CVE-2026-19630

In a BIND resolver, inbound DNS protocol messages with a particular structure will result in additional processing, with no limit imposed by BIND. A DNS message with a maliciously large number of such structures will cause BIND to consume disproportionate amounts of CPU time and memory during processing. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.

Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols and provides an openly redistributable reference implementation of the major components of the Domain Name System. This package includes the components to operate a DNS server.

Security Fix(es):

In a BIND resolver, inbound DNS protocol messages with a particular structure will result in additional processing, with no limit imposed by BIND. A DNS message with a maliciously large number of such structures will cause BIND to consume disproportionate amounts of CPU time and memory during processing. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.(CVE-2026-19630)

Replaying GSS-TSIG signed UDP messages can result in memory corruption in "named". An attacker who can capture a previously signed UDP message can replay it while the negotiated TSIG key is still valid. By also sending crafted queries to a zone the attacker controls, the attacker may potentially achieve remote code execution. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.(CVE-2026-94300)

A BIND resolver that is configured with both a "redirect" zone and "qname-minimization strict" may abort with an assertion failure while processing the redirect. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.16.8-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.(CVE-2026-96888)

A recursive BIND server that receives a query with recursion desired (RD=1) followed by a non-recursive query (RD=0) may exit with an assertion failure, resulting in a denial of service. To be vulnerable, the BIND server must allow recursive queries and have at least two RPZ zones configured: one with the default setting of "recursive-only yes", and the other with "recursive-only no". This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.(CVE-2026-97313)

Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols and provides an openly redistributable reference implementation of the major components of the Domain Name System. This package includes the components to operate a DNS server.

Security Fix(es):

In a BIND resolver, inbound DNS protocol messages with a particular structure will result in additional processing, with no limit imposed by BIND. A DNS message with a maliciously large number of such structures will cause BIND to consume disproportionate amounts of CPU time and memory during processing. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.(CVE-2026-19630)

Replaying GSS-TSIG signed UDP messages can result in memory corruption in "named". An attacker who can capture a previously signed UDP message can replay it while the negotiated TSIG key is still valid. By also sending crafted queries to a zone the attacker controls, the attacker may potentially achieve remote code execution. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.(CVE-2026-94300)

A BIND resolver that is configured with both a "redirect" zone and "qname-minimization strict" may abort with an assertion failure while processing the redirect. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.16.8-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.(CVE-2026-96888)

A recursive BIND server that receives a query with recursion desired (RD=1) followed by a non-recursive query (RD=0) may exit with an assertion failure, resulting in a denial of service. To be vulnerable, the BIND server must allow recursive queries and have at least two RPZ zones configured: one with the default setting of "recursive-only yes", and the other with "recursive-only no". This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.(CVE-2026-97313)

Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols and provides an openly redistributable reference implementation of the major components of the Domain Name System. This package includes the components to operate a DNS server.

Security Fix(es):

In a BIND resolver, inbound DNS protocol messages with a particular structure will result in additional processing, with no limit imposed by BIND. A DNS message with a maliciously large number of such structures will cause BIND to consume disproportionate amounts of CPU time and memory during processing. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.(CVE-2026-19630)

Replaying GSS-TSIG signed UDP messages can result in memory corruption in "named". An attacker who can capture a previously signed UDP message can replay it while the negotiated TSIG key is still valid. By also sending crafted queries to a zone the attacker controls, the attacker may potentially achieve remote code execution. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.(CVE-2026-94300)

A BIND resolver that is configured with both a "redirect" zone and "qname-minimization strict" may abort with an assertion failure while processing the redirect. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.16.8-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.(CVE-2026-96888)

A recursive BIND server that receives a query with recursion desired (RD=1) followed by a non-recursive query (RD=0) may exit with an assertion failure, resulting in a denial of service. To be vulnerable, the BIND server must allow recursive queries and have at least two RPZ zones configured: one with the default setting of "recursive-only yes", and the other with "recursive-only no". This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.16.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.(CVE-2026-97313)

The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols. BIND includes a DNS server (named); a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS); and tools for verifying that the DNS server is operating correctly.

Security Fix(es):

• bind: BIND: Denial of Service via unbounded processing of crafted DNS messages (CVE-2026-19630)

• bind: bind: Arbitrary code execution via GSS-TSIG UDP message replay (CVE-2026-94300)

• bind: bind: Denial of Service via assertion failure during redirect processing (CVE-2026-96888)

• bind: bind: Denial of service via assertion failure in RPZ query processing (CVE-2026-97313)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain) is an implementation of the DNS (Domain Name System) protocols. BIND includes a DNS server (named), which resolves host names to IP addresses; a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS); and tools for verifying that the DNS server is operating properly.

