203sp3 | 9.16.23-23.oe2203sp3 |
bindopenEuler:22.03-LTS-SP1 From an advisory covering 2 CVEs |
before 9.16.23-23.oe2203sp1 | 9.16.23-23.oe2203sp1 |
bindopenEuler:24.03-LTS |
before 9.18.21-3.oe2403 | 9.18.21-3.oe2403 |
bindopenEuler:22.03-LTS-SP4 |
before 9.16.23-23.oe2203sp4 | 9.16.23-23.oe2203sp4 |
bindSUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 9.18.28-150600.3.3.1 | 9.18.28-150600.3.3.1 |
bindSUSE:Linux Enterprise Module for Server Applications 15 SP6 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 9.18.28-150600.3.3.1 | 9.18.28-150600.3.3.1 |
bindopenSUSE:Leap 15.6 From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 9.18.28-150600.3.3.1 | 9.18.28-150600.3.3.1 |
isc-dhcpUbuntu:18.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 4.3.5-3ubuntu24.3.5-3ubuntu34.3.5-3ubuntu44.3.5-3ubuntu54.3.5-3ubuntu6 Show 5 moreShow less4.3.5-3ubuntu74.3.5-3ubuntu7.14.3.5-3ubuntu7.24.3.5-3ubuntu7.34.3.5-3ubuntu7.4 |
None known |
bind9Ubuntu:20.04:LTS |
before 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1, plus listed versions 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu21:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu31:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu41:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu51:9.11.14+dfsg-1ubuntu1 Show 21 moreShow less1:9.11.14+dfsg-3ubuntu11:9.16.0-1ubuntu31:9.16.0-1ubuntu41:9.16.0-1ubuntu51:9.16.1-0ubuntu11:9.16.1-0ubuntu21:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.11:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.21:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.31:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.41:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.61:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.71:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.81:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.91:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.101:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.111:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.121:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.141:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.151:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.161:9.16.48-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 |
1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 |
bind9-libsUbuntu:20.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 1:9.11.16+dfsg-3~build11:9.11.16+dfsg-3~ubuntu1 |
None known |
bind9Ubuntu:22.04:LTS |
before 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.22.04.1, plus listed versions 1:9.16.15-1ubuntu11:9.16.15-1ubuntu21:9.16.15-1ubuntu31:9.18.0-2ubuntu11:9.18.0-2ubuntu2 Show 11 moreShow less1:9.18.0-2ubuntu31:9.18.1-1ubuntu11:9.18.1-1ubuntu1.11:9.18.1-1ubuntu1.21:9.18.1-1ubuntu1.31:9.18.12-0ubuntu0.22.04.11:9.18.12-0ubuntu0.22.04.21:9.18.12-0ubuntu0.22.04.31:9.18.18-0ubuntu0.22.04.11:9.18.18-0ubuntu0.22.04.21:9.18.24-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 |
1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 |
bind9-libsUbuntu:22.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 1:9.11.19+dfsg-2.1ubuntu11:9.11.19+dfsg-2.1ubuntu21:9.11.19+dfsg-2.1ubuntu3 |
None known |
bind9Ubuntu:24.04:LTS |
before 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.24.04.1, plus listed versions 1:9.18.18-0ubuntu21:9.18.21-0ubuntu11:9.18.24-0ubuntu31:9.18.24-0ubuntu41:9.18.24-0ubuntu5 |
1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 |
isc-dhcpUbuntu:24.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 4.4.3-P1-2ubuntu54.4.3-P1-4ubuntu14.4.3-P1-4ubuntu2 |
None known |
isc-dhcpUbuntu:25.10 |
All versions, plus listed versions 4.4.3-P1-4ubuntu2 |
None known |
isc-dhcpUbuntu:26.04:LTS |
All versions, plus listed versions 4.4.3-P1-4ubuntu2 |
None known |