Security Fix(es):

• bind: BIND: Denial of Service via unbounded processing of crafted DNS messages (CVE-2026-19630)

• bind: bind: Arbitrary code execution via GSS-TSIG UDP message replay (CVE-2026-94300)

• bind: bind: Denial of Service via assertion failure during redirect processing (CVE-2026-96888)

• bind: bind: Denial of service via assertion failure in RPZ query processing (CVE-2026-97313)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols. BIND includes a DNS server (named); a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS); and tools for verifying that the DNS server is operating correctly.

Security Fix(es):

• bind: BIND: Denial of Service via unbounded processing of crafted DNS messages (CVE-2026-19630)

• bind: bind: Arbitrary code execution via GSS-TSIG UDP message replay (CVE-2026-94300)

• bind: bind: Denial of Service via assertion failure during redirect processing (CVE-2026-96888)

• bind: bind: Denial of service via assertion failure in RPZ query processing (CVE-2026-97313)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols. BIND includes a DNS server (named); a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS); and tools for verifying that the DNS server is operating correctly.

Security Fix(es):

• bind9: bind: BIND 9: Denial of Service via crafted DNSSEC responses (CVE-2026-19662)

• bind: BIND: Denial of Service via unbounded processing of crafted DNS messages (CVE-2026-19630)

• bind: bind: Arbitrary code execution via GSS-TSIG UDP message replay (CVE-2026-94300)

Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):

• random named crashes on different Rocky Linux 8.10 resolvers after of installing bind-9.11.36-16.el8_10.14 (RHSA-2026:54654) (JIRA:Rocky Linux-257162)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols. BIND includes a DNS server (named); a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS); and tools for verifying that the DNS server is operating correctly.

Security Fix(es):

• bind9: bind: BIND 9: Denial of Service via crafted DNSSEC responses (CVE-2026-19662)

• bind: BIND: Denial of Service via unbounded processing of crafted DNS messages (CVE-2026-19630)

• bind: bind: Arbitrary code execution via GSS-TSIG UDP message replay (CVE-2026-94300)

• bind: bind: Denial of Service via assertion failure during redirect processing (CVE-2026-96888)

• bind: bind: Denial of service via assertion failure in RPZ query processing (CVE-2026-97313)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

In a BIND resolver, inbound DNS protocol messages with a particular structure will result in additional processing, with no limit imposed by BIND. A DNS message with a maliciously large number of such structures will cause BIND to consume disproportionate amounts of CPU time and memory during processing. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.

The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols. BIND includes a DNS server (named); a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS); and tools for verifying that the DNS server is operating correctly.

Security Fix(es):

• bind: BIND: Denial of Service via unbounded processing of crafted DNS messages (CVE-2026-19630)
• bind: bind: Arbitrary code execution via GSS-TSIG UDP message replay (CVE-2026-94300)
• bind: bind: Denial of Service via assertion failure during redirect processing (CVE-2026-96888)
• bind: bind: Denial of service via assertion failure in RPZ query processing (CVE-2026-97313)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain) is an implementation of the DNS (Domain Name System) protocols. BIND includes a DNS server (named), which resolves host names to IP addresses; a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS); and tools for verifying that the DNS server is operating properly.

Security Fix(es):

• bind: BIND: Denial of Service via unbounded processing of crafted DNS messages (CVE-2026-19630)
• bind: bind: Arbitrary code execution via GSS-TSIG UDP message replay (CVE-2026-94300)
• bind: bind: Denial of Service via assertion failure during redirect processing (CVE-2026-96888)
• bind: bind: Denial of service via assertion failure in RPZ query processing (CVE-2026-97313)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols. BIND includes a DNS server (named); a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS); and tools for verifying that the DNS server is operating correctly.

Security Fix(es):

• bind: BIND: Denial of Service via unbounded processing of crafted DNS messages (CVE-2026-19630)
• bind: bind: Arbitrary code execution via GSS-TSIG UDP message replay (CVE-2026-94300)
• bind: bind: Denial of Service via assertion failure during redirect processing (CVE-2026-96888)
• bind: bind: Denial of service via assertion failure in RPZ query processing (CVE-2026-97313)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols. BIND includes a DNS server (named); a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS); and tools for verifying that the DNS server is operating correctly.

Security Fix(es):

• bind9: bind: BIND 9: Denial of Service via crafted DNSSEC responses (CVE-2026-19662)
• bind: BIND: Denial of Service via unbounded processing of crafted DNS messages (CVE-2026-19630)
• bind: bind: Arbitrary code execution via GSS-TSIG UDP message replay (CVE-2026-94300)

Bug Fix(es) and Enhancement(s):

• random named crashes on different AlmaLinux 8.10 resolvers after of installing bind-9.11.36-16.el8_10.14 (RHSA-2026:54654) (JIRA:RHEL-257162)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

The Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) is an implementation of the Domain Name System (DNS) protocols. BIND includes a DNS server (named); a resolver library (routines for applications to use when interfacing with DNS); and tools for verifying that the DNS server is operating correctly.

Security Fix(es):

• bind9: bind: BIND 9: Denial of Service via crafted DNSSEC responses (CVE-2026-19662)
• bind: BIND: Denial of Service via unbounded processing of crafted DNS messages (CVE-2026-19630)
• bind: bind: Arbitrary code execution via GSS-TSIG UDP message replay (CVE-2026-94300)
• bind: bind: Denial of Service via assertion failure during redirect processing (CVE-2026-96888)
• bind: bind: Denial of service via assertion failure in RPZ query processing (CVE-2026-97313)

For more details about the security issue(s), including the impact, a CVSS score, acknowledgments, and other related information, refer to the CVE page(s) listed in the References section.

In a BIND resolver, inbound DNS protocol messages with a particular structure will result in additional processing, with no limit imposed by BIND. A DNS message with a maliciously large number of such structures will cause BIND to consume disproportionate amounts of CPU time and memory during processing. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.18.50, 9.20.0 through 9.20.29, 9.21.0 through 9.21.26, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.18.50-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.29-S1.

• In a BIND resolver, inbound DNS protocol messages with a particular structure will result in additional processing, with no limit imposed by BIND. A DNS message with a maliciously large number of such structures will cause BIND to consume disproportionate amounts of CPU time and memory during processing (CVE-2026-19630).
• Replaying GSS-TSIG signed UDP messages can result in memory corruption in "named". An attacker who can capture a previously signed UDP message can replay it while the negotiated TSIG key is still valid. By also sending crafted queries to a zone the attacker controls, the attacker may potentially achieve remote code execution (CVE-2026-94300).
• A BIND resolver that is configured with both a "redirect" zone and "qname-minimization strict" may abort with an assertion failure while processing the redirect (CVE-2026-96888).
• A recursive BIND server that receives a query with recursion desired (RD=1) followed by a non-recursive query (RD=0) may exit with an assertion failure, resulting in a denial of service. To be vulnerable, the BIND server must allow recursive queries and have at least two RPZ zones configured: one with the default setting of "recursive-only yes", and the other with "recursive-only no" (CVE-2026-97313).

These are all security issues fixed in the bind-9.20.30-1.1 package on the GA media of openSUSE Tumbleweed.

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain DNS messages with repeated singleton records such as SOA, CNAME, or DNAME records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to use excessive memory, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-75029)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled cached DNSSEC proofs. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-19662)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain invalid DNSSEC records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to use excessive CPU resources, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-19668)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled malformed answers on resolvers configured to use DNS64. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-19666)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled TKEY queries when no global options block was present. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-76163)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly verified TSIG signatures during zone transfers. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to inject unauthorized zone contents into a secondary server. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-19033)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled certain NSEC wildcard proofs. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to forge NXDOMAIN responses and hide the existence of wildcard records. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-19941)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled DNS-over-HTTPS requests with invalid SIG(0) records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-77692)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled malformed zones containing NS or DNAME nodes above the zone origin. An attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to serve out-of-zone records as authoritative, leading to cache poisoning. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-78301)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled SVCB/HTTPS AliasMode records referencing large numbers of ServiceMode records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to exhaust resources, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-81563)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly validated NSEC3 records from unrelated sibling zones. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to perform a DNSSEC downgrade attack and have forged unsigned answers accepted. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-77119)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled wildcard answers with mixed NSEC and NSEC3 proofs. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-80274)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled oversized negative cache records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to crash, resulting in a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-19667)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly handled cached trees of SVCB/HTTPS AliasMode records. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to use excessive CPU resources, leading to a denial of service. This issue only affected Ubuntu 26.10. (CVE-2026-81736)

It was discovered that Bind incorrectly limited the processing of compression pointers in inbound DNS messages. A remote attacker could possibly use this issue to cause Bind to use excessive CPU and memory…