bind9Ubuntu:20.04:LTS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1, plus listed versions 1:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu21:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu31:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu41:9.11.5.P4+dfsg-5.1ubuntu51:9.11.14+dfsg-1ubuntu1 Show 21 moreShow less1:9.11.14+dfsg-3ubuntu11:9.16.0-1ubuntu31:9.16.0-1ubuntu41:9.16.0-1ubuntu51:9.16.1-0ubuntu11:9.16.1-0ubuntu21:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.11:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.21:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.31:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.41:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.61:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.71:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.81:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.91:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.101:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.111:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.121:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.141:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.151:9.16.1-0ubuntu2.161:9.16.48-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 |
1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.20.04.1 |
bind9Ubuntu:22.04:LTS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.22.04.1, plus listed versions 1:9.16.15-1ubuntu11:9.16.15-1ubuntu21:9.16.15-1ubuntu31:9.18.0-2ubuntu11:9.18.0-2ubuntu2 Show 11 moreShow less1:9.18.0-2ubuntu31:9.18.1-1ubuntu11:9.18.1-1ubuntu1.11:9.18.1-1ubuntu1.21:9.18.1-1ubuntu1.31:9.18.12-0ubuntu0.22.04.11:9.18.12-0ubuntu0.22.04.21:9.18.12-0ubuntu0.22.04.31:9.18.18-0ubuntu0.22.04.11:9.18.18-0ubuntu0.22.04.21:9.18.24-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 |
1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.22.04.1 |
bind9Ubuntu:24.04:LTS From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.24.04.1, plus listed versions 1:9.18.18-0ubuntu21:9.18.21-0ubuntu11:9.18.24-0ubuntu31:9.18.24-0ubuntu41:9.18.24-0ubuntu5 |
1:9.18.28-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 |
bindopenSUSE:Tumbleweed From an advisory covering 4 CVEs |
before 9.20.0-1.1 | 9.20.0-1.1 |
Public exploits
Links only. Every CVE stores no exploit code.
| Source | Link | Date |
|---|---|---|
| PoC in GitHub | SpiralBL0CK/CVE-2024-0760 | 2025-03-12 |
History
| Recorded | Changed | Sources |
|---|---|---|
| affected, facts | ||
| aliases | EUVD | |
| first indexed | CVE List, GitHub Advisories, NVD, OSV, PoC in GitHub |
Dates are when Every CVE recorded each change. Upstream dates may differ.
In short
CVE-2024-0760 is a high vulnerability (CVSS 7.5) in Isc Bind, published July 23, 2024. Public exploit code exists. EPSS puts the chance of exploitation in the next 30 days at 4.68%, the 91st percentile. Fixed in bind 9.18.31-r0.
References
kb.isc.org/docs/cve-2024-0760
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/23/1
openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/07/31/2
security.netapp.com/advisory/ntap-20240731-0004
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2024-0760
github.com/advisories/GHSA-v3r3-642v-rqj8
Show 26 moreShow less
security.alpinelinux.org/vuln/CVE-2024-0760
docs.bell-sw.com/security/cves/CVE-2024-0760
docs.bell-sw.com/security/advisories/BELL-SA-2024-45
security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/CVE-2024-0760
advisories.mageia.org/MGASA-2024-0342.html
bugs.mageia.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33437
ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-6909-1
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2014
nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2023-50868
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2015
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2016
openeuler.org/zh/security/security-bulletins/detail?id=openEuler-SA-2024-2017
suse.com/support/update/announcement/2024/suse-su-20242636-1
bugzilla.suse.com/1228255
bugzilla.suse.com/1228256
bugzilla.suse.com/1228257
bugzilla.suse.com/1228258
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-0760
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-1737
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-1975
suse.com/security/cve/CVE-2024-4076
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-0760
cve.org/CVERecord?id=CVE-2024-0760
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-1737
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-1975
ubuntu.com/security/CVE-2024-4076
Left out here: the rest of 1 source description. The JSON record has them